Raz devices keep showing up in the same places. Vape counters. Gas-station displays. Reseller lists. The “Raz Purse Vape” nickname also keeps popping up, and it tends to pull new buyers into the brand’s wider lineup. I wanted to treat the whole thing like a real buying decision, not a flavor-of-the-week post.
I ran the testing with a fixed team. I handled daily reliability, charge behavior, and messy little issues like condensation. Marcus Reed leaned into harder sessions and higher output modes. Jamal Davis treated each device like a pocket tool during a busy routine. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed wording around nicotine risk and labeling.
We used each device across repeat sessions, then we compared notes. We also tracked airflow behavior, screen accuracy, draw consistency, and leak control. Then we scored each device with the same rubric across the lineup.
Product Overview
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAZ RYL Classic 35K (Raz Purse Vape) | Confident build feel. Airflow switch helps. Screen stays readable. | Bulky for tight pockets. Chain can snag. Limited flavor range. | Adults who want a carry accessory feel | $24.99 | 4.4 |
| RAZ Vape 25000 (LTX25000, formerly DC25000) | Big screen. Dual modes change the hit. Flavor list is huge. | Size still noticeable. Boost mode drains faster. | Adults who want features without setup work | $23.99 | 4.3 |
| RAZ TN9000 | Compact. Easy carry. Flavor variety stays strong. | Smaller battery. Screen is smaller. | Adults who want a lighter daily disposable | $19.99 | 4.1 |
| RAZ RX 50K Dew Edition | Three modes. Many airflow levels. Bright screen style. | Flavor names are coded. Body feels larger. | Adults who like tinkering with airflow feel | $24.99 | 4.5 |
Pricing and baseline specs were pulled from current product listings and brand pages.
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept coming back to consistency. On the better Raz units, the draw stays stable across the day. The screen also helps me avoid “surprise dead battery” moments. When the device slips, it usually happens in boost-style modes, with heat creep and faster drain.
Marcus treated the lineup like a stress test. He kept pushing longer chains of pulls, then he watched for heat at the shell. He also tracked when flavors started tasting tired. His notes stayed blunt. “If it ramps up, then it needs to stay there,” he said, after a session on the higher-output settings.
Jamal cared about carry friction. Pocket edges. Mouthpiece comfort. The way a device behaves when it rides in a bag. He kept repeating one line during commutes. “I want it to disappear until I need it,” he said, after swapping between the TN9000 and the purse-style RYL.
Dr. Walker’s input stayed narrow on purpose. He flagged language that implies reduced harm. He also pushed for clear adult-only framing. When we described throat hit, he insisted we keep it subjective. He also reminded that nicotine is addictive, and that non-users should not start.
Raz Purse Vape Vapes Comparison Chart
| Spec or trait | RAZ RYL Classic 35K | RAZ Vape 25000 (LTX25000) | RAZ TN9000 | RAZ RX 50K Dew Edition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable |
| Puff claim | Up to 35,000 | Up to 25,000 | Up to 9,000 | Up to 50,000 (mode-based) |
| E-liquid capacity | 16.5 mL | 20 mL | 12 mL | 19 mL |
| Nicotine range | 5% | 5% (also sold in 0% variants) | 5% (also sold in 0% variants) | 5% |
| Activation | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated |
| Battery capacity | 820 mAh | 800 mAh | 650 mAh | Commonly listed as 800 mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
| Screen | 0.96 inch | 2.5 inch | 0.96 inch | 3D-style display |
| Modes | Single output feel | Regular, Boost | Single output feel | Normal, Boost, Super |
| Airflow | Switch | Switch | Switch | Multi-step airflow system |
| Flavor availability | 15+ | 40+ | 40+ | 5 |
| Flavor performance | Dense, smoother blends | Wide range, punchy | Consistent, lighter body | Strong, “beverage” lean |
| Throat hit style | Medium-firm | Adjustable via mode | Medium | Mode-dependent |
| Vapor production | Medium | Medium-high in Boost | Medium | High in Super |
| Leak resistance | Strong if kept upright | Strong, watch condensation | Strong, light condensation | Strong, watch mouthpiece wetness |
| Ease of use | Very simple | Simple, more controls | Very simple | Simple, more tuning |
| Build feel | “Accessory” vibe | Techy disposable | Classic compact | Large feature body |
Core specs come from current device listings and brand pages for each model.
What We Tested and How We Tested It
Each score comes from the same set of criteria. Flavor was judged by accuracy, intensity, and how clean the finish felt. Throat hit was recorded as a personal feel only. Vapor production was judged by density and consistency across back-to-back pulls.
Airflow and draw were scored by smoothness, noise, and how predictable the resistance felt. Battery life was tracked in normal daily use, plus heavier sessions. Charging behavior mattered too. I watched for hot charging, odd screen jumps, and unstable output near low battery.
