Hayati’s lineup keeps showing up in the same conversations. People mention big puff counts. People also mention screens, airflow tweaks, and those dual-flavor builds. I wanted to see what the design choices feel like in daily use, not in a spec sheet.
I ran these devices through the same routine we use on VapePicks. I rotate flavors, track how the draw shifts, then log battery behavior. Marcus pushes devices hard. Jamal treats them like pocket tools, not desk toys.

Product Overview
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hayati Pro Ultra 15000 | Dual tank feel, clear screen feedback, steady flavor | Larger body, more condensate to manage | Adults who want long use with flavor variety | £8.99–£12.99 | 4.4 |
| Hayati Pro Ultra+ 25000 | Dual-flavor switching, strong build feel, long runtime | Heavier carry, flavor pairing can clash | Adults who want “two vapes in one” convenience | £10.00–£15.99 | 4.5 |
| Hayati Duo Mesh 7000 | Dense vapor for a disposable, strong battery spec, punchy flavors | Not rechargeable, warmth under long pulls | Adults who like bolder output without a mod | £4.99–£12.99 | 4.2 |
| Hayati Pro Mini 600 | Simple grab-and-go, clean mouthpiece feel, predictable draw | Short lifespan, limited control | Adults who want a tiny backup device | £0.99–£3.99 | 4.0 |
| Hayati X4 Refillable Pod System | Adjustable power range, airflow control, reuse reduces waste | Needs e-liquid and upkeep, pods add cost | Adults who want control without a full mod | £14.99–£16.99 | 4.3 |
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept coming back to how “engineered” the Hayati devices feel for their category. Screens help with pacing, even when the device is still disposable. The bigger units also collect more condensation. That part shows up in mouthpiece hygiene, especially after sweet flavors.
Marcus treated the higher-output Hayati choices like stress tests. He took long pulls, then repeated them. He kept watching case warmth and consistency under load. During the Duo Mesh runs, he said, “It hits hard for a disposable, but I can feel the body warming up when I chain it.” He also noted coil fatigue cues. Those cues showed up as a flattening of top notes, not an instant burnt taste.
Jamal cared less about puff counts. He cared about what fits in a pocket without being annoying. He kept picking up the Pro Mini as a quick errand device. He also got picky about mouthpiece shape on the larger models. Mid-commute, he muttered, “This one is fine in a jacket pocket, but it’s not a jeans pocket thing.” On the Pro Ultra line, he liked the display. He disliked the extra wipe-down.
Hayati Vape Vapes Comparison Chart
| Spec | Pro Ultra 15000 | Pro Ultra+ 25000 | Duo Mesh 7000 | Pro Mini 600 | X4 Refillable Pod |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Disposable | Refillable pod system |
| Puff claim | 15000+ | 25000+ | 7000+ | Up to 600 | Not stated as “puffs” |
| Nicotine range | 2% listed | 20 mg listed | 2% listed | 2% listed | Depends on e-liquid |
| Activation | Draw-activated (typical use) | Draw-activated (typical use) | Draw-activated (typical use) | Draw-activated | Not stated; adjustable wattage suggests controlled output |
| Battery | 850 mAh | 850 mAh | 1800 mAh | 500 mAh | 1300 mAh |
| E-liquid capacity | 2 × 12 mL | 2 + 2 × 10 mL | 14 mL | 2 mL | 2 mL |
| Coil | 1.1Ω mesh noted | Not stated on page | 1.0Ω duo mesh noted | Mesh noted | 0.6Ω / 0.8Ω / 1.2Ω cartridges listed |
| Airflow | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Ergonomic airflow control |
| Display | Visual display screen | Smart display and animation | Battery indicator | Not stated | Intelligent display |
| Output | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | 11–25 W adjustable |
| Charging | Side charging noted | Not stated | Non-rechargeable stated | Non-rechargeable | USB-C listed in database entry |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We used a repeatable scoring grid across devices. Flavor scoring came from accuracy and intensity over time. We looked for top-note fade, sweetness buildup, then that flat “everything tastes the same” phase.
Throat hit was logged as subjective feel. We tracked sharpness, dryness, and how it changed with longer pulls. Vapor production was measured by consistency per pull, not just “big clouds once.”
Airflow and draw smoothness came from real pulls in short bursts and long sessions. Battery life testing used typical adult routines. That meant commutes, work breaks, and evening sessions. We also logged charging behavior on rechargeable units, watching heat and speed.
Leak and condensation control mattered. We checked mouthpiece pooling, device exterior stickiness, and pocket lint issues. Build quality focused on seams, buttons when present, and mouthpiece fit. Ease of use included setup, maintenance, and disposal steps.
