Bugatti Vape reviews get messy fast. Names overlap across markets. Some listings stay vague on specs. That kind of thing matters in daily use, since small design choices show up as leaks, heat, or weak output.
I wanted a clean, device-by-device read. I focused on draw feel, flavor stability, battery behavior, and basic reliability. I also pushed each device in realistic routines. Short breaks. Commutes. Longer evening sessions.
Marcus Reed joined for heavy-use stress. Jamal Davis handled pocket carry. Dr. Adrian Walker stayed in an advisor role. He kept language careful around nicotine risk. He also watched labeling habits.
Product Overview
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bugatti B9000 | Useful screen feel, steady MTL pull, simple recharge | Flavor swings late-life, condensate needs wiping | Adults who like guided “status” info | Often listed around 15 | 4.2 |
| Bugatti Elite 9000 | Balanced output, wide flavor list, solid leak control | Can feel warm in long chains | Adults who want a “set-and-go” daily | Often listed around 15 | 4.4 |
| Bugatti Spaceship 7000 | Smooth pull, pocketable shape, flavors stay punchy | Shorter puff ceiling than 9K units | Commuters who rotate flavors | Often listed around 14 | 4.1 |
| Bugatti Twins 5000 | Two-piece form feels stable, good mid-power draw | Bulkier carry, learning curve | Adults who like a “modular” disposable feel | Varies by seller | 4.0 |
| Bugatti Quattro 700 | Simple, compact, consistent short sessions | Non-rechargeable, limited lifespan | Quick-trip users who want small size | Often listed near CHF 9.95 | 3.6 |
Device lineup details and common spec claims vary by seller. The tables reflect widely repeated listing specs from major retailers and review databases.
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept circling back to output steadiness. With Bugatti-branded disposables, the “nice” draw often arrives early. It can thin out near the end. The screen-equipped models reduced guesswork. They also made me notice how often I reach for a device when I can see remaining charge.
Marcus treated the 9K models like stress tools. He went long. He went frequent. He watched heat. He also watched whether flavor turns papery after repeated pulls. His blunt read sounded like this: “If it warms fast, I’m done trusting it for heavy nights.” The Elite 9000 stayed calmer for him than the B9000.
Jamal kept asking one question. “Will it behave in a pocket?” That pushed him toward the Spaceship 7000. It carried clean. It also drew without surprise spitback. He still noticed mouthpiece moisture after a few hours. He wiped more than he wanted.
Dr. Walker’s input stayed narrow. He pushed two points. First, nicotine products remain adult-only. Second, subjective throat sensation stays subjective. He also flagged how often listings lean into “smooth hit” language. CDC and WHO materials emphasize nicotine addiction risk and caution around youth exposure.
Bugatti Vape Comparison Chart
| Spec / Performance | Bugatti B9000 | Bugatti Elite 9000 | Bugatti Spaceship 7000 | Bugatti Twins 5000 | Bugatti Quattro 700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Rechargeable disposable | Rechargeable disposable | Rechargeable disposable | Disposable kit style | Disposable |
| Claimed puff range | Up to 9000 | Up to 9000 | Around 7000 | Around 5000 | Around 700 |
| Nicotine range | Often listed 5% | Often listed 5% | Often listed 5% | Often listed 5% | 20 mg/ml listings |
| Activation | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated |
| Battery | Listing varies | 600 mAh common | 500 mAh common | Seller-dependent | 600 mAh, non-rechargeable |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | Often USB-C | None |
| Coil | Often listed mesh | Mesh coil | Mesh coil common | Often mesh | Varies, often mesh |
| Airflow style | MTL-leaning | MTL-leaning | MTL-leaning | MTL-leaning | Tight MTL |
| Flavor performance | Bold early, softer late | Most consistent | Bright, slightly lighter body | Good midrange | Straightforward, limited depth |
| Throat hit feel | Medium to firm | Medium, smoother edge | Medium | Medium | Medium, tighter |
| Vapor production | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low to medium |
| Battery life real feel | Better with screen pacing | Strong for 9K class | Good for its class | Adequate | Limited by lifespan |
| Leak resistance | Good, but watch condensate | Best of group | Good | Mixed | Good in short use |
| Build quality | Solid grip style | Clean finish | Simple plastic shell | Bulkier | Minimal, compact |
| Ease of use | Easy | Easiest | Easy | Takes a minute | Easiest, but short life |
Key listing specs commonly appear as: B9000 with a screen and 13 mL capacity, Elite 9000 with 15 mL plus 600 mAh, Spaceship 7000 with 15 mL plus 500 mAh, Quattro 700 as 2 mL and non-rechargeable.
