Quick Take: The Blueberry Ice Vape (2026)
Blueberry Ice is popular with adult vapers who want a fruit top note plus a cold finish, but it’s easy for devices to push it into candy syrup or sharp menthol. I wanted to see which devices keep the blueberry readable when the cooling stacks up. I also watched for sweetness creep, aroma realism, and the kind of aftertaste that hangs around between short sessions.
We ran the same workflow across all five: flavor accuracy, consistency across puffs, airflow and draw behavior, throat hit as a subjective sensation, heat stability, leak or condensation risk, battery life and charging behavior, and mouthpiece comfort.
The most complete package here was the Geek Bar Pulse X, mainly for flavor consistency and airflow control, and it stayed stable during longer sessions. The trade-off is size, plus it can build some condensation when you chain it. Lost Mary OS5000 is the calmer pick for commuting, while Vuse ePod 2 is the cleanest option for a tight, low-fuss draw.
Top Picks
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geek Bar Pulse X (Blueberry Ice) | Tunable airflow; strong flavor consistency; two modes with a clear screen | Larger in pocket; condensation needs wiping in long sessions | Flavor-first users who still want control | $15.99 | 4.5 |
| RAZ TN9000 (Blueberry Ice) | Adjustable airflow; clear display; reliable day-to-day draw | Cooling can feel sharp if you over-pull; finish is a bit “icy sweet” | People who like to fine-tune draw resistance | $24.99 | 4.3 |
| Lost Mary OS5000 (Blueberry Ice) | Easy carry; predictable MTL-style draw; low learning curve | Less airflow range; cooling is fixed | Commuters and short-session users | $12.99 | 4.3 |
| Flum Pebble X (Blue Icy) | No charging routine; steady draw; simple “use it and toss it” behavior | No recharge; fewer adjustments | Adults who want a true disposable feel | $19.99 | 4.3 |
| Vuse ePod 2+ with Blueberry Ice pods | Very consistent pods; tight MTL draw; low mess | Smaller battery; lower vapor output | Discreet, pocketable daily carry | $17.95 | 4.2 |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geek Bar Pulse X (Blueberry Ice) | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| RAZ TN9000 (Blueberry Ice) | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Lost Mary OS5000 (Blueberry Ice) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Flum Pebble X (Blue Icy) | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.7 |
| Vuse ePod 2+ with Blueberry Ice pods | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
How to Choose the Blueberry Ice Vape?
Start with draw style. If you prefer a tighter MTL pull and lower vapor, a closed pod system like Vuse ePod 2+ fits that rhythm; it’s also the cleanest choice in pockets. If you like looser airflow or bigger vapor, stick with disposables that offer airflow control.
Match cooling tolerance to session length. People who chain vape tend to feel “ice fatigue” faster, so airflow control matters; Pulse X and RAZ TN9000 let you tame the cold edge by opening draw or shortening pulls. If you want a steady, predictable profile for short breaks, Lost Mary OS5000 stays consistent without tuning. If you hate charging routines and still want a blueberry-ice profile, Flum Pebble X behaves like a true disposable.
Quick matching from this lineup: heavy sessions and flavor control, Geek Bar Pulse X; adjustable draw without jumping to a larger device, RAZ TN9000; commuting and pocket carry, Lost Mary OS5000; no-cable routine, Flum Pebble X; tight MTL with minimal mess, Vuse ePod 2+.