These are usage observations. They do not replace medical advice or medical evaluation.
Hayati Vape Vapes Our Testing Experience
Hayati Pro Ultra 15000

Our Testing Experience
I treated the Pro Ultra like a “daily driver” disposable. It stayed in my bag, then moved to my desk. The screen kept me from guessing. That part matters more than I expected. I stopped over-pulling, since I could see where the device was at.
The dual-tank setup changed how I used it. I did not chase variety all day. I swapped flavors as a reset. After a few hours of sweet pulls, I switched to something cleaner. The device made that easy, and it also made me notice how quickly sweet profiles can coat the mouthfeel.
Marcus tried to break consistency. He hit it hard, then hit it again. His notes stayed focused on stability. He said, “It doesn’t wobble around on output, even when I’m being rude to it.” He still flagged warmth during long chains, though it never turned into a hot spot.
Jamal’s feedback landed on carry and cleanup. He liked the screen. He disliked the extra condensate after heavy use. Midday, he said, “This tastes great, but I’m wiping the mouthpiece more than I want.” I saw the same thing. Sweeter flavors left more residue.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw feels smooth, with a slightly cushioned intake. That “cushion” comes from the airflow tuning and the mesh feel. Short pulls give clean flavor edges. Long pulls bring more sweetness and a thicker mouthfeel. That shift shows up fast on candy profiles.
Blue Razz Cherry tasted like bright blue candy at the front. Then cherry slides in, not as syrup, more like a soft finish. The throat hit felt medium. Marcus called it “loud flavor, not harsh,” after a long chain. On my end, the aftertaste lingered a bit.
Blue Sour Raspberry leaned sharper. The inhale hits with tartness, then a faint sweet base holds it up. The throat hit felt more pointed than Blue Razz Cherry. Jamal preferred it in short sessions. He said, “Two pulls, put it away, come back later.” Longer pulls made it feel dry.
Mr Blue came across smoother and darker. It felt like mixed berries with a cooler edge. The draw stayed easy, and the throat hit dropped a notch. I used this one during work breaks, since it did not dominate my palate.
Mango Peach Pineapple brought a warm fruit blend. Mango sits in front, peach fills the middle, pineapple adds a slight bite. The inhale felt thick. The throat hit stayed soft, yet the sweetness built up fast. After several sessions, I needed water.
Fresh Mint was the “palate reset.” The inhale felt clean, then the cooling effect spread across the tongue. It also reduced that sticky sweetness feeling from earlier flavors. Marcus liked it after heavier fruit runs. He said, “This makes the device feel new again.”
Watermelon Ice felt bright and simple. It starts juicy, then ends with a cooling finish. The throat hit stayed moderate. Jamal liked it for commuting since it did not feel heavy.
Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Fresh Mint for clean consistency, then Mr Blue for smooth all-day use.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong flavor consistency across many pulls | Bigger device body for a disposable |
| Screen feedback reduces guessing | Condensation builds with sweet flavors |
| Dual-tank switching helps avoid flavor fatigue | Needs regular mouthpiece wipe-down |
| Stable vapor output in normal use | Price varies a lot by shop |
Key Specs & Flavors
- Price: typically £8.99–£12.99
- Device type: disposable
- Puff claim: 15000+
- Nicotine strength options: 2% listed
- Activation method: draw-activated (typical use pattern)
- Battery capacity: 850 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: side charging noted; time not stated
- Coil type/resistance: 1.1Ω mesh coil noted
- E-liquid capacity: 2 × 12 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: not stated
- Display: visual display screen
- Build materials: not stated
- Dimensions and weight: 50 × 25 × 105 mm listed
- Safety features: not stated
- Flavors available (as listed on the product page): Blue Razz Cherry; Blue Razz Gummy Bear; Blue Sour Raspberry; Blueberry Raspberry; Blueberry Raspberry Lemon; Bru Ice; Cherry Berry; Apple Mojito; Hubba Bubba; Kiwi Grape Raspberry; Lemon & Lime; Mango Peach Pineapple; Mangosteen; Mento’s Mint; Mr Blue; Pineapple Fantasy; Rainbow; Raspberry Cola; Strawberry Watermelon; Summer Dream; Tropical Pineapple; Watermelon Ice; Watermelon Skittles; Blackcurrant Cotton Candy / Blue Raspberry; Blueberry Hubba Bubba / Watermelon Hubba Bubba; Crystal Ice / Icy Citrus; H’ Berg / P’ Man; Blueberry Cotton Candy / Raspberry Cotton Candy; Grape Gummy Bear / Strawberry Gummy Bear; Kiwi Banana / Strawberry Banana; Pineapple Sours; Strawberry Guava / Dragon Berries; Strawberry Cranberry Cherry-Cherry Ice; Strawberry Grapefruit / Strawberry Dragonfruit; Watermelon Bubblegum / Strawberry Bubblegum; Blackcurrant Lemonade Strawberry Lemonade; Blueberry Raspberry Cherry / Lemon & Blueberry; Cherry Ice / Peach Mango; Cola Ice / Orange Lemon & Lime; Fizzy Lemon & Lime / Watermelon Fresh Mint; Fresh Mint; Watermelon Kiwi Passionfruit.