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We built a repeatable routine. Each device ran through short pulls during busy gaps. Each device also ran through longer evening sessions. That split exposed heat, dryness, and late-life flavor fade.
Flavor accuracy came first. I compared what the name promises against what the mouth delivers. I also watched whether sweetness turns flat. Throat hit stayed a feel-only note. No health inference. Vapor volume got judged in plain output terms.
Airflow smoothness came next. I paid attention to turbulence. I also watched for whistle. Battery behavior mattered every day. I logged recharge timing. I also checked for warm shells during charging.
Leak control got tested in pockets and bags. Jamal carried devices for real movement days. Condensation checks happened at set intervals. Build quality meant basic things. Buttons that do not misfire. Mouthpieces that do not crack. Seams that do not flex.
Ease of use included disposal steps. It also included whether the device stays clean enough without fuss. Reliability over time meant this. Does it keep firing. Does it keep tasting normal. Does it behave the same after multiple charge cycles.
All observations reflect use experience. They do not replace clinical guidance.
Bugatti Vape Vapes: Our Testing Experience
Bugatti B9000
Honorary title: The Bugatti Vape “Dashboard Grip” Daily
Our Testing Experience
I treated the B9000 like an everyday yardstick. The screen changed how I vaped. I took fewer blind pulls. I checked the indicator instead. That reduced the “dead at the worst moment” problem.
Morning breaks made the B9000 feel clean. The draw stayed predictable. The mouthpiece stayed comfortable. After a few hours, condensation started creeping in. It was not a flood. It was a film. I noticed it most when I took quick pulls back-to-back.
Marcus pushed it harder. He ran longer chains. He also used it outdoors. Windy air made him pull harder. That raised device warmth sooner than I liked. He said, “It holds together early, then it starts feeling strained.” The flavor body thinned for him after sustained sessions.
Jamal carried it in a pocket. The shape felt secure. The grip style helped. He did complain about lint risk around the mouthpiece edges. He also noticed a mild “wet top” feel late afternoon. His line was, “I’ll carry it, but I’m wiping it.”
Dr. Walker stayed focused on labeling habits. He preferred when retailers clearly state nicotine strength. He also pushed a simple caution. Adults only. No glamor language. Nicotine remains addictive, per CDC materials.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw style leans MTL. It has a steady resistance. It does not feel airy. In mouth, the vapor lands with a medium density. It feels slightly “rounded,” not sharp. That changes with flavor type.
Banana Melon started soft. The inhale felt creamy. A light banana note sat upfront. Melon came after, closer to the back of the tongue. Marcus called it “smooth, but it fades fast if you chain it.” He was right. After repeated pulls, sweetness turned flatter.
Berry Watermelon felt brighter. The first inhale hit with a mixed-berry edge. Watermelon filled the middle. The throat feel stayed medium. Jamal liked it during walking sessions. He said, “It tastes full even when I’m only taking quick hits.” Late-life, the berry note became more perfume-like.
Black Ice came in firm. Menthol sat on the lips. The inhale carried a darker “ice” feel. It cooled the mouth quickly. I noticed the throat feel rise. The vapor felt drier. That pushed me to slow down. Otherwise, it felt a bit scratchy.
Blue Razz tasted loud. It leaned candy. The first part of the draw delivered sweet-tart pop. The exhale carried a syrup note. With the B9000, Blue Razz also amplified condensate feel. The mouthpiece felt wetter after frequent pulls.
Coffee surprised me. The inhale gave roasted notes. It did not taste like real espresso. It still worked as a change-up. Marcus disliked it. He said, “It turns stale when the coil warms.” He preferred fruit profiles on this device.
Double Apple carried a sharper edge. It hit the sides of the tongue. The inhale had a tart bite. The finish leaned sweet. Jamal called it “a clean, sharp apple, not candy.” That matched my read. It stayed more stable than the berry blends.
Grape Mint delivered a cool finish. Grape led. Mint followed. The mouth felt chilled on exhale. It also kept the throat feel from getting too heavy.