Leak and condensation control was judged by mouthpiece wetness, pocket residue, and any gurgle. Build quality covered shell flex, mouthpiece fit, and overall durability feel. Ease of use covered setup friction, learning curve, and how annoying the controls felt. Portability covered bulk, pocket comfort, and carry safety.
All observations are usage-based. They do not replace medical advice. Nicotine products are intended for adults only.
Raz Purse Vape Vapes Our Testing Experience
RAZ RYL Classic 35K The Chain Carry Statement Piece
Our Testing Experience
The purse-style body changes how the device fits into a routine. I did not treat it like a tiny stick vape. I treated it like a thing that sits on a desk, then moves with me. The chain made that natural. It also created a new annoyance. It can snag, then it can tap a table edge.
During normal work breaks, the draw stayed consistent. The airflow switch let me tighten the pull when I wanted a calmer hit. Under that kind of switch setting, the vapor stayed more focused. The screen also helped me pace the device. I could glance, then decide whether to push another session.
Marcus ran it harder than I did. He kept longer pulls, then he watched the shell. Heat stayed controlled in normal use. Under longer chains, a warm spot showed up near the top. His note felt practical. “It’s fine until you treat it like a contest,” he said, after pushing repeated pulls.
Jamal liked the carry identity, yet he also complained first. The device feels thick in a front pocket. The chain can feel like clutter in a bag. He ended up using it like a wrist carry on errands. “It feels like I’m carrying a keychain, not a vape,” he said, once he found that rhythm.
Dr. Walker’s input was about presentation. The purse vibe can read like a fashion object. He pushed us to keep the tone grounded. He also reminded that nicotine addiction risk stays present, no matter the shell.
This device fits adults who like an accessory feel. It also fits people who hate fiddly controls. It does not fit minimalists who want a tiny pocket carry.
Draw Experience & Flavors
I tested this device in sessions where the airflow setting mattered. With the airflow tightened, the draw feels slower. Vapor warms up a little. Flavor also sits longer on the tongue. With the airflow opened, the pull turns lighter. The finish gets cleaner. The device also becomes easier to overuse, since it feels effortless.
Blue Razz Ice came first for me. The inhale starts with a bright candy-blue note. It hits the front of the mouth fast. Then a cold edge rides along the sides of the tongue. The exhale keeps a sharp sweetness. After a few pulls, that sweetness can start to feel sticky. Marcus noticed that faster. “It’s loud, then it keeps talking,” he said, after a heavier run.
Raspberry Watermelon felt rounder. The raspberry note sits mid-mouth. Watermelon lifts it without turning it into syrup. The draw has a softer “wet fruit” impression. It does not feel fizzy. It feels smooth. Jamal liked this one during commutes. “It doesn’t spike my mouth,” he said, when he swapped it in between short pulls.
Peach Passionfruit brought more tang. The peach note shows up first, then passionfruit pushes a sharper edge. On inhale, I got a slight tart pinch near the back of the cheeks. That tart feel stayed controlled with tighter airflow. With open airflow, it can turn sharper, then the throat feel gets firmer. I kept it in the middle setting most of the time.
Miami Mint changed the whole device mood. Mint hits the top of the palate. Then a fruit tone slides underneath it. The mint is not purely “toothpaste.” It feels more like a cool rinse, with a sweet edge. Marcus still found a heat creep when he hammered it. The mint masked some of that. He called it out anyway. “Mint hides mistakes,” he said, after a long session.
Night Crawler in this line reads like a candy mix. The inhale carries a blended berry-candy note. It feels thick. The finish stays sweet. Under repeated pulls, the sweetness builds, then the mouth starts to feel coated. I kept water nearby for this one. Jamal refused to keep it as a daily flavor. “It’s fun, then it’s tiring,” he said, after a day of quick sessions.
Wild Berry Dew, from the extra collection list, felt brighter than Night Crawler. The berry note carries a “fresh” edge. The coolness lands later, not first. On inhale, the mouth feel stays smooth. On exhale, the berry note sharpens, then the cool edge shows up at the end.
After cycling these, the best draw experience came from Raspberry Watermelon. The blend stays balanced across short sessions. Miami Mint also performed well when I wanted a cleaner finish. Blue Razz Ice still works, yet it fits shorter bursts better.
