Polar Ice Vape: 5 Best Devices Reviewed (2026)

Quick Take: The Polar Ice Vape (2026)

Polar Ice sounds straightforward, yet brands interpret it in very different ways. Some go for clean menthol, while others add a sweet mint-candy edge. I wanted to see which devices keep the cold note crisp without sliding into bitter “ice” aftertaste. Sweetness level, cooling intensity, mint clarity, and finish dryness usually decide whether this flavor stays enjoyable all day.

For this round, we scored flavor accuracy, consistency across puffs, airflow and draw behavior, throat hit as a subjective sensation, heat stability in longer sessions, leak or condensation risk, and charging behavior. I rotated each device through commute pulls and longer desk sessions, then Marcus stress-tested them with heavier chains for heat and stability. Jamal carried them in pockets and bags to see what actually happens to mouthpieces and airflow when you’re moving.

Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice)

The Raz TN9000 in Polar Ice took Best Overall for this category. It stayed steady from the first pull to the later part of the tank, and the adjustable airflow made the cold bite easier to tune. The trade-off is a firm cooling edge, plus some condensation that needs a quick wipe. People who want an even longer-session, higher-output option can look at Mr Fog Nova.

Top Picks

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) Tunable airflow; clear screen; steady ice profile Cooling stays assertive; occasional mouthpiece condensation Most adult users who want balance $15.99 4.6
Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) Two power modes; strong output; big tank Bigger carry; Turbo mode eats liquid faster Stronger pulls and longer evening sessions $19.99 4.4
Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) Huge puff range; screen; modes for pacing Bulky; easy to overdo the cold hit in Turbo Heavy users who value battery and runtime $24.99 4.4
Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) Good value; HD display; consistent cooling Draw feel is less tunable; flavor is simpler Adults who want a cold, no-fuss daily beater $12.49 4.3
Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic Best flavor control; strong build; pocket friendly Requires refilling; coil/pod upkeep Adults who want a refillable Polar Ice alternative 22.90+11.99 4.5

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality/Durability Ease of Use Portability
Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) 4.6 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.6
Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic 4.5 4.8 4.3 4.0 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.8
Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.2
Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.2 4.4 4.3 3.9
Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 4.2 4.5 4.1 4.2 4.6 4.1

How to Choose the Polar Ice Vape?

Raz TN9000

Start with how cold you actually want it. If you like a clean menthol edge with control, pick a device with adjustable airflow and a steady, repeatable draw; Raz TN9000 fits that lane. If you chain vape or take longer sessions, prioritize heat behavior and battery runway; Mr Fog Nova and Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo held up better under heavier pacing.

Match nicotine to tolerance. Most disposables here are sold as 50mg, which can feel sharp in a strong ice profile. If you want flexibility, the refillable route matters: XROS 4 Mini plus a Polar Ice salt nic lets you choose strength and swap pods when the flavor dulls.

Quick matching:

  • Simple grab-and-go commuter: Raz TN9000 or Fume Pro 30K
  • Former heavy smoker who wants strong punch: Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo or Mr Fog Nova
  • Flavor-first adult who hates “flat ice”: XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic
  • Pocket carry priority: Raz TN9000 or XROS 4 Mini

Polar Ice Vape: Our Testing Experience

Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice)

Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It

I carried the TN9000 for 7 days and treated it like a normal daily disposable, not a desk-only test. My log averaged about 160–220 pulls a day, with most of them happening during short breaks. Marcus pushed longer chains to see if the cold note turned harsh when the device warmed up. Jamal kept it in a jeans pocket and a gym bag to see how the mouthpiece and airflow held up. The adjustable airflow and the clear battery/liquid screen were the two features we leaned on most.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The Polar Ice profile here reads as a clean mint-menthol core with a firm cooling layer that shows up early in the draw. On tighter airflow, the flavor gets denser and the finish feels drier, like a crisp mint lozenge. Open it up and the cooling spreads wider, while the mint note thins slightly. In longer sessions, Marcus noted the flavor stayed “same-note” rather than turning sugary, which helped it feel consistent instead of cloying.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Adjustable airflow helps tune the bite Cooling stays strong even on lighter pulls
Screen makes battery/liquid checks fast Mouthpiece can collect condensation with frequent use
Stable flavor across shorter and longer sessions If you prefer sweet ice, it can feel too “clean”
Rechargeable, mid-size daily carry 50mg options can feel sharp for some users