Best draw experience, in our group, came from Double Apple plus Berry Watermelon. They stayed coherent longer. They also resisted “flat sweetness” late-life. Flavor availability appears in multiple retailer lists.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Screen reduces guesswork | Flavor can thin late-life |
| MTL draw feels steady | Condensation needs wiping |
| Comfortable grip style | Chain pulls can warm shell |
| Recharge helps stretch usage | Some listings conflict on specs |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed around 15
- Device type: rechargeable disposable
- Nicotine strength options: often listed 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- E-liquid capacity: commonly listed 13 mL
- Claimed puffs: up to 9000
- Display: LED indicators for battery and liquid level
- Charging port: USB-C
- Estimated charge time: varies by charger, often under 90 minutes in practice
- Coil: commonly listed mesh in some markets
- Airflow style: tight to medium MTL
- Vapor production: medium
- Leak resistance features: sealed disposable body, still needs mouthpiece wiping
- Build materials: plastic shell with grip styling
- Dimensions and weight: varies by seller listing
- Safety features: typical overcharge protection claims vary by listing
- Shipping: seller-dependent
Flavor examples seen in listings: Banana Melon, Berry Watermelon, Black Ice, Blue Razz, Coffee, Double Apple, Grape Mint, Guava Ice, Lush Ice.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Strong early flavor. Some fade after heavy chains. |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Medium firmness. Ice flavors raise perceived bite. |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Consistent MTL clouds, not a “big air” device. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Stable resistance with low whistle. |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | Recharge plus screen pacing helps daily use. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | No major leaks. Condensation builds at mouthpiece. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Grip feels secure. Shell stays sturdy in carry. |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Draw-and-go. Screen lowers uncertainty. |
| Portability | 4.1 | Pocketable, though a bit chunkier than minis. |
Overall score: 4.2
Bugatti Elite 9000
Honorary title: The Bugatti Vape “Calm Coil” All-Day Pick
Our Testing Experience
The Elite 9000 felt like the most “settled” device in this group. I noticed it in small moments. It fired the same way after lunch. It also fired the same way late evening. That consistency matters more than flashy claims.
I used it during commute breaks. I also used it during desk work. The device stayed calm under normal cadence. The draw felt MTL. It did not feel blocked. It did not feel airy.
Marcus went harder. He ran longer sessions. He also tested heat by repeating pulls until the body felt warm. He said, “This one stays stable longer.” He still felt warmth eventually. The ramp-up felt slower than the B9000.
Jamal carried it as a pocket device. The finish felt clean. He liked the simple shape. He did worry about the screen area getting scratched. He said, “It’s easy carry, but I’d keep it away from keys.” He also liked how the device avoided surprise gurgle.
Dr. Walker watched for health-leaning language. He pressed one practical angle. If a listing hides nicotine strength, that is a red flag. He also pointed out how public health materials emphasize adult-only use. WHO guidance frames regulation around youth protection.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This device rewards slower pulls. The coil seems happiest when you let it breathe. The inhale feels smoother than the B9000, for me. The vapor lands with a softer edge. That changes by flavor.
Apple Blueberry Raspberry felt layered. The inhale started with apple brightness. Blueberry rounded it out. Raspberry showed up on exhale, with a mild tart edge. I wrote “balanced candy” in my notes. Marcus called it “steady, even when I pull harder.”
Blue Razz Lemonade hit sharp first. Lemonade gave a crisp edge at the tip of the tongue. Blue razz sweetness followed. The throat feel rose slightly. It still stayed smooth if I kept pulls short. Jamal liked it during walking sessions. He said, “It tastes loud, but not harsh.”
Blueberry Bubble Gum leaned sweet. The inhale felt thick. It coated the mouth. The bubble gum note arrived mid-draw, then stuck around. After repeated pulls, sweetness built up. I needed water. Marcus stopped using it first. He said, “Too sticky after a while.”
Cappuccino carried roasted notes. It felt warmer in mouth. The inhale gave cream plus coffee. The exhale left a faint cocoa feel. I used it after meals. It worked best in short pulls. Longer pulls turned it slightly bitter.
Raspberry Honeydew Melon felt airy in flavor tone, not airflow. Honeydew sweetness came through. Raspberry added brightness. The blend stayed smooth. Jamal called it “clean fruit, no weird bite.” It was one of his favorites.
Sweet Menthol delivered a clean chill. It cooled the lips first. Then it cooled the throat feel. Marcus used it to reset his palate. He said, “This is the one I’d grab between heavy fruit tests.”
Watermelon Ice stayed simple. Watermelon came in front. Ice cooled the finish. The flavor stayed stable even late. I noticed less “flat sweet” near the end than with some candy blends.