Dr. Walker’s reminder stayed in view. Flavor comfort can encourage overuse. Nicotine remains addictive. Adults who do not use nicotine should not start.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Distinct carry style that feels durable | Bulkier than typical pocket disposables |
| Adjustable airflow actually changes the draw | Chain can snag on bags or clothing |
| Screen makes battery and liquid checks easy | Flavor range is smaller than the 25K line |
| Stable output in normal daily sessions | Sweet flavors can feel heavy in long sessions |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: $24.99
- Device type: Disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5%
- Activation method: Draw-activated
- Battery capacity: 820 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, typical quick top-ups in under an hour
- Coil type or resistance: Mesh-style coil tech (as described in listings)
- Tank capacity: 16.5 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: Airflow switch
- Display: 0.96 inch screen indicators
- Vapor production: Medium, higher with open airflow
- Leak resistance features: Tight mouthpiece fit, sealed disposable body
- Build materials: Leather finish shell details, metal logo accents
- Dimensions and weight: Chunky “purse” body, heavier than stick disposables
- Included accessories: Attachable chain lanyard
- Safety features: Standard charge protections implied in modern USB-C disposables
- Shipping: Varies by seller, adult signature rules may apply
- Flavors available for this vape: Blue Razz Ice, Watermelon Ice, Rainbow, Orange Mango, Peach Passionfruit, Raspberry Watermelon, Sour Apple, Sour Strawberry, Triple Berry, White Yummy Ice, Icy Mint, Miami Mint, Banana Ice, Blue Razz Bliss, Wild Berry Dew, Dragonfruit Lemonade, Night Crawler
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Flavors feel dense. The finish stays clear with mint choices. |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Medium-firm feel, especially with tighter airflow. |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Steady output. It thickens when airflow is opened. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Switch has real impact. Resistance stays predictable. |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Battery holds up well. Heavy sessions drain it faster. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Pocket residue stayed low. Mouthpiece wetness stayed minor. |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Shell feels solid. Chain hardware feels sturdy. |
| Ease of Use | 4.7 | No real learning curve. Screen is easy to read. |
| Portability | 4.2 | Wrist carry works. Tight pockets feel crowded. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Strong daily stability, with bulk as the trade-off. |
RAZ Vape 25000 LTX The Feature Packed Daily Workhorse
Our Testing Experience
This device feels like Raz trying to add “smart disposable” behavior without turning it into a hobby. The big screen changes how you pace a day. I checked battery and liquid more than I expected. It became a habit. Then it reduced surprise failures.
Regular mode stayed calm for me. It kept the throat feel moderate. Boost mode changed the tone. Vapor got denser. The draw also got louder. I used Boost for short sessions, then I moved back to Regular. That pattern kept the device feeling stable.
Marcus used Boost far more. He treated it like the whole point. Heat stayed acceptable at first. After repeated long pulls, a warm band showed up near the top half. He also watched how flavor held up as the liquid level dropped. “Boost is honest,” he said. “It tells you what the coil can’t hide.”
Jamal liked the screen and airflow switch. He did not love the size. The body sits bigger than a TN9000. It also feels more “device-like” in a pocket. He still carried it, since the output stayed predictable in short pulls. “It’s bigger, yet it behaves,” he said, after a week of commuting sessions.
One detail mattered more than I expected. The control approach. Listings describe draw activation with a simple control button for mode behavior. I treated that button like a “settings tap,” not a fire button. That kept the routine simple.
Dr. Walker flagged one pattern. High puff claims can push people toward longer use cycles. He pushed us to keep the message simple. Adult-only. Nicotine is addictive. The device convenience does not change that.
This model fits adults who want a feature set with almost no upkeep. It does not fit anyone who wants a tiny pocket carry.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This line has so many flavors that it can feel like a menu, not a list. I narrowed it to flavors that expose different problems. Sweet blends can show coil fatigue. Mint blends can hide roughness. Sour blends can reveal harsh edges. Then I ran them with Regular mode first. Next came Boost mode in short bursts.
Iced Blue Dragon hit with a sharp blue-candy note. It feels bright at the front of the mouth. The “iced” part lands fast, then it spreads across the tongue. In Regular mode, the sweetness stays controlled. In Boost, the candy note turns louder, then the throat feel firms up. Marcus liked it for intensity. “That’s the one that stays loud,” he said, after a higher-output run.
Razzle Dazzle tastes like a mixed candy bowl. The inhale starts sweet, then it turns into a layered fruit-candy blend. Mouthfeel gets thick. Under longer sessions, that thickness can feel like coating. Jamal backed off quickly. “I need air after that,” he said, once the sweetness built up during a commute.
Fire & Ice is a different kind of blend. It lands with a hot-cold impression. The “fire” reads like a spice-candy edge. Then the cooling note comes in behind it. On inhale, it hits the back of the throat faster than the fruit blends. In Boost mode, that sensation gets more aggressive. I treated it as a “short session only” flavor. Dr. Walker’s note fits here. Throat sensations vary by person. They should stay framed as subjective.
