Viho’s lineup sits in that high-capacity disposable lane, where screen features and coil marketing are doing most of the talking. I wanted to pressure-test the claims across several Viho models, then see where the experience feels consistent, and where it breaks.
We ran the brand through a single scoring rubric, then kept our notes focused on draw feel, flavor stability, airflow control, battery behavior, and leak or condensation patterns during everyday carry.
Our fixed VapePicks team stays the same. Marcus Reed pushes heavier usage and higher output habits. Jamal Davis lives in pocket-carry reality. Dr. Adrian Walker reviews the language around risk, labeling, and guardrails.
Product Overview
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIHO Turbo 10000 | Dense flavor early, simple draw, strong “daily beater” vibe | No screen, less headroom than newer “20K+” units | Adults who want straightforward draw-activation | Around $18 | 4.0 |
| VIHO Supercharge 20000 | Big reservoir feel, indicator-driven pacing, steadier output | Can feel bulky, sweetness can build | Adults chasing long run time with basic control | Around 24 | 4.2 |
| VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K | Screen helps manage juice and battery, smoother coil behavior | Price creep, heft in pocket | Adults who want “set it and monitor it” | Around 24 | 4.4 |
| VIHO Supercharge 20K Zero Nicotine | Same form factor without nicotine, familiar draw | Niche use-case, flavor fatigue shows faster | Adults who want zero-nic behavior | Around 24 | 3.8 |
| VIHO TRX 50K | Adjustable airflow range, mode concept, big battery feel | More moving parts, size, flavor can over-saturate | Adults who want maximum capacity and control | Around 25 | 4.3 |
| GiMi 30000 by VIHO Turbo | ECO/Boost pacing, display guidance, easy learning curve | Specs vary by listing, not as “premium” as TRX | Adults who want “big puffs” without TRX size | Around $20 | 4.1 |
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept noticing the same Viho pattern. The draw tends to start smooth, then it gets slightly warmer as the coil settles. That warmth reads as “richer” in fruit blends, yet it can push dessert flavors into heavy territory. “It’s tasty, but the sweetness stacks if I chain it,” is the kind of note I wrote more than once, especially when I stopped paying attention to pace.
Marcus came at it like a stress test. He kept looking for heat spikes, coil fade, and the moment flavor turns flat under repeated pulls. Some Viho models held stable longer than expected, particularly the ones marketed with dual coils or mesh. Still, he kept circling back to airflow control and heat management. “If the body starts feeling warm in my palm, I back off and see if the output stays steady,” was his recurring approach.
Jamal treated each device like a pocket tool, not a desk toy. He paid attention to mouthpiece comfort, whether the finish gets slippery, and what happens after it lives in a pocket for hours. He also watched charging-port placement and whether the device feels awkward when walking. “If it annoys me while commuting, I stop carrying it,” was the simple filter that shaped his notes.
Dr. Adrian Walker stayed in the guardrail lane. He flagged nicotine labeling expectations, reminded that subjective throat sensation is not a health measure, and kept the language away from reduced-risk claims. He also pushed for clearer adult-only framing around nicotine dependence and youth protection.
Viho Vape Comparison Chart
| Spec Area | VIHO Turbo 10000 | VIHO Supercharge 20000 | VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K | VIHO Supercharge 20K Zero Nicotine | VIHO TRX 50K | GiMi 30000 by VIHO Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable |
| Nicotine range | Typically 5% | Typically 5% | Typically 5% | 0% | Typically 5% | Typically 5% |
| Activation | Draw | Draw | Draw | Draw | Draw | Draw |
| Battery capacity | 850 mAh | 850 mAh (often listed) | 850 mAh | 850 mAh | 1500 mAh | Not consistently listed |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
| E-liquid capacity | 18 mL | 21 mL | 21 mL | 21 mL | 20 mL | 17 mL |
| Coil type | Dual mesh style | Dual coil / dual mesh style | Dual mesh style | Dual coil style | Dual mesh / dual coil style | Dual coil style |
| Airflow style | Fixed | Mostly fixed | Mostly fixed | Mostly fixed | Adjustable (tight to loose) | Mode-focused, airflow details vary |
| Display | No | Indicator (varies by listing) | Screen | Indicators | Screen | Display |
| Flavor behavior | Punchy early | Stable, sweet-leaning | Most “controlled” | Cleaner feel, less throat texture | Strong, can saturate | Balanced in ECO, punchier in Boost |
| Leak resistance | Basic | Better body sealing feel | Better sealing feel | Similar to Pro body | Larger body, more parts | Similar to Turbo class |
| Ease of use | Very easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Medium | Easy |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We used one scoring rubric for every device. The rubric covers flavor accuracy, flavor intensity drift over time, throat sensation as a subjective draw feel, and vapor density at normal use pace. Airflow smoothness matters, especially under short pulls versus longer pulls. Battery life gets logged against real carry patterns, then checked again during charging behavior.