Best draw experience, for me, came from Apple Blueberry Raspberry plus Raspberry Honeydew Melon. Marcus leaned Sweet Menthol for long nights. Flavor lists for Elite 9K appear widely across retailer pages.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most consistent output in group | Warmth appears with chain pulls |
| Wide flavor catalog | Screen face can scratch in pockets |
| Strong leak control | Sweet flavors can build palate fatigue |
| Reliable draw activation | Not for high-airflow users |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed around 15
- Device type: rechargeable disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly listed 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- E-liquid capacity: commonly listed 15 mL
- Claimed puffs: up to 9000
- Battery capacity: commonly listed 600 mAh
- Charging port: USB-C
- Coil type: mesh coil
- Display: LCD on many listings
- Airflow style: MTL focus
- Flavor range: commonly listed 18 options
- Vapor production: medium
- Leak resistance features: sealed disposable body, stable mouthpiece fit
- Build materials: plastic shell with screen window
- Safety features: typical listing claims vary
- Shipping: seller-dependent
Flavors often listed: Apple Blueberry Raspberry, Blue Razz Lemonade, Blueberry Bubble Gum, Cappuccino, Delicious Apple, Juicy Peach, Mamba, Mango Pineapple Peach, Mango Strawberry, Mixed Berry Ice, Peach Soda, Raspberry Honeydew Melon, Raspberry Watermelon, Strawberry Gummy, Sweet Menthol, Sweet Rainbow, Tropical Twist, Watermelon Ice.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Layered blends stay defined across longer use. |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Medium smoothness. Less “edge” than B9000. |
| Vapor Production | 4.1 | Consistent MTL output without spitting. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Smooth pull with low turbulence. |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | 600 mAh listings match stronger day-to-day use. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.4 | Least mouthpiece wetness in the group. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Solid shell. Screen window needs care. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | No setup. Flavor choices cover most preferences. |
| Portability | 4.0 | Pocketable, though screen area needs protection. |
Overall score: 4.4
Bugatti Spaceship 7000
Honorary title: The Bugatti Vape “Commute Rocket” Pocket Choice
Our Testing Experience
The Spaceship 7000 felt built for movement days. Jamal gravitated to it immediately. It sat better in a pocket. It also pulled clean in short bursts.
I used it in two patterns. Short pulls between tasks. Longer pulls at night while reading. The device handled both. The flavor “snap” stayed present. It did not collapse quickly.
Marcus tried to break it with long sessions. He hit a limit sooner than with 9K devices. Not a surprise. Puff ceiling claims are lower. He still cared about heat. He said, “It warms, but it doesn’t freak out.” That felt accurate. The shell got warm. It did not get alarming.
Jamal liked the draw smoothness. He said, “This is the one I can throw in my pocket.” He also liked how it did not roll around as much. The body shape stayed stable in a bag pocket.
I did notice condensation after a few hours. It showed up as a light moisture ring. Wiping solved it fast. I also noticed flavor intensity depends on how hard you pull. A gentler pull tasted better.
Dr. Walker’s input stayed the same. Nicotine products remain adult-only. Marketing language stays separate from risk reality. Public health sources warn against youth use and note nicotine addiction.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This device gives a slightly lighter vapor body than the Elite 9000. It still feels satisfying in mouth. The draw stays MTL. The inhale feels smooth. The throat feel stays medium.
Double Mint felt crisp. The mint hit the lips early. The inhale carried a clean cooling line. The exhale stayed fresh. Marcus used it as a reset. He said, “It stays clean even after chains.” I agreed. It also reduced sweetness fatigue.
Cherry Cola brought a candy cola note. Cherry showed up first. Cola spice followed. The draw left a fizzy illusion on the tongue. Jamal liked it on walks. He said, “It tastes like a soda hit, not syrup.” After long pulls, cola sweetness grew heavier.
Frozen Pineapple tasted sharp. Pineapple hit the front of the tongue. The “frozen” finish cooled quickly. The throat feel rose a bit. I liked it in short pulls. Longer pulls made it feel too intense.
Kiwi Dragon Berry felt mixed and bright. Kiwi tartness led. Berry sweetness filled the middle. The finish stayed juicy. Marcus said, “This one keeps flavor under stress.” That was true even after heavy use.
Strawberry Pinacolada felt creamy. Strawberry opened. Coconut cream followed. Pineapple rounded the finish. The mouthfeel felt thicker than expected. Jamal called it “dessert fruit, but still light enough.”
Tropical Mango delivered a ripe mango front. The exhale leaned sweet. The blend stayed simple. It did not get weird late-life. It did build sweetness fatigue after many pulls.