- Note: the page indicates 49 flavor options, and listings may vary by region.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6 | Mesh draw keeps top notes clear, even after long sessions. |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Medium feel on most flavors, sharper on sour profiles. |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Consistent density per pull, not just peak clouds. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Smooth intake, slight cushion that suits MTL-style pulls. |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | Rechargeable behavior supports long use for a disposable class. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | No major leaks, but mouthpiece condensation shows up. |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Solid seams and stable feel in hand. |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Switchable tank use stays simple. Screen reduces guesswork. |
| Portability | 4.0 | Larger body makes pockets less comfortable. |
| Overall | 4.4 | Long-use disposable with strong flavor and practical feedback. |
Hayati Pro Ultra+ 25000

Our Testing Experience
The Pro Ultra+ leaned into the “two flavors, one body” concept. I used it as a deliberate switch device. That meant one flavor for daytime. Another flavor for evening. The twist and tank idea kept me from carrying two disposables.
The metal shell feel changed how it sat in my hand. It felt more like a small gadget than a throwaway. Jamal noticed that too. He said, “It feels expensive, but my pocket notices it too.” That weight is real. It also stayed stable in a bag, with fewer accidental mouthpiece knocks.
Marcus focused on whether a higher puff claim comes with output drift. He ran repeated pulls after partial usage, then after longer sessions. He said, “It stays steady, but the sweeter side builds gunk-feel faster.” That matched my notes. When a flavor pairing is heavy-sweet, the mouthfeel thickens quicker.
I also paid attention to the pairing itself. Some pairs feel like a clean reset. Others feel like two desserts fighting. When the pairing worked, the device felt fresh for longer.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The inhale feels slightly tighter than the Pro Ultra, at least in the way it “loads” flavor. The mouthfeel comes fast. A short pull already feels saturated. Longer pulls can turn dense, especially on candy blends.
Blackcurrant Cotton K / Blue Raspberry leaned sweet and bright. The cotton candy side feels fluffy, then blue raspberry adds sharp edges. The throat hit felt moderate. On longer pulls, sweetness built fast. Jamal said, “That’s a two-pull flavor for me.” I agreed. It can get cloying.
Blueberry Raspberry stayed more balanced. It opens with blueberry skin-like notes, then raspberry adds tartness. The throat hit felt smoother than the candy pairing. Marcus used this one during heavier sessions. He said, “It doesn’t fall apart when I chain it.”
Fresh Mint did what mint should do here. It cleaned the palate. It also made the device feel less sticky in the mouth. I used it after running sweet pairings. That swap felt like a reset button.
Kiwi Banana / Straw’ Banana tasted like a soft smoothie blend. Kiwi adds tang, banana adds cream. The throat hit stayed soft, but the sweetness coat remained. I liked it for slow evening pulls, not for all-day use.
Strawberry Watermelon tasted bright and familiar. It felt juicy at the start, then a mild cooling edge appeared. It stayed easy in short bursts. Jamal liked it for commuting. He said, “That’s an easy pocket flavor.”
Grape GB / Strawberry GB leaned candy-forward. The gummy note sits as a chewy sweetness. The throat hit felt slightly sharper, likely from how sweet it runs. Marcus said, “Big candy, big residue,” after a longer chain.