New York Mint felt cleaner than Miami Mint in my sessions. It comes across more direct. The inhale delivers a cool mint sheet across the palate. It does not lean fruity. The exhale clears fast. When I switched from candy flavors, this one made the device feel “reset.” Marcus also liked it for managing the heavier pull cycles. “Mint keeps the coil feeling less tired,” he said, after he swapped it in during heavy use.
Watermelon Ice Cream surprised me. It has a soft creamy note, not just fruit. On inhale, watermelon hits first. Then a dairy-like sweetness follows. It can feel round and smooth. Under repeated pulls, the creamy note can turn cloying. I kept it in short sessions. Jamal liked it in brief pulls, mostly as a change-up. “It’s weirdly dessert,” he said, after a quick bag-carry day.
Bangin Sour Berries did what sour blends should do. It hits the cheeks with a tart pinch. Then the berry sweetness follows. In Regular mode, it stays balanced. In Boost, the tart edge can feel sharper. The mouth feel becomes more intense. Marcus liked that honesty. He also noticed that sour blends can turn harsh if the device runs hot.
After cycling these, the best draw experience came from New York Mint when I wanted clean consistency. Iced Blue Dragon also performed well for strong flavor. For a sweeter pick, Watermelon Ice Cream worked best in short sessions.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Large screen makes status checks easy | Device body feels bulky in tight pockets |
| Dual modes change vapor and hit feel | Boost mode increases drain and warmth |
| Very wide flavor selection | Sweet blends can feel heavy in long sessions |
| Airflow switch gives real control | More “controls” than simpler disposables |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: $23.99
- Device type: Disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5% (also sold as 0% variants)
- Activation method: Draw-activated
- Battery capacity: 800 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, typical quick charge behavior
- Coil type or resistance: Often listed as mesh coil in reseller listings
- Tank capacity: 20 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: Adjustable airflow with switch
- Display: 2.5 inch HD screen indicators
- Vaping modes: Regular mode, Boost mode
- Vapor production: Medium in Regular, higher in Boost
- Leak resistance features: Sealed disposable body, firm mouthpiece fit
- Build materials: Ergonomic disposable shell
- Dimensions and weight: Larger body, screen-forward design
- Included accessories: Device only
- Safety features: Standard charge protections implied for USB-C disposables
- Shipping: Varies by seller, adult signature rules may apply
- Flavors available for this vape (current listing set): Bangin Sour Berries, Black & Blue Lime Ice, Black Cherry Peach, Blue Raz Gush, Blue Razz Ice, Blueberry Punch, Blueberry Watermelon, Cherry Strapple, Clear Diamond, Clear Sapphire, Clear, Fire & Ice, Frozen Banana, Frozen Cherry Apple, Frozen Dragonfruit Lemon, Frozen Juicy Strawberry, Frozen Raspberry Watermelon, Georgia Peach, Hawaiian Punch, Iced Blue Dragon, Mango Loco, Miami Mint, New York Mint, Night Crawler, Orange Berry Lime Ice, Orange Mango, Orange Pineapple Punch, Pink Lemonade Minty O’s, Rainbow Rain, Raspberry Limeade, Razzle Dazzle, Sour Apple Ice, Sour Apple Watermelon, Sour Raspberry Punch, Sour Raspberry Watermelon, Sour Watermelon Peach, Strawberry Burst, Strawberry Kiwi Pear, Strawberry Orange Tang, Strawberry Peach Gush, Tobacco, Triple Berry Gush, Triple Berry Punch, Tropical Gush, Watermelon Ice, Watermelon Ice Cream, White Grape Gush, Wintergreen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Wide variety. Mint and sour blends stay clear. |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Boost adds firmness. Regular stays smoother. |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Boost mode gives denser output. Regular stays steady. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Switch changes resistance. Draw stays consistent. |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | 800 mAh holds up. Boost shortens real-life runtime. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Low pocket residue. Mild mouthpiece condensation at times. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Solid shell feel. Screen area stayed intact in bag carry. |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Simple control approach. Screen reduces guesswork. |
| Portability | 4.0 | Pocketable, yet noticeable. Bag carry feels easier. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Strong feature balance, with size as the main cost. |
RAZ TN9000 The Compact Everyday Carry Regular
Our Testing Experience
TN9000 feels like the “normal” Raz device in the best way. It fits a pocket without drama. The screen is smaller than the 25K line, yet it still does the job. I used it during work breaks, then I kept it for errands. It felt easy to live with.
Draw activation stayed reliable. The airflow switch gave enough range for a tighter pull. I used that tighter setting when I wanted a calmer session. The device also stayed less warm than the bigger models during short use.
Marcus pushed it harder, even though it is not built for extreme output. He found the limits quickly. Longer chains made the vapor feel warmer. Flavor also started flattening faster than it did on the bigger tanks. “It’s fine,” he said, “until you try to make it bigger than it is.”
