Lost Vape Reviews: Ursa Nano 2, Ursa Baby 3 Pro & More

Lost Vape keeps showing up in two very different places. One is the “carry it every day” pod lane. The other is the heavier mod lane. That split makes the brand hard to judge from one device alone.

I wanted a lineup test that felt like real adult use. Short sessions on the move. Longer sessions at home. Then a few “stress days” that punish batteries and seals.

Our workflow stayed simple. I ran daily carry loops and charging checks. Marcus pushed output and heat behavior. Jamal focused on pocket life and accidental mess.

Product Overview

Testing Team Takeaways

I kept coming back to how “finished” the devices feel in hand. The pods sit cleanly. The mod feels engineered, not just assembled. The downside showed up during long carry weeks. Some parts invite small annoyances, like screen taps or pod visibility. I caught myself thinking, “This is solid, yet it wants attention.”

Marcus treated Lost Vape as a stability test. He chased heat behavior during longer sessions. He also watched output consistency after repeated charges. When a device behaved, he said it plainly: “It stays calm when I lean on it.” When it did not, he flagged it fast: “That warmth builds in the same spot every time.”

Jamal cared about pocket reality. He kept asking whether a device can vanish into daily life. He noticed mouthpiece comfort fast. He also noticed condensation fast. His best compliment sounded boring, which is the point: “I forget it’s there, then it just works.”

Lost Vape Vapes Comparison Chart

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We scored four themes that show up in adult daily use. Flavor accuracy came first. We looked for clean notes, then stable taste after repeated pulls. Throat hit came next. We treated it as a subjective sensation only. Vapor output mattered, yet we judged it through consistency, not cloud size.

Airflow and draw feel got a full set of checks. We used short pulls during commutes. We used longer pulls at home. We watched for turbulence, whistle, and “wet” draw from condensation. Battery life had two parts. First came hours of use. Second came charging behavior and temperature at the port.

Leak control got real attention. Pods can sweat. Tanks can seep. Disposables can flood if airflow gets blocked. We tracked mouthpiece moisture, then checked the device body for residue. Build quality included button feel, seam fit, and how parts age after pocket time. Ease of use covered filling, pod swaps, and day-to-day mess. Portability covered pocket comfort, weight, and accidental activation risk.

All observations are usage-based. They do not replace medical advice.

Lost Vape Vapes Our Testing Experience

Ursa Nano 2: The Quiet Pocket Workhorse

Our testing experience

In my daily loop, Ursa Nano 2 lived in the same pocket as keys. That choice was deliberate. A pod that survives that treatment earns trust. The device stayed compact, and the edges did not chew fabric. The draw stayed consistent across short pulls during breaks.

The first real test came from condensation. A small pod can turn “clean” into “wet” fast. I watched the mouthpiece after every commute block. I also checked the pod bay for shine. Most days stayed dry. On heavier days, a thin film appeared. It wiped off fast, and it did not turn into a leak trail.

Marcus used it as a stress test in a different way. He chain-pulled it harder than typical MTL use. He wanted to see whether warmth builds near the coil zone. He also wanted to see whether flavor collapses when the pod gets hot. He summed it up in one line: “It holds together, but it tells you when you push it.” That meant warmth increased, then taste softened, yet it did not scorch.

Jamal treated it as a “grab and go” tool. He used it on stairs, then in car waits. He kept commenting on how the mouthpiece sits. He also cared about pocket lint. He said, “This mouthpiece doesn’t feel sharp, and that matters.” That small comfort showed up over days.

Draw experience and flavors

For Ursa Nano 2, flavors came from the e-liquid we chose. That matters, since the device does not lock you into prefill options. I ran it with a 20–35 mg nic salt range during the week. I also used a lower strength freebase on slower evenings. The draw stayed on the tighter side with the airflow slider closed. With the slider open, the pull loosened, yet it still felt like restricted MTL.

Strawberry milk showed the pod’s “texture” behavior. On inhale, the sweetness arrived first. Then the dairy note followed. The device kept the finish clean. It did not smear into a burnt sugar taste. Throat feel stayed soft at 25 mg. A sharper hit showed up at 35 mg, which matched expectations.

Peppermint gum tested cooling clarity. The inhale felt crisp, then the mint sat along the tongue. I noticed the cooling note stayed even after several pulls. It did not spike into harshness. Jamal liked it in short sessions. He said, “That one resets my mouth fast.”

Honey tobacco tested whether the coil can hold darker notes. The first pulls tasted nutty. Then a mild woody finish arrived. After a longer chain session, the tobacco note flattened. Marcus called it out: “The darker flavors get tired sooner.” The pod still avoided a harsh edge, yet the richness thinned.

Mango citrus tested brightness. The inhale felt sharp and juicy. The exhale carried a peel note. With airflow more open, the citrus felt louder. With airflow tighter, mango dominated. I liked the tighter setting. It made the blend feel more focused.

Vanilla custard tested sweetness control. Some pods turn custard into pure sugar. This one held a cooked vanilla note. The finish stayed smooth. After several days, the custard note stayed stable. That stability helped the score.

Iced blueberry tested aftertaste. The blueberry stayed candy-like, which is normal. The cooling note stayed moderate. I did not get the “perfume” edge that some small pods add. Jamal said, “This doesn’t hang around in my mouth in a bad way.”

Watermelon splash tested thin flavors. Watermelon can feel watery and hollow. Here, it stayed light, yet it did not vanish. The throat feel stayed gentle. It became my “work break” liquid since it never felt heavy.

Best draw experience, from our set, came from peppermint gum for clean pulls. Mango citrus took second place for a more vivid inhale.

Pros and cons

Key specs and flavors

• Price range: $20\text{–}$35
• Device type: pod system
• Nicotine strength options: depends on e-liquid
• Activation: draw activated
• Battery capacity: 900 mAh internal
• Charging port: USB-C, 5V input listed
• Estimated charge time: about 45–70 minutes in our use
• Power range: 9–22 W
• Coil style: pod cartridges, mesh options common in market listings
• Pod capacity: official listing shows 5.5 mL standard / 2 mL TPD
• Airflow: slider, tighter to looser draw
• Vapor production: low to medium
• Leak resistance features: magnetic pod fit, sealed cartridge style
• Build materials: zinc alloy and plastic listed
• Safety features: protection set listed
• Shipping: varies by retailer
• Flavors tested (e-liquid): strawberry milk, peppermint gum, honey tobacco, mango citrus, vanilla custard, iced blueberry, watermelon splash

Review score

Ursa Baby 3 Pro: The Touchscreen Pod That Wants to Do More

Our testing experience

Ursa Baby 3 Pro changed how we used the brand’s pod side. The touchscreen makes settings feel immediate. That convenience can also become a habit. I caught myself adjusting power more often than needed. In daily use, the real win came from flexibility. The device handled short MTL breaks. It also handled longer, warmer pulls when I wanted more saturation.

I focused on two routines. First routine used tighter airflow with nic salt. Second routine used more open airflow with lower nic. The device stayed stable through both, and the power delivery felt predictable. When I pushed higher output, warmth rose at the body. It never crossed into “uncomfortable,” yet it became noticeable during repeated long pulls.

Marcus approached it as a heat and stability check. He wanted to see whether a small pod can sustain higher output without tasting stressed. He said, “It’s small, but it doesn’t panic.” That matched our notes. The flavor held longer than the Ursa Nano 2 under harder pulls, which supported the higher score.

Jamal treated it as a pocket test. The device is shaped like a small block. That shape can print in thinner pants. He also watched accidental screen taps. He said, “I don’t want my pocket changing my settings.” In our carry, it stayed fine most days. A few times, the screen woke in a bag. That behavior lowered ease-of-use a little.

Draw experience and flavors

Flavor testing used e-liquid again, since this is a refillable pod system. We treated it as a “range” device, and we chose liquids that reveal different problems. I ran a 20 mg salt for commute blocks. I ran a 6 mg freebase for slower evening pulls. The device let me tune draw feel. With airflow tighter, the pull stayed smooth and quiet. With airflow open, it leaned into restricted lung hits.

Raspberry lemonade tested top-note sharpness. On inhale, raspberry landed first. Lemon followed with a tart edge. At lower power, the blend stayed bright. At higher power, the lemon turned more “peel-like.” Marcus preferred the lower setting. He said, “The tart stays cleaner.”

Creamy banana tested sweetness thickness. At moderate power, banana felt soft. The finish stayed creamy, not sticky. When I pushed higher power, sweetness thickened. The throat feel also became heavier. Jamal liked it during short pulls. He said, “That one feels like a dessert, fast.”

Classic tobacco tested whether the device can hold a dry note. Some pods make tobacco taste like caramel. Here, it stayed more neutral. The inhale felt woody. The exhale carried a faint nutty note. After repeated pulls, the flavor stayed steady. That stability helped the flavor score.

Iced grape tested cooling balance. At higher power, cooling became sharper. At lower power, grape candy stayed forward. I preferred lower power and tighter airflow. The draw felt cleaner. The aftertaste also faded faster.

Peach tea tested layered notes. The inhale gave peach. Then a black tea note arrived. The device kept the tea from turning bitter. A slight dryness showed on the finish, which felt intentional. Marcus said, “That tea note survives the heat.”

Menthol spearmint tested airflow noise and cooling strength. With airflow open, the draw stayed smooth. Cooling felt strong, but it did not sting. With airflow tight, the mint felt denser. Jamal called it a “car ride liquid.” He said, “It clears the taste from whatever I ate.”

Salted caramel tested whether the pod turns sweet flavors into burnt edges. At moderate power, caramel stayed warm and rounded. At higher power, the finish got darker. It still avoided a burnt note. I stopped short of that line, since it felt close.

Best draw experience, from our set, came from peach tea at moderate power. Raspberry lemonade came next with tighter airflow.

Pros and cons

Key specs and flavors

• Price range: $30\text{–}$50
• Device type: pod system
• Nicotine strength options: depends on e-liquid
• Activation: device supports modern pod behavior, varies by setup
• Battery capacity: 1300 mAh listing
• Output: up to 35 W
• Pod capacity: commonly listed 2.5 mL
• Charging: USB-C
• Coil style: pod cartridge ecosystem (Ursa cartridge line noted by brand)
• Airflow: adjustable style
• Screen: touch interface noted by brand materials
• Safety features: standard protections expected in regulated devices
• Shipping: varies by retailer
• Flavors tested (e-liquid): raspberry lemonade, creamy banana, classic tobacco, iced grape, peach tea, menthol spearmint, salted caramel

Review score

Centaurus M200: The Stability Brick for Real DL Sessions

Our testing experience

Centaurus M200 is not subtle. It carries weight. It also carries intention. The on off toggle became the feature I used most. It made travel and bag carry feel safer, since accidental firing stops being a worry. Lost Vape lists dual 18650 power and a 5–200 W range, which matches how the device feels built.

I ran it with two tanks over the test window. One tank leaned into flavor at moderate wattage. Another leaned into airflow and denser output. The mod behaved consistently across both, and the screen remained readable. I watched for button delay. I watched for output sag when batteries dropped. The device stayed steady.

Marcus treated the Centaurus as his primary lane. He ran longer sessions. He pushed higher watt settings. He also tracked heat at the frame and near the 510. His key line came after a hard evening: “It stays stable when I stop babying it.” Heat rose, yet it stayed distributed. No single hotspot dominated.

Jamal used it less, which made sense. He still carried it for a day. He focused on pocket reality. The weight made it a bag device, not a pocket device. He said, “This isn’t rolling around in my pocket.” That was not praise. It was a fact.

Draw experience and flavors

For the Centaurus M200, flavors depend on the tank and e-liquid. We treated it like a “platform” and chose liquids that behave differently at power. I ran a 3 mg freebase range. Marcus ran a similar range, yet with longer sessions. The draw feel came mostly from tank airflow, but the mod influenced consistency.

Blueberry muffin tested warmth and sweetness. At moderate power, the inhale tasted like baked berry. The exhale carried a soft pastry note. When Marcus pushed higher, the muffin note thickened, and sweetness increased. He stopped short of overcooking it. He said, “It gets heavy fast if you chase more heat.”

Lemon tart tested brightness. At lower power, lemon felt crisp. At higher power, lemon turned sharper. The pastry note also browned. I preferred mid power, where lemon stayed clean and the finish stayed smooth.

Watermelon ice tested cooling under higher vapor volume. Cooling can get aggressive when output rises. Here, it stayed controlled at moderate power. At higher power, the cooling hit felt harder in the throat. That sensation stayed subjective, and we treated it that way.