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.8 Crisp menthol-mint stays clear without turning syrupy late in use
Throat Hit 4.6 Firm “cold bite” on inhale; intensity tracks airflow settings
Vapor Production 4.4 Solid output for a daily disposable; not a cloud-first device
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Adjustable airflow changes both density and cooling feel
Battery Life 4.3 650mAh class behavior felt steady across normal daily carry
Leak Resistance 4.4 No true leaking in our use; condensation needs occasional wiping
Build Quality 4.6 Felt sturdy in pocket carry; screen stayed readable
Ease of Use 4.7 Simple draw behavior plus clear indicators reduce guesswork
Portability 4.6 Easy pocket fit compared with oversized “30K+” bodies
Overall Score 4.6 Best total balance for Polar Ice daily use

Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic

Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic

Why We Picked It

A refillable pod setup shows what Polar Ice tastes like when you control the liquid and swap pods instead of finishing a fixed tank. I ran the XROS 4 Mini for 10 days and refilled the pod as needed, keeping the same Polar Ice salt nic the whole time. Marcus focused on whether the pod flavor fell off after heavier pacing. Jamal cared about pocket carry, mouthpiece comfort, and whether the pod seeped when it bounced around in a bag. The kit uses a 1000mAh battery and adjustable airflow, which makes it a practical disposable alternative.

Draw Experience & Flavors

This setup delivered the cleanest “defined mint” note in the group, mostly because the flavor didn’t have to fight a huge airflow tunnel. The cooling came through as a smooth chill, then tightened into a crisp finish when the airflow was set more restrictive. With longer chains, Marcus noticed the draw stayed consistent until the pod was near empty, then the cold note started to feel sharper. Jamal liked that it didn’t blast cold air on every tiny pull, which made short sessions easier to manage.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Strong flavor control through liquid choice and pod swaps Requires refilling and basic upkeep
Adjustable airflow helps manage cooling intensity Flavor depends on keeping pods fresh and primed
Solid pocket carry; durable feel Not for cloud-chasing expectations
Nicotine strength flexibility via bottled options Refill routine adds friction versus disposables

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.8 Clean, well-defined mint-cold profile with less “generic ice” taste
Throat Hit 4.3 Depends on chosen strength; cold edge is clear but controllable
Vapor Production 4.0 Pod-level output; satisfying for MTL-style pulls, not big clouds
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Airflow slider meaningfully shifts tightness and cooling feel
Battery Life 4.4 1000mAh class carry handled full-day use in our routine
Leak Resistance 4.5 No messy leaking in our carry; careful pod seating mattered most
Build Quality 4.6 Felt rigid and well-finished; held up to bag and pocket wear
Ease of Use 4.2 Simple to vape, but refills and pod changes add steps
Portability 4.8 Light, small, and easy to live with compared with big disposables
Overall Score 4.5 Best option when you want Polar Ice control without a bulky device

Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice)

Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Blue Razz Ice)

Why We Picked It

This pick is for adults who like a Polar Ice vape that can shift from steady pulls to bigger, louder hits. I ran it for 8 days and alternated between the two power modes during evening sessions, then kept it in the lower-output mode for daytime use. Marcus focused on heat and whether Turbo mode caused the cold note to turn harsh. Jamal tracked pocket carry and how often the mouthpiece needed cleaning. On paper, it pairs a 16ml tank with two wattage modes and a screen, which is exactly the kind of setup that can make Polar Ice feel either smooth or aggressive.