Jamal liked it most across the lineup. The size fit his routine. The mouthpiece comfort stayed decent in quick pulls. He carried it in a pocket during commuting and outdoor walking. “This one is actually forgettable,” he said, after a week of bag and pocket swaps.
Dr. Walker’s guidance here was straightforward. Smaller devices can encourage frequent micro-sessions. That can increase total nicotine intake for some people. We kept the language neutral. Adults only. Nicotine is addictive. People who do not use nicotine should not start.
This model fits adults who want a lighter disposable and a wide flavor catalog. It does not fit heavy-output users who want strong mode control.
Draw Experience & Flavors
I tested TN9000 flavors in the kind of short sessions it seems built for. A few pulls. Then a pause. Then another small set later. Under that pattern, TN9000 can feel clean. Under long sessions, sweetness can pile up.
Ruby was the first “wow” flavor for me. It reads like cherry, strawberry, and raspberry blended together. The inhale starts with a bright cherry edge. Then a softer berry body fills in. The throat feel stays medium. On exhale, the sweetness lingers, yet it does not turn syrupy fast. Jamal liked it during commute pulls. “It tastes full without getting sticky,” he said, after a day of short sessions.
Tiffany, described as kiwi and watermelon, lands lighter. The inhale gives a watery melon note. Kiwi adds a soft tart edge along the cheeks. The finish stays clean. I noticed that it becomes more refreshing when the airflow is opened. With tighter airflow, it feels more concentrated, then the kiwi note sharpens. Marcus found it less satisfying in heavy sessions. “Too polite for my pulls,” he said, after trying to push it harder.
Vicky, the pink lemonade profile, hits with a bright citrus impression. The inhale brings lemon candy. Then a soft berry sweetness shows up. The mouth feel is sharp at first, then it smooths out. In repeated pulls, the citrus edge can feel more “zingy” in the throat. I kept sessions short with this one. Jamal liked it for quick hits. “It wakes up my mouth,” he said, when he used it between tasks.
Clear is a pure menthol style in the listing. It tasted like a cold, clean blast without sweetness. The inhale spreads coolness across the palate. The exhale clears fast. It can feel almost dry, since sweetness is not there to round it out. Marcus liked it after candy flavors. “That resets everything,” he said, after a heavy run earlier in the day.
Blue Razz Ice, in TN9000, feels sharper than some of the same-name blends in other lines. The inhale hits with blue candy. Then the cold note follows. The sweetness can build quickly in longer sessions. I liked it in short pulls. Jamal treated it as a “sometimes” flavor. “It’s fun, then it’s loud,” he said, after he swapped back to Ruby.
Strawberry Shortcake is the dessert pick that exposes coil behavior. The inhale brings strawberry jam sweetness. Then a soft bakery note follows. Mouthfeel gets thick fast. It feels smooth at first. Under repeated pulls, the sweetness coats the tongue. Marcus found it tiring quickly. “Dessert is a trap,” he said, after the flavor felt heavy in a longer session.
Polar Ice is the extreme cooling option. The inhale hits cold fast. It spreads across the mouth, then it pulls attention away from sweetness. The throat feel can feel firmer, just from the cooling intensity. I kept it for short bursts. Jamal used it outdoors. “Cold air plus this is a lot,” he said, after a winter walk session.
Best draw experience, across my sessions, came from Ruby. It stayed balanced in short pulls. Clear also performed well when I wanted a clean finish.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Compact size fits daily carry | Smaller battery limits long heavy sessions |
| Wide flavor range for a small device | Screen is smaller than the 25K line |
| Airflow switch helps tune resistance | Sweet flavors can feel heavy in long runs |
| Draw stays consistent in short use | Not built for high-output style use |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: $19.99
- Device type: Disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5% (also sold as 0% variants)
- Activation method: Draw-activated
- Battery capacity: 650 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, often quoted as fast charging in listings
- Coil type or resistance: Commonly listed as mesh coil in reseller descriptions
- Tank capacity: 12 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: Adjustable airflow with switch
- Display: 0.96 inch screen indicators
- Vapor production: Medium, consistent in short sessions
- Leak resistance features: Sealed disposable body, firm mouthpiece fit
- Build materials: Compact disposable shell
- Dimensions and weight: Pocket-forward size, light carry feel
- Included accessories: Device only
- Safety features: Standard charge protections implied for USB-C disposables
- Shipping: Varies by seller, adult signature rules may apply
- Flavors available for this vape (current listing set): Apple Cinnamon, Banana Coconut, Black Cherry Kiwi, Black Cherry Peach, Blue Raz Cotton Clouds, Blue Raz Ice, Blue Razz B-Pop, Blueberry Watermelon, Cactus Jack, Cherry Lemon, Citronade, Clear, Day Crawler, Dragon Fruit Lemonade, Georgia Peach, Graham Twist, Grape Ice, Mango Colada, Miami Mint, Night Crawler, Orange Raspberry, Peach Grapefruit, Pineapple Passionfruit Guava, Polar Ice, Ruby, Strawberry Ice, Strawberry Orange Mango, Strawberry Shortcake, Strawberry Watermelon, Tiffany, Tobacco, Triple Berry Ice, Vicky, Violet, Watermelon Ice, White Gummy Watermelon, White Yummy Grape
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Many flavors stay clear. Dessert blends get heavy sooner. |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Medium feel. Cooling flavors add perceived sharpness. |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Consistent output in short pulls. Long chains flatten it. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Switch gives enough range. Draw stays reliable. |
| Battery Life | 3.9 | 650 mAh fits the size. Heavy users will recharge more. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Pocket residue stayed low. Minor mouthpiece wetness appeared. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Solid for a compact disposable. Not built for rough abuse. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | Very low effort. Screen and airflow are simple. |
| Portability | 4.8 | The best carry feel of the lineup. It disappears in pockets. |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Strong daily carry value, with battery limits for heavy use. |
RAZ RX 50K Dew Edition The Mode and Airflow Control Toy
Our Testing Experience
RX 50K feels like Raz trying to out-feature the high-puff crowd. It adds three output modes. It also adds many airflow steps in listings. I treated it like a controlled experiment. I kept one flavor, then I cycled airflow. Then I cycled modes. That exposed how the device changes.
Normal mode felt steady and smooth. Boost mode thickened vapor quickly. Super mode pushed density hard. It also raised warmth. I used Super in short bursts only. That kept the device from feeling overheated during my routine.
Marcus treated Super mode like the baseline. He pushed longer sessions, then he checked shell warmth. He also watched for flavor fade. “Super is where the truth lives,” he said, after he noticed the device’s warmth climbing during longer pulls.
Jamal liked the idea, yet he did not love the body size. He can carry it, yet it feels more like a “big disposable.” He still used it for commutes, mainly in Normal mode, with airflow tuned to a comfortable resistance. “It’s a lot of device,” he said, after it bumped around in a pocket.
The coded flavors changed the vibe. You pick Code Blue, not “Blue Razz Soda,” at least not on the main label. That can be fun, yet it also makes buying less direct. I had to rely on seller descriptions and taste to decode the intent.
Dr. Walker focused on labeling expectations. Clear nicotine warnings matter. He also pushed for adult-only framing. He reminded that mode controls can encourage more use, since “tuning” invites more pulls.
This model fits adults who like tweaking airflow feel. It does not fit people who want simple flavor shopping.
Draw Experience & Flavors
I tested each code flavor across the same routine. Normal mode first. Then Boost in short bursts. Then Super for a few pulls only. I also adjusted airflow during each run. That let me see whether sweetness gets harsh, or whether cooling notes turn sharp.
Code Green reads like a citrus-lime soda profile in many seller descriptions. On inhale, I got a bright lime edge. It sits on the sides of the tongue. The mouth feel has a slight “fizz” illusion, mostly from sharp citrus. In Normal mode, it feels smooth enough for repeat pulls. In Super, the citrus can feel sharper at the throat. Marcus liked it for intensity. “That one bites back,” he said, after a heavier run.
Code Red reads like a cherry-citrus blend. The inhale starts with cherry candy. Then a citrus lift hits the cheeks. The finish stays sweet, then it clears. With tighter airflow, cherry gets thicker. With open airflow, citrus pops more. Jamal liked it in Normal mode. “It tastes loud without being sticky,” he said, after a commute session.
Code Blue reads like a blue-raspberry soda direction. The inhale hits with blue candy. A cool edge follows, then it spreads across the palate. In Boost, sweetness gets stronger. It can feel heavy if I chain pulls. I used it for short sessions only. Marcus found it good for stress testing. “If it burns, it’ll burn here,” he said, after pushing Super mode.
Code White reads like a clean citrus with icy notes. It felt lighter than Code Blue. The inhale brings a crisp citrus tone. Then cooling follows. The finish stays clean. This one worked best when I wanted a simpler mouth feel. With open airflow, it turns airy. With tighter airflow, it turns more concentrated, then the cooling feels firmer.
Code Pink reads like sparkling berry plus strawberry in seller descriptions. The inhale starts with strawberry candy. Then a mixed berry note fills in. The mouth feel feels soft. It also carries sweetness longer than Code White. In Super mode, sweetness can become too much. I treated it like a Normal-mode flavor.
Across all five, the best draw experience came from Code White when I wanted a clean finish. Code Red also stayed balanced across modes. For an intensity pick, Code Green stood out, although it can feel sharper in the throat in higher modes.
