The IGET Bar Plus 6000 sits in a spot where a lot of disposables and pod-style kits blur together. I reviewed it because the “high-puff” claim, the pod-style format, and the screen/lock features change how people actually use it day to day. The experience tends to hinge on three variables: flavor stability after a few hundred puffs, heat control during back-to-back pulls, and how predictable the airflow feels when you’re not babying the draw.
What is the IGET Bar Plus 6000?
The IGET Bar Plus 6000 is a prefilled, pod-style vape kit that’s commonly sold as a device plus a compatible prefilled pod. Listings commonly describe about 6000 puffs, 16 mL e-liquid capacity, Type-C charging, and a mesh coil around 1.4 Ω, with a battery listed near 600 mAh.
The main appeal is convenience with fewer “dead battery” endings than a strictly non-rechargeable disposable. The main risks in real use are simple: overheating from chain pulls, condensation at the mouthpiece, and inconsistent nicotine labeling across markets.
Why choose the IGET Bar Plus 6000?
It fits adult users who want a straightforward daily carry but still care about flavor staying intact past the first day. It also fits people who like a moderate MTL to restricted-lung draw, especially when they prefer sweet fruit profiles or mint/cooling blends that don’t require tuning. It tends to work for commuters who can tolerate brief top-offs on Type-C rather than needing a “forget it for a week” battery routine.
Skip it if you demand an ultra-tight MTL, or if cooling additives bother your throat quickly. It also won’t suit people who hate sweet, syrup-leaning flavors, or users who want a low-nicotine option without hunting for a specific market label. If you routinely chain vape high output devices, the smaller battery and compact airflow behavior can feel limiting.
How We Tested It
We ran a 3-day carry test with 100–300 puffs per day, using it in short bursts plus a few longer sessions to stress heat and consistency. I tracked flavor accuracy, puff-to-puff consistency, airflow/draw behavior, heat stability, condensation/leak risk, and portability. Marcus focused on sustained pulls and heat hotspots, then called out any flavor flattening. Jamal treated it like a commuter device and watched pocket carry comfort, mouthpiece feel, and how often he felt pushed into a recharge.
Performance Scores of the Vape
Test duration: 3 days. Usage pattern: 100–300 puffs/day, mixed short bursts and longer sessions. Scoring rubric: flavor/airflow/condensation are mostly observational; “battery life” reflects practical uptime with recharging.
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Sweet profiles stayed defined after repeated sessions; light “muting” showed up late-day on heavier pulls |
| Throat Hit | 3.8 | Noticeable, but it shifted with draw strength and cooling flavors; not the sharpest hit in this style |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Dense enough for a restricted draw; falls off when you baby the airflow |
| Airflow/Draw | 3.9 | Consistent once you learn the pace; can feel a bit “narrow” if you pull too hard |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Rechargeable behavior reduced dead-device frustration; heavy use still pushed frequent top-ups |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | No major leaks in pocket carry; condensation showed up and needed routine wipe-down |
| Build Quality | 3.8 | Solid shell feel, but the pod swap and screen behavior demanded a bit of care |
| Ease of Use | 4.1 | Simple daily use; lock/on-off behavior varies by version and can confuse new users |
| Portability | 3.7 | Pocketable, though the round body can feel chunky in slim jeans |
| Overall | 4.0 | Strong “daily driver” performance if you accept minor condensation and periodic charging |
Our Testing Experience
Our Testing Results
I treated the IGET Bar Plus 6000 like a normal daily device: desk use, car use, and pocket carry. Day one felt clean and predictable, with stable flavor and no odd heat spikes. Day two showed the pattern that mattered: it liked steady, medium draws, and it punished aggressive chain pulls with warmer vapor and a slightly flatter top note on sweeter flavors. Marcus pushed longer sessions and flagged that the device stayed usable, but it felt better when he spaced pulls instead of stacking them. Jamal carried it on short walks and in a jacket pocket, and he mainly noticed two things: the body felt comfortable in hand, and the mouthpiece picked up a light film of condensation that needed a wipe when he returned to it after an hour.
The practical upside was recharging behavior. It didn’t turn into a dead-stick problem the way a purely non-rechargeable disposable can. Many listings describe Type-C charging and a small display, and that matched the way it fit into daily routines—quick checks, quick top-offs, then back in the pocket.
Draw Experience
I stayed with three flavors that are commonly listed for this line: Strawberry Kiwi Ice, Cherry Cola, and Mountain Spring Mint.
Strawberry Kiwi Ice opened with a candy-sweet strawberry layer, then a brighter kiwi edge. After heavier use, the kiwi note dulled first, while the cooling stayed stable. Cherry Cola was the most “syrupy” on the tongue. The cola spice came through on the exhale, and it got cloying faster if I chain pulled. Mountain Spring Mint was the cleanest on repeat use. It kept a crisp, mint-forward finish, and it also covered flavor fatigue better between sessions.
Across all three, the best draw was a controlled pull that stayed even from start to finish. When I pulled too hard, the vape felt warmer and the flavor got less precise.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Consistent daily use once draw pace is learned | Sweet flavors can turn heavy with chain pulls |
| Rechargeable behavior reduces “dead disposable” endings | Condensation can build at the mouthpiece over the day |
| Mesh-coil style output supports defined flavor edges | Airflow can feel narrow if you pull aggressively |
| Pod-style format makes swaps straightforward | Lock/on-off behavior differs by version and can confuse |
| Screen/check features help manage routine charging | Round body can feel bulky in tighter pockets |
| Works well for moderate MTL / restricted draw preferences | Users wanting an ultra-tight MTL draw may be disappointed |
| No major pocket leaks during commuter-style carry | Flavor fatigue shows sooner on syrup-leaning profiles |
| Solid baseline vapor volume for this format | Frequent top-ups can happen for heavy users |
Key Specs
Below are device details that are commonly listed for the IGET Bar Plus 6000 by multiple sellers and product pages. Specs can vary by market and version, so any purchase should be matched to the packaging label.
Device type: Prefilled pod-style vape kit (device + compatible prefilled pod)
Estimated puff count: 6000 puffs
E-liquid capacity: 16 mL
Battery capacity: 600 mAh
Charging: Type-C
Estimated charge time: 30–60 minutes (commonly listed)
Coil: Mesh coil, commonly listed at 1.4 Ω
Size and weight (commonly listed for the kit): 30 × 102.5 mm, ~78 g
Activation and controls: Draw to vape is commonly described, with versions also listing on/off or lock behavior via a button or pod-insert sequence
Nicotine strength: -
Pod/tank capacity: 16 mL (prefilled pod)
Price: -
IGET Bar Plus 6000 Vs. Alternatives
Choose this device if you want prefilled convenience with recharging, if you care about flavor consistency more than huge airflow, and if you like sweet fruit or mint profiles that stay readable across the day. It also makes sense for users who prefer a device that feels less “one-and-done” than a basic disposable.
Two competing options in the same broad category: Elf Bar BC5000 (often picked for wide flavor variety and easy, no-pod handling) and Lost Mary OS5000 (often chosen for a strong, consistent draw feel in a compact carry). Pick those when you want simpler “single unit” usage and you do not want to deal with pod swaps.
Pro Tips for IGET Bar Plus 6000
- Take steady, medium draws. When you yank hard, the vapor warms up and the flavor loses detail.
- Treat it like a device that benefits from short breaks. A 20–30 second pause between pulls reduces heat creep.
- Wipe the mouthpiece once or twice a day. A dry tissue does more than people expect for condensation control.
- Keep the device upright in a pocket or bag when you can. It cuts down on pooled condensation near the mouthpiece.
- Use a low-power USB source when charging, and unplug once the charge is done. Overcharging habits tend to increase heat and battery wear over time.
- If your version has a lock or power sequence, learn it once and stick to it. Different versions use different patterns, and confusion looks like “device not working.”
- Rotate flavors thoughtfully. Sweeter profiles can cause faster flavor fatigue; mint profiles often reset the palate between sessions.
- If the draw feels tight, check for lint around the airflow area. Pocket carry can block airflow without you noticing.
- Expect the need for top-up charging if you vape heavily. A small battery can keep the device alive, but it won’t replace a large mod-style setup.
- Nicotine labeling varies by market and seller. Read the packaging, and do not assume a strength from the name alone.
FAQs
What’s the simplest way to avoid “muted” flavor after heavy use?
Use shorter sessions, slow the draw slightly, and rotate to a mint or lighter profile for a few pulls.
Does it leak in a pocket?
In daily carry, the bigger issue is usually condensation rather than a true leak. Wipe the mouthpiece and keep it upright when possible.
Is it easy to use if I hate settings?
There are no wattage settings in normal use. The only learning curve comes from lock/on-off behavior on some versions.
How do I pick flavors that won’t get cloying?
Avoid heavy “cola/candy” profiles as your only option. Mix in mint or less sweet fruit to keep the taste from turning syrupy.
About the Author: Chris Miller