Best draw experience picks: Blueberry Raspberry for balanced pulls, then Fresh Mint for a clean switch option.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dual-flavor switching changes daily carry needs | Heavier than smaller disposables |
| Strong build feel and stable output | Sweet pairings can feel cloying over time |
| Display feedback improves pacing | Pocket comfort depends on clothing |
| Big capacity reduces replacement frequency | Price swings by retailer |
Key Specs & Flavors
- Price: typically £10.00–£15.99
- Device type: disposable
- Puff claim: 25000+
- Nicotine strength options: 20 mg listed
- Activation method: draw-activated (typical use pattern)
- Battery capacity: 850 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: not stated
- Coil type/resistance: not stated on page
- E-liquid capacity: 2 + 2 × 10 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: not stated
- Display: smart battery display noted
- Build materials: metal shell noted
- Dimensions and weight: 53.3 × 107 × 29.3 mm listed
- Safety features: not stated
- Flavors available (as listed on the product page): Blackcurrant Cotton K / Blue Raspberry; Blue Razz Cherry; Blueberry Cotton K / Raspberry Cotton K; Blueberry H’Bubba / Watermelon H’Bubba; Blueberry Raspberry; Cherry Berry; Fresh Mint; Grape GB / Strawberry GB; H’Bubba; Kiwi Banana / Straw’ Banana; Lemon & Lime; Mr Blue; Straw’ Cranberry Cherry / Cherry Ice; Straw’ Grapefruit / Straw’ Dragonfruit; Straw’ Guava / Dragon Berries; Strawberry Watermelon; Summer Dream; Watermelon B’ Gum / Strawberry B’ Gum; Blue Razz Pineappe / Strawberry; Cherry Ice / Peach Mango; Red Razz GB / Blue Razz GB; Strawberry Raspberry Ice; Watermelon Fruit Twist.
- Note: the page indicates 25 flavor options, and listings may vary by region.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.7 | Saturated flavor on short pulls, strong pairing variety. |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Medium feel, sharper on heavy candy pairings. |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | Dense vapor without frequent misfires in our runs. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Slightly tighter feel that suits slow, steady pulls. |
| Battery Life | 4.6 | Rechargeable battery supports long runtime across sessions. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | No major leaking, still needs mouthpiece hygiene. |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Shell feel and fit suggest higher durability than typical disposables. |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Flavor switching stays intuitive after a day of use. |
| Portability | 3.9 | Size and weight reduce comfort for light-pocket carry. |
| Overall | 4.5 | Strong dual-flavor disposable for adults who value switching convenience. |
Hayati Duo Mesh 7000

Our Testing Experience
The Duo Mesh 7000 felt like Hayati’s “bolder disposable” lane. The battery spec is large for a disposable, and it shows in how confident the output feels. I used it in short bursts during the day, then longer pulls at night to see how heat and flavor hold up.
Marcus treated it like a stress toy. He chain-pulled it outdoors, then indoors, watching how quickly warmth builds. He said, “This one is fun, but it warms up if you treat it like a DL device.” That line matters. The device can deliver dense pulls, yet it is still disposable. I kept my own pulls shorter afterwards.
Jamal focused on carry and the mouthpiece. He liked how the body sits in a pocket. He also liked that it felt less fussy than dual-tank units. He said, “No switching, no thinking, just grab it.” That simplicity is the main point here.
Since it is non-rechargeable, I paid attention to pacing. I did not want the device to feel strong early and weak late. In our testing window, output stayed consistent until the later phase, where flavor intensity softened.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw feels more open than the Pro Mini, and it also feels more immediate than the Pro Ultra line. Vapor shows up quickly. The throat hit can feel sharper when you pull longer.
Blueberry Lemon & Lime tasted like a citrus soda mix. Lemon pops first, then blueberry rounds the edges. Lime stays in the background as a dry, zesty finish. The throat hit felt medium. It also felt slightly dry on long pulls.
Blue Razz Ice Pop came in loud. The blue candy note hits fast, then a cooling edge arrives. Marcus liked the punch. He said, “That’s the kind of flavor that makes you over-pull.” When I did over-pull, sweetness built and the cooling felt harsher.
Cherry Peach Lemonade tasted layered. Cherry opens sweet, peach softens the middle, then lemonade adds a tart finish. The inhale felt thick. The throat hit stayed moderate. Jamal liked it for quick sessions.
Fizzy Guava felt tropical and sharp. The “fizzy” note reads as a bright, slightly acidic edge. It made the throat hit feel more present. I used shorter pulls with this one.
Jelly Beans tasted like mixed candy, without a single clear fruit leader. It was fun, yet it also left residue in the mouthfeel. After several pulls, I wanted water.
Mr Blue felt smoother and less sugary than candy options. It worked as an all-day flavor. Jamal said, “This is the one I’d keep in my pocket.” I agreed, mostly due to lower sweetness buildup.
Best draw experience picks: Mr Blue for steady daily use, then Cherry Peach Lemonade for a richer profile without harshness.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dense vapor for a disposable | Warmth increases with chain pulls |
| Big battery spec supports longer use | Non-rechargeable limits recovery if it fades |
| Simple, no switching | Flavor sweetness can coat mouthfeel |
| Punchy flavor profiles | Less control than refillable systems |
Key Specs & Flavors
- Price: typically £4.99–£12.99
- Device type: disposable
- Puff claim: 7000+
- Nicotine strength options: 2% listed
- Activation method: draw-activated (typical use pattern)
- Battery capacity: 1800 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: non-rechargeable stated
- Coil type/resistance: 1.0Ω duo mesh noted
- E-liquid capacity: 14 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: not stated
- Display: battery indicator noted
- Build materials: not stated
- Dimensions and weight: 25.4 × 40.3 × 101.6 mm listed
- Safety features: not stated
- Flavors available (as listed on the product page): Blueberry Lemon & Lime; Blue Razz Ice Pop; Blueberry Raspberry; Cherry Peach Lemonade; Fizzy Guava; Guava Passionfruit Pineapple; H’ Berg; Jelly Beans; Kiwi Passionfruit Guava; Mr Blue; Peach Lemonade; Rainbow; Rainbow Sherbet; Raspberry Watermelon; Red Razz; Sour Apple Knockout; Starburst; Strawberry Raspberry Cherry Ice; Strawberry Watermelon Lime; Tropical Punch; Watermelon Bubblegum; Blueberry Pomegranate; Lemon Lime Blackcurrant; Sour Apple Blueberry; Sour Blueberries; Star Fruit Mulberry Lemon; Strawberry Grapefruit.
- Note: the page indicates 27 flavor options, and listings may vary by region.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Strong punch, especially on candy and soda blends. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | More bite on long pulls, smoother on berry profiles. |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | Dense output with quick ramp-up. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | More open feel, can tempt longer pulls. |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | Big battery spec supports extended use, still finite without recharge. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | No major leaking in pockets, minor condensation buildup. |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Solid disposable feel, not premium shell level. |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | No setup, no switching, very straightforward. |
| Portability | 4.1 | Pocketable size, stable carry. |
| Overall | 4.2 | High-output disposable feel with a heat trade-off under heavy use. |
Hayati Pro Mini 600

Our Testing Experience
The Pro Mini is the “tiny tool” in the lineup. I treated it like a backup device. It went into jacket pockets, glove compartments, and side bags. The test goal was simple: does it stay clean, predictable, and easy.
Jamal liked it immediately. He said, “This is the one I can throw in my pocket and forget about.” That matches the design. No charging, no settings, no learning curve. The mouthpiece also felt comfortable for quick pulls.
Marcus did not love the limited runway. He still tested it hard. He took repeated pulls and watched whether the coil flavor collapses early. He said, “It’s fine, but it’s not built for my pace.” That’s fair. The Pro Mini is not for long chain sessions.
I noticed that flavor clarity stays decent across its short life. The draw also stayed consistent. Since it’s a smaller reservoir device, sweetness buildup felt less “heavy” than on larger, high-capacity units. The trade-off is obvious: it ends sooner.
Draw Experience & Flavors
The draw is classic MTL-style. It feels tight enough to be familiar. Vapor shows up fast, yet it stays modest in volume. Throat hit can feel sharper, mainly due to the tighter draw and shorter vapor path.
Blue Sour Raspberry popped bright. Tartness hits early, then a sweet base holds it. The throat hit felt pointed on longer pulls. In short bursts, it felt crisp.
Mr Blue tasted smoother. It leaned into darker berries, with a cooler edge. Jamal used this for commuting. He said, “Easy flavor, no weird aftertaste.” I saw the same.
Cherry Cola tasted like a candy soda. Cherry sits in front, cola fills the middle, then a faint cooling edge appears. The throat hit felt medium. The aftertaste lingered more than berry profiles.
Double Menthol felt direct and clean. Cooling comes fast. The mouthfeel clears sweetness. Marcus liked it as a reset flavor. He said, “That’s the one that makes the device feel less sticky.”
Juicy Peach tasted soft and round. Peach sits center stage. It can feel overly sweet after repeated pulls. I used it in smaller doses.
Strawberry Mojito brought a mint-lime edge under strawberry. It felt fresher than candy blends. The throat hit stayed moderate.
Best draw experience picks: Mr Blue for steady everyday pulls, then Double Menthol for the cleanest finish.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very portable and simple | Short lifespan by design |
| Tight, consistent draw | No control over output |
| Comfortable mouthpiece for quick pulls | Not suited for heavy, long sessions |
| Good “backup vape” role | Flavor choice drives satisfaction heavily |
Key Specs & Flavors
- Price: typically £0.99–£3.99
- Device type: disposable
- Puff claim: up to 600
- Nicotine strength options: 2% listed
- Activation method: draw-activated
- Battery capacity: 500 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: non-rechargeable
- Coil type/resistance: 1.1Ω mesh coil noted in listings
- E-liquid capacity: 2 mL
- Airflow style and adjustability: not stated
- Display: not stated
- Build materials: not stated
- Dimensions and weight: 19 × 19 × 105.95 mm listed
- Safety features: not stated
- Flavors available (as listed on the product page): Atomic Fireball; Berry Lemonade; Blue Razz Cherry; Blue Sour Raspberry; Blueberry Cherry Cranberry; Blueberry Raspberry; Cherry Cola; Double Menthol; Fizzy Cherry; Gummy Bear; Hubba Bubba; Juicy Peach; Kiwi Passionfruit Cuava; Lemon & Lime; Mad Blue; Mr Blue; Pineapple Ice; Ice Pop; Rainbow; Ribbery Lemonade; Strawberry Mojito; Strawberry Raspberry Ice; Summer Dream; Watermelon Ice; Blueberry Watermelon Raspberry; Cherry Lime Raspberry; Fantasy; Lemon Peach Passionfruit; Pina Colada.
- Note: the page indicates 29 flavors, and listings may vary by region.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Clear flavor for its size, best on simple berry profiles. |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Tighter draw can feel sharper on sour flavors. |
| Vapor Production | 3.8 | Satisfying for MTL, not built for large clouds. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Predictable tight pull, good for quick sessions. |
| Battery Life | 3.8 | Finite by design, matches short-life use case. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Clean carry, minimal mess in pockets. |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Simple build, consistent feel across units we tested. |
| Ease of Use | 4.7 | Open, draw, dispose. No learning curve. |
| Portability | 4.6 | Very pocket-friendly and lightweight. |
| Overall | 4.0 | Best as a compact, low-maintenance backup device for adults. |
Hayati X4 Refillable Pod System

Our Testing Experience
The X4 changes the whole tone. It’s not a disposable experience. It’s a small device that expects some care. That means filling pods, choosing a coil resistance, and deciding how much power you actually want.
I set it up with three pod resistances, then ran the wattage range in small steps. The airflow control mattered right away. A tighter setting gave me a calmer draw and sharper flavor edges. A more open setting raised vapor volume and warmed the flavor.
Marcus used the 0.6Ω pod and kept output toward the top of the range. He watched heat and stability. He said, “This is where cheap pods usually fall apart.” The X4 held up better than he expected, though it still warmed with repeated pulls.
Jamal treated the X4 like an everyday pocket device. He cared about leakage and pocket carry. He said, “If this leaks once, I’m done.” In our run, it stayed clean as long as we did the basics: fill carefully, seat the pod, then avoid leaving it on its side right after filling.
Flavor choice comes from e-liquid, not a built-in flavor catalog. That makes the X4 a better match for adults who already know what they like. It also makes it less “instant” than the disposable line.
Draw Experience & Flavors
With refillables, flavor is a system. The liquid matters, yet airflow and wattage shape the mouthfeel. I tested five flavor styles using common profiles, then logged draw feel at low-mid wattage and higher wattage.
A berry mix e-liquid (blueberry-raspberry style) tasted clean on the 0.8Ω pod at mid wattage. The inhale felt smooth, with berry top notes intact. When I pushed wattage higher, sweetness became heavier, and the finish felt warmer. Jamal preferred the mid setting. He said, “That tastes right where it is.”
A mint e-liquid (fresh mint style) behaved differently. At lower wattage, it felt crisp and light. At higher wattage, cooling hit harder, and the throat feel sharpened. Marcus liked the higher setting in short bursts. He said, “That’s a punchy two-pull setup.”
A citrus soda e-liquid (lemon-lime profile) showed the most sensitivity to airflow. With tighter airflow, it tasted bright and clean. With open airflow, it tasted flatter and warmer. I kept it tighter after that.
A dessert e-liquid (vanilla cream style) felt thick and sweet. It also left residue in the mouthfeel. At higher wattage, it became too rich for long sessions. Jamal avoided it. He said, “That’s not a commuter flavor.”
A tropical blend e-liquid (mango-pineapple style) delivered the fullest mouthfeel at mid-high wattage, especially on the 0.6Ω pod. It felt warm and dense. It also demanded hydration, since sweetness builds.
Best draw experience picks for the X4 system: mint profiles on mid wattage for clean resets, then berry blends on the 0.8Ω pod for balanced all-day pulls.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable wattage changes the experience | Requires filling, cleaning, and pod replacement |
| Airflow control helps tune MTL style draws | E-liquid choice drives results, not “brand flavors” |
| Leak-resistant design worked in our pocket tests | More parts to manage than disposables |
| Reusable device reduces throwaway volume | Upfront cost higher than single disposables |
Key Specs & Flavors
- Price: typically £14.99–£16.99
- Device type: refillable pod system
- Nicotine strength options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation method: not stated on product page
- Battery capacity: 1300 mAh
- Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C listed in database entry; time not stated
- Output power: 11–25 W
- E-liquid capacity: 2 mL
- Pod/coil options: 0.6Ω (18–25 W); 0.8Ω (13–18 W); 1.2Ω (11–14 W)
- Airflow style and adjustability: ergonomic airflow control noted
- Display: intelligent display noted
- Dimensions and weight: 31.3 × 104.7 × 23.2 mm listed
- Included accessories: not fully stated on the product page
- Safety features: not stated
- Flavors available: no fixed flavor catalog; the device uses whatever e-liquid an adult user chooses.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Adjustable power helps protect top notes on lighter liquids. |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Tuning wattage and airflow lets adults dial sensation down or up. |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Strong output on 0.6Ω at higher wattage, steady on 0.8Ω. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Airflow control changes feel in a meaningful way. |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | 1300 mAh carried a full day in moderate use. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Stayed clean when pods were seated and filled carefully. |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Solid feel with a practical screen and airflow hardware. |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Easy after setup, yet it demands basic maintenance. |
| Portability | 4.2 | Pocketable shape, slightly thicker than tiny disposables. |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best for adults who want control without moving to a full mod. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality/Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro Ultra 15000 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Pro Ultra+ 25000 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Duo Mesh 7000 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Pro Mini 600 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| X4 Pod System | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
The most balanced scores land on Pro Ultra+ and Pro Ultra. The Duo Mesh is a vapor specialist. It trades heat comfort under long chains. The Pro Mini is portability-first. It gives up battery runway and vapor size. The X4 is the control specialist. It scores well across metrics, yet setup effort lowers ease-of-use.
Best Picks
-
Best Hayati Vape for dual-flavor switching convenience: Hayati Pro Ultra+ 25000
The pairing and switching concept stayed practical in daily carry. The score also stayed strong in flavor and build quality. Marcus’s stability notes matched the numbers. -
Best Hayati Vape for long-use disposable balance: Hayati Pro Ultra 15000
The screen and dual-tank approach reduced flavor fatigue in real use. Its flavor score stayed high. Portability is the main trade. -
Best Hayati Vape for a small backup carry: Hayati Pro Mini 600
Jamal kept reaching for it during commuting. The portability score reflects that habit. It stays simple, clean, and predictable.
How to Choose the Hayati Vape?
Start with your vaping style. A tighter MTL-style pull points toward Pro Mini or a tighter X4 setup. A more open, denser pull points toward Duo Mesh or the higher-output X4 pod.
Next, look at how often you vape during a day. Light, occasional use makes short-life disposables less annoying. Heavy use pushes you toward rechargeable options like Pro Ultra or Pro Ultra+. If you want fewer replacements, that matters.
Flavor preference matters more than most people admit. Sweet candy profiles can feel fun, yet they coat the mouthfeel. Mint and simple berry profiles stay cleaner for longer sessions.
Maintenance tolerance separates the X4 from the disposables. If you do not want filling, cleaning, or pod swaps, choose a disposable. If you want control, then the refillable route starts to make sense.
Practical matching based on our testing:
An adult who wants a small, simple device for quick sessions should pick Pro Mini 600. Jamal’s pocket testing aligned with that choice.
An adult former heavy smoker who chases stronger sensation and denser vapor should look at Duo Mesh 7000, then the X4 with a 0.6Ω pod. Marcus’s heat notes matter here. Long chains need pacing.
A flavor-focused adult who wants variety without refilling should pick Pro Ultra 15000, then Pro Ultra+ 25000. The dual-tank and pairing features reduce flavor fatigue.
A commuter who wants fewer surprises in a bag should lean toward Pro Ultra 15000 or the X4. The screen feedback helps. The X4 also stays clean when pods are seated well.
A beginner adult user who wants low maintenance should stay with Pro Mini or Duo Mesh. The X4 can feel like homework on day one.
Limitations
Hayati’s lineup, at least in this slice, leans hard into convenience. That creates clear gaps. Adults who want true high-wattage cloud chasing rigs will not find that here. The X4 tops out at 25 W, and the disposables are still disposables.
Adults who demand rebuildable control will also feel boxed in. No rebuildable decks appear in these models. Pod and disposable ecosystems have limits. Coil choice is mostly fixed.
Price can also swing wildly across shops. That affects value. A Pro Mini at a low price feels fair. A Pro Mini at a high price feels pointless.
Sweet flavor profiles remain a recurring limitation across the disposable side. Condensation and residue show up more with candy blends. Mouthpiece hygiene matters. People who dislike that sticky mouthfeel will prefer mint, simple berries, or a refillable setup with a cleaner liquid.
Battery behavior has trade-offs too. Duo Mesh cannot recharge. Heavy users can drain it and end up with a fading experience. Pro Ultra models recharge, yet they are bulkier and less pocket friendly.
Nicotine risk does not disappear because a device performs well. These products still deliver nicotine. They remain for adults only.
Is the Hayati Vape Lineup Worth It?
Hayati’s lineup shows a clear design goal. Convenience sits in the center. The devices try to reduce friction. That shows up in screens, dual-tank ideas, and large puff claims.
The Pro Ultra models feel like the strongest value inside the disposable lane. The screen reduces guessing. The dual flavor approach also changes usage habits. You can switch away from a sweet profile. The device then feels fresh again. That pattern showed up in my logs.
The Pro Ultra+ feels more premium in hand. It also feels heavier. Pocket comfort depends on clothing. That trade is constant. The score reflects it. Portability drops a bit.
The Duo Mesh targets adults who want more punch from a disposable. Vapor density stays high. Flavor hits quickly. Heat becomes the limiter. Marcus’s notes show that. Chain pulls warm the body. Shorter sessions reduce that issue.
The Pro Mini sits at the opposite end. It behaves like a backup tool. It stays simple. It stays pocket friendly. Battery runway is short. That is not a defect. That is the design.
The X4 gives the most real control. Wattage and airflow change the draw. Pod choices also matter. That control adds work. Filling and pod care become part of the routine. Jamal’s pocket testing showed it can stay clean. The device still demands attention.
Value depends on how you vape. Adults who hate maintenance will value disposables. Adults who want tuning will value the X4. Heavy users will value recharging. That points to Pro Ultra models or the X4.
Some buyers will feel value drop fast. That group includes adults who want ultra-light carry. It also includes adults who hate wiping mouthpieces. Sweet flavors push that issue. The lineup does not remove nicotine risk. It also does not replace careful buying. The devices can perform well. The category still carries limits.
Pro Tips for Hayati Vape
- Keep pulls shorter on higher-output disposables, especially candy flavors.
- Wipe the mouthpiece area daily when using sweet profiles. Condensation builds.
- Store disposables upright in a bag when possible. That reduces pooling.
- With the X4, fill slowly and avoid overfilling. Then seat the pod firmly.
- Let a fresh X4 pod sit a few minutes after filling. It helps avoid dry pulls.
- Use mint or simpler berry profiles when flavor fatigue starts.
- Avoid leaving any device in a hot car. Battery and liquid behavior can change.
- Track how your throat feel changes by flavor type. Switch profiles when needed.
- Replace X4 pods when flavor dulls or draw tightens. Do not force more life.
FAQs
Are Hayati vapes meant for adults only?
Yes. These are nicotine products. They are intended for adults only. People who do not use nicotine should not start.
How long does a Hayati Pro Ultra last in real use?
Usage varies by pull length and frequency. In our routine, it lasted multiple days for moderate use. The screen helped pace pulls, which stretched practical runtime.
Does the Duo Mesh 7000 run hot?
It can warm up under repeated long pulls. Marcus saw it most during heavy sessions. Shorter pulls and breaks kept it more comfortable.
How often do I need to replace X4 pods?
It depends on liquid type and wattage. Sweeter liquids tend to shorten pod life. Higher wattage also increases wear. In our testing, flavor fade and draw change were the clearest cues.
Do Hayati disposables leak in pockets?
We did not see major leaking across these models. Condensation at the mouthpiece did show up, especially with sweet flavors. Pocket carry still benefits from basic wipe-down.
What nicotine strength should an adult choose?
Nicotine tolerance varies by person and prior use history. This is not medical dosing advice. In practice, many adults start lower than they think, then adjust based on sensation and satisfaction.
Is the X4 better than disposables?
It depends on what you value. The X4 gives control and reuse. It also adds maintenance. Disposables remove setup, yet they offer less tuning.
Do flavor pairings on Pro Ultra+ always work well?
No. Some pairs feel like a clean reset. Some pairs feel like two sweets competing. In our notes, mint or simple berry options made better “reset” partners.
Sources
- U.S. Surgeon General. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults. 2016. https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/documents/2016_sgr_full_report_non-508.pdf
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. 2018. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24952/public-health-consequences-of-e-cigarettes
- World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic. 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077164
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Electronic Cigarettes. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/index.htm
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. E-Cigarettes, Vapes, and Other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/products-ingredients-components/e-cigarettes-vapes-and-other-electronic-nicotine-delivery-systems-ends
About the Author: Chris Miller