Raz keeps showing up in the same pockets as other high-puff disposables. The screens, the airflow control, and the leather-style grip push it into a different lane. That mix made me want to test the lineup as a group, then judge where each device actually fits.
I handled the testing, then I pulled in Marcus Reed for heavy-use stress. Jamal Davis stayed on everyday carry, travel, and quick sessions. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed language around risk, labeling, and nicotine framing.
Our workflow stayed simple. We rotated devices across normal routines, then we tracked draw feel, flavor drift, battery behavior, and leak patterns. We scored each device on a 5-point scale, using the same criteria across the lineup.

Product Overview
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAZ CA6000 | Compact feel, easy draw, quick learning curve | Shorter lifespan, lighter vapor in longer pulls | Pocket-first users, short sessions | 15 | 4.1 |
| RAZ TN9000 | Stable flavor, useful screen, balanced airflow range | Taller body, sweetness can feel heavy in some flavors | All-day casual users, screen fans | 25 | 4.2 |
| RAZ LTX 25K | Long runtime, steady output, broad flavor range | Bigger footprint, more weight in light pants | Frequent users who hate swapping devices | 20 | 4.2 |
| RAZ DC25000 | Strong vapor in higher mode, crisp flavor pop | Boost can warm up fast, bulky carry | Output chasers who still want disposable ease | 20 | 4.3 |
| RAZ RYL Classic 35K | Premium build feel, smooth draw, long stretch use | Chain and weight can annoy, not subtle in public | Style-focused adults, long-shift users | 27 | 4.2 |
| RAZ RX50K | Most control, big vapor headroom, strong screen feedback | More settings, largest carry profile | Heavy users who want modes and tuning | 30 | 4.2 |
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept noticing how consistent the airflow hardware feels across Raz. That matters in daily use. A device can have a big puff count, yet a sloppy inlet ruins it. With Raz, the draw stayed predictable, and the screens kept the experience from turning into guesswork. The weak point showed up in bulk. The higher-puff bodies ask for pocket space, then they demand attention.
Marcus treated the lineup like a stress test. He leaned into longer pulls, then he repeated them after charge cycles. Heat management became his early filter. “If the case warms up by pull five, I stop trusting the rest of the promise.” On the DC25000 and RX50K, he liked the headroom, yet he kept calling out how fast warmth shows up under aggressive use. He also tracked flavor burn risk by feel. “The moment sweetness turns papery, I back off and mark it.”
Jamal cared about the parts people ignore. He kept checking mouthpiece comfort, then he watched pocket lint and condensation. “If I can toss it in my pocket and forget it, it earns points.” The CA6000 and TN9000 fit his routine. The RYL Classic 35K looked good, yet the chain detail created friction in real carry. He also kept noting how a screen changes behavior. “A battery bar makes me stop babying the device.”
Raz Vape comparison chart
| Spec and performance area | RAZ CA6000 | RAZ TN9000 | RAZ LTX 25K | RAZ DC25000 | RAZ RYL Classic 35K | RAZ RX50K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable |
| Stated puff range | ~6000 | ~9000 | ~25000 | ~25000 | ~35000 | up to ~50000 |
| E-liquid capacity | ~10 mL | ~12 mL | ~16 mL | ~16 mL | ~16.5 mL | ~19 mL |
| Nicotine range | Commonly 5%, some listings show 0% variants | Commonly 5%, some listings show 0% variants | Commonly 5%, some listings show 0% flavors | Commonly 5%, some listings show 0% flavors | Commonly 5% | Commonly 5% |
| Activation | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated | Draw-activated |
| Battery capacity | ~650 mAh | ~650 mAh | ~800 mAh | ~800 mAh | ~820 mAh | ~800 mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
| Coil style | Mesh | Mesh | Mesh / dual mesh in many listings | Mesh / dual mesh in many listings | Mesh / dual mesh in many listings | Mesh system, tuned for modes |
| Airflow style | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable, mode-linked feel |
| Screen and feedback | Indicator lights | 0.96-inch style screen | LED screen | HD-style screen with modes | 0.96-inch style screen | LED display with modes |
| Flavor performance | Clean, simple blends | Strong candy-fruit balance | Dense flavor body | Bright flavor pop in higher mode | Smooth and rounded | Strong intensity with tuning |
| Throat hit feel | Mild-to-medium | Medium, steady | Medium-to-strong | Stronger in boost | Medium-to-strong | Medium-to-strong, mode dependent |
| Vapor production | Moderate | Moderate-plus | Strong | Strongest | Strong | Strongest, most adjustable |
| Battery life real use | Shortest | Solid | Long | Long | Long | Long, but mode matters |
| Leak resistance | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good, watch condensation |
| Ease of use | Easiest | Very easy | Easy | Easy, but modes add behavior | Easy, chain adds fuss | Most complex in this set |
| Build feel | Simple grip | Solid body | Substantial | Substantial | Most premium | Substantial, tech-forward |
| Best fit snapshot | Grab-and-go | Balanced daily device | Long-run users | Output chasers | Style plus longevity | Heavy users wanting control |
What we tested and how we tested it
We scored flavor based on accuracy, intensity, and how it held up after repeated sessions. We tested throat hit as a subjective feel, then we compared smoothness across airflow positions. Vapor production was judged by density, warmth, and how stable it stayed as battery dropped.
Airflow and draw smoothness came from slow pulls, quick pulls, and mid-length pulls. Battery life and charging behavior came from timed use blocks, then a check for abnormal heating during charge. Leak and condensation control came from pocket carry, mouthpiece wipes, and close inspection around seams.
Build quality and durability came from daily handling, bag carry, and drop-risk moments that happen in normal life. Ease of use covered learning curve, screen clarity, and how annoying the device feels over a week. Portability focused on pocket comfort, weight feel, and whether the body shape fights the carry.
All observations come from usage impressions and product behavior. They do not replace medical advice or medical evaluation.
Raz Vape vapes our testing experience
RAZ CA6000

Our testing experience
The CA6000 felt like the entry point for this lineup. That kind of compact body changes how people vape. Short sessions happen more often. Longer sessions feel less tempting. I carried it on commutes and used it in quick breaks, then I kept checking the mouthpiece for condensation. The device stayed clean, and the draw stayed stable.
Jamal liked the size immediately. “This sits flat in my pocket and doesn’t bully my keys.” He used it while walking and waiting, then he noted how the airflow ring lets him dial out harshness without killing flavor. He also liked the simple indicator behavior. It reduced second guessing.
Marcus treated it as a limit test. He pushed longer pulls, then he watched for flavor collapse. The CA6000 held up better than most small disposables, yet it did not love aggressive chaining. “It’s fine, but it’s not built for my kind of session.” Heat stayed controlled, though, and that mattered to him.
Draw experience and flavors
The draw on the CA6000 sits on the MTL side, yet it does not feel tight. Under low airflow, the pull feels cushioned. Air moves with a soft resistance, then the vapor arrives with a gentle weight. I noticed a mild snap at the end of the pull, like the coil ramps quickly, then settles.
Alaskan Mint felt like a cold sheet across the tongue. The inhale stayed smooth, while the mint landed in the back of the mouth. The cooling effect did not taste like medicine. It leaned clean, then it faded without a syrupy tail.
Crushed Berries carried a mixed-berry candy note, then a light chill showed up mid-draw. The mouth feel turned slightly sticky, yet the finish stayed neat. Jamal called it “bright, then tidy.” In short pulls, it tasted more like berry hard candy. In longer pulls, a darker berry tone appeared.
Dragon Fruit Lemonade had a sharp edge at the start. The lemon note hit first, then a soft tropical body followed. The blend felt more “wet” in the mouth, with a pulpy impression that lingered. I kept tasting a faint rind note after the exhale. That gave it a realistic bite, yet it may feel too pointed for all-day use.
Watermelon Ice delivered a clean watermelon top note, then a cooling layer slid in behind it. The inhale felt slick. The throat feel stayed mild. Marcus still flagged it during heavy use. “In long sessions, sweet watermelon can turn flat.” He was right. The flavor stayed fun, yet the last third of a long session felt less defined.
Spearmint leaned classic. It tasted greener than Alaskan Mint, with less cold and more herbal bite. The draw felt crisp, then the aftertaste cleared fast. That made it easier to rotate with other flavors.
Frozen Strawberry hit with a candy-strawberry body, then the cooling effect smoothed the sweetness. The inhale felt dense for a smaller device. I noticed the flavor stayed consistent across a day, which is not always true at this size.
Cactus Jack brought a strange but enjoyable twist. The profile felt like a sweet citrus soda idea, with a faint tropical edge. The mouth feel stayed light, then the finish popped and disappeared.
Best draw experience picks from our set were Alaskan Mint for clean smooth pulls, then Crushed Berries for a bright candy feel without harsh edges.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Pocket-friendly size and weight | Shorter lifespan than higher-puff Raz devices |
| Adjustable airflow gives real control | Vapor output feels lighter in long pulls |
| Smooth draw with stable activation | Sweet flavors can flatten under heavy chaining |
| Condensation stayed manageable in carry | Not a great fit for high-output users |
| Simple, low-maintenance daily use | Value depends on local pricing |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 15
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%, some listings show 0% variants
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: around 650 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, typically under 60–90 minutes depending on adapter
- Coil type and resistance: mesh coil system
- Tank capacity: around 10 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Flavor range: broad, varies by retailer
- Vapor production: moderate, MTL-leaning
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, tight mouthpiece fit in our units
- Build materials: plastic body with leather-style grip section on many editions
- Dimensions and weight: compact, light pocket feel
- Included accessories: typically device only, some bundles include lanyard
- Safety features: standard overcharge and over-discharge protections are commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Spearmint, Dragon Fruit Lemonade, Hawaii Sunset, Crushed Berries, Alaskan Mint, Watermelon Ice, Strawberry Kiwi, Peach Pear, Georgia Peach, Frozen Strawberry, Polar Ice, Clear, plus other rotating editions depending on retailer batches
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Clean profiles, then mild flattening during long chained sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Medium feel under tighter airflow, then softer under open airflow |
| Vapor Production | 3.8 | Satisfying in short pulls, less dense under long pulls |
| Airflow Draw | 3.9 | Useful adjustment range, yet not as airy as the big Raz bodies |
| Battery Life | 3.7 | Fine for a day of light use, heavy use asks for recharging |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Pocket carry stayed clean, and mouthpiece wipe-downs were minor |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | No rattles, stable seams, and reliable activation in our run |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | No settings, simple behavior, and low learning curve |
| Portability | 4.6 | Light, compact, and easy for real daily carry |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best fit for portability-first adults who want simple use |
RAZ TN9000

Our testing experience
The TN9000 felt like the “standard” Raz experience. The screen changes how you pace it. I stopped guessing. I checked the battery bar, then I decided whether to run longer sessions. During commutes, it behaved like a steady daily tool, and the airflow range felt wider than the CA6000.
Jamal carried it in tighter pants and still kept it in rotation. “It’s tall, but it stays smooth and doesn’t leak on me.” He used it in quick pulls while walking, then he opened airflow slightly to keep the draw light. The mouthpiece stayed comfortable, and the screen stayed readable in daylight.
Marcus used it as a baseline, then he compared bigger devices against it. He noticed the TN9000 stays calmer in heat behavior than the DC25000. “It doesn’t try to bite back when I chain it.” He still wanted more vapor headroom, yet he respected the stability.
Draw experience and flavors
The TN9000 draw lands in a balanced zone. With airflow tightened, it becomes a firm MTL pull. With airflow open, it slides toward a loose MTL. The inhale starts with a soft resistance, then the vapor ramps in smoothly. That ramp made it easier to avoid harsh spikes.
Blue Raz Ice tasted sharp at the front. The blue raspberry sits on the tongue with a sweet-tart edge. The cooling layer arrives later, then it clears the sweetness instead of burying it. The throat feel stayed medium. Jamal called it “clean candy, then cold air.”
Miami Mint felt smoother than expected. The mint note tasted sweet, then a cool finish showed up with a soft menthol edge. The inhale stayed silky, and the aftertaste cleared fast. I used it during work breaks because it did not cling to the mouth.
Night Crawler, in our batch, leaned like tart fruit candy with a darker twist. The inhale had a punchy sweet note, then a tangy edge showed up behind it. Marcus noticed how it holds up in longer sessions. “This one stays defined even when I’m hammering pulls.” The throat feel pushed medium-strong, yet it stayed smooth.
Dragon Fruit Lemonade returned with that citrus bite. On TN9000, it tasted a little brighter than on CA6000. The lemon note comes in first, then the dragon fruit body rounds it out. The mouth feel felt thicker, like a syrup impression, yet the finish stayed clean enough for rotation.
Watermelon Ice stayed simple and reliable. The watermelon note feels watery and crisp, then the cooling layer adds a slick mouth feel. In repeated pulls, sweetness can build. I adjusted airflow tighter, then it felt less cloying.
Black Cherry Peach came across as rich and candy-like. The cherry note hits first. Peach comes in as a soft body behind it. The mouth feel felt dense, then the aftertaste lingered longer than other fruit blends. It’s enjoyable, yet it can feel heavy as far as all-day use is concerned.
Blueberry Watermelon blended two soft fruit notes into one smooth pull. The blueberry sits as a darker top note, and the watermelon adds lift. The throat feel stayed mild-to-medium, and the aftertaste stayed friendly to quick sessions.
Best draw experience picks from our set were Miami Mint for smooth repeat pulls, then Night Crawler for flavor staying defined under longer sessions.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Screen feedback reduces guessing | Taller body can feel awkward in small pockets |
| Balanced airflow range | Some sweet blends feel heavy in long sessions |
| Reliable draw activation | Not the biggest vapor output in the Raz family |
| Flavor holds steady across the day | Pricing swings widely by seller |
| Good daily carry stability | Large flavor menu can be hit-or-miss by preference |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 25
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%, some listings show 0% variants
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: around 650 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, often around 60–90 minutes
- Coil type and resistance: mesh coil system
- Tank capacity: around 12 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Flavor range: wide, classic line plus rotating editions
- Vapor production: moderate-plus, stable ramp
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, stable mouthpiece fit in our units
- Build materials: molded body, screen window, grip finish varies by edition
- Dimensions and weight: medium size, taller profile than CA6000
- Included accessories: device only, some bundles include lanyard
- Safety features: standard charging protections commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Blue Raz Ice, Blue Raz Cotton Cloudz, Blueberry Watermelon, Banana Coconut, Black Cherry Peach, Cherry Lemon, Dragon Fruit Lemonade, Miami Mint, Night Crawler, Watermelon Ice, Polar Ice, Grape Ice, Strawberry Ice, Clear, Tobacco, plus Dream Edition options such as Ruby, Tiffany, Vicky, Violet, along with other rotating seasonal releases
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Strong profile clarity, and good hold through normal daily pacing |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Medium-to-strong when airflow tight, then smoother when opened |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Solid density, yet below the high-mode devices in this set |
| Airflow Draw | 4.1 | Usable adjustment range, and a smooth ramp at activation |
| Battery Life | 3.9 | Good for casual all-day use, heavy use asks for top-ups |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Pocket carry stayed clean, with low mouthpiece wetness |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Screen stayed readable, and activation stayed consistent |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Simple behavior, helpful screen, minimal fuss |
| Portability | 4.4 | Still pocketable, though taller than the smallest option |
| Overall | 4.2 | A balanced daily-driver pick with strong flavor stability |
RAZ LTX 25K

Our testing experience
The LTX 25K exists for adults who hate swapping devices. The body feels bigger, and that changes how it lives in a pocket. I carried it in a jacket pocket, then I moved it to a bag pocket during office days. The screen and the capacity created a steady rhythm. I used it more like a “long-haul” device.
Marcus liked the output stability. He ran longer sessions, then he compared it against the DC25000. “This stays steady without getting twitchy.” Heat still showed up under heavy pulls, yet it rose slower than on the DC25000 boost behavior. He also liked how airflow tuning helped him avoid harshness.
Jamal respected the battery life, yet he complained about bulk. “This is the one I carry when I’m out all day, not the one I carry for a quick errand.” He also noticed that a bigger mouthpiece can collect more condensation. Wipes stayed minor, yet the device needed attention.
Draw experience and flavors
The LTX draw feels fuller than TN9000. Air moves with less resistance when opened. With airflow tightened, the draw becomes a firm MTL. With airflow opened, it becomes a loose MTL that borders on restricted DL for some users. The vapor arrives with more body, then it coats the mouth more heavily.
Hawaiian Punch tasted like a fruit drink idea. The inhale hits with bright sweetness, then a tangy edge arrives mid-pull. The mouth feel turns thick, then the finish leaves a candy-like aftertaste. Marcus liked it early. “It’s loud, but it stays clean.” After repeated sessions, the sweetness felt heavy for me.
Blueberry Punch leaned darker. The blueberry note sits deeper on the tongue, then a mixed-fruit top note lifts it. The throat feel stayed medium, and the vapor felt dense. In longer pulls, the flavor stayed stable, which is a real win for a high-capacity device.
Triple Berry Punch delivered a layered berry feel. The inhale starts with a sweet berry hit, then a tart edge arrives late. The mouth feel felt juicy, then the exhale left a sticky candy note. Jamal described it as “bold, then it hangs around.” That lingering tail can be great or annoying, depending on tolerance for sweet.
Sour Raspberry Punch brought a sharper bite. The sour edge shows up immediately, then the raspberry body fills in. The throat feel felt more punchy, even with airflow opened. I adjusted airflow tighter, then the sour felt smoother and less scratchy.
Bangin Sour Berries leaned like mixed berry candy with a sour coating. The inhale feels bright, then the sour note sits at the sides of the tongue. In short pulls, it tastes punchy. In long pulls, it can feel intense.
New York Mint felt like sweet mint with an icy back end. The draw stayed smooth. The aftertaste cleared fast, and that made it useful between fruit-heavy sessions.
Razzle Dazzle, in our unit, leaned like a sweet-tart berry blend with a playful candy tone. It delivered a smooth inhale, then a crisp finish. Marcus liked it as a reset flavor. “This one doesn’t collapse under heat.”
Best draw experience picks from our set were Blueberry Punch for stable flavor body, then New York Mint for smooth repeat pulls without a heavy aftertaste.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Long runtime reduces device swapping | Bigger footprint hurts pocket comfort |
| Strong vapor body with airflow range | Sweet blends can feel heavy over a long day |
| Screen feedback supports pacing | Condensation needs occasional wipe-downs |
| Stable output for repeated use | Not subtle in public carry |
| Broad flavor menu | Price varies widely by seller |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 20
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%, some flavors are sold in 0% variants
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: often listed around 800 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, typically around 60–100 minutes depending on adapter
- Coil type and resistance: mesh or dual mesh listed on many editions
- Tank capacity: around 16 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Flavor range: large, includes Punch Edition and rotating releases
- Vapor production: strong, fuller mouth feel than TN9000
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, tight seams in our units
- Build materials: heavier body, screen window, grip finish varies
- Dimensions and weight: larger than TN9000, better in jacket pocket than pants pocket
- Included accessories: device only in most listings
- Safety features: standard charging protections commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Triple Berry Punch, Blueberry Punch, Hawaiian Punch, Sour Raspberry Punch, Bangin Sour Berries, New York Mint, Razzle Dazzle, Strawberry Burst, Blueberry Watermelon, Watermelon Ice, plus rotating seasonal and special editions depending on vendor catalogs
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Dense flavor body, with strong stability across repeated sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Medium-to-strong feel, then smoother with airflow tuning |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Thick vapor, and a fuller mouth coating than smaller models |
| Airflow Draw | 4.3 | Wide adjustment range, and stable draw activation behavior |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | Long runtime in real carry, fewer charging interruptions |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Mostly clean carry, minor condensation with heavier use |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Substantial feel, stable screen behavior, and consistent seams |
| Ease of Use | 4.1 | Simple use, yet size and flavor intensity require pacing |
| Portability | 3.9 | Best in jacket or bag pockets, less friendly in slim pants |
| Overall | 4.2 | The long-haul Raz option with strong flavor stability |
RAZ DC25000

Our testing experience
The DC25000 is the one Marcus kept grabbing when he wanted output. The dual-mode concept changes behavior. Normal mode feels steady. Boost mode pushes harder, then it warms faster. I used normal mode during commutes and work breaks. I saved boost for short sessions when I wanted a stronger feel.
Marcus used boost like a stress lever. “If a device can’t stay stable in the high mode, I don’t trust the rest.” He watched heat around the body, then he tracked flavor sharpness during fast chaining. The DC25000 delivered the loudest vapor in this set outside the RX50K, yet it demanded respect. Boost is not an all-day setting for him.
Jamal carried it less. The bulk annoyed him. He still tested pocket behavior. “This feels like a small gadget, not a simple disposable.” Condensation stayed manageable, yet the mouthpiece needed more wipes after heavy sessions.
Draw experience and flavors
The draw in normal mode feels similar to LTX. Boost changes the feel. Vapor arrives warmer, then it hits the throat more firmly. Airflow tuning helps. A tighter setting can smooth the edge. A wide-open setting can feel airy, yet it may push vapor faster than some users want.
Orange Mango delivered a bright inhale. Orange sits at the front, then mango fills the mid-palate. The mouth feel felt thick, like a fruit nectar impression. In boost mode, sweetness popped harder, then it lingered longer.
Sour Apple Ice opened with a crisp apple bite. The sour note lands early, then the cooling layer follows. The throat feel felt sharper in boost, and Marcus called it out. “Boost turns sour into a throat punch.” Tightening airflow helped. Short pulls kept it crisp without feeling scratchy.
Strawberry Kiwi Pear felt more blended than expected. Strawberry gives the body. Kiwi adds a tart edge. Pear smooths the back end. The inhale felt rounded, then the finish stayed soft. Jamal liked it during quick sessions. “It tastes finished, not messy.”
Black Cherry Peach tasted heavy and rich. The cherry note hits first, then peach adds a soft sweetness behind it. In normal mode it felt smooth. In boost, it became dense and almost syrupy.
Blue Razz Ice delivered that familiar candy edge, yet the DC25000 coil made it feel sharper. The cooling layer felt stronger in boost. I used it in short pulls, then it stayed clean. In long boost sessions, it can overwhelm the mouth.
Razzle Dazzle tasted like a sweet-tart berry blend with a crisp finish. The inhale felt playful, and the aftertaste cleared quicker than some fruit blends. Marcus liked it as an all-day option in normal mode.
New York Mint stayed smooth and controlled. The mint note felt sweet, then the icy finish cleared the palate. It worked well after heavy fruit flavors.
Best draw experience picks from our set were Strawberry Kiwi Pear for smooth blended pulls, then New York Mint for clean repeat sessions without flavor fatigue.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong vapor headroom, especially in higher mode | Higher mode can warm up fast under heavy chaining |
| Sharp flavor intensity | Bulky carry in pants pockets |
| Screen and mode feedback supports pacing | Some sour flavors feel aggressive in boost |
| Adjustable airflow helps tune harshness | Mouthpiece needs more wipe-downs in heavy use |
| Long runtime | Value depends on pricing swings |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 20
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%, some flavors sold in 0% variants
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: often listed around 800 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, commonly 60–100 minutes
- Coil type and resistance: mesh or dual mesh listed on many editions
- Tank capacity: commonly listed around 16 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Modes: normal and boost style modes in many listings
- Vapor production: strong, warmer feel in higher mode
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, stable seams in our units
- Build materials: heavier body, screen window, grip finish varies
- Dimensions and weight: large carry profile, better in jacket or bag
- Included accessories: device only in most listings
- Safety features: standard charging protections commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Orange Mango, Sour Apple Ice, Strawberry Kiwi Pear, Black Cherry Peach, Blue Raz Ice, New York Mint, Razzle Dazzle, Strawberry Burst, Bangin Sour Berries, Blueberry Watermelon, plus rotating seasonal and limited releases depending on retailer catalogs
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Strong clarity, then extra punch in boost without fast collapse |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Firmer feel in boost, then smoother in normal with airflow tuning |
| Vapor Production | 4.6 | Densest output in this set outside RX50K’s top mode behavior |
| Airflow Draw | 4.4 | Wide adjustment, and stable activation across modes |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | Long use stretch, boost increases drain in real sessions |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Mostly clean carry, condensation increases with heavy boost use |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Substantial feel, reliable screen, and consistent seams |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Normal mode is simple, mode switching adds behavior changes |
| Portability | 3.8 | Large body, less comfortable in tight pockets |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best for adults who want stronger output from a disposable |
RAZ RYL Classic 35K

Our testing experience
The RYL Classic 35K looks like a style object, then it vapes like a serious long-run device. The chain detail changes how you carry it. I tried pocket carry, then I tried bag carry. The device felt best in a jacket pocket or a bag side pocket. The build felt premium in hand, and the grip finish helped.
Jamal liked the hand feel, then he got irritated by the chain. “It looks good, but it snags when I’m moving fast.” He used it on commutes and outdoor walks. He also tracked mouthpiece comfort. It stayed comfortable, and condensation stayed moderate.
Marcus focused on stability. “This feels calmer than the DC when I push it.” Heat rose slowly, and the draw stayed smooth even during long sessions. He still treated it with respect. A long puff count invites overuse by convenience.
Draw experience and flavors
The RYL draw feels smooth and rounded. With airflow tightened, it becomes a firm MTL pull with a soft throat feel. With airflow opened, it becomes a loose MTL with a fuller mouth feel. Vapor arrives evenly, then it coats the mouth without a sudden spike.
Watermelon Ice tasted clean and crisp. The watermelon note feels watery, then the cooling layer adds a slick finish. On the RYL coil, sweetness felt smoother and less sharp than on TN9000.
Sour Apple Ice felt bright and punchy. The apple bite hits first, then sour rides along the sides of the tongue. The cooling layer clears the finish. In long sessions, sour can feel sharp. Tightening airflow made it smoother.
Miami Mint tasted sweet and cool with a soft menthol edge. The inhale felt silky. The aftertaste cleared fast. That made it a strong daily option as far as repeated sessions are concerned.
Rainbow Raspberry Watermelon blended candy raspberry with a juicy watermelon body. The inhale starts sweet, then it becomes more fruity mid-pull. Jamal called it “sweet, then juicy.” It stayed pleasant, yet it can feel sugary over a long day.
Peach Passionfruit leaned tropical. Peach gives a soft body. Passionfruit adds a tangy bite. The mouth feel felt thick, and the finish lingered. I used it in shorter pulls, then it stayed clean.
Triple Berry carried a layered berry candy feel. The inhale hits sweet, then tart arrives late. Marcus liked the stability. “It doesn’t turn papery when I’m pushing it.”
Icy Mint leaned colder than Miami Mint. It hit with a crisp cold layer, then the mint note sat behind it. The throat feel stayed smooth, yet the cooling effect stayed strong.
Best draw experience picks from our set were Miami Mint for smooth repeat pulls, then Peach Passionfruit for a rich tropical mouth feel without harsh edges.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Premium build feel and grip | Chain detail can snag and annoy |
| Smooth draw with stable ramp | Weight hurts minimal-pocket carry |
| Long stretch use with strong battery | Not subtle, and it draws attention |
| Flavor feels rounded and less sharp | Higher price in many shops |
| Good stability under heavier sessions | Bulk is real in tight pants pockets |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 27
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: commonly listed around 820 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, typically 60–100 minutes
- Coil type and resistance: mesh or dual mesh listed on many editions
- Tank capacity: commonly listed around 16.5 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Screen: 0.96-inch style display with battery and e-liquid indicators
- Vapor production: strong, smooth ramp
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, stable seams in our units
- Build materials: leather-style grip, chain attachment detail
- Dimensions and weight: larger and heavier than TN9000
- Included accessories: device, chain or chain attachment detail varies by listing
- Safety features: standard charging protections commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Sour Apple Ice, Watermelon Ice, Blue Raz Ice, Icy Mint, Miami Mint, Orange Mango, Peach Passionfruit, Rainbow Raspberry Watermelon, Triple Berry, Sour Strawberry, plus seasonal editions such as Spring Edition flavors that rotate by vendor catalogs
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Rounded profiles with good stability, less sharpness than DC25000 |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Smooth medium-to-strong feel, then easy tuning via airflow |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Dense output with a softer ramp than boost-focused devices |
| Airflow Draw | 4.2 | Useful adjustment, and consistent activation across sessions |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | Long use stretch with fewer recharge interruptions |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Clean carry behavior, minor condensation over heavy sessions |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Best hand feel in the set, and solid seams in our units |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Simple operation, chain detail adds carry fuss |
| Portability | 3.6 | Heavy carry profile, best in jacket or bag |
| Overall | 4.2 | Premium-feel longevity for adults who accept the bulk |
RAZ RX50K

Our testing experience
The RX50K is the “most device-like” disposable in this group. Modes change real behavior. Normal mode felt steady and calm. Boost increased punch. Super boost pushed vapor hard, and it demanded shorter sessions. I used normal during the day, then I used higher modes only in controlled blocks. Battery and e-liquid indicators helped me pace it.
Marcus treated it like a stress instrument. “This is the one that shows you what the coil and airflow can really do.” He watched heat carefully. Super boost warmed up fast under chaining, and he backed off. He still respected the output stability when used in short blocks.
Jamal disliked the size, then he still admitted the control helps. “It’s huge, but it tells you what’s going on.” He used it while commuting, then he left it in a bag pocket. He also checked for accidental draw triggers. It behaved well, and the airflow control helped him avoid harsh pulls outdoors.
Draw experience and flavors
The RX50K draw can feel soft or aggressive, depending on mode and airflow. With airflow tightened and normal mode, it feels like a smooth MTL pull with a thick mouth feel. With airflow opened and higher modes, it can feel close to restricted DL for some users. Vapor arrives fast in super boost, then it fills the mouth quickly.
Sour Apple Ice hit crisp and cold. The apple bite lands early, then sour rides the sides of the tongue. Cooling clears the finish. In super boost, the sour edge can feel sharp. I tightened airflow and shortened pulls. That made it feel smoother.
Blue Raz Ice tasted bright and candy-like. The inhale hits sweet-tart, then cooling arrives late. The mouth feel feels thick in higher modes. Jamal said “it tastes louder than the TN.” He was right. It can fatigue the palate if used nonstop.
Orange Mango delivered thick fruit nectar vibes. Orange hits first, then mango fills the middle. In boost mode, sweetness pops harder, and the aftertaste lingers. Normal mode felt more balanced.
Strawberry Burst leaned candy strawberry. The inhale feels smooth, then sweetness builds across the mouth. Marcus noticed how it holds under higher output. “It doesn’t scorch fast, but it gets heavy.” He used it in shorter blocks.
New York Mint worked as a reset flavor. Sweet mint arrives first, then icy finish clears the palate. Higher modes made it colder and sharper. Normal mode felt smoother and more repeatable.