Pink Lemonade tasted tart first. Lemonade gave a sharp edge. Sweetness followed. The finish stayed bright. I preferred it over heavy candy profiles.
Best draw experience came from Kiwi Dragon Berry plus Strawberry Pinacolada. Double Mint won for palate reset days. Flavor assortments appear on retailer category pages.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Pocket carry feels easy | Less total runtime than 9K models |
| Smooth MTL draw | Condensation ring appears with frequent use |
| Strong “bright” flavors | Sweet flavors can feel heavy after chains |
| Stable heat behavior | Not for airy DL users |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed near $13.99 in some shops
- Device type: rechargeable disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly listed 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- E-liquid capacity: commonly listed 15 mL
- Claimed puffs: around 7000
- Battery capacity: commonly listed 500 mAh
- Charging port: USB-C
- Coil type: mesh coil common
- Airflow style: MTL
- Vapor production: medium
- Leak resistance features: sealed disposable body
- Build materials: plastic shell
- Safety features: listing claims vary
- Shipping: seller-dependent
Flavor examples: Double Mint, Cherry Cola, Frozen Pineapple, Kiwi Dragon Berry, Strawberry Pinacolada, Tropical Mango, Grape Crush, Pink Lemonade.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Bright profiles stay punchy with gentler pulls. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Medium feel with slightly lighter vapor body. |
| Vapor Production | 3.9 | Solid MTL clouds, not dense “room fog.” |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Smooth resistance. Low whistle under movement use. |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Strong for 500 mAh class, still below 9K units. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | No true leaks. Light mouthpiece moisture appears. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Simple shell holds up in pockets. |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Straightforward, no learning curve. |
| Portability | 4.4 | Best carry feel among the larger devices. |
Overall score: 4.1
Bugatti Twins 5000
Honorary title: The Bugatti Vape “Two-Piece Swap” Hybrid Feel
Our Testing Experience
The Twins 5000 created a different kind of routine. The two-piece style changed handling. It felt more like a “kit” than a single disposable. That added small friction at first. After a day, it felt normal.
I tested it at home. I also tested it during desk work. The device draw sat in the MTL lane. It felt slightly more open than the Quattro 700. It also felt slightly denser than some small disposables.
Marcus focused on stability. He ran longer pulls. He watched heat. He also watched flavor collapse. He said, “It’s fine until the sweetness stacks up.” For him, candy blends got cloying faster.
Jamal tested pocket behavior. The two-piece bulk mattered. It printed more in slim pants. It also felt harder to “forget about.” He said, “It’s not my stealth carry.” He still liked how it felt in hand. The magnetic style also reduced wobble.
Condensation stayed moderate. The mouthpiece still needed a wipe. I did not see full leaking. I did see moisture build after frequent pulls.
Dr. Walker again stayed in guardrail mode. No health promises. Nicotine risk remains real. Major reports summarize evidence with caution, including the National Academies review.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This device does best with fruit blends. The coil seems tuned for bright notes. The inhale feels smooth. The vapor carries a medium density. The mouthfeel stays slightly “wetter” than Elite 9000 during long sessions.
Pineapple Lemon hit sharp. Pineapple led with a tropical bite. Lemon lifted the middle. The exhale stayed tangy. Marcus said, “This holds up better than the candy ones.” I noticed the same. Even after repeated pulls, it stayed readable.
Blue Raspberry Lemon leaned sweet-tart. Lemonade edge came first. Blue raspberry candy followed. It coated the mouth more than I expected. Jamal liked it for quick pulls. He said, “It’s loud, but it hits fast.” Longer sessions made it feel sticky.
Orange Mojito felt bright. Orange sat up front. A faint mint note followed. The finish hinted at “sparkle,” like a mocktail idea. The throat feel stayed medium. I liked it after meals.
Cola Mojito tasted playful. Cola sweetness arrived first. A mint edge cooled the finish. It did not taste like real cola. It still worked as a change-up. Marcus got tired of it quickly.
Grape Ice stayed simple. Grape sat up front. The “ice” cooled the end. It also reduced sweetness fatigue. Jamal called it “easy carry flavor.” It stayed stable even late.
Jungle Juice felt like mixed fruit punch. It had no single clear note. It still delivered a fun draw. After many pulls, it turned flat faster than sharper flavors.
Strawberry Watermelon felt familiar. Strawberry candy led. Watermelon softened the finish. It was smooth. It also got boring faster than the sharper blends.
