Quick Take: The Polar Ice Vape (2026)
Polar Ice sounds straightforward, yet brands interpret it in very different ways. Some go for clean menthol, while others add a sweet mint-candy edge. I wanted to see which devices keep the cold note crisp without sliding into bitter “ice” aftertaste. Sweetness level, cooling intensity, mint clarity, and finish dryness usually decide whether this flavor stays enjoyable all day.
For this round, we scored flavor accuracy, consistency across puffs, airflow and draw behavior, throat hit as a subjective sensation, heat stability in longer sessions, leak or condensation risk, and charging behavior. I rotated each device through commute pulls and longer desk sessions, then Marcus stress-tested them with heavier chains for heat and stability. Jamal carried them in pockets and bags to see what actually happens to mouthpieces and airflow when you’re moving.

The Raz TN9000 in Polar Ice took Best Overall for this category. It stayed steady from the first pull to the later part of the tank, and the adjustable airflow made the cold bite easier to tune. The trade-off is a firm cooling edge, plus some condensation that needs a quick wipe. People who want an even longer-session, higher-output option can look at Mr Fog Nova.
Top Picks
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) | Tunable airflow; clear screen; steady ice profile | Cooling stays assertive; occasional mouthpiece condensation | Most adult users who want balance | $15.99 | 4.6 |
| Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) | Two power modes; strong output; big tank | Bigger carry; Turbo mode eats liquid faster | Stronger pulls and longer evening sessions | $19.99 | 4.4 |
| Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) | Huge puff range; screen; modes for pacing | Bulky; easy to overdo the cold hit in Turbo | Heavy users who value battery and runtime | $24.99 | 4.4 |
| Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) | Good value; HD display; consistent cooling | Draw feel is less tunable; flavor is simpler | Adults who want a cold, no-fuss daily beater | $12.49 | 4.3 |
| Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic | Best flavor control; strong build; pocket friendly | Requires refilling; coil/pod upkeep | Adults who want a refillable Polar Ice alternative | 11.99 | 4.5 |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 |
How to Choose the Polar Ice Vape?

Start with how cold you actually want it. If you like a clean menthol edge with control, pick a device with adjustable airflow and a steady, repeatable draw; Raz TN9000 fits that lane. If you chain vape or take longer sessions, prioritize heat behavior and battery runway; Mr Fog Nova and Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo held up better under heavier pacing.
Match nicotine to tolerance. Most disposables here are sold as 50mg, which can feel sharp in a strong ice profile. If you want flexibility, the refillable route matters: XROS 4 Mini plus a Polar Ice salt nic lets you choose strength and swap pods when the flavor dulls.
Quick matching:
- Simple grab-and-go commuter: Raz TN9000 or Fume Pro 30K
- Former heavy smoker who wants strong punch: Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo or Mr Fog Nova
- Flavor-first adult who hates “flat ice”: XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic
- Pocket carry priority: Raz TN9000 or XROS 4 Mini
Polar Ice Vape: Our Testing Experience
Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It
I carried the TN9000 for 7 days and treated it like a normal daily disposable, not a desk-only test. My log averaged about 160–220 pulls a day, with most of them happening during short breaks. Marcus pushed longer chains to see if the cold note turned harsh when the device warmed up. Jamal kept it in a jeans pocket and a gym bag to see how the mouthpiece and airflow held up. The adjustable airflow and the clear battery/liquid screen were the two features we leaned on most.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The Polar Ice profile here reads as a clean mint-menthol core with a firm cooling layer that shows up early in the draw. On tighter airflow, the flavor gets denser and the finish feels drier, like a crisp mint lozenge. Open it up and the cooling spreads wider, while the mint note thins slightly. In longer sessions, Marcus noted the flavor stayed “same-note” rather than turning sugary, which helped it feel consistent instead of cloying.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable airflow helps tune the bite | Cooling stays strong even on lighter pulls |