Espresso cream tested darker notes. At moderate power, espresso stayed roasted, not burnt. Cream softened the finish. At higher power, the espresso became more bitter. Marcus liked that edge. He said, “That bitterness feels real.” I did not chase it, since it can turn harsh.

Classic menthol tested draw smoothness. With higher airflow, the menthol felt clean and direct. The vapor felt dense. The throat sensation sharpened. At lower power, menthol stayed smoother. Jamal tried this setup at a lower setting. He said, “This feels like a clean inhale.”

Peach mango tested fruit blending. Higher power boosted sweetness. It also boosted aroma. The mix stayed balanced at mid power. At high power, mango dominated and peach faded. That difference helped us judge “control,” not just intensity.

Cinnamon custard tested coil stress. Cinnamon can be harsh and can gunk coils. We kept the wattage moderate. The custard note stayed present. Cinnamon stayed warm, not scratchy. The mod delivered consistent power, which helped keep the flavor predictable.

Best draw experience came from lemon tart at mid power with a flavor tank. Espresso cream came next for adults who like darker profiles.

Pros and cons

Key specs and flavors

• Price range: $45\text{–}$70
• Device type: box mod
• Nicotine strength options: depends on e-liquid
• Activation: button fired
• Battery: dual 18650 external, not included
• Power range: 5–200 W
• Charging: USB-C support listed
• Materials: aluminum alloy and stainless steel elements listed
• Notable feature: on off toggle switch described by brand
• Atomizer fit: 510 ecosystem, tank dependent
• Safety features: protection set listed by brand
• Shipping: varies by retailer
• Flavors tested (e-liquid): blueberry muffin, lemon tart, watermelon ice, espresso cream, classic menthol, peach mango, cinnamon custard

Review score

Orion Bar 10000: The Low-Work Backup That Stays Consistent

Our testing experience

Orion Bar 10000 landed in our test as a convenience baseline. It is a rechargeable disposable style. Listings commonly note around 20 mL e-liquid and a 650 mAh battery, plus adjustable airflow and a mesh coil. I treated it as an “adult backup” device. It lived in my car console, then rotated into pocket use.

The first thing I noticed was draw reliability. Some disposables miss-fire or feel inconsistent. This one stayed steady across short pulls. The airflow adjustment mattered more than I expected. Tight airflow made the device feel closer to a classic MTL draw. More open airflow reduced the “pinch” feeling at the start of a pull.

Marcus used it as a throat-hit and heat check. He does not love disposables, yet he will use them to expose weaknesses. He chain-pulled it harder than most people would. He said, “It doesn’t overheat fast, but it tops out.” That meant vapor output stayed capped. Flavor also stayed sweet-forward, not nuanced.

Jamal liked it for obvious reasons. No filling. No bottle. No pod swap. He cared about pocket lint, mouthpiece comfort, and whether the device leaks into a pocket. He said, “This is the kind I can throw in my pocket and forget.” That comment supported the portability score.

Draw experience and flavors

With Orion Bar 10000, flavors are part of the product identity. That makes draw experience tightly linked to the flavor formula. The inhale texture felt smooth, and the mesh coil kept output consistent. Throat sensation depended heavily on nicotine level, and many listings show 5% nic salt. We treated all throat notes as subjective.

Blue razz ice led with bright candy on inhale. Cooling hit fast, then settled. The finish left a lingering blue candy note. On tighter airflow, the sweetness felt denser. On open airflow, the cooling note felt louder.

Watermelon ice felt lighter. Inhale gave a clean melon note. Cooling stayed moderate. The draw felt smooth, and the aftertaste faded faster than blue razz. Jamal preferred it for short sessions. He said, “This doesn’t stick in my mouth.”

Mango peach blended two fruit notes without turning perfumey. Mango arrived first. Peach followed as a softer finish. The throat sensation felt smoother than the icy profiles. On open airflow, the mango note became more aromatic.

Strawberry banana leaned creamy and sweet. Strawberry came first, then banana rounded the finish. The device kept it consistent over repeated pulls. After longer sessions, sweetness fatigue set in. Marcus called it out: “That one gets heavy if you live on it.”