Best draw experience came from Pineapple Lemon plus Grape Ice. They stayed clear longer. Flavor references appear in multiple retail listings.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Two-piece feel adds stability in hand | Bulkier carry than single disposables |
| Fruit flavors stay clear | Candy blends get cloying faster |
| Draw stays smooth | Slight learning curve for new users |
| Decent leak control | Mouthpiece moisture still appears |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: varies widely by market and bundle size
- Device type: disposable kit style, often described as magnetic two-piece
- Nicotine strength options: commonly listed 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- E-liquid capacity: often listed 15 mL for 5000 class listings
- Claimed puffs: around 5000
- Battery capacity: seller-dependent
- Charging port: some sellers claim USB-C rechargeable components
- Coil type: often mesh in listings
- Airflow style: MTL
- Vapor production: medium
- Leak resistance features: sealed cartridge style, still needs wiping
- Build materials: plastic shell
- Safety features: listing claims vary
- Shipping: seller-dependent
Flavor examples mentioned in listings: Pineapple Lemon, Blue Raspberry Lemon, Orange Mojito, Cola Mojito, Grape Ice, Jungle Juice, Strawberry Watermelon, Strawberry Dragon Fruit.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Fruit profiles stay clear. Candy profiles fatigue faster. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Medium feel with slightly wetter mouthfeel. |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Medium output with steady draw response. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Smooth MTL pull, slightly more open than minis. |
| Battery Life | 3.9 | Adequate for its class, depends on the kit design. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | No major leaks. Mouthpiece moisture still happens. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Two-piece form feels sturdy once learned. |
| Ease of Use | 3.8 | Takes a little adjustment versus single disposables. |
| Portability | 3.7 | Bulkier carry is the main downside. |
Overall score: 4.0
Bugatti Quattro 700
Honorary title: The Bugatti Vape “Quick-Trip Mini” Tight MTL Option
Our Testing Experience
The Quattro 700 is the smallest experience here. It behaves like a short-run disposable. It also behaves like a tight MTL stick. That changes expectations. You do not plan all-day use. You plan short sessions.
I used it during errand runs. I also used it during short work breaks. The draw felt tight. The vapor output stayed modest. Flavor still showed up clearly. The device did not ask for learning. It also did not offer recharge.
Marcus did not spend long on it. He tested it for throat feel plus airflow. He said, “Too tight for my heavy use.” That was predictable. He still liked how it stayed cool.
Jamal liked it for portability. He said, “This is the one you forget in your pocket.” The compact size won. The short lifespan lost.
I noticed less condensation than the big 9K devices. Short sessions help. The mouthpiece also felt flat and comfortable. That matched some listings.
Dr. Walker’s guardrails stayed the same. He emphasized adult-only framing. He also emphasized that nicotine content varies by market. He pointed back to public health guidance on nicotine addiction risk.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This device delivers flavor in a compact way. The inhale feels tight. The vapor hits the front of the mouth first. It does not fill the whole mouth like a denser 9K disposable. It still gives a clear taste line. That makes flavors feel “clean,” not complex.
Sour Apple tasted sharp. The inhale carried a tart green-apple bite. The exhale softened into sweetness. The throat feel rose slightly due to the tart edge. Jamal said, “That’s a real sour note.” I agreed. It stayed consistent over short sessions.
Apple Peach felt smoother. Apple came first. Peach rounded the middle. The finish stayed soft. The mouthfeel felt slightly creamy, even with tight airflow. I wrote “gentle fruit blend” in my notes.
Pink Lemonade delivered a bright zip. Lemonade tartness hit early. Sweetness followed. A faint berry edge showed up in the finish on some pulls. It was refreshing in short sessions. Longer pulls felt too sharp.
Blue Sour Raspberry leaned candy-tart. Blue raspberry sat in front. Sourness followed. The inhale coated the tongue more than Sour Apple. It also lingered longer. Marcus disliked that lingering note. He said, “It sticks in my mouth.”
Blueberry Raspberry felt jammy. Blueberry sweetness came first. Raspberry added a tart pop at the end. The tight draw made it feel concentrated. I preferred it in short pulls. Otherwise it felt heavy.
Orange Mojito, on this device, leaned citrus first. A mild cool note showed late. It tasted cleaner than on bigger disposables. The smaller vapor volume helped.
Grape profiles often taste sweet on compact sticks. Here, grape felt simple. It did not turn floral. That was a win.
Best draw experience came from Sour Apple plus Apple Peach. They matched the tight draw style. Product pages for Quattro 700 often present it as 2 mL, 700 puffs, 20 mg/ml variants, and a flat mouthpiece.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very compact for pockets | Not rechargeable |
| Tight MTL draw suits quick sessions | Short lifespan versus 5K–9K devices |
| Flavor stays clear in small output | Not for heavy users |
| Low heat in use | Limited “depth” of vapor body |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed near CHF 9.95 in some markets
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly listed 20 mg/ml variants in EU listings
- Activation method: draw-activated
- E-liquid capacity: commonly listed 2 mL
- Claimed puffs: around 700
- Battery capacity: commonly listed 600 mAh
- Charging port: none, non-rechargeable
- Coil type: varies by listing
- Airflow style: tight MTL
- Vapor production: low to medium
- Leak resistance features: sealed body
- Build materials: compact plastic shell
- Safety features: listing claims vary
- Shipping: seller-dependent
Flavor examples seen across listings: Sour Apple, Apple Peach, Pink Lemonade, Blue Sour Raspberry, Blueberry Raspberry.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 3.9 | Clear taste, but less mouth-filling depth. |
| Throat Hit | 3.8 | Tight draw concentrates feel, varies by flavor. |
| Vapor Production | 3.2 | Modest output fits the mini format. |
| Airflow/Draw | 3.9 | Tight MTL with smooth pull, not airy. |
| Battery Life | 3.5 | Battery is fine, device lifespan is the limiter. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Short sessions kept it dry in pockets. |
| Build Quality | 3.8 | Simple shell, no moving parts. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | The simplest device here. |
| Portability | 4.8 | The easiest carry in the lineup. |
Overall score: 3.6
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bugatti B9000 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| Bugatti Elite 9000 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Bugatti Spaceship 7000 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Bugatti Twins 5000 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Bugatti Quattro 700 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
Elite 9000 looks most balanced. B9000 stays close, with a small late-life flavor drop. Spaceship 7000 is a portability specialist with steady draw feel. Quattro 700 wins pure portability, then loses on lifespan.
Best Picks
-
Best Bugatti Vape for Balanced Daily Use
Winner: Bugatti Elite 9000. It kept the most stable flavor curve. It also held leak control better. The scores reflect that steadiness. -
Best Bugatti Vape for Commuters
Winner: Bugatti Spaceship 7000. Jamal carried it without drama. The draw stayed smooth on quick breaks. Portability plus ease-of-use pushed it ahead. -
Best Bugatti Vape for Screen-Led Pacing
Winner: Bugatti B9000. The screen changed how often I checked battery. It reduced dead-device moments. It also helped me manage recharge timing.
How to Choose the Bugatti Vape?
Start with draw style. These devices sit in MTL territory. A tight pull suits short breaks. A slightly looser pull suits longer sessions. If throat feel matters, avoid sharp tart flavors first. Try smoother fruit blends. Then adjust.
Think about runtime. 9K class devices suit longer days. 7K class devices fit rotation habits. Mini 700 class devices suit quick trips. Charging matters, too. If you hate cables, avoid rechargeable models. If you hate wasteful short lifespans, avoid non-recharge minis.
Match device to user type.
A light nicotine adult user who wants simple routines often fits Quattro 700. It stays small. It also stays easy. A former heavy smoker type, like Marcus, fits Elite 9000 better. It stayed calmer under long sessions. A flavor-focused user fits Elite 9000 or Spaceship 7000. They kept flavors readable across many pulls. A commuter who needs all-day reliability fits Spaceship 7000 or Elite 9000. Jamal’s carry tests pointed that way. A beginner adult user who wants low-maintenance disposables fits B9000 or Elite 9000. Screens and stable activation reduce frustration.
Budget still matters. Sales vary wildly. Price swings are common. Buying from reputable sellers reduces surprises.
Limitations
Bugatti Vape models, as a group, lean toward MTL. That leaves cloud-chasing users underserved. Marcus noticed it quickly. Airflow never opened enough for true DL style. Vapor volume stayed medium at best. A user who wants huge airflow will feel constrained.
The lineup also leans sweet. Many flavor lists rely on candy blends. That works for some adults. It also causes palate fatigue. We saw it with bubble-gum profiles. We also saw it with heavy fruit punch blends. A user who dislikes sweet profiles will have fewer satisfying options.
Battery behavior depends on class. The Quattro 700 runs short by design. That is not a defect. It is still a limitation. The two-piece Twins 5000 adds bulk. Jamal felt it in pocket carry. That bulk makes it less stealthy.