| Screen makes battery/liquid checks fast | Mouthpiece can collect condensation with frequent use |
| Stable flavor across shorter and longer sessions | If you prefer sweet ice, it can feel too “clean” |
| Rechargeable, mid-size daily carry | 50mg options can feel sharp for some users |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.8 | Crisp menthol-mint stays clear without turning syrupy late in use |
| Throat Hit | 4.6 | Firm “cold bite” on inhale; intensity tracks airflow settings |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Solid output for a daily disposable; not a cloud-first device |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Adjustable airflow changes both density and cooling feel |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | 650mAh class behavior felt steady across normal daily carry |
| Leak Resistance | 4.4 | No true leaking in our use; condensation needs occasional wiping |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Felt sturdy in pocket carry; screen stayed readable |
| Ease of Use | 4.7 | Simple draw behavior plus clear indicators reduce guesswork |
| Portability | 4.6 | Easy pocket fit compared with oversized “30K+” bodies |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | Best total balance for Polar Ice daily use |
Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic

Why We Picked It
A refillable pod setup shows what Polar Ice tastes like when you control the liquid and swap pods instead of finishing a fixed tank. I ran the XROS 4 Mini for 10 days and refilled the pod as needed, keeping the same Polar Ice salt nic the whole time. Marcus focused on whether the pod flavor fell off after heavier pacing. Jamal cared about pocket carry, mouthpiece comfort, and whether the pod seeped when it bounced around in a bag. The kit uses a 1000mAh battery and adjustable airflow, which makes it a practical disposable alternative.
Draw Experience & Flavors
This setup delivered the cleanest “defined mint” note in the group, mostly because the flavor didn’t have to fight a huge airflow tunnel. The cooling came through as a smooth chill, then tightened into a crisp finish when the airflow was set more restrictive. With longer chains, Marcus noticed the draw stayed consistent until the pod was near empty, then the cold note started to feel sharper. Jamal liked that it didn’t blast cold air on every tiny pull, which made short sessions easier to manage.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong flavor control through liquid choice and pod swaps | Requires refilling and basic upkeep |
| Adjustable airflow helps manage cooling intensity | Flavor depends on keeping pods fresh and primed |
| Solid pocket carry; durable feel | Not for cloud-chasing expectations |
| Nicotine strength flexibility via bottled options | Refill routine adds friction versus disposables |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.8 | Clean, well-defined mint-cold profile with less “generic ice” taste |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Depends on chosen strength; cold edge is clear but controllable |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Pod-level output; satisfying for MTL-style pulls, not big clouds |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Airflow slider meaningfully shifts tightness and cooling feel |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | 1000mAh class carry handled full-day use in our routine |
| Leak Resistance | 4.5 | No messy leaking in our carry; careful pod seating mattered most |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Felt rigid and well-finished; held up to bag and pocket wear |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 | Simple to vape, but refills and pod changes add steps |
| Portability | 4.8 | Light, small, and easy to live with compared with big disposables |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | Best option when you want Polar Ice control without a bulky device |
Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It
This pick is for adults who like a Polar Ice vape that can shift from steady pulls to bigger, louder hits. I ran it for 8 days and alternated between the two power modes during evening sessions, then kept it in the lower-output mode for daytime use. Marcus focused on heat and whether Turbo mode caused the cold note to turn harsh. Jamal tracked pocket carry and how often the mouthpiece needed cleaning. On paper, it pairs a 16ml tank with two wattage modes and a screen, which is exactly the kind of setup that can make Polar Ice feel either smooth or aggressive.
