How We Test Vapes

This page explains how the VapePicks team evaluates vape devices for adult nicotine users.
Every product we review goes through the same structured process. We look at:

  • Flavor
  • Throat hit
  • Vapor production

  • Airflow / draw

  • Battery life

  • Leak resistance

  • Build quality

  • Ease of use

  • Portability

All devices are tested by adults only. We do not review or recommend any nicotine product for minors, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine.

We focus on how a device behaves in real daily use, not just on a lab bench. That means pockets, commute bags, office desks, and sofas, plus controlled test sessions that are repeatable across products.

1. Who Is Doing the Testing?

Chris Miller – Lead Tester and Narrator

I (Chris) coordinate the full testing process and write the final review.
My background is in tech and consumer-electronics reviewing, and a large part of my work now focuses on vape devices and related regulation. I am familiar with disposables, pod systems, refillable devices, and more powerful box mods.

When I test, I pay close attention to:

  • Build quality and reliability over several days or weeks

  • Battery behavior (charge stability, abnormal heat, fast drain)

  • Consistency of draw-activation or button firing

  • Leaking and mouthpiece cleanliness during daily carry

I describe throat hit, flavor, and overall feel as subjective experience only. I do not turn those impressions into health claims.

Marcus Reed – High-Output and Stress Testing

Marcus is an adult former heavy smoker who now uses vaping as his main nicotine intake method. He focuses on:

  • Higher-wattage devices and direct-lung (DL) vaping

  • How coils behave under long, frequent sessions

  • Heat buildup, hot spots, and performance at higher power ranges

He often pushes devices toward their stated limits and reports:

  • How long coils stay usable before a burnt or “dry” taste appears

  • Whether the device stays stable under load

  • How airflow and vapor volume feel during heavy use

Jamal Davis – Everyday Carry and Mobility

Jamal lives a busy, urban life with frequent commuting and outdoor time. He focuses on:

  • Size, weight, and pocketability

  • Comfort of the mouthpiece and hand feel

  • Risk of accidental activation in pockets or bags

  • Real-world battery life during short, frequent sessions

He often answers one basic question: Is this something I can throw in my pocket and forget about until I need it?

Dr. Adrian Walker – Clinical and Respiratory Advisor

Dr. Walker is a board-certified physician (internal medicine, pulmonary medicine, sleep medicine) who advises on:

  • How we describe throat irritation, cough, chest tightness, or breathing discomfort

  • Whether any health-related statements line up with current medical knowledge

  • Packaging warnings, nicotine strength labeling, and regulatory language

He does not test devices himself and does not appear in first-person stories. He keeps our language cautious and reminds readers that any persistent symptoms (for example, chest pain or long-term cough) need medical evaluation, not just a change of device. 

2. Our 5-Point Scoring System

Each category uses the same 1–5 scale, where:

  • 1/5 – Very poor: Clear problems or serious limitations in normal adult use

  • 2/5 – Below average: Noticeable issues that many users would find frustrating

  • 3/5 – Acceptable: Works reasonably well with some trade-offs

  • 4/5 – Strong: Performs well for most adult users in typical contexts

  • 5/5 – Excellent: Stands out in our test group with few practical drawbacks

Scores are built from structured tests plus multi-day usage. We log data, compare notes, and then agree on the final number. Sensory results, such as flavor and throat hit, always remain subjective and can vary from person to person.

3. How We Run Our Tests

Every device follows a consistent path:

  1. Intake and basic inspection

    • Check packaging warnings, nicotine strength labels, and age restriction statements.

    • Dr. Walker reviews the health and safety wording against public-health guidance from bodies such as CDC, FDA, and international expert groups. 

  2. Setup and break-in

    • Use manufacturer instructions to install pods, coils, or cartridges.

    • Run a short “break-in” period at moderate use levels to let coils saturate and stabilize.

  3. Structured test sessions

    • Run timed puff sequences with defined puff lengths, rest intervals, and power settings.

    • Use the same e-liquid type and nicotine strength across compatible devices when possible, to keep comparisons fair.