Draw Experience & Flavors

In the lower mode, Polar Ice landed as a steady, clean menthol with a medium sweetness that doesn’t stick to the tongue. Flip into Turbo and the cooling sharpens, with a faster “cold rush” that hits the throat earlier in the draw. Marcus described it as “cold first, mint second” in Turbo, especially on longer chains. Jamal noticed the flavor stayed enjoyable, yet the mouthpiece needed a wipe more often when we used the higher output for extended sessions.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Two modes let you choose steady use or stronger hits Turbo mode can feel too sharp for ice-sensitive users
Screen helps manage pacing and carry Bigger body than mid-range disposables
Strong vapor output on demand Condensation cleanup is more frequent in heavy sessions
Large capacity supports longer ownership Not as pocket-friendly as smaller daily drivers

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.6 Clean mint-cold profile; stays readable across the tank
Throat Hit 4.5 Turbo adds a sharper cold bite; Smooth mode feels more even
Vapor Production 4.7 Turbo mode delivers the most “hit” sensation in this list
Airflow/Draw 4.3 Draw is consistent, but less tunable than airflow-focused devices
Battery Life 4.1 Rechargeable behavior felt normal; bigger output needs more charging
Leak Resistance 4.3 No leaking; mouthpiece moisture rises with heavier mode use
Build Quality 4.4 Solid feel; screen stayed legible through daily handling
Ease of Use 4.6 Simple mode switching; screen supports pacing decisions
Portability 4.2 Carryable, but you feel the size compared with TN9000
Overall Score 4.4 Best choice when you want Polar Ice with a real output toggle

Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice)

Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It

This one targets the adult user who doesn’t want to think about running out mid-day. I used it for 9 days, including a weekend where it stayed in hand for long stretches. Marcus used it for heavy chains to see if heat built up across Eco/Boost/Turbo. Jamal carried it in a coat pocket and a backpack to judge comfort and bulk. The listing calls out ~36,000 puffs, 20ml of e-liquid, a 0.4ohm mesh coil, a TFT screen, and a 900mAh rechargeable battery, which makes it a runtime-first device by design.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Polar Ice here leans colder and more “icy air” than sweet mint. In Eco, the chill feels smoother and the mint note reads clearer. In Boost and Turbo, the cooling ramps quickly and can crowd out the mint detail, which Marcus flagged after long chains. Jamal’s feedback was simple: the flavor stayed consistent, but the device shape made it less forgettable in a pocket. The screen made pacing easier, since you can check liquid and battery without guessing.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Big capacity and battery reduce “run out” anxiety Bulkier carry; not subtle in a pocket
Modes help pace heat and cooling strength Turbo can overwhelm the mint detail
Screen is useful in daily use Higher output encourages faster consumption
Strong vapor when you want it Not the most comfortable option for tight pants carry

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 Cold-forward profile stays stable; mint detail drops in Turbo
Throat Hit 4.4 Strong chill effect; can feel sharp in longer chains
Vapor Production 4.8 High output when pushed; especially noticeable outside
Airflow/Draw 4.4 Consistent draw; modes change the feel more than airflow tweaks
Battery Life 4.8 900mAh class runtime showed up clearly in day-to-day use
Leak Resistance 4.2 No leaking; mouthpiece moisture rises with heavy mode use
Build Quality 4.4 Felt robust; screen held up to constant handling
Ease of Use 4.3 Modes add choices; screen helps but still adds complexity
Portability 3.9 You notice the size; better in a bag than in a front pocket
Overall Score 4.4 Best fit when long runtime matters more than compact carry

Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice)

Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It

This is the “keep it simple” Polar Ice vape in the group, with pricing that stays relatively low while still offering a screen and dual mesh coil. I used it for 6 days and leaned on it as a work-break device. Marcus ran repeated longer pulls to watch for heat spikes and flavor drop. Jamal pocket-carried it and checked whether the mouthpiece stayed comfortable during short, frequent sessions. The listing calls out 22ml of e-liquid, 30,000 puffs, a 0.8ohm dual mesh coil, an HD display, and a 750mAh rechargeable battery with USB-C.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Polar Ice here is direct: cold mint, minimal sweetness, quick finish. It doesn’t layer extra candy notes, which kept it from getting sticky late in the day. The draw feel is consistent, although it doesn’t give as much tuning as an airflow-focused device. Marcus noted that long chains kept the vapor thick, but the cold edge became the dominant note and flattened the mint nuance. Jamal liked the simple behavior: short pulls still tasted the same, with no “weird” transition between sessions.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Strong price-to-performance value Less airflow tuning than top picks
HD display helps track usage Flavor is simpler, less nuanced
Dual mesh coil supports consistent output Cooling can feel one-note in long chains
Easy, predictable daily use Not the best pocket feel compared with smaller bodies

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.3 Clean, simple cold mint; less depth than the leaders
Throat Hit 4.4 Firm cold edge that shows up fast, especially on deeper pulls
Vapor Production 4.6 Thick output for the price; holds up in outdoor use
Airflow/Draw 4.2 Consistent, but not as tunable as devices with airflow focus
Battery Life 4.5 750mAh class use felt dependable across the workday
Leak Resistance 4.1 No leaks; mouthpiece moisture is manageable with wiping
Build Quality 4.2 Solid enough; finish shows wear faster than premium bodies
Ease of Use 4.6 Straightforward behavior; display reduces guesswork
Portability 4.1 Carryable, though not as pocket-friendly as slim devices
Overall Score 4.3 Best value when you want cold consistency without paying extra

Compare Specs of These Vapes

Spec Raz TN9000 (Polar Ice) Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo (Polar Ice) Mr Fog Nova 36K (Polar Ice) Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice) Vaporesso XROS 4 Mini + Polar Ice salt nic
Overall Score 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.5
Best For Balanced daily Polar Ice Output toggle sessions Runtime and battery Value daily cold mint Refillable control
Device type Disposable Disposable Disposable Disposable Refillable pod system
Approx. puffs 9000 15000 (Smooth) / 7500 (Turbo) ~36000 30000 -
E-liquid capacity 12ml 16ml 20ml 22ml Pod: 3ml; Bottle: 30ml
Nicotine strength 50mg 5% / 50mg 50mg 50mg 20mg / 35mg / 55mg options
Activation method Draw-activated - - - Draw-activated
Battery capacity 650mAh 600mAh 900mAh 750mAh 1000mAh
Charging USB-C USB Type-C USB-C Type-C USB-C
Coil - Dual mesh 0.4ohm mesh coil 0.8ohm dual mesh coil Included pod listed as 0.4Ω on store
Modes - Smooth / Turbo (11W / 22W) Eco / Boost / Turbo - -
Screen/indicator LED screen Display screen 1.0" TFT screen HD display Battery light indicator (varies)
Airflow style Adjustable airflow - - - Adjustable airflow

Pro Tips for Polar Ice Vape

Fume Pro 30K (Polar Ice)
  • Start with shorter pulls when you open a fresh Polar Ice vape; the cooling can feel sharper at the start of a device.
  • If the ice note turns “dry,” wipe the mouthpiece and take two slower pulls instead of rapid back-to-back hits.
  • Keep the device upright during carry when possible; it reduces how much moisture ends up at the mouthpiece.
  • For screen devices, use the battery and liquid indicators to pace longer sessions instead of pushing the last bit hard.
  • Avoid long chains in the highest output modes if you’re sensitive to harsh cold; the cooling edge stacks quickly.
  • Use a consistent charger and cable; erratic charging habits often show up as inconsistent daily runtime.
  • For refillables, let the pod sit after filling so the first pulls don’t taste sharp or under-saturated.
  • When Polar Ice starts tasting muted, swap pods (refillables) or slow your draw; both changes tend to restore clarity.
  • Keep Polar Ice away from heat in a car or bag; the profile can shift toward sweetness when the liquid warms.

FAQs

  1. What does a Polar Ice vape taste like?
    A Polar Ice vape usually tastes like mint-menthol with a strong cooling layer. The balance varies: some feel clean and dry, others feel sweeter and more candy-like.

  2. Is Polar Ice the same as menthol?
    Not always. Menthol can be the main note, while “ice” can also mean extra cooling that changes the throat feel and the finish.

  3. Why does Polar Ice sometimes feel harsher later?
    Long chains and higher-output modes can push the cooling edge forward. Mouthpiece moisture can also change how sharp the inhale feels.

  4. How can the ice feel less intense without changing devices?
    Use tighter airflow when available and take slower pulls. Shorter sessions also keep the cooling from stacking into a harsher finish.

  5. Disposable or refillable for Polar Ice?
    Disposables win on convenience. Refillables win on control, since you can pick nicotine strength and refresh flavor by changing pods.

About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.