RAZ CA6000 Review

The RAZ CA6000 is a rechargeable disposable built around a mesh coil and adjustable airflow, with an e-liquid level light and a battery indicator that affect day-to-day use. A device like this usually comes down to three things: whether the flavor holds up late in the tank, whether the draw stays consistent when you change airflow, and whether the battery behavior stays stable under real pocket carry. Those are the variables that decided most of this review.

RAZ CA6000 Review

What is the RAZ CA6000?

RAZ CA6000 is a draw-activated, rechargeable disposable that’s commonly listed with up to 6000 puffs, 10 mL prefilled liquid, adjustable airflow, and a mesh coil. Many listings also show 5% (50 mg) nicotine and a USB-C charge port, plus battery and e-liquid indicator lights and a leather-grip style body. The main risks come from high nicotine strength, sweetened flavor profiles that can feel heavy over long sessions, and normal rechargeable-disposable concerns like condensation and heat near the port when charging.

Why choose the RAZ CA6000?

This fits adult users who want a restricted DL to looser MTL-leaning draw that you can tune with airflow, and who prefer forward, sweet fruit or menthol/ice profiles that show up fast on the inhale. It also fits people who like quick status checks; the indicator lights reduce guesswork when the liquid is getting low.
Skip it if you need an ultra-tight MTL pull, if cooling agents give you headaches, or if syrupy sweetness builds up on your palate during frequent sessions. It’s also a poor match for commuters who refuse mid-day top-offs, since rechargeable disposables still behave like small-battery devices under heavy puff counts.

RAZ CA6000 Review

How We Tested It

We tested the RAZ CA6000 over 3 days, rotating it as a daily carry with short bursts and longer chain sessions, landing around 100–300 puffs per day depending on workload. I tracked airflow behavior, flavor accuracy, puff-to-puff consistency, throat hit, condensation/leak risk, and battery/charging stability. Marcus focused on heat, sustained output, and whether flavor degraded during higher-frequency pulls. Jamal ran pocket-carry checks during commuting and outdoor walking, then logged comfort, draw resistance shifts, and aftertaste between sessions.

Performance Scores of the Vape

Test duration: 3 days, mixed usage at roughly 100–300 puffs/day, tested on commonly sold 5% nicotine versions and across multiple airflow positions.
Scoring: 1.0–5.0 scale; consistency, leaks/condensation, and heat were treated as observable checks, while flavor and throat hit were logged as repeatable personal impressions.

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.2 Clear fruit-forward delivery early in the tank; sweetness can feel dense late-day with frequent sessions.
Throat Hit 4.0 Noticeable hit on tighter airflow; smoother when opened up, still firm at 5% strength.
Vapor Production 4.1 Consistent medium-to-full vapor for a disposable; stays stable unless chain-puffed hard.
Airflow/Draw 4.0 Adjustment is meaningful; it shifts from a tighter pull to a more open restricted DL feel without becoming airy.
Battery Life 3.8 Rechargeable behavior helps, but heavy use still pushes you into top-offs; indicator reduces surprises.
Leak Resistance 4.1 No true leaks in our carry, but light condensation appeared under the mouthpiece after long bursts.
Build Quality 4.0 Body feels solid with the grip section; survived pocket carry and desk drops without rattles.
Ease of Use 4.4 Draw activation is straightforward; battery and e-liquid lights make it less annoying to manage.
Portability 3.9 Pocketable, but not tiny; the lanyard point helps when you don’t want it in a pocket.

Overall score: 4.1 / 5.0

RAZ CA6000 Review

Our Testing Experience

Our Testing Results

I used the CA6000 as a main device for two workdays and as a backup on day three, keeping it in a jeans pocket, a jacket pocket, and a car console. The airflow control changed the feel more than I expected; on the tighter setting it leaned closer to a cigarette-like pull, while the more open setting shifted it toward a restricted DL cadence. Over roughly 3 days of mixed use in the 100–300 puffs/day range, the device stayed consistent on activation with no misfires, and it did not develop the “delayed wake-up” draw you see in some disposables. Marcus ran longer chain sessions and flagged mild heat buildup near the top after repeated pulls, but it never crossed into harsh heat. Jamal’s carry notes were simple: no leaking in pockets, minor mouthpiece moisture after walking sessions, and the indicator lights prevented the classic “sudden burnt surprise” when liquid ran low.