Blueberry Ice Vape: Our Testing Experience
Geek Bar Pulse X 25K
Why We Picked It
I carried it for 7 days and logged steady commute use plus longer evening sessions; it got three full recharges before the flavor started to thin out. Marcus ran two heavy nights back-to-back and watched for heat spikes during longer pulls, then noted the output stayed stable when he switched modes. Jamal used it as a daily pocket carry and flagged that it can collect mouthpiece condensation if you chain it, but it didn’t turn into a leaker.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The blueberry reads darker and “jammy” on the first pull, then the cooling lands late, closer to the back of the tongue. When I tightened airflow, the ice felt cleaner and less windy, with a clearer berry center. Marcus got denser vapor in longer pulls, and the cooling felt more forceful there, while Jamal’s short hits kept the aftertaste crisp instead of syrupy. Throat hit stayed noticeable, not harsh.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong blueberry clarity; airflow gives real control; two modes help match session style | Bigger body in pocket; condensation shows up in long sessions; cooling can feel intense in extended pulls |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.8 | Blueberry stays distinct even after repeated sessions; cooling doesn’t fully cover the fruit. |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Noticeable hit with a clean finish; feels sharper when airflow is tight. |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Dense output on longer pulls; stays consistent across the charge cycle. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Adjustable airflow makes the flavor and cooling feel tunable instead of fixed. |
| Battery Life | 4.6 | Recharge cadence stayed predictable across a full week of mixed use. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | No true leaks in our run; condensation needs occasional wiping near the mouthpiece. |
| Build Quality | 4.5 | Screen and body held up to pocket carry without rattles or loose parts. |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Settings are readable and quick to adjust once you learn the icons. |
| Portability | 4.1 | Comfortable in-hand, but the footprint is still larger than simpler disposables. |
| Overall | 4.5 | Best balance of flavor consistency, control, and stable output in this lineup. |
RAZ TN9000
Why We Picked It
I used it for 6 days and treated it like a “set-and-forget” carry, checking whether the airflow control actually mattered in real life; I recharged it twice. Marcus pushed longer sessions outdoors and focused on heat management, then reported it stayed comfortable as long as he didn’t run tight airflow with long pulls. Jamal used it in short, frequent hits during errands and liked that the draw feel stays consistent even when the device gets tossed in a bag.
Draw Experience & Flavors
Blueberry comes through as sweet and bright, with the ice hitting earlier than on the Pulse X. When I opened airflow a notch, the cooling felt less sharp and the berry tasted rounder. Marcus described the exhale as “icy sweet” during heavy sessions, and he backed off by shortening pulls. Jamal liked the quick reset between hits; the aftertaste faded faster than the richer devices, which helped for all-day use.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable airflow with a clear effect; easy-to-read display; reliable draw activation | Cooling can feel sharp if you over-pull; flavor leans sweet; less “natural berry” than top pick |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Sweet blueberry is consistent, though it reads more candy than fresh fruit. |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Firm hit on tighter airflow; smoother when opened up. |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Solid output for a daily carry device; doesn’t drop off abruptly. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Airflow slider meaningfully changes restriction and cooling feel. |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Needed regular charging under heavy use; still predictable day to day. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Stayed clean in pockets; minor condensation but no mess. |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Screen and shell handled bag carry without flex or squeaks. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | Straightforward controls; screen helps prevent “dead device” guessing. |
| Portability | 4.4 | Pocket-friendly shape with enough grip to avoid slips. |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best for users who want adjustable draw without jumping to a larger device. |
Lost Mary OS5000
Why We Picked It
I ran it for 8 days as a commute staple and focused on whether it stayed consistent without fiddling; it took two recharges in my routine. Marcus treated it as a secondary device during heavier nights and watched for the moment the coil taste shifts, then noted it stayed steady when he kept pulls short. Jamal used it in short bursts while walking and liked that it never demanded attention, even after being pocketed all day.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This is the “calm” Blueberry Ice. The blueberry tastes softer and less syrupy, with cooling that sits under the fruit instead of taking over. I noticed the flavor stays predictable across quick hits, and that helped keep the profile from feeling overly sweet. Marcus said long pulls flatten the berry and make the ice louder, so he treated it like a short-hit device. Jamal liked the smooth mouthfeel and the clean finish between sessions.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very easy daily carry; consistent short-hit flavor; predictable draw | Less airflow range; cooling is fixed; vapor output is moderate rather than big |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Softer blueberry stays readable; cooling supports instead of masking. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Smooth, steady sensation; less “snap” than higher-output picks. |
| Vapor Production | 4.1 | Enough density for MTL-style use; not built for cloudier pulls. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Tight, consistent draw; no tuning beyond pull style. |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Two recharges fit an 8-day commute-heavy run without surprises. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Pocket carry stayed clean; light condensation is manageable. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Shell and mouthpiece stayed solid through daily abuse. |
| Ease of Use | 4.8 | No settings, no learning curve; it behaves the same every time. |
| Portability | 4.7 | One of the easiest carries here, especially for quick sessions. |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best “simple and predictable” option when you want blueberry plus cooling without tuning. |
Flum Pebble X 6000 (Blue Icy)
Why We Picked It
I used it for 6 days straight to see how a true disposable behaves when you remove the charging routine; once it slowed down, it was done. Marcus ran it during a weekend block of heavier use and flagged that it stayed comfortable since there’s no power mode to tempt longer, hotter pulls. Jamal treated it like a “throw it in the pocket and forget it” piece and liked that nothing about it changed after being carried loose with keys.