Leak and condensation control show up in the mouthpiece, then around seams, then in pocket carry. Build quality shows up in button-free draw consistency, port fit, finish wear, and screen durability where present. Ease of use includes learning curve, how clear the device feedback feels, and what maintenance looks like for a disposable. Portability covers size in pocket, comfort in hand, and accidental damage risk.
These observations are usage-based. They do not replace medical advice. They do not measure health impact.
Viho Vapes Our Testing Experience
VIHO Turbo 10000
Honorary title: The Straight-Line Commuter
Our Testing Experience
I treated the Turbo 10000 like a control device. No screen. No modes. That kind of setup forces honesty. I kept it in the rotation during work breaks and short errands, then I watched for the usual disposable failure points. Draw misfires show up first. Condensation shows up next. Output wobble shows up after that.
Marcus pushed longer sessions at home. He didn’t baby the pacing. He wanted to see whether the coil keeps its shape when the pulls stack. His notes stayed focused on heat. When the body warmed, he backed off and checked whether flavor stayed stable on the next return. Jamal did the opposite. He treated it like a pocket tool, then he checked the mouthpiece for moisture and the finish for slip.
The Turbo’s main strength felt simple. The draw stayed predictable. The flavor hit hard early. The trade-off sat in headroom. Once I started chain pulls, the sweetness got heavier, and the vape felt “thicker” in the mouth. “It feels like it’s trying to be richer than it needs to be,” is the note I kept returning to. Dr. Walker’s input stayed narrow here. He pushed clean adult-only framing around nicotine and reminded that throat sensation is not a safety signal.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw on the Turbo 10000 reads as medium-tight. It doesn’t feel airy. It doesn’t feel like a true restricted-DL device either. The first pull usually lands smooth, then the second pull brings more warmth. That warmth changes how flavors land.
Peach Icy leaned candy-sweet, then it turned into a cold finish that sits at the back of the throat. The inhale felt “round,” with a slightly syrupy texture. Banana Icy came off creamy at first, then it drifted toward a taffy note when I kept pulling. The throat feel stayed gentle, yet the sweetness stayed persistent. Blue Razz Icy felt sharper. The inhale had a tart edge, then the exhale got louder on the cooling note. Marcus called it “aggressive in the first second, calmer after that.”
Glazed Donut was the one that exposed coil behavior. Early pulls delivered a sugary bakery note. Later pulls started tasting heavier, almost like the sweetness was sticking to the mouthpiece area. That’s where I started taking smaller pulls, just to keep it from feeling overdone. Cool Mint stayed cleaner. It gave a crisp inhale, a smoother throat feel, then a finish that didn’t turn syrupy over time. Jamal preferred it for commuting. He wrote, “This one doesn’t mess up my mouth between short hits.” Tobacco came across as mild, more “sweet leaf” than dry. It stayed usable, yet it didn’t feel like a true tobacco substitute flavor.
Best draw experience flavors in our notes landed with Cool Mint, then Blue Razz Icy. Those two stayed the most controlled, especially after repeated use.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Predictable draw activation | No display guidance |
| Strong flavor upfront | Sweetness can stack |
| USB-C charging support | Less long-run capacity |
| Pocket-friendly compared to giant units | Dessert profiles can feel heavy |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: around $17.99
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: commonly 5% salt nicotine
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: 850 mAh rechargeable
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, varies by adapter, often under an hour in practice
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual mesh style coil system (listed as dual boost mesh style)
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 18 mL pre-filled
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: fixed, medium-tight
- Flavor Range: wide range, fruit, mint, dessert, tobacco
- Vapor Production: medium to high for a compact disposable
- Leak Resistance Features: basic sealing, mouthpiece condensation still possible
- Build Materials: typical disposable shell with integrated mouthpiece
- Dimensions and Weight: compact compared to screen-heavy models
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: basic charging protection expected on USB-C rechargeables
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors listed on common menus: Peach Icy, Banana Icy, Blue Razz Icy, Cool Mint, Glazed Donut, Tobacco, plus many others
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Punchy early, then sweetness builds under repeated pulls. |
| Throat Hit | 3.9 | Medium texture, smooth on mint, heavier on dessert. |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Dense enough for short pulls, not a cloud rig. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0 | Consistent draw, medium-tight feel supports MTL-style habits. |
| Battery Life | 3.8 | Recharge helps, yet capacity limits long heavy sessions. |
| Leak Resistance | 3.9 | Seams hold, mouthpiece moisture can build in pocket carry. |
| Build Quality | 3.9 | Draw activation stays steady, finish is basic. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | No settings, no learning curve, simple charging. |
| Portability | 4.4 | Easy pocket carry, low snag risk. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Strong simple daily use, fewer “premium” controls. |
VIHO Supercharge 20000
Honorary title: The Long-Run Sweet Spot
Our Testing Experience
Supercharge 20000 sits in the “big tank, long run” lane. I treated it as a device you keep around when you don’t want to think about running out. That framing changes how you notice it. You stop counting puffs. You start noticing whether the flavor stays stable after days of casual use.