Draw Experience & Flavors
In the lower mode, Polar Ice landed as a steady, clean menthol with a medium sweetness that doesn’t stick to the tongue. Flip into Turbo and the cooling sharpens, with a faster “cold rush” that hits the throat earlier in the draw. Marcus described it as “cold first, mint second” in Turbo, especially on longer chains. Jamal noticed the flavor stayed enjoyable, yet the mouthpiece needed a wipe more often when we used the higher output for extended sessions.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Two modes let you choose steady use or stronger hits | Turbo mode can feel too sharp for ice-sensitive users |
| Screen helps manage pacing and carry | Bigger body than mid-range disposables |
| Strong vapor output on demand | Condensation cleanup is more frequent in heavy sessions |
| Large capacity supports longer ownership | Not as pocket-friendly as smaller daily drivers |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6 | Clean mint-cold profile; stays readable across the tank |
| Throat Hit | 4.5 | Turbo adds a sharper cold bite; Smooth mode feels more even |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Turbo mode delivers the most “hit” sensation in this list |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Draw is consistent, but less tunable than airflow-focused devices |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Rechargeable behavior felt normal; bigger output needs more charging |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | No leaking; mouthpiece moisture rises with heavier mode use |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Solid feel; screen stayed legible through daily handling |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | Simple mode switching; screen supports pacing decisions |
| Portability | 4.2 | Carryable, but you feel the size compared with TN9000 |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Best choice when you want Polar Ice with a real output toggle |
Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It
This one targets the adult user who doesn’t want to think about running out mid-day. I used it for 9 days, including a weekend where it stayed in hand for long stretches. Marcus used it for heavy chains to see if heat built up across Eco/Boost/Turbo. Jamal carried it in a coat pocket and a backpack to judge comfort and bulk. The listing calls out ~36,000 puffs, 20ml of e-liquid, a 0.4ohm mesh coil, a TFT screen, and a 900mAh rechargeable battery, which makes it a runtime-first device by design.
Draw Experience & Flavors
Polar Ice here leans colder and more “icy air” than sweet mint. In Eco, the chill feels smoother and the mint note reads clearer. In Boost and Turbo, the cooling ramps quickly and can crowd out the mint detail, which Marcus flagged after long chains. Jamal’s feedback was simple: the flavor stayed consistent, but the device shape made it less forgettable in a pocket. The screen made pacing easier, since you can check liquid and battery without guessing.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Big capacity and battery reduce “run out” anxiety | Bulkier carry; not subtle in a pocket |
| Modes help pace heat and cooling strength | Turbo can overwhelm the mint detail |
| Screen is useful in daily use | Higher output encourages faster consumption |
| Strong vapor when you want it | Not the most comfortable option for tight pants carry |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Cold-forward profile stays stable; mint detail drops in Turbo |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Strong chill effect; can feel sharp in longer chains |
| Vapor Production | 4.8 | High output when pushed; especially noticeable outside |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Consistent draw; modes change the feel more than airflow tweaks |
| Battery Life | 4.8 | 900mAh class runtime showed up clearly in day-to-day use |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | No leaking; mouthpiece moisture rises with heavy mode use |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Felt robust; screen held up to constant handling |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Modes add choices; screen helps but still adds complexity |
| Portability | 3.9 | You notice the size; better in a bag than in a front pocket |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Best fit when long runtime matters more than compact carry |
Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It
This is the “keep it simple” Polar Ice vape in the group, with pricing that stays relatively low while still offering a screen and dual mesh coil. I used it for 6 days and leaned on it as a work-break device. Marcus ran repeated longer pulls to watch for heat spikes and flavor drop. Jamal pocket-carried it and checked whether the mouthpiece stayed comfortable during short, frequent sessions. The listing calls out 22ml of e-liquid, 30,000 puffs, a 0.8ohm dual mesh coil, an HD display, and a 750mAh rechargeable battery with USB-C.
Draw Experience & Flavors
Polar Ice here is direct: cold mint, minimal sweetness, quick finish. It doesn’t layer extra candy notes, which kept it from getting sticky late in the day. The draw feel is consistent, although it doesn’t give as much tuning as an airflow-focused device. Marcus noted that long chains kept the vapor thick, but the cold edge became the dominant note and flattened the mint nuance. Jamal liked the simple behavior: short pulls still tasted the same, with no “weird” transition between sessions.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong price-to-performance value | Less airflow tuning than top picks |
| HD display helps track usage | Flavor is simpler, less nuanced |
| Dual mesh coil supports consistent output | Cooling can feel one-note in long chains |
| Easy, predictable daily use | Not the best pocket feel compared with smaller bodies |
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Clean, simple cold mint; less depth than the leaders |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Firm cold edge that shows up fast, especially on deeper pulls |
| Vapor Production | 4.6 | Thick output for the price; holds up in outdoor use |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Consistent, but not as tunable as devices with airflow focus |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | 750mAh class use felt dependable across the workday |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | No leaks; mouthpiece moisture is manageable with wiping |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Solid enough; finish shows wear faster than premium bodies |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | Straightforward behavior; display reduces guesswork |
| Portability | 4.1 | Carryable, though not as pocket-friendly as slim devices |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best value when you want cold consistency without paying extra |
Compare Specs of These Vapes
| Spec | Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) | Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) | Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) | Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) | Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Best For | Balanced daily Polar Ice | Output toggle sessions | Runtime and battery | Value daily cold mint | Refillable control |
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Refillable pod system |
| Approx. puffs | 9000 | 15000 (Smooth) / 7500 (Turbo) | ~36000 | 30000 | - |
| E-liquid capacity | 12ml | 16ml | 20ml | 22ml | Pod: 3ml; Bottle: 30ml |
| Nicotine strength | 50mg | 5% / 50mg | 50mg | 50mg | 20mg / 35mg / 55mg options |
| Activation method | Draw-activated | - | - | - | Draw-activated |
| Battery capacity | 650mAh | 600mAh | 900mAh | 750mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB Type-C | USB-C | Type-C | USB-C |
| Coil | - | Dual mesh | 0.4ohm mesh coil | 0.8ohm dual mesh coil | Included pod listed as 0.4Ω on store |
| Modes | - | Smooth / Turbo (11W / 22W) | Eco / Boost / Turbo | - | - |
| Screen/indicator | LED screen | Display screen | 1.0" TFT screen | HD display | Battery light indicator (varies) |
| Airflow style | Adjustable airflow | - | - | - | Adjustable airflow |
Pro Tips for Polar Ice Vape

- Start with shorter pulls when you open a fresh Polar Ice vape; the cooling can feel sharper at the start of a device.
- If the ice note turns “dry,” wipe the mouthpiece and take two slower pulls instead of rapid back-to-back hits.
- Keep the device upright during carry when possible; it reduces how much moisture ends up at the mouthpiece.
- For screen devices, use the battery and liquid indicators to pace longer sessions instead of pushing the last bit hard.
- Avoid long chains in the highest output modes if you’re sensitive to harsh cold; the cooling edge stacks quickly.
- Use a consistent charger and cable; erratic charging habits often show up as inconsistent daily runtime.
- For refillables, let the pod sit after filling so the first pulls don’t taste sharp or under-saturated.
- When Polar Ice starts tasting muted, swap pods (refillables) or slow your draw; both changes tend to restore clarity.
- Keep Polar Ice away from heat in a car or bag; the profile can shift toward sweetness when the liquid warms.
FAQs
-
What does a Polar Ice vape taste like?
A Polar Ice vape usually tastes like mint-menthol with a strong cooling layer. The balance varies: some feel clean and dry, others feel sweeter and more candy-like. -
Is Polar Ice the same as menthol?
Not always. Menthol can be the main note, while “ice” can also mean extra cooling that changes the throat feel and the finish. -
Why does Polar Ice sometimes feel harsher later?
Long chains and higher-output modes can push the cooling edge forward. Mouthpiece moisture can also change how sharp the inhale feels. -
How can the ice feel less intense without changing devices?
Use tighter airflow when available and take slower pulls. Shorter sessions also keep the cooling from stacking into a harsher finish. -
Disposable or refillable for Polar Ice?
Disposables win on convenience. Refillables win on control, since you can pick nicotine strength and refresh flavor by changing pods.
About the Author: Chris Miller