  4. Daily carry and long-term checks

    • Chris uses each device through commutes, work breaks, and evenings.

    • Marcus runs heavier sessions at home and in outdoor settings.

    • Jamal carries the device during a typical week of commuting, errands, and casual use.

  5. Debrief, comparison, and scoring

    • We collect notes on each category.

    • Any health-related observations (irritation, cough, unusual chest sensation) are flagged for Dr. Walker to frame carefully.

    • Final scores are assigned on the 1–5 scale and are always accompanied by plain-language explanations.

We do not claim to measure long-term health outcomes. Health risks related to nicotine, inhaled aerosols, and dependency are discussed using evidence from public-health and research sources, not personal opinion. 

4. How We Test Each Vape Category

4.1 Flavor

What flavor means in our tests
Flavor covers how clearly and accurately a device or e-liquid delivers its stated taste profile, and how that taste holds up over time.

How we test flavor

  • Use standardized e-liquids (for refillable devices) and multiple pre-filled options (for pods and disposables) in common categories such as tobacco, menthol, and fruit.

  • Run blind comparison sessions where Chris, Marcus, and Jamal sample several devices without branding in view.

  • Evaluate:

    • Clarity and balance of the main flavor notes

    • Presence of unwanted tastes (chemical notes, plastic, burnt tones)

    • Flavor stability across a tank or pod and after several refill/charge cycles

Marcus often notices when a coil starts muting flavor under high power or long pulls. Jamal tends to pick up on flavor fade in short, frequent sessions during commuting.

How we score flavor (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Harsh off-notes, frequent burnt taste, or flavor collapse after a short time

  • 2/5 – Noticeable issues with chemical or artificial taste that many users may dislike

  • 3/5 – Recognizable, usable flavor with some imbalance or fading

  • 4/5 – Clear, consistent flavor that matches the label well

  • 5/5 – Clean, well-defined flavor that stays stable across multiple days of typical use

4.2 Throat Hit

What throat hit means in our tests
Throat hit is the subjective sensation in the throat and upper chest when inhaling vapor. It is influenced by:

  • Nicotine strength

  • Base ratio (PG/VG)

  • Flavoring components

  • Device power and airflow

How we test throat hit

  • Use several nicotine strengths within adult-typical ranges, in both freebase and nicotine salt formulations where relevant.

  • Run paired tests at different power levels to feel how the same liquid changes with more or less output.

  • Record:

    • Intensity of the hit (very soft to very strong)

    • Smoothness or roughness

    • Immediate irritation (for example, scratchiness or urge to cough)

Chris focuses on describing the sensation in language that adult users can compare with their own experience. Marcus often notices how throat hit changes when power is pushed higher. Jamal watches whether short, frequent puffs feel manageable through a day.

Dr. Walker reviews wording in this section closely. He ensures that we present throat hit as a subjective sensation and not as a sign of a product being safe or unsafe by itself. 

How we score throat hit (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Unpleasant, harsh, or inconsistent hit for most settings

  • 2/5 – Narrow “sweet spot,” with many settings feeling either too weak or too harsh

  • 3/5 – Usable range with some compromise; acceptable for many adult users

  • 4/5 – Controlled, predictable hit across sensible power and airflow settings

  • 5/5 – Very consistent sensation that matches the device’s intended style (smooth MTL, punchy DL, etc.)

4.3 Vapor Production

What vapor production means in our tests
We look at volume and density of visible vapor, and whether the device’s performance matches its stated design (stealthy vs. cloudier output).

How we test vapor production

  • Use defined puff lengths (for example, 2–3 seconds for mouth-to-lung, 3–4 seconds for direct-lung) with fixed rest intervals.

  • Compare performance at low, medium, and, where supported, higher power settings.

  • Evaluate:

    • Consistency of vapor from puff to puff

    • Whether vapor output drops sharply as the battery drains

    • How vapor production interacts with airflow and temperature

Marcus leads most vapor volume tests, especially on higher-output devices. Chris checks whether vapor output feels aligned with the device’s stated purpose. Jamal notes how visible the exhaled vapor is in everyday settings where discretion may matter.