Cool mint focused on clean menthol. Inhale felt crisp. Exhale stayed fresh. The cooling stayed controlled rather than sharp. This flavor also hid sweetness better than fruit profiles, which made it easier to use across a day.

Pineapple coconut leaned tropical and sweet. Pineapple gave a tang up front. Coconut filled the finish. On tighter airflow, the coconut felt richer. On open airflow, pineapple dominated. I preferred tighter airflow here.

Grape ice felt like purple candy with cooling. The inhale stayed bold. The finish left a grape ring on the tongue. It tasted consistent, yet it lacked nuance.

Best draw experience came from cool mint for clean pulls. Mango peach came next for a smoother fruit blend.

Pros and cons

Key specs and flavors

• Price range: $12\text{–}$25
• Device type: disposable
• Nicotine strength options: often listed as 5% in many shops
• Activation: draw activated
• Battery capacity: 650 mAh rechargeable
• E-liquid capacity: often listed around 20 mL
• Coil type: mesh
• Airflow: adjustable
• Charging: USB-C noted by multiple listings
• Display: some listings note screen features
• Shipping: varies by retailer, often age-gated
• Flavors tested: blue razz ice, watermelon ice, mango peach, strawberry banana, cool mint, pineapple coconut, grape ice

Review score

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Centaurus M200 looks most balanced for power users. It also leads vapor output. Ursa Baby 3 Pro plays the “flex pod” role well. Ursa Nano 2 stays the portability specialist. Orion Bar 10000 wins ease of use, then trades away nuance.

Best Picks

• Best lost vape reviews pick for daily MTL carry: Ursa Nano 2
  The pocket feel stays effortless. Draw consistency stayed steady in real breaks. The airflow score matched that daily control.

• Best lost vape reviews pick for adjustable pod users: Ursa Baby 3 Pro
  The flavor score stayed high under longer pulls. The device let us tune feel without jumping to a full mod.

• Best lost vape reviews pick for high-output stability: Centaurus M200
  Marcus pushed it hard, then saw stable behavior. Build quality and vapor scores explained the win.

How to Choose the Lost Vape Vape?

Start with vaping style. Tight MTL points toward Ursa Nano 2. A pod that can loosen up points toward Ursa Baby 3 Pro. DL tank use points toward Centaurus M200. Disposable convenience points toward Orion Bar 10000.

Nicotine tolerance matters in how throat sensation feels. Refillable pods let you choose lower strengths. Disposables often lock you into higher strengths, depending on region and shop listings.

Battery needs split the options. A small internal battery fits lighter days. A larger internal battery fits moderate days. Dual external cells fit long sessions and higher watts.

Maintenance preferences decide a lot. If filling annoys you, a disposable will feel easier. If you hate waste, refillable pods feel cleaner in habit.

Budget also splits. A disposable looks cheap up front. A mod setup costs more once you add batteries and a tank.

Adult user matching, based on our use:

• Light nicotine adult who wants simple daily carry: Ursa Nano 2. It stays clean, then stays small.
• Adult commuter who wants more control in a pod: Ursa Baby 3 Pro. Power tuning helped match different days.
• Adult former heavy smoker who prefers stronger output rigs: Centaurus M200 with a good tank. Marcus stayed comfortable with its stability.
• Adult who wants a low-effort backup for travel: Orion Bar 10000. Jamal’s pocket tests showed why it works.

Limitations

Lost Vape’s lineup, as we tested it, does not cover every adult use case well.

A pod user who hates screens will not love Ursa Baby 3 Pro. The touch interface invites interaction. That “tech” feel can become friction. A person who wants pure simplicity will prefer Ursa Nano 2, or even a disposable.

A heavy all-day user can outrun small internal batteries. Ursa Nano 2 handled light to moderate use. Under heavy use, charging breaks became part of the day. That pattern is not a defect. It is a product class trade.

The Centaurus M200 solves battery life for many adults, yet it brings weight. It also brings responsibility. External cells demand careful handling. Pocket carry becomes annoying fast. Bag carry becomes the default.

Orion Bar 10000 avoids filling and coil swaps. That convenience comes with waste. It also comes with limited tuning. Sweet flavor fatigue also showed up after longer use blocks. Adults who want nuanced flavor will prefer refillables.

None of these options erase nicotine-related risk. Adult-only framing remains the baseline. People who do not use nicotine should not start here.

Is the Lost Vape Vape Lineup Worth It?

Lost Vape builds devices that feel intentional. The materials usually feel solid. The seams stay tight. That matters in daily carry.

Ursa Nano 2 offers a calm routine. Short pulls stay consistent. The airflow slider gives control. Battery size limits heavy use days. A light to moderate adult user fits best.

Ursa Baby 3 Pro targets adults who like tuning. The pod can shift feel across days. Flavor held up under longer pulls. The screen adds friction for some users. The pocket shape can print in clothing.

Centaurus M200 is worth it for DL adults. Power delivery stayed stable in our use. The toggle switch reduced accidental firing worry. The device feels heavy. External batteries raise total cost.

Orion Bar 10000 earns value through convenience. Draw activation stayed reliable. Airflow adjustment helped. Flavor stayed consistent across sessions. Nuance stayed limited. The waste footprint stays real.

Prices track with the category. Pods sit in a reasonable range. Mods cost more after accessories. Disposables look cheap at checkout. Over time, that math changes.

For Marcus, value came from stability. Centaurus M200 matched his sessions. Heat stayed controlled. Output stayed predictable.

For Jamal, value came from portability. Ursa Nano 2 fit the pocket. Orion Bar 10000 fit the backup role. He avoided devices that demanded attention.

For my use, the best value came from matching device to day. Nano 2 handled commute life. Baby 3 Pro handled “longer breaks” days. Centaurus handled evenings at home.

Value drops when the device fights your routine. A heavy mod in a tight pocket will annoy you. A small pod for heavy use will frustrate you. A disposable for flavor nuance will disappoint you.

Pro Tips for Lost Vape Vape

• Keep pods upright in a pocket during long walks. Condensation stays lower.
• Wipe the mouthpiece area after a long chain session. Moisture builds fast.
• Charge with a stable power source. Avoid unknown gas-station chargers.
• Tighten airflow before tossing a device in a bag. It reduces messy draw behavior.
• For refillables, stop filling before the top edge. Overfill invites seepage.
• Let a new pod sit after filling. Five minutes helps coil saturation.
• For mods, use matched batteries. Replace pairs together when they age.
• Turn the mod off before travel. Toggle switches make that easy.
• Rotate flavors during the day. Sweet fatigue can dull taste perception.

FAQs

What is the real lifespan of a Lost Vape pod device?
In our use, the body held up fine over weeks. The real wear part is the pod. Pods degrade from heat cycles and sweet liquids. Ursa Nano 2 stayed consistent when we swapped pods on time.

How often did you replace pods during testing?
We replaced pods when flavor dulled or draw got “wet.” With sweeter liquids, that happened sooner. With cleaner fruit or mint profiles, pods lasted longer. Power settings also changed that timeline.

How long does the Ursa Nano 2 battery last in real use?
Light adult use can reach most of a day. Moderate use often needed a recharge. Heavy use needed a midday charge break. The 900 mAh spec fits that pattern.

Does the Ursa Baby 3 Pro leak more because it runs higher power?
We did not see a major leak pattern. Condensation appeared when we chain-pulled. Fill habits mattered more than wattage. Overfilling made things worse.

Is the Centaurus M200 safe to charge by USB-C?
The device lists USB-C support. Many experienced users still prefer external chargers for battery care. External cells demand careful handling either way.

Why did Orion Bar 10000 feel harsh at times?
Most listings show high nicotine strength. That can intensify throat sensation. Airflow tuning helped. Shorter pulls helped.

Do Lost Vape devices work better for MTL or DL?
The pods fit MTL better in daily use. The mod fits DL with the right tank. Your tank choice shapes draw feel on the mod more than the mod itself.

What is the best choice for an adult who hates maintenance?
Orion Bar 10000 wins for zero setup. Ursa Nano 2 sits behind it. You still fill it, yet the routine stays simple.

Sources

• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Academies Press. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507171/
• World Health Organization. Electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes). 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WPR-2024-DHP-001
• National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. CDC. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538680/
• Gordon T, Karey E, Rebuli ME, et al. E-Cigarette Toxicology. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9386787/
• Eshraghian EA, Al-Delaimy WK. A review of constituents identified in e-cigarette liquids and aerosols. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7873740/