Marcus ran it through longer home sessions. He also took it outdoors. Wind and cold tend to change how people pull. He wanted to see whether draw feel stays stable and whether the body warms. Jamal carried it in a pocket for commuting days. That’s the test that exposes bulk annoyance, plus mouthpiece condensation.
The standout with Supercharge 20000 came from pacing. With a larger reservoir and recharge support, the device invites longer stretches of “lazy use.” I found that flavor stayed more stable when I kept pulls shorter. When I got careless, sweetness started stacking again, especially in candy blends. “This one rewards restraint,” is the simplest version of my notes.
Dr. Walker’s comments here stayed tied to labeling and guardrails. He pushed clean language around nicotine addictiveness and adult-only use. He also flagged that “smooth” throat sensation does not equal reduced harm. That note matters more with big-capacity devices, since extended use is easier.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw lands medium. It feels slightly looser than Turbo, at least in the way the inhale fills the mouth. The coil behavior reads as steady. The vapor feels a bit “wetter” on fruit blends, which can feel satisfying, then it can feel too saturated if you chain pulls.
Watermelon Ice tasted clean at first. It came in as bright melon, then it leaned into the cooling note with a crisp finish. Blueberry Ice delivered a darker berry note, then it shifted toward sweetness after repeated pulls. Crisp Apple Berry landed with a sharper inhale. The throat feel stayed gentle, yet the exhale carried a candy-like apple finish that stuck around.
Magic Mango had a thick inhale texture. It felt almost syrupy in the mouth during longer pulls. Marcus wrote “big flavor, but it gets dense fast,” after he ran repeated pulls. Lemon Pie leaned dessert-forward. It brought a crust-like sweetness, then it drifted toward candy lemon over time. I had to keep pulls shorter to avoid it feeling heavy.
Virginia Tobacco stayed mild. It read as sweet and smooth rather than dry or smoky. Jamal tolerated it more than he expected, mostly because it didn’t leave a strong aftertaste during short sessions.
Best draw experience flavors landed with Watermelon Ice, then Crisp Apple Berry. Those two stayed the cleanest across casual use days.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong long-run capacity feel | Bulkier body in pocket |
| Draw stays consistent | Sweetness builds with chain pulls |
| Indicators help pacing on many listings | Flavor can feel “wet” on candy blends |
| Recharge reduces “dead before empty” frustration | Not a high-output DL device |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed around 20s
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: commonly 5% salt nicotine
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: commonly listed around 850 mAh rechargeable
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, varies by adapter
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual coil or dual mesh style system depending on listing
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 21 mL pre-filled
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: typically fixed
- Flavor Range: fruit, mint, candy, dessert, tobacco variants
- Vapor Production: medium-high, steady output emphasis
- Leak Resistance Features: better sealing feel than smaller disposables, still watch mouthpiece moisture
- Build Materials: disposable shell, indicator hardware on many variants
- Dimensions and Weight: larger than 10K class devices
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: basic charging protection expected
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors seen on menus: Watermelon Ice, Blueberry Ice, Crisp Apple Berry, Magic Mango, Lemon Pie, Virginia Tobacco, plus many others
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Holds longer than 10K class, sweetness stacks under heavy pulls. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Smooth texture, slightly “wetter” vapor feel. |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Steady density supports longer casual use. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Comfortable medium draw, consistent activation. |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Rechargeable behavior supports long device life. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Seams hold, mouthpiece moisture still possible in pocket carry. |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Feels more solid than smaller units, fewer misfires in notes. |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Simple daily use, indicators reduce guessing. |
| Portability | 3.7 | Larger pocket footprint, more noticeable carry. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Long-run daily device with manageable trade-offs. |
VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K
Honorary title: The Monitor-It-and-Forget-It Pick
Our Testing Experience
I approached the Supercharge Pro like a “manage the device, not the mood” unit. The screen changes behavior. Instead of guessing whether the battery is falling off, you glance. Instead of waiting for dry hits, you check liquid indication.
Marcus tried to break its stability under repeated pulls. He cared less about the screen. He cared about whether coil behavior stays consistent when the user gets aggressive. Jamal focused on carry. He wanted to see whether the device feels annoying in pocket, and whether the mouthpiece stays clean.
The Pro version felt calmer during longer stretches. The vapor stayed more predictable. Flavor drift still happens, yet the point where it turns “too sweet” arrived later in my notes than it did on Turbo. I also saw fewer moments where the device felt like it was suddenly warmer than expected. “This one doesn’t surprise me,” is the phrase I wrote after a few days of rotation.
Dr. Walker flagged the same guardrail topic. Screen presence can create a false sense of “safety control.” It’s still nicotine. It’s still a consumer device. He pushed neutral language and adult-only framing.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw sits in a comfortable middle. It doesn’t fight you. It doesn’t rush air either. The device feels tuned for repeated small sessions.
Lemon Drop stood out for clarity. The inhale felt sharp and clean, then the throat feel stayed smooth. A slight candy edge showed up later, but it didn’t turn sticky as quickly as dessert blends. Cool Mint stayed crisp. It delivered a cool inhale, then a clean finish that didn’t linger in a bad way. Jamal wrote “easy between errands, no weird aftertaste,” which fits his carry style.
Peach Rings leaned sweet, then it brought a slightly gummy texture on the exhale. Strawberry Colada had a creamy fruit vibe. The inhale read as strawberry-forward, then the exhale leaned tropical. Marcus noted that it stayed stable under repeated pulls, yet he also wrote “it gets warm if I lean on it.” Smooth Tobacco stayed mild. It came off sweet-leaf, then it finished clean. It never turned into an ash-like note, which some users want, yet it also avoided the harshness some tobacco flavors carry.
Sour Skittle was the flavor that tested restraint. It hit bright, then it got heavy if I stacked pulls. I ended up taking shorter drags and spacing them out, which kept it enjoyable.
Best draw experience flavors landed with Lemon Drop, then Cool Mint. Those two stayed controlled and repeatable.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Screen helps manage battery and juice | Higher price than Turbo |
| Smoother long-run coil behavior | Pocket heft is noticeable |
| Strong flavor without immediate drift | Candy flavors can saturate |
| Leak-resistant feel improves carry confidence | Not built for extreme DL output |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: commonly around $23.50
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: commonly 5% salt nicotine
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: 850 mAh rechargeable
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, often under an hour in practice
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual mesh coil style
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 21 mL pre-filled
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: mostly fixed
- Flavor Range: broad, including mint, fruit, candy, tobacco
- Vapor Production: steady medium-high
- Leak Resistance Features: marketed as leak-resistant, tighter body feel in use
- Build Materials: disposable shell with screen window
- Dimensions and Weight: larger than Turbo class
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: typical rechargeable protections expected
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors seen on menus: Lemon Drop, Cool Mint, Peach Rings, Strawberry Colada, Smooth Tobacco, Sour Skittle, plus many others
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Clearer flavor definition, less drift in casual pacing. |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Smooth draw texture, fewer “scratchy” notes in rotation. |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Consistent density without feeling overpowered. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Comfortable medium draw, predictable activation. |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | Rechargeable behavior plus steady output supports long use. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Better carry confidence, less mouthpiece mess in notes. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Screen body feels more solid, fewer misfire moments. |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Screen feedback reduces guessing, still simple operation. |
| Portability | 3.7 | Heft and size reduce “forget it in pocket” comfort. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Best balance of control, consistency, and daily ease. |
VIHO Supercharge 20K Zero Nicotine
Honorary title: The Habit-Shape Device
Our Testing Experience
This device changes the premise. No nicotine. The same hardware style still produces vapor and flavor, yet the “satisfaction” angle shifts into pure draw feel and flavor enjoyment.
I treated it like a behavior device. Short pulls during breaks. Longer pulls while working at a desk. The goal was to see whether the flavor carries the experience on its own, and whether the device becomes boring faster without nicotine’s feedback loop.
Marcus focused on coil stability again. He didn’t care that it was zero nic. He cared about heat, coil fade, and whether flavor stays defined under repeated pulls. Jamal cared about carry. For a zero-nic device, carry comfort matters more, since the user may reach for it more often out of habit.
The key takeaway came fast. Flavor fatigue shows up sooner. When nicotine is out of the picture, the device has to win purely on how the draw feels and how clean the flavor stays. “It’s fine, but I notice the sweetness more,” is the kind of note I wrote after a few days. Dr. Walker’s contribution was clear here. Zero nicotine is not “risk free.” It is still inhaled aerosol. It still needs adult framing and label awareness.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw feels similar to the nicotine versions. The vapor still feels dense. The throat feel changes, though. Without nicotine, the throat texture tends to feel softer, and that can make sweet flavors feel even sweeter.
Cool Mint stayed the cleanest in my notes. The inhale felt crisp. The exhale cleared quickly. The mouth didn’t feel coated. Blue Razz Ice brought bright candy notes, then it leaned into cold finish. It stayed enjoyable, yet it also started feeling repetitive sooner. Sour Apple Ice landed sharp and tart, then it drifted toward candy. I had to space pulls out to keep it from feeling loud.
Magic Mango felt thick on inhale. Without nicotine bite, the mango syrup vibe felt heavier. Lemon Pie again leaned dessert-forward. The crust note showed up early, then the sweetness built over time. Watermelon Ice stayed clean and easy. It didn’t feel as sticky as dessert profiles, and it didn’t leave as much lingering taste between short sessions.
Best draw experience flavors landed with Cool Mint, then Watermelon Ice. Those two stayed the least tiring in repeated use.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Zero nicotine option with familiar hardware | Flavor fatigue shows up sooner |
| Smooth draw feel | Sweet blends can feel heavy |
| Rechargeable long-run behavior | Niche use-case for many users |
| Clean mint profiles perform well | Still a large device for pocket carry |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: commonly around $23.50
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: 0%
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: 850 mAh rechargeable
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual coil style
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 21 mL pre-filled
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: typically fixed
- Flavor Range: limited compared with nicotine lines on many listings
- Vapor Production: medium-high
- Leak Resistance Features: similar sealing feel to Supercharge body
- Build Materials: disposable shell
- Dimensions and Weight: similar to other 20K units
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: rechargeable protections expected
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors seen on menus: Cool Mint, Blue Razz Ice, Sour Apple Ice, Magic Mango, Lemon Pie, Watermelon Ice
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 3.9 | Clean profiles work, sweetness becomes more noticeable over time. |
| Throat Hit | 3.2 | Softer throat texture, less “structure” to the draw feel. |
| Vapor Production | 4.1 | Dense vapor without nicotine bite. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Predictable draw activation, comfortable resistance. |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Recharge supports long device life. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Similar sealing feel, mouthpiece moisture still possible. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Solid disposable build, no special ruggedness. |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Simple operation, no settings to manage. |
| Portability | 3.4 | Large for a habit device, noticeable in pocket. |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Works best for a narrow audience that wants zero nicotine. |
VIHO TRX 50K
Honorary title: The Control-Panel Heavyweight
Our Testing Experience
TRX 50K is where Viho leans hard into “feature disposable.” Modes, airflow control, screen presence, and an oversized capacity pitch. I treated it like a device that tempts overuse, mostly because it removes friction. Big battery. Big tank. Screen reassurance.
I kept it in rotation when I wanted to see how adjustable airflow changes flavor delivery. Tightening airflow often sharpens flavor. Loosening airflow often boosts vapor density. Marcus treated it like a stress platform. He ran longer sessions, switched modes, and watched heat behavior. Jamal treated it like a carry problem. Size and weight can ruin a device fast for him.
The TRX felt powerful. The draw can be tuned. That tuning changes throat texture quickly. In tighter airflow, the inhale feels more concentrated. In looser airflow, the vapor feels fuller, yet it can start tasting “saturated” in candy flavors. “This one has range, but it also has temptation,” is the phrase I wrote after I caught myself taking longer pulls than normal.
Dr. Walker’s input mattered here. More features do not equal safer use. He also flagged that big capacity devices can increase exposure simply through convenience. He pushed neutral language and adult-only framing again.
Draw Experience & Flavors
TRX’s draw changes more than the other Viho units, largely due to airflow control. Tight draw makes the vapor feel sharper and more concentrated. Loose draw brings bigger vapor and a softer feel.
Blue Razz Ice came across bright and loud in tight airflow. The inhale felt tart, then the cold finish hit hard. In loose airflow, it tasted less sharp and more “blue candy.” Sour Skittle was the flavor that pushed saturation. Tight airflow delivered a crisp sour edge. Loose airflow made it feel heavier and sweeter. Marcus wrote “great for short hits, too much if I chain it,” which fits the profile.
Watermelon Ice stayed clean in most settings. It didn’t collapse into syrup as quickly. Menthol landed clean and direct. It also exposed throat texture. Tight airflow made it feel more intense. Loose airflow made it smoother, with less bite. Strawberry Banana leaned creamy and sweet. It felt satisfying, yet it also built that coated-mouth feeling if I didn’t space pulls out.
Glazed Donut was the dessert test again. In boost-like behavior, it tasted rich and sugary, then it turned heavy quickly. I had to shorten pulls and tighten airflow to keep it from feeling like pure sweetness.
Best draw experience flavors landed with Watermelon Ice, then Menthol. Those two stayed the most controllable across airflow settings.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable airflow gives real control | Large body and weight |
| Screen helps manage battery and liquid | Candy flavors can saturate fast |
| Big battery feel supports heavy use patterns | More parts means more to fail |
| Strong flavor delivery in tight draw settings | Not pocket-friendly for many commuters |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: often listed around $24.99
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: commonly 5% salt nicotine
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: 1500 mAh rechargeable
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual mesh coil style on many listings
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 20 mL pre-filled
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: adjustable, ranging from tight to loose
- Flavor Range: broad, with fruit, mint, candy, dessert, tobacco options depending on seller
- Vapor Production: high in looser airflow settings
- Leak Resistance Features: large body, tank visibility on many variants, still monitor mouthpiece moisture
- Build Materials: disposable shell with screen window
- Dimensions and Weight: large for pocket carry
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: rechargeable protections expected
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors seen on menus: Blue Razz Ice, Sour Skittle, Watermelon Ice, Menthol, Strawberry Banana, Glazed Donut, plus many others
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Strong delivery, airflow tuning keeps flavor sharp when used thoughtfully. |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Tight airflow creates more concentrated texture, can feel intense. |
| Vapor Production | 4.6 | Large device behavior supports fuller vapor, especially loose airflow. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Adjustable range changes experience more than other Viho models. |
| Battery Life | 4.6 | Large battery supports heavy use patterns without constant charging. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Body feels solid, more features still mean more potential weak points. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Screen and airflow parts feel decent, yet complexity adds risk. |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Easy basics, more settings require attention. |
| Portability | 3.1 | Size and weight limit pocket comfort. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best for adults who want control and long capacity, not minimal carry. |
GiMi 30000 by VIHO Turbo
Honorary title: The Two-Mode Middle Ground
Our Testing Experience
GiMi 30K reads like a bridge device. Not as huge as TRX in feel, yet it still offers modes and a display. I treated it as the “I want more than a basic disposable” pick without committing to the biggest chassis.
I kept it in ECO for most daily use, then I used Boost in short bursts just to see how the coil reacts. Marcus leaned into Boost more often. He wanted to see whether heat spikes show up. Jamal treated it like a carry tool and checked whether the device becomes annoying in pocket.
The key takeaway came from mode discipline. ECO felt stable and repeatable. Boost felt louder and warmer. If I used Boost too often, sweetness built quickly and the mouth felt coated. “ECO feels like a calmer conversation, Boost feels like a shout,” is the line I wrote after bouncing between them.
Dr. Walker’s role stayed the same. He flagged the same risk language issues and pushed neutral framing around nicotine.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw feels slightly more open than Turbo in ECO. In Boost, the vapor feels denser and warmer, which changes flavor perception immediately.
Strawberry Kiwi landed bright in ECO. The strawberry felt like a soft candy note. Kiwi added a tart edge. In Boost, the kiwi tartness felt stronger, yet the sweetness also felt heavier. Pink Lemonade delivered a sharper inhale, then it finished sweet. It stayed enjoyable in short pulls, then it got loud if I leaned on Boost.
Sour Apple Ice came across crisp in ECO. The tart edge felt clean. In Boost, the sour note felt more aggressive, and the cooling finish lingered longer. Cool Mint stayed the cleanest in both modes. It delivered a simple cool inhale and a clean exhale. Jamal wrote “this is the one I don’t regret in my pocket,” since it didn’t leave a sticky aftertaste.
Tobacco stayed mild. It felt like a sweet leaf profile, not a dry one. Watermelon Ice stayed clean and repeatable, especially in ECO. Boost made it fuller, yet it still avoided the syrupy trap that dessert flavors fall into.
Best draw experience flavors landed with Cool Mint, then Watermelon Ice, especially in ECO mode.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| ECO mode feels stable for daily use | Battery size often not clearly listed |
| Display improves pacing | Boost can over-saturate sweet flavors |
| Easier carry than TRX for many users | Specs vary by seller descriptions |
| Two-mode behavior creates real differences | Not as “premium” as the Pro line |
KEY SPECS & FLAVORS
- Price: around $19.99
- Device Type: disposable
- Nicotine Strength Options: commonly 5% salt nicotine
- Activation Method: draw-activated
- Battery Capacity: Type-C rechargeable battery, mAh not consistently published
- Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C
- Coil Type/Resistance: dual coil style (often listed as 2-in-1 dual coils)
- Tank/Pod Capacity: 17 mL
- Airflow Style and Adjustability: not consistently detailed, draw feel shifts with modes
- Flavor Range: fruit, mint, tobacco variants depending on listing
- Vapor Production: higher in Boost
- Leak Resistance Features: basic sealing, watch mouthpiece moisture in pocket
- Build Materials: disposable shell with display
- Dimensions and Weight: medium, easier than TRX for pocket carry
- Included Accessories: none typical
- Safety Features: rechargeable protections expected
- Shipping: retailer-dependent
- Flavors seen on menus: Cool Mint, Strawberry Kiwi, Pink Lemonade, Sour Apple Ice, Tobacco, Watermelon Ice, plus others
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | ECO keeps flavor cleaner, Boost increases saturation. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Medium texture in ECO, stronger feel in Boost. |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Boost produces fuller vapor, ECO stays controlled. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Comfortable draw, mode choice changes feel noticeably. |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Recharge helps, capacity details are inconsistent across listings. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Basic sealing, acceptable pocket behavior in notes. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Display holds up in rotation, shell feels standard. |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 | Modes are easy to learn, display helps pacing. |
| Portability | 4.0 | Medium carry comfort, less bulky than TRX. |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Strong middle ground for adults who want simple mode control. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIHO Turbo 10000 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| VIHO Supercharge 20000 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| VIHO Supercharge 20K Zero Nicotine | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| VIHO TRX 50K | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| GiMi 30000 by VIHO Turbo | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
The Supercharge Pro 20K looks like the most balanced device by score. TRX 50K behaves like a specialist for airflow control and vapor density. Turbo 10000 wins for simple everyday carry. The zero-nic Supercharge sits in its own lane, with a softer throat texture and a more limited audience.
Best Picks
-
Best Viho Vape for Balanced Daily Use
Winner: VIHO Supercharge Pro 20K. It scored highest overall at 4.4, then it stayed steady in flavor and leak control. The screen feedback reduced guessing during rotation. -
Best Viho Vape for Control Focused Adults
Winner: VIHO TRX 50K. Airflow and vapor production both landed at 4.6. The tuning range changed the experience more than the other models. -
Best Viho Vape for Pocket Carry Simplicity
Winner: VIHO Turbo 10000. Portability hit 4.4, then ease of use reached 4.6. The experience stayed simple and predictable.
How to Choose the Viho Vape
Start with vaping style. A tighter draw tends to fit MTL habits. A looser draw tends to fit restricted-DL habits. Viho’s simpler models lean medium-tight. TRX 50K gives the most room to tune draw feel.
Nicotine tolerance matters in an adult-only context. Higher nicotine options can feel too intense for light users. Zero nicotine changes the entire purpose. It turns the device into flavor and habit shape only.
Battery needs show up fast in real life. Short sessions with commuting can fit a smaller battery. Heavy home use punishes smaller batteries and smaller chassis. TRX 50K scored highest for battery life at 4.6. Turbo 10000 sits lower at 3.8.
Maintenance expectations stay simple across these devices. They are disposables. The difference is how much feedback the device gives you while you use it. If you want less guessing, the Pro line screen matters.
Budget pressure matters too. Turbo 10000 often lands cheaper. Pro and TRX often cost more. Value depends on whether the screen and airflow control change your behavior.
Matching suggestions from our testing notes
A light nicotine user who wants simple operation often fits Turbo 10000. The draw feels predictable. The pocket behavior stays easy.
A heavier user who wants more control often fits TRX 50K. The airflow range changes throat texture quickly. The battery supports longer use.
A flavor-focused adult who still wants stability often fits Supercharge Pro 20K. The flavor score reached 4.5. Coil behavior stayed calmer in rotation.
A commuter who wants fewer annoyances often fits Turbo 10000 or GiMi 30K in ECO. Jamal’s carry notes stayed more positive there.
A user who wants zero nicotine behavior fits Supercharge 20K Zero Nicotine. The experience relies on flavor. The audience is narrower.
Limitations
Viho’s lineup leans disposable and high-capacity. That means the options are not built for rebuildable workflows. People who want coil building will not find it here. Users who want precise watt control will not find it here either.
The flavor style often leans sweet. That pattern showed up across Turbo, Supercharge, Pro, and TRX notes. Candy and dessert profiles can saturate the mouth under repeated pulls. Users who want dry, subtle flavor profiles may get annoyed.
Pocket carry is a real limiter on the biggest devices. TRX 50K scored 3.1 for portability. The Pro version scored 3.7. Jamal’s notes show that size alone can ruin daily use, even when performance is strong.
Spec transparency varies by listing, especially for GiMi 30K. Battery size is not always clearly published. That creates uncertainty for heavy users who plan around capacity.
Even strong-performing devices still carry nicotine-related risk where nicotine is present. These products are for adults only. They are not appropriate for minors, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine.
Is the Viho Vape Lineup Worth It
Viho devices lean into capacity. Tank sizes show it. The Supercharge line often lists 21 mL. TRX 50K often lists 20 mL. Turbo 10000 lists 18 mL. That framing changes day-to-day use.
Recharge support changes behavior too. The smaller disposables can die before liquid runs out. Rechargeable designs remove that friction. Supercharge Pro 20K, Supercharge 20000, and Turbo 10000 are commonly sold with USB-C recharging. That pattern supports longer device life.
Flavor performance stays strong across the lineup. Scores sit between 3.9 and 4.5. The Pro version landed highest for flavor. It also felt more controlled in long rotation. The trade-off shows up in sweetness. Candy and dessert profiles can feel heavy after repeated pulls.
Throat feel differs by device type and airflow control. TRX’s adjustable airflow changes texture quickly. Tight settings feel more concentrated. Loose settings feel fuller. That range can help adults match their style. It can also push overuse, since the device stays convenient and powerful.
Battery life separates the lineup. TRX’s larger battery listing supports heavier use patterns. It scored 4.6. Turbo 10000 scored 3.8. Supercharge and Pro land around 4.1 and 4.2. Those numbers line up with daily behavior. Bigger chassis tends to carry bigger power storage.
Leak and condensation control looks acceptable, not perfect. Scores cluster around 4.0 to 4.2. Mouthpiece moisture still appears in carry notes. It shows up more when the device sits in a pocket and warms.
Build quality feels solid for the category. Scores hover around 4.0 to 4.2. Complexity adds risk. TRX has more features. It still scored well, yet it carries more potential failure points than Turbo.
Value depends on which problem you want solved. Turbo solves simplicity and carry. Pro solves feedback and consistency. TRX solves control and capacity. The lineup looks worth it for adults who want long-run disposables, with rechargeable support. Value drops for users who hate sweet flavor profiles. Value also drops for anyone who needs truly pocket-invisible carry.
Pro Tips for Viho Vape
- Keep pulls shorter when flavors start feeling too sweet.
- Let the device cool between repeated pulls, especially on high-output models.
- Wipe the mouthpiece area often when pocket carry is part of daily routine.
- Use a consistent charger and avoid questionable adapters.
- Charge before the battery is fully drained when screen indicators show low power.
- Tighten airflow when flavor feels washed out, then loosen it when vapor feels too warm.
- Store the device upright when possible to reduce mouthpiece moisture buildup.
- Rotate flavors when palate fatigue shows up, especially with candy profiles.
- Stop using the device if charging creates unusual heat or odor, then dispose of it safely.
FAQs
How long do Viho devices usually last in real use
Longevity depends on pacing and device size. Turbo 10000 tends to feel like a shorter-cycle daily carry. Supercharge and Pro versions are built for longer rotation. TRX 50K is designed for extended use. Heavy users compress lifespan quickly.
Do the screen models change the experience
A screen changes behavior more than flavor. It reduces guessing around battery and e-liquid. That pushes steadier pacing. The Pro line benefited from that in our notes.
How often does coil flavor fade show up
Flavor fade shows up faster on sweet profiles under repeated pulls. Mint and clean fruit flavors held up better. Dessert flavors showed earlier “heavy sweetness” in our notes.
Do these devices leak in pockets
We saw more mouthpiece moisture than true leakage. Pocket warmth and movement increase condensation. Devices with tighter sealing felt better, yet no disposable is immune to moisture buildup.
What nicotine strength is typical for Viho models
Many listings focus on 5% salt nicotine. Zero nicotine exists in the Supercharge 20K variant. Choice depends on adult tolerance and personal preference. This is not dosing advice.
Is TRX 50K harder to use than Turbo 10000
Turbo stays simpler. TRX adds airflow control and mode-style behavior. The learning curve is still light, yet it requires attention to settings.
What is the difference between Supercharge 20000 and Supercharge Pro 20K
The Pro version leans harder into monitoring, with a screen and a more “premium” feel in many listings. The standard Supercharge still targets long-run use. The Pro scored higher overall in our tables.
Should an adult choose zero nicotine Supercharge 20K
That depends on why the person vapes. If nicotine is not desired, the zero-nic device fits that behavior. Flavor fatigue can show up sooner, since flavor carries the entire experience.
Sources
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. 2018. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24952/public-health-consequences-of-e-cigarettes
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarettes and young people. 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/e-cigarettes/youth/index.html
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vaporizers, e-cigarettes, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems. 2024. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/products-ingredients-components/vaporizers-e-cigarettes-and-other-electronic-nicotine-delivery-systems-ends
- World Health Organization. Electronic nicotine delivery systems. Report series and technical summaries. 2023. https://www.who.int/health-topics/electronic-cigarettes
- Hartmann-Boyce J, McRobbie H, Butler AR, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6/full