How we score vapor production (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Weak, inconsistent vapor that often cuts out or thins unexpectedly

  • 2/5 – Below expectations for the device category, with notable drop-off at lower battery levels

  • 3/5 – Adequate and predictable for typical adult use

  • 4/5 – Strong, stable output that fits the design and settings

  • 5/5 – Exceptionally consistent production that stands out in direct comparisons within its class

4.4 Airflow and Draw

What airflow/draw means in our tests
Airflow and draw describe how easy or tight it feels to inhale from the device and how smooth the airflow path is.

How we test airflow

  • Test all adjustable airflow positions, from tightest to most open.

  • Use both steady puffs and short, quick draws to reveal whistle, turbulence, or dead spots.

  • Check:

    • Whether the draw matches the marketing claim (for example, “cigarette-like MTL”)

    • Whether the airflow ring or slider is easy to move but not too loose

    • Stability of airflow as pods or coils age

Marcus evaluates airflow under high power and long pulls. Jamal pays attention to draw feel while walking or moving, where small design flaws become more obvious.

How we score airflow/draw (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Inconsistent, noisy, or awkward draw with clear design flaws

  • 2/5 – Limited useful positions or difficult adjustment controls

  • 3/5 – Acceptable but unremarkable airflow with some minor issues

  • 4/5 – Smooth, predictable draw that matches the device’s intended style

  • 5/5 – Very refined airflow system with wide but controlled adjustment and stable performance over time

4.5 Battery Life

What battery life means in our tests
Battery life covers how long a device runs between charges under realistic adult use, and how it behaves during charging.

How we test battery life

  • Log puff counts and total active time per charge cycle in typical scenarios:

    • Chris: mixed workday and evening use

    • Marcus: heavier, longer sessions

    • Jamal: short, frequent outdoor and commuting sessions

  • Track:

    • Number of full or partial days per charge

    • Charge time and whether fast-charge claims hold up

    • Any abnormal heating during charging or use

    • Output stability at low battery (weak hits, misfires, or sudden shutdowns)

Dr. Walker reviews any notes on unusual heat or battery behavior. We highlight that users should follow manufacturer safety instructions and avoid using damaged or unauthorized chargers, consistent with regulatory guidance. 

How we score battery life (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Frequent recharging, unstable behavior, or concerning heat patterns

  • 2/5 – Below-average runtime for its size and category, or inconvenient charge experience

  • 3/5 – Reasonable daily use with some compromise

  • 4/5 – Strong performance that matches or slightly beats expectations

  • 5/5 – Standout runtime and consistent output with practical, reliable charging behavior

4.6 Leak Resistance

What leak resistance means in our tests
Leak resistance describes how well the device prevents liquid from escaping into pockets, bags, hands, or the mouthpiece area.

How we test leak resistance

  • Carry devices in pockets, bags, and car compartments over several days.

  • Store devices upright and on their side to simulate typical handling.

  • Expose them to temperature changes, such as moving between indoor and outdoor environments.

  • Inspect:

    • Pod and tank seals

    • Condensation around airflow holes and mouthpiece

    • Any liquid on hands, clothing, or device surfaces

Jamal reports many of the day-to-day leak observations. Marcus tracks leakage during high-output sessions where heat and pressure may stress seals. Chris checks seals and fill ports during maintenance.

Dr. Walker reviews language around leakage because leaked liquid on hands or surfaces may lead to unintended skin or oral exposure to nicotine, which carries its own risks. 

How we score leak resistance (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Frequent leaks or visible pooling of liquid

  • 2/5 – Recurring small leaks, noticeable residue, or unreliable seals

  • 3/5 – Occasional minor condensation but manageable with basic care

  • 4/5 – Good sealing with only light, expected condensation

  • 5/5 – Very clean performance with strong seals and minimal maintenance needs

4.7 Build Quality

What build quality means in our tests
Build quality covers materials, assembly, tolerances, and durability of the device body, buttons, connectors, and pods.

How we test build quality

  • Inspect fit and finish of panels, seams, and moving parts.

  • Test buttons and switches for wobble, misfires, or sticking.

  • Evaluate pod and coil connection strength to avoid accidental drops or disconnections.

  • Run light drop and knock tests that simulate slips from pockets or desks.

  • Check how coatings and finishes hold up to a week or more of intensive carry.

Chris leads this area, drawing on experience with other consumer electronics. Marcus watches how devices hold up under heavier, high-output use. Jamal focuses on whether a device still looks and feels solid after being carried in busy, real-world conditions.

How we score build quality (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Flimsy construction, frequent misfires, or visible structural issues

  • 2/5 – Notable weaknesses such as loose pods, rattling buttons, or fragile finishes

  • 3/5 – Acceptable everyday durability with some visible wear over time

  • 4/5 – Solid materials, precise assembly, and reliable buttons and connectors

  • 5/5 – Robust device that feels stable, shows minimal wear, and inspires confidence in daily use

4.8 Ease of Use

What ease of use means in our tests
Ease of use includes setup, operation, maintenance, and basic troubleshooting for adult users.

How we test ease of use

  • Assemble and start each device only with the included instructions to see how clear they are.

  • Evaluate:

    • Simplicity of filling, pod changes, and coil swaps

    • Clarity of indicators (LEDs, screens, vibration feedback)

    • Menu navigation on devices with settings

  • Ask:

    • How quickly a typical adult user can go from unboxing to first puff

    • Whether the device is forgiving of small mistakes, such as slightly under-tightening a pod

Jamal leads many of these checks, since he favors straightforward, low-maintenance devices. Chris records any confusing steps that might cause frustration. Marcus notes whether heavy use exposes design flaws in everyday handling.

How we score ease of use (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Confusing, error-prone, or demanding frequent troubleshooting

  • 2/5 – Steep learning curve or several design quirks

  • 3/5 – Reasonably manageable once users get familiar with it

  • 4/5 – Simple, intuitive design with clear instructions and minimal friction

  • 5/5 – Very straightforward experience that most adult users could handle without extra help

4.9 Portability

What portability means in our tests
Portability reflects how practical the device is to carry and use throughout a normal adult day.

How we test portability

  • Measure size, weight, and shape, then compare across devices in the same class.

  • Carry each device:

    • In front and back pockets

    • In bags or backpacks

    • In car compartments or gym bags

  • Check:

    • Comfort while walking, sitting, and bending

    • Risk of rolling around, falling out, or accidental activation

    • Whether the device design works with real-world routines such as commuting, social outings, or work breaks

Portability testing is led by Jamal, whose daily routine brings the device into varied situations. Chris cross-checks how portability interacts with build quality and battery life. Marcus notes whether more powerful devices still make sense to carry outside the house.

How we score portability (1–5)

  • 1/5 – Awkward to carry, too heavy or bulky for its purpose

  • 2/5 – Manageable but inconvenient in pockets or bags

  • 3/5 – Acceptable for everyday use with some minor trade-offs

  • 4/5 – Comfortable to carry, easy to store, and practical for most adult routines

  • 5/5 – Stands out for compact, thoughtful design that fits naturally into daily life

5. How We Use Health and Safety Evidence

Our testing focuses on performance and user experience. At the same time, we acknowledge that:

  • Nicotine is an addictive substance.

  • E-cigarette aerosols can contain nicotine, ultrafine particles, and other substances that may carry health risks. 

Because of this, any mention of health risk, respiratory impact, or nicotine dependence in our reviews:

  • Relies on public-health and research sources such as national health agencies and expert reports. 

  • Is reviewed by Dr. Walker to avoid overstatement or understatement of risks.

  • Is not a substitute for individual medical advice.

If an adult reader experiences persistent symptoms such as ongoing cough, chest discomfort, or breathing difficulty, they should seek evaluation from a qualified health professional, regardless of which device they use.

Sources

Back to blog