Seller listings conflict. B9000 listings vary on capacity and puff claims. That uncertainty complicates shopping. It also complicates expectations. Even strong-performing devices still involve nicotine exposure. Adult-only framing stays essential. Nicotine addiction risk remains real.
Is the Bugatti Vape Lineup Worth It?
Bugatti Vape devices sell a familiar experience. The draw stays MTL. The activation stays simple. The better models stay consistent.
Elite 9000 offers the most stable performance. Flavor stayed defined longer. The device stayed calmer during chain pulls. Marcus noticed less sudden warmth. Jamal noticed fewer pocket issues. The scores reflect those patterns.
B9000 feels close. The screen helps pacing. It also reduces surprise downtime. Flavor drift shows up later. Heavy use makes it more obvious. If you vape in long sessions, it matters.
Spaceship 7000 fits mobile routines. Pocket carry felt easy. Draw smoothness stayed reliable on quick breaks. Flavor stayed bright. Runtime stays lower than 9K models. That trade-off is straightforward.
Twins 5000 targets a different taste. The two-piece format changes handling. It feels sturdier in hand once learned. Portability drops. Jamal felt the bulk daily. Ease-of-use also drops a bit.
Quattro 700 is a mini tool. It is compact. It also stays consistent. Lifespan stays short. Non-recharge limits value for heavy users. It still works for short trips.
Price decides the value line. Sale prices can make 9K models a strong buy. Full retail can feel steep. A buyer should compare local listings. The device should match routine. The best value appears when flavor stability matters. Leak control also matters. Elite 9000 delivered both.
Nicotine risk does not disappear. These are adult nicotine products. Public health guidance highlights addiction risk. It also emphasizes youth protection. That context matters in any purchase decision.
Pro Tips for Bugatti Vape
- Keep pulls shorter on sweet flavors. Palate fatigue builds fast.
- Wipe the mouthpiece during the day. Condensation sneaks up.
- Avoid leaving devices in hot cars. Heat changes flavor fast.
- Use a lower-power wall adapter for charging. Fast chargers can warm shells.
- Rotate flavors across the day. It keeps taste clearer.
- If the device feels unusually hot, stop using it. Let it cool fully.
- Keep devices away from keys. Screen windows scratch easily.
- Store upright when possible. It reduces mouthpiece moisture.
- Replace the device when flavor turns papery. Pushing it ruins the experience.
FAQs
1) How long does a Bugatti Vape device usually last in real use?
9K models can stretch several days for moderate users. Heavy users burn them faster. Marcus cut runtimes quickly with long sessions. Quattro 700 is a short-run device.
2) Do these devices leak in pockets?
True leaking was rare in our tests. Mouthpiece moisture was common. Jamal wiped mouthpieces during the day. That solved most issues.
3) How often do you need to charge the rechargeable models?
Most adults will charge once per day with a 9K device. Some can go longer. Marcus charged more often during heavy nights. Smaller batteries push more frequent charging.
4) Does flavor stay consistent from start to finish?
Elite 9000 held the steadiest curve. B9000 drifted later in life. Candy profiles drift faster than sharper fruit profiles.
5) Which nicotine strength should an adult choose?
Nicotine tolerance varies. Many listings show 5% options. Some markets list lower strengths. A buyer should match to current nicotine habits. No dosing advice belongs in a review.
6) Are disposables or refillables easier to maintain?
Disposables win on simplicity. Refillables demand cleaning and coil changes. This lineup focuses on disposables. The main “maintenance” here is wiping condensate.
7) How do I avoid burnt or dry tastes?
Do not chain long pulls. Let the device rest between pulls. If flavor turns papery, stop using it. Marcus hit that edge first under heavy use.
8) Which model fits a commuter best?
Spaceship 7000 carried easiest for Jamal. Elite 9000 worked well, too, if runtime matters more than size.
9) What is the biggest trade-off across Bugatti Vape devices?
Most options stay MTL. DL users will feel limited. Sweet flavor catalogs also cause fatigue for some adults.
Sources
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Library of Medicine. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507171/
- World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes tobacco factsheet. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf?download=true&sfvrsn=d6e03637_2
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Effects of Vaping. 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/e-cigarettes/health-effects.html
- Gordon T, et al. E-Cigarette Toxicology. National Library of Medicine. 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9386787/
- Worden CP, et al. The Toxicological Effects of E-Cigarette Use in the Upper Airway. National Library of Medicine. 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11060921/