Dr. Walker’s reminder fits this device more than most. More tuning leads to more pulls. Nicotine remains addictive. Adult-only use stays the baseline message.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Three modes give real output control | Flavor names are not descriptive on the device |
| Many airflow steps help fine tune resistance | Body feels large for pocket carry |
| Strong vapor in higher modes | Super mode can raise warmth quickly |
| Screen-forward, feature-heavy experience | Only five flavors in the Dew set |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: $24.99
- Device type: Disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5%
- Activation method: Draw-activated
- Battery capacity: Commonly listed as 800 mAh in retail listings
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C fast charging behavior is commonly described
- Coil type or resistance: Commonly listed as mesh coil in retail listings
- Tank capacity: 19 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: Multi-step adjustable airflow system
- Display: 3D-style display with indicators
- Vaping modes: Normal, Boost, Super
- Vapor production: High in Super, moderate in Normal
- Leak resistance features: Sealed disposable body, firm mouthpiece fit
- Build materials: Large-feature disposable shell
- Dimensions and weight: Larger body than TN9000, more “desk carry” friendly
- Included accessories: Device only
- Safety features: Standard charge protections implied for USB-C disposables
- Shipping: Varies by seller, adult signature rules may apply
- Flavors available for this vape: Code Blue, Code White, Code Green, Code Pink, Code Red
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Clean “dew” profiles. Coded naming reduces shopping clarity. |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Mode shifts change firmness fast. Super feels strongest. |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Very dense in Super. Boost stays strong. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Many steps help dial resistance. Draw stays stable. |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | High capacity behavior for the class. Modes affect drain. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Pocket residue stayed low. Mouthpiece can get wet in Super. |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Shell feels sturdy. Screen area held up in carry. |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 | Controls are simple. Tuning can tempt extra fiddling. |
| Portability | 3.9 | Carry is possible. Bulk is the cost of features. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | Best for adults who like mode control and airflow tuning. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAZ RYL Classic 35K (Raz Purse Vape) | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
| RAZ Vape 25000 (LTX25000) | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| RAZ TN9000 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| RAZ RX 50K Dew Edition | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
RX 50K is the most output-driven device. TN9000 is the portability specialist. RYL Classic 35K is the build-and-carry identity pick. The 25K line stays the most balanced on features, flavor variety, and daily stability.
Best Picks
-
Best Raz Purse Vape for carry style and build feel: RAZ RYL Classic 35K
The accessory shape changes how it fits daily life. The build score stayed highest. The ease score also stayed near the top. -
Best Raz Purse Vape for airflow control and vapor output: RAZ RX 50K Dew Edition
Vapor production leads the chart. Airflow control also stands out. It fits adults who like tuning feel. -
Best Raz Purse Vape for light daily carry: RAZ TN9000
Portability leads the chart. Ease of use stays high. It fits adults who want simple pocket carry.
How to Choose the Raz Purse Vape Vape?
Start with vaping style. A tighter MTL-style pull tends to match airflow-tight settings. A looser pull tends to match open airflow. Then look at nicotine tolerance as a personal preference. Keep it as a subjective comfort factor, not a medical rule.
Device type matters, even inside disposables. RX 50K rewards tuning. The 25K line balances features with a wide flavor catalog. RYL 35K adds an accessory carry identity. TN9000 focuses on compact daily use.
Battery needs follow lifestyle. If sessions stay short, TN9000 can work fine. If use stretches through the day, bigger tanks and batteries reduce hassle. Maintenance preferences also matter. Disposables remove coil changes. That convenience can increase usage frequency for some people.
Matching advice by adult user type:
A light nicotine user who wants something simple often lands on TN9000. Short pulls feel natural. Pocket carry stays easy.
A former heavy smoker who wants a firmer hit often prefers RX 50K. Mode control lets the device feel stronger. Airflow tuning helps dial resistance.
A flavor-focused user usually lands on the 25K line. The catalog is massive. Regular and Boost modes change how flavors present.
A commuter who needs fewer surprises often likes RYL 35K or the 25K line. Screens reduce guesswork. Larger tanks stretch the device lifespan.
A beginner adult user who wants low-fuss buying often prefers TN9000. Flavor names are clear. The routine stays simple.
Limitations
Raz devices lean hard into high-puff disposables. That fits convenience buyers. It does not serve adults who want refillable systems. It also does not serve people who want rebuildable control.
The purse-style RYL can feel bulky. Tight pockets can feel crowded. Bag carry can add chain snag problems. Adults who want a minimalist carry will feel that friction.
The 25K line adds controls and a big screen. Some users want less device. Some users also dislike mode temptation, since it can pull extra sessions.
TN9000 has a smaller battery. Heavy users will recharge more often. Flavor also tends to flatten sooner under long chain pulls.