Bangin Sour Berries hit with sour candy energy. The inhale feels bright, then the sour layer sits on the tongue. In super boost, it can feel aggressive. Tightening airflow helped reduce edge.
Watermelon Ice stayed clean and crisp. The watermelon feels watery. Cooling adds slickness. Even in higher modes, it stayed approachable. That made it one of our most repeatable options.
Best draw experience picks from our set were New York Mint for controlled smooth pulls across modes, then Watermelon Ice for staying clean even when output rises.
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Highest control and output range | Largest carry profile in this lineup |
| Modes let users pace intensity | More settings can annoy simple-use buyers |
| Strong vapor production | Higher modes can warm up quickly under chaining |
| Clear screen feedback supports pacing | Flavor intensity can cause palate fatigue |
| Long stretch use | Pricing varies widely by shop |
Key specs and flavors
- Price: commonly 30
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: commonly 5%
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: commonly listed around 800 mAh rechargeable
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, often 60–110 minutes
- Coil type and resistance: mesh system tuned for modes
- Tank capacity: commonly listed around 19 mL prefilled
- Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable airflow control
- Modes: normal, boost, super boost style modes in many listings
- Display and lighting: LED display with battery and e-liquid indicators, light modes listed on some editions
- Vapor production: strongest in the set when pushed
- Leak resistance features: sealed body, watch condensation under high output
- Build materials: larger body, screen, grip finish varies
- Dimensions and weight: largest device in this group
- Included accessories: device only in most listings
- Safety features: standard charging protections commonly listed
- Shipping: varies by seller and local rules
- Flavor list: Sour Apple Ice, Blue Raz Ice, Orange Mango, Strawberry Burst, New York Mint, Bangin Sour Berries, Watermelon Ice, plus rotating catalog flavors depending on vendor lists and release waves
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Strong intensity, then stable clarity when pulls stay controlled |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Mode-dependent punch, smoother in normal with tighter airflow |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Highest headroom, especially in top mode behavior |
| Airflow Draw | 4.5 | Wide tuning range, and clear changes by mode and airflow |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | Long use stretch, higher modes drain faster in real sessions |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Mostly clean, condensation rises when output stays high |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Substantial body, consistent seams in our units |
| Ease of Use | 3.9 | Mode control adds complexity that simple users may dislike |
| Portability | 3.5 | Best in jacket or bag, not ideal in tight pockets |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best for heavy users who want control and output |
Compare performance scores of these vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAZ CA6000 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| RAZ TN9000 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| RAZ LTX 25K | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| RAZ DC25000 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| RAZ RYL Classic 35K | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| RAZ RX50K | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
The most balanced daily device was the TN9000, with strong flavor and low fuss. The DC25000 acted like the vapor specialist, then it asked for more pacing under heavy use. The CA6000 won portability, yet it gave up vapor headroom. The RYL Classic 35K led build feel, while RX50K led output and control.
Best picks
-
Best Raz Vape for pocket carry and short sessions
Winner: RAZ CA6000
The portability score stayed highest. Jamal’s carry notes stayed clean, and the device stayed low-maintenance. -
Best Raz Vape for strong vapor without stepping into the biggest bodies
Winner: RAZ DC25000
Vapor production led the set outside RX50K. Marcus also liked the high-output behavior, as long as sessions stayed paced. -
Best Raz Vape for longevity with premium hand feel
Winner: RAZ RYL Classic 35K
Build quality scored highest. The draw stayed smooth, and the long stretch use matched long-shift routines.
How to choose the Raz Vape
Start with vaping style. A tighter draw supports MTL habits. A looser draw supports bigger pulls, and it changes throat feel. Next, look at nicotine tolerance and how smooth delivery affects your pacing. Flavor preference matters too. Some users want bright candy fruit. Others want mint that clears fast.
Device type stays simple here. These are disposables. Maintenance stays minimal. Battery life and carry comfort become the trade. Bigger tanks last longer, yet pockets complain. Budget also matters. Local pricing swings can flip value fast.
For a light nicotine user who wants something simple, the CA6000 fits. It stays easy, and it disappears in a pocket. For a former heavy smoker who wants a firmer throat feel, TN9000 or DC25000 fits better, based on how Marcus experienced stability under longer sessions. For a flavor-focused user who wants dense mouth feel, LTX 25K fits well, and the flavor body stayed stable across repeated sessions. For a commuter who needs long battery life, RYL Classic 35K or LTX 25K fits better, since Jamal hated swapping devices mid-day. For a user who wants control and mode tuning, RX50K fits, as long as pocket size is not a dealbreaker.
Limitations
Raz disposables lean into screens, airflow control, and high puff counts. That design choice leaves some adult users behind. People who want tiny devices that disappear in any pocket will dislike the bigger bodies. The DC25000, RYL Classic 35K, and RX50K feel bulky in slim pants. That pattern stayed consistent in Jamal’s daily carry notes.
Users who want extremely airy DL pulls will not get a true open draw here. Even with airflow open, these devices live closer to loose MTL or restricted DL. Marcus could push them, yet he still described limits in how airy they can feel.
Ultra-budget shoppers may not like the value math. Pricing swings by seller are real. A CA6000 can feel like a bargain. A TN9000 or RYL Classic 35K can feel overpriced in some shops. Under those circumstances, value becomes a local issue, not a brand issue.
Adults who want refillable systems, rebuildables, or custom coils should skip this lineup. These devices do not aim at that user type. They are meant to be used, then disposed. Attempts to modify them raise safety concerns, and the design is not meant for it.
Nicotine-related risk remains present across the lineup. Smooth delivery can make intake feel easy. That is not a benefit claim. It is a behavior note that affects adult pacing and storage habits.
Is the Raz Vape lineup worth it
Raz competes on consistency, then it adds screens and airflow control. Those features show up in daily use. The draw stayed predictable across models. Flavor stayed stable in normal pacing. That pattern held on TN9000 and LTX 25K. It also showed up on the RYL Classic 35K.
Battery behavior stayed mostly calm. Charging used USB-C across the set. No unit showed alarming charge heat in our runs. Marcus still watched the hotter modes. DC25000 boost warmed faster. RX50K super boost warmed fastest. Those facts changed how we used them. Shorter sessions fit those modes better.
Leak resistance stayed good across the group. Pocket carry produced minor condensation. Jamal wiped mouthpieces more on larger bodies. He wiped less on CA6000 and TN9000. That fits the carry reality. Bigger mouthpieces collect more moisture.
Ease of use depends on the model. CA6000 stayed simplest. TN9000 stayed easy, then the screen reduced guessing. LTX 25K stayed easy, yet size added friction. DC25000 stayed easy, yet mode behavior changed pacing. RYL Classic 35K stayed easy, yet the chain detail added fuss. RX50K asked for the most attention. Modes create choices. Some adults want that. Others do not.
Value depends on how you buy. Lower models can cost close to higher models in some shops. Under that pricing, the long-run devices make more sense. LTX 25K and DC25000 deliver longer stretches. RYL Classic 35K adds premium feel. RX50K adds control. TN9000 delivers balance. CA6000 delivers portability.
The lineup fits adult users who want disposables that feel controlled. It also fits adults who like screens and airflow tuning. Heavy users get the most practical value from LTX 25K, DC25000, RYL Classic 35K, or RX50K. Light users often waste capacity. They may prefer CA6000 or TN9000.
Value drops for adults who hate bulk. It also drops for adults who want true open DL airflow. It drops again for users who want refillable ecosystems. Raz does not aim at that lane.
Pro tips for Raz Vape
- Keep airflow slightly tighter when sweetness feels heavy.
- Use shorter pulls in higher output modes, then let the device cool.
- Wipe the mouthpiece daily, especially after pocket carry.
- Avoid leaving the device in a hot car. Heat can change draw feel.
- Charge with a standard low-power adapter, not an aggressive fast brick.
- Store the device upright in a bag pocket when possible. Condensation stays lower.
- Rotate flavors when palate fatigue shows up. Mint helps reset taste.
- Stop using a device that shows unusual heat, swelling, or charging problems.
- Keep devices away from minors and non-users. Storage habits matter.
FAQs
How long does a Raz disposable usually last in real use
It depends on session length and mode behavior. CA6000 can feel like several days for light users. LTX 25K and DC25000 can run much longer for the same user type. Heavy users burn through any device faster, especially in higher output settings.
How often did you need to recharge these devices
CA6000 and TN9000 needed more frequent top-ups under heavy use. LTX 25K, DC25000, RYL Classic 35K, and RX50K stretched longer between charges. Higher modes on DC25000 and RX50K increased drain in Marcus’s stress sessions.
Do Raz devices leak in a pocket
In our carry tests, leakage was rare. Condensation showed up more often than true leaks. Jamal wiped larger devices more often. CA6000 stayed easiest to keep clean.
Does flavor stay consistent from start to finish
Flavor stayed most consistent on TN9000 and LTX 25K in normal pacing. DC25000 boost sessions can feel louder, then sweetness can build faster. RX50K mode changes can also change how intense flavor feels.
How should an adult pick nicotine strength without medical advice
Treat label strength as a behavior variable. Smooth delivery can increase intake by convenience. Adults who are sensitive often prefer pacing tactics, tighter airflow, and shorter sessions rather than chasing stronger feel. Persistent discomfort needs clinical evaluation.
Are these devices refillable or meant for maintenance
They are designed as disposables. Normal use does not involve refilling. The lineup fits people who want low maintenance, then consistent behavior.
How often do coils burn out
In disposables, coil behavior shows up as flavor flattening or harshness. Marcus noticed earlier harshness when he chained long pulls in high-output modes. Normal pacing reduced that issue across the lineup.
Which model is best for commuting
Jamal preferred TN9000 for balance, then CA6000 for minimal pocket burden. For long days with few charging chances, he leaned toward LTX 25K, while accepting the extra bulk.
Sources
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. The National Academies Press. 2018. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24952/public-health-consequences-of-e-cigarettes
- Gotts JE, Jordt SE, McConnell R, Tarran R. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes? BMJ. 2019. https://www.bmj.com/content/366/bmj.l5275
- World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf
- Park-Lee E, et al. Notes from the Field: E-Cigarette and Nicotine Pouch Use Among U.S. Middle and High School Students. MMWR. 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7335a3.htm
- Kwan D. The effects of electronic cigarettes on the respiratory tract. Annals of Basic and Health Sciences. 2025. https://journals.lww.com/abhs/fulltext/2025/10000/the_effects_of_electronic_cigarettes_on_the.2.aspx
About the Author: Chris Miller