Draw Experience & Flavors
Blueberry is clean and straightforward, and the menthol-like cooling is obvious but not scratchy in short pulls. I got the best balance by keeping pulls short, letting the berry land first, then letting the ice finish the exhale. Marcus said long pulls make the cooling feel louder than the fruit, which is typical for this simpler profile. Jamal liked the quick reset; aftertaste cleared fast, which helped for frequent, on-the-move hits.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| No charging routine; consistent draw; simple daily behavior | No recharge or adjustments; cooling can dominate if you chain it; fewer “fine-tune” options |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Clear blueberry with a cold finish; less layered than higher-end screens-and-modes devices. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Steady sensation; sharpness rises if you over-pull. |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Solid output for a true disposable; stays consistent until end-of-life decline. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Fixed draw that suits short sessions; no tuning beyond pull length. |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | “No recharge” design removes cable dependence; it ran reliably through the week. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Stayed clean in pockets; anti-leak design helped with daily carry. |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Lightweight body holds up, though it’s still a disposable shell. |
| Ease of Use | 4.7 | No settings and no cable; it’s as close to frictionless as this category gets. |
| Portability | 4.5 | Very easy carry; works well for errands and short breaks. |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best for adults who want a blueberry-ice profile without adding charging or settings to the day. |
Vuse ePod 2+ with Blueberry Ice pods
Why We Picked It
I used the device for 10 days and rotated pods the way most closed-pod users do, tracking whether it stayed clean in pockets and whether the draw stayed consistent; I charged it daily. Marcus tested it as a low-output baseline between higher-intensity sessions and checked whether the pods ever tasted “burnt,” then noted the flavor stayed steady as long as he didn’t take long pulls. Jamal carried it in a pocket during commuting and gym-bag time and liked that it resisted leaks better than disposables.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The blueberry tastes more restrained here, closer to a clean berry note than a sweet candy blend. Cooling is present, but it’s controlled and doesn’t whip the whole mouth. I noticed the tighter MTL draw makes the flavor feel focused, with less lingering sweetness. Marcus said it won’t satisfy if you want big vapor, yet it stays consistent across many short hits. Jamal liked the low mess factor and the predictable finish between errands.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very consistent pods; tight MTL draw; strong leak resistance; easy pocket carry | Smaller battery; lower vapor output; less “punch” than 5% disposables |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.0 | Clean blueberry with controlled cooling; less intense than big disposables. |
| Throat Hit | 3.8 | Smoother, lighter sensation tied to pod strength and MTL delivery. |
| Vapor Production | 3.6 | Lower output is expected; it’s built for discreet, cigarette-like pulls. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Tight, consistent restriction that suits short, frequent use. |
| Battery Life | 3.7 | Daily charging fit normal use; small battery limits long sessions. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.6 | Closed pod design stayed the cleanest in pockets and bags. |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Device body and pod fit stayed solid with repeated swaps. |