RX 50K uses coded flavors in the Dew set. That reduces shopping clarity. The larger body can also frustrate pocket-first users.
Across the whole lineup, nicotine risk stays present. These products remain intended for adults only. Non-users should not start. Pregnant individuals should avoid nicotine products.
Is the Raz Purse Vape Vape Lineup Worth It?
Raz is chasing daily convenience. The lineup stays disposable-first. That fact sets the value frame. No coil swaps. No bottle refills. Less setup. That ease can feel worth it.
The purse-style RYL wins on build feel. The shell feels deliberate. The chain changes carry behavior. Desk use feels natural. Wrist carry also works. Pocket carry feels mixed. That is the trade.
The 25K line feels like the center of the lineup. The screen is large. The dual modes add real change. Regular mode stays calm. Boost adds density. The airflow switch helps fine tune resistance. Flavor choice is the main selling point. The catalog stays huge. That kind of variety fits adults who rotate flavors often.
TN9000 wins on carry comfort. The device stays light. It fits short sessions well. Battery capacity is smaller. That shows up for heavy use. For lighter routines, it stays practical.
RX 50K is the output option. Modes change the experience fast. Super mode produces dense vapor. It also raises warmth. Airflow steps help dial the draw. The flavor set is small in Dew Edition. The code naming can frustrate buyers. For adults who like tuning, it stays fun.
Value depends on the buyer’s habits. If daily carry matters most, TN9000 often makes sense. If screen feedback matters, the 25K line fits. If carry identity matters, RYL stands out. If output control matters, RX 50K fits.
Prices sit in the same general band across the feature models. That pushes the decision toward lifestyle fit. Bulk tolerance matters. Flavor shopping style matters. Mode control appetite matters.
The lineup is worth it for adult users who want convenience. It is also worth it for people who accept disposable waste. For adults who want refillable value, the lineup will feel limited. For adults who want extreme cloud chasing, these devices will feel constrained.
Pro Tips for Raz Purse Vape Vape
- Keep the device upright in a pocket when possible. Mouthpiece wetness drops.
- Wipe the mouthpiece daily with a dry tissue. Condensation stays under control.
- Use higher modes in short bursts. Shell warmth stays lower.
- If sweetness feels heavy, swap to a mint flavor for a reset.
- Avoid leaving the device in a hot car. Battery behavior can become unstable.
- Charge with a basic USB-C source. Avoid unknown high-output chargers.
- If airflow gets noisy, adjust the switch slightly. It can smooth resistance.
- Store the purse-style chain away from zippers. Snags happen fast.
- Stop using the device if it overheats while charging. Replace it.
FAQs
Q1: How long does a Raz Purse Vape device usually last in real use?
A: It depends on session frequency and mode use. High-puff devices last longer in days. Heavy sessions shrink that timeline. I relied on screens to pace usage.
Q2: Does Boost or Super mode change flavor, or just vapor?
A: Flavor changes too. Higher output pushes sweetness harder. It can also make sour notes sharper. Marcus noticed heat and flavor fade sooner in higher modes.
Q3: How often will I need to recharge these devices?
A: TN9000 needs more frequent charging for heavy users. The 25K and 35K models stretch longer between charges. RX 50K mode use changes drain quickly.
Q4: Are Raz devices prone to leaking?
A: In our testing, major leaking stayed rare. Condensation showed up sometimes. Mouthpiece wiping helped. Pocket carry angle also mattered.
Q5: Why does the Raz Purse Vape feel bulkier than expected?
A: The body is shaped like an accessory. It adds thickness. The chain hardware adds presence. Wrist carry feels better than tight pockets.
Q6: How do I pick a nicotine strength in these devices?
A: Treat it as personal tolerance. Start lower if you are sensitive. Avoid treating stronger nicotine as “better.” Dr. Walker’s framing stayed consistent here.
Q7: Do coded flavors on RX 50K matter for buying?
A: They can. You may need seller descriptions to decode intent. If you dislike guessing, TN9000 and the 25K line use clearer names.
Q8: What should I do if the device tastes burnt or harsh?
A: Stop using it. Harsh taste can come from overheating or coil fatigue. Marcus treated that as an end-of-life signal, not a problem to push through.
Q9: What is the main difference between TN9000 and the 25K line?
A: TN9000 is compact. The 25K line adds a larger screen and output modes. Flavor catalogs overlap, yet the feel differs under Boost.
Sources
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Library of Medicine. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507171/
- Breland A, Soule E, Lopez A, et al. Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. National Library of Medicine. 2016. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4947026/
- Goniewicz ML, Knysak J, Gawron M, et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control. National Library of Medicine. 2014. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23467656/
- Farsalinos KE, Spyrou A, Tsimopoulou K, et al. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. National Library of Medicine. 2015. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4469966/
- World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf