blu Pods are still one of the cleaner “grab-and-go” options in the closed-pod lane, and they’re built around a small, draw-activated battery. I reviewed the blu Device Kit because the daily experience depends on a few tight variables: pod flavor clarity, draw consistency, and how the device behaves once condensation shows up. Battery behavior also matters on small-capacity devices, especially in short, frequent sessions.
What is the blu Device Kit?
The blu Device Kit is a compact, rechargeable closed-pod vape that runs prefilled blu Pods. It’s draw-activated, charges over Micro-USB, and uses a click-in pod fit that’s meant to keep setup simple. The core risks are the usual ones for nicotine products—dependence risk, overuse from easy access, and irritation if you chain puff when the pod is drying out. It fits adult nicotine users who want a cigarette-like routine without settings, screens, or refills.
Why choose the blu Device Kit?
This setup works best for adult nicotine users who want a straightforward MTL-style draw with minimal fuss, and who prefer flavors that stay in the tobacco/menthol lane rather than candy-heavy profiles. It also fits pocket-carry routines, where short pulls and quick re-pocketing are the norm.
It’s a poor fit for people who want adjustable airflow, restricted-DL vapor volume, or “one device all day” stamina without recharging. It also won’t satisfy flavor-first users who chase layered sweetness, since the pods I tested leaned more direct than complex. Anyone who dislikes cooling effects should also be picky with menthol/ice options, because the cooling can sit on the back of the tongue and flatten subtler notes after repeated pulls.
How We Tested It
We tested the blu Device Kit for 3 days with three adults on the same workflow: I ran daily-carry reliability checks, Marcus pushed heavy-use and chain-puff heat behavior, and Jamal focused on pocket carry and commute handling. Daily use landed around 100–300 puffs total per person, spread across short bursts and a few longer sessions. I tracked draw consistency, flavor accuracy, throat hit feel, condensation/leak risk, and battery behavior across two charge cycles. Pod labels covered multiple nicotine strengths in the lineup we used.
Performance Scores of the Vape
Test window: 3 days, rotating blu pod flavors across normal pocket-carry use and a few chain-puff stress runs.
Daily pattern: short bursts with occasional longer sessions; roughly 100–300 puffs/day per tester.
Scoring: 5-point scale; build, portability, and ease-of-use lean objective, while flavor and throat hit are more subjective.
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 3.8/5 | Clean for menthol and simple tobaccos, but subtle notes fade after repeated pulls. |
| Throat Hit | 3.6/5 | Noticeable with higher-strength pods, yet it stays more “firm” than sharp. |
| Vapor Production | 3.2/5 | MTL-leaning output; it’s not built for dense clouds. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0/5 | Consistent, medium-tight draw; no adjustability, but it doesn’t wander. |
| Battery Life | 3.4/5 | Small battery feels adequate in short bursts; heavy use compresses the day fast. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1/5 | No true leaks in our runs; condensation is the main mess, not liquid dumping. |
| Build Quality | 3.9/5 | Light, pocket-friendly body; pod fit stays stable, with minor wear marks over time. |
| Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Insert pod, draw, and go; almost no learning curve. |
| Portability | 4.6/5 | Slim profile and low weight make it easy to carry and easy to stash. |
| Overall Score | 3.9/5 | A simple closed-pod daily carry that performs best in short, steady routines. |
Our Testing Experience
Our Testing Results
I carried the blu Device Kit through three normal days—desk work, errands, and a couple of longer car rides—using it the way most small pod systems actually get used: short pulls, back into a pocket, then repeat. The device stayed predictable on draw activation, including after it warmed up in a pocket. The pod click-in fit never loosened during the test, and I didn’t get random misfires when I took quick pulls while walking.
Marcus did the stress work: repeated pulls in tight sequence to see whether the device got hot or whether the flavor collapsed into that dry, papery edge. Heat stayed modest, which matched the device’s low-output personality, but condensation showed up faster. The mouthpiece area felt slightly damp after long chains, and the draw felt a touch tighter until we wiped it. Jamal’s commuter routine was the opposite—short hits at crosswalks and in parking lots. In that pattern, condensation was present but manageable, and the device stayed clean in a pocket with a basic wipe-down at night.
Battery behavior tracked the form factor. On light-to-moderate use, it stayed convenient. On heavy use, it turned into a “top it off when you can” device. The Micro-USB charging was functional, and the fast-charge claim felt directionally right in everyday terms, even if real-world time still depends on the power source you plug into.
Draw Experience
I focused on three classic pod profiles that map to how most people actually buy blu Pods: Menthol, Gold Leaf, and Tobacco Ice. Menthol opened crisp and direct, with a cool finish that stayed clean for the first stretch of pulls. Once I crossed deeper into the pod, the cooling started to dominate more, and the mint detail flattened into a simpler “cold” sensation.
Gold Leaf came across as a mild tobacco with a faint dry edge, not sweet syrup. The first few sessions felt balanced, then the flavor leaned more neutral as puff count climbed, which is where the device’s “steady but not vivid” flavor score comes from. Rich tobacco-style pods landed warmer and more familiar, with a firmer nicotine presence when I used a higher-strength option. In long chains, the finish got slightly ashy, which is the moment where backing off for a minute kept the next pulls from tasting thin.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple closed-pod routine with minimal setup and no settings to babysit | No airflow control, so the draw is what it is |
| Draw activation stays reliable in short, frequent “daily carry” pulls | Heavy use compresses battery time quickly on a small-capacity device |
| Menthol and tobacco profiles come through clean, without messy sweetness | Flavor nuance fades with repeated pulls as the pod gets worked |
| Pod fit stays stable; we didn’t see pods backing out in pockets | Condensation builds at the mouthpiece in chain-puff sessions |
| Pocket carry is easy due to slim size and low weight | Micro-USB charging feels dated next to newer USB-C gear |
| No true leaking during our test days, even with pocket carry | Vapor output is limited; DL-style users will find it underpowered |
| Fast “top-off” charging is workable in real use when you plug in often | Pod lineup is the experience; if you don’t like the pod flavors, there’s no tweak to save it |
Key Specs
- Device type: Closed pod system (prefilled pods)
- Activation method: Draw-activated
- Battery capacity: 350mAh
- Charging method: Micro-USB
- Estimated charge time: 20 minutes (listed as “rapid recharge”); real time varies by power source
- Pod format: Prefilled blu Pods; click-in fit
- Pod capacity: 1.5 mL per pod (listed on several pod SKUs)
- Pod pack size: 2 pods per pack (common listing format)
- Nicotine strength: Varies by pod; examples include 2.4% and 3.6% on Rich Tobacco pods, and 2.5% or 4.0% on Tobacco Ice pods
- Coil/atomizer details: Organic cotton wick is listed for some pods; coil resistance: -
- Airflow: Fixed; no external adjustment
- Output/wattage: -
- Dimensions: 4.25" x 0.71" x 0.35"
- Weight: 0.78 oz
- Leak resistance (observed): No leaking in pockets; condensation present after chain use
- Build quality (observed): Stable pod fit; light cosmetic wear from pocket friction
- Ease of use (observed): Insert pod, draw, and go; minimal steps
- Portability (observed): Very pocketable; low snag risk on draw since it self-activates on inhale
blu Device Kit Vs. Alternatives
Pick the blu Device Kit if you want a small, simple pod routine, you prefer tobacco/menthol-forward profiles, and you value predictable draw activation over customization. It also makes sense if you recharge often and treat the device like a short-session tool, not an all-day workhorse.
If you want a tighter mainstream closed-pod ecosystem with broad retail reach, Vuse Alto is the obvious cross-shop. If you want a compact device with a strong “single-purpose” feel and a highly recognizable pod format, JUUL2 is another common alternative in the same general category.
Pro Tips for blu Device Kit
- Keep sessions short when the pod is getting low; long chains are where flavor turns thin.
- Wipe the mouthpiece area once or twice a day; condensation shows up before true leaking does.
- Store the device upright when possible; pocket carry is fine, but overnight storage benefits from being vertical.
- Rotate pods instead of finishing one in a single marathon; it reduces that dull, flattened finish.
- If the draw feels tight, remove the pod and reseat it; the fit is click-based and can sit slightly off if rushed.
- Charge from a steady power source; weak USB ports stretch charge time more than people expect.
- Treat Micro-USB gently; cable angle pressure is what wears ports out.
- If menthol feels “too cold” over time, alternate with a tobacco pod; it resets your palate between sessions.
- Don’t leave the device in a hot car; heat makes condensation and flavor instability worse.
- Replace pods promptly once the finish turns papery; pushing past that point doesn’t recover the flavor.
FAQs
Do blu Pods leak in a pocket?
In our pocket-carry days, I didn’t see liquid dumping or wet pockets. What shows up more often is light condensation around the mouthpiece after repeated pulls.
Does the blu Device Kit have buttons or settings?
No. It’s draw-activated. You inhale, and it self-activates, which keeps daily use simple.
Is the draw ultra-tight MTL?
It’s medium-tight, closer to cigarette-style than airy, but it isn’t the tightest MTL feel on the market. There’s no airflow control to tune it.
How long does a charge last in real use?
On short bursts, it felt practical. Under heavy, frequent use, it needed top-offs. The battery is 350mAh, and the device is meant for that smaller-duty cycle.
About the Author: Chris Miller