| Ease of Use | 4.8 | Pod swap is fast; no setup beyond charging and inserting a pod. |
| Portability | 4.8 | One of the easiest carries here, especially for discreet daily use. |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best closed-pod option when you want blueberry ice flavor with minimal mess. |
Compare Specs of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Best For | Device Type | Nicotine Strength | Activation | Battery Capacity | Charging | Coil/Heating | Airflow Style | Screen | Capacity | Approx Puffs | Flavor Performance | Throat-Hit Smoothness | Vapor Production | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geek Bar Pulse X (Blueberry Ice) | 4.5 | Balanced “do-it-all” with control | Disposable | 5% | Draw | 820 mAh | USB-C | Dual mesh coil | Adjustable | Yes | 18 mL | 25K / 15K modes | Rich blueberry, strong cooling | Medium-firm | High | Strong with recharging | Good, watch condensation | Strong | High |
| RAZ TN9000 (Blueberry Ice) | 4.3 | Adjustable draw in a simpler body | Disposable | 5% (0% exists) | Draw | 650 mAh | USB-C | Mesh coil | Adjustable | Yes | 12 mL | 9000 | Sweet blueberry, earlier ice | Medium | Medium-high | Medium | Medium-high | Good | High |
| Lost Mary OS5000 (Blueberry Ice) | 4.3 | Predictable pocket carry | Disposable | 5% | Draw | 650 mAh | USB-C | Mesh coil | Fixed | No | 10 mL | 5000 | Soft blueberry, steady ice | Smooth-medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Good | Very high |
| Flum Pebble X (Blue Icy) | 4.3 | True disposable, no charging routine | Disposable | 5% | Draw | 2400 mAh | N/A | Mesh coil | Fixed | No | 14 mL | 6000 | Clean blueberry with menthol finish | Smooth-medium | Medium | Strong by design | Medium-high | Good | Very high |
| Vuse ePod 2+ + Blueberry Ice pods | 4.2 | Tight MTL, low mess | Pod system (closed) | 18 mg/mL (varies) | Draw (button lock) | 350 mAh | Magnetic USB charger | Ceramic heating system | Fixed (tight MTL) | No | 1.9 mL per pod | - | Clean, restrained blueberry | Smooth | Low-medium | Lower | Highest | Good | Very high |
Pro Tips for Blueberry Ice Vape
- Wipe the mouthpiece area during long sessions; condensation shows up faster with colder flavors.
- If cooling starts to feel sharp, shorten pulls first before you change devices.
- Open airflow slightly when the “ice” feels too loud; tighter airflow often makes cooling hit harder.
- Keep the device upright in a pocket or bag when possible; it reduces pooled condensation at the mouthpiece.
- For rechargeable disposables, avoid charging right after a long chain session; let the body cool down first.
- Rotate flavors during the day if Blueberry Ice starts to taste flat; palate fatigue is common with menthol finishes.
- If a device has modes, use the calmer mode for commuting and the higher mode only for brief, deliberate sessions.
- Store pods and disposables away from heat in a car; heat shifts sweetness and can thin the cooling.
- Replace pods early if flavor turns muted; closed pods usually stay consistent until they don’t.
FAQs
Does a blueberry ice vape always taste like menthol?
Not always. In our tests, Vuse felt controlled and tight, while Flum and RAZ pushed a more obvious menthol-style finish during longer pulls.
Which one stays consistent in short, frequent hits?
Lost Mary OS5000 stayed the most predictable for Jamal’s quick sessions, with a clean finish between hits.
Which one is best for longer sessions?
Pulse X held flavor and output better when Marcus ran heavier evenings, especially when airflow wasn’t set too tight.
Why do cold flavors cause more mouthpiece moisture?
Longer pulls plus cooler vapor often mean more condensation; we saw it most on higher-output devices, and wiping fixed it.
Which one is the lowest fuss daily carry?
Vuse ePod 2+ was the cleanest in pockets due to the pod system, while Lost Mary was the easiest disposable to live with.
About the Author: Chris Miller