Draw Experience

Crushed Berries started with a bright mixed-berry note and a cold edge, then it shifted into a thicker candy-like sweetness after longer strings of pulls. Dragon Fruit Lemonade hit sharper; the lemonade tang sat on the front of the tongue, while the dragon fruit read as a softer tropical body note that held up better as the puff count climbed. Alaskan Mint was the cleanest palate reset; on tighter airflow it delivered a firmer throat hit and a colder exhale, while open airflow made it smoother but more “airy-cool” than minty-sweet. Across all three, the mesh-coil style warmth stayed even, and the main downside was condensation that collected after repeated short bursts.

RAZ CA6000 Review

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Airflow adjustment produces real changes in draw feel. Sweet profiles can feel heavy across long sessions.
Mesh-style heating delivers steady flavor early in the tank. Condensation builds under the mouthpiece with frequent bursts.
Indicator lights reduce guesswork for battery and remaining liquid. Battery still needs top-offs under heavy daily use.
Draw activation stayed consistent; no misfires in our use. Open airflow can feel less “tight MTL” than some users want.
Pocket carry held up well; no leaking in our bags or pockets. Cooling-heavy flavors can fatigue sensitive users over a day.
Grip section improves handling when hands are dry or cold. Retail pricing varies a lot; one common listing showed $19.99.
Lanyard point is practical when pockets are crowded. Limited transparency on some listings (battery capacity omitted in certain stores).

Key Specs

  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Activation method: Draw-activated
  • Puff count: Up to ~6000 puffs
  • Prefilled capacity: 10 mL
  • Nicotine strength (tested unit): 5% (50 mg)
  • Charging: USB Type-C / USB-C port
  • Battery capacity: 650 mAh (commonly listed)
  • Estimated charge time (observed): about 60–75 minutes from low-battery indication to steady/full indication (varied with charger)
  • Heating element: Mesh coil
  • Coil resistance: -
  • Airflow: Adjustable
  • Indicators: Battery indicator light and e-liquid indicator light
  • Exterior details commonly listed: leather grip, lanyard attachment point
  • Flavor options (examples): Crushed Berries, Dragon Fruit Lemonade, Alaskan Mint, Frozen Strawberry, Hawaii Sunset, Spearmint
  • Price: - (varies by retailer; one listing showed $19.99)
RAZ CA6000 Review

RAZ CA6000 Vs. Alternatives

Choose the CA6000 if you want adjustable airflow in a rechargeable disposable, you prefer fruit-and-ice flavors that hit fast, and you like having battery/e-liquid indicators for day-to-day tracking. If you want a more established “baseline” disposable with broad availability, Elf Bar BC5000 is a common alternative with widely listed 5000 puffs and a rechargeable 650 mAh battery. If you want a slightly smaller-feeling device profile, Lost Mary MO5000 is another close competitor with 5000 puffs, 13.5 mL, and a 500 mAh battery listed on major review databases.

Pro Tips for RAZ CA6000

  • Keep airflow slightly tighter during short sessions. The throat hit feels more defined, and it reduces that “thin airy” feel that can show up when you take only a few quick pulls.
  • After a long burst, wipe the mouthpiece once. Condensation shows up first there, and it can change flavor on the next few puffs.
  • If you taste sweetness building up, rotate to a mint flavor for a few sessions. It resets your palate better than pushing more fruit puffs back-to-back.
  • Don’t chain-puff when the device is warm. In our use, the top section got mildly warm during sustained pulls, and flavor started to flatten when we kept pushing.
  • Charge before the battery drops to its last indicator. Rechargeable disposables often feel less consistent right at the bottom of the battery range.
  • Use a lower-power USB charger when possible. A steady charge reduced heat at the port in our checks, and it kept the device calmer on a desk charge.
  • Keep it upright in a bag pocket when you can. Mouthpiece-up storage reduced moisture migration into the top area during commuting.
  • When switching flavors, give it 5–10 puffs to settle. Early puffs after a break tasted sharper and colder, then the profile smoothed out.
  • If you prefer a tighter draw, close airflow first and slow your pull. The CA6000 reacts better to a slower draw than to quick hard pulls.
RAZ CA6000 Review

FAQs

How many puffs do you actually get from the RAZ CA6000?
Listings commonly describe it as up to around 6000 puffs, but real count depends on draw length and airflow setting. In our use, longer pulls on open airflow reduced the “days of use” compared with short pulls on tighter airflow.

Is the RAZ CA6000 rechargeable, and what charging port does it use?
Many retailers list it as rechargeable with a USB-C/Type-C port. Our unit behaved like a typical USB-C rechargeable disposable with mid-day or nightly top-offs under heavier use.

Does it leak in a pocket or bag?
We didn’t see liquid leaks in pockets or bags during commuting and outdoor carry. We did see light mouthpiece condensation after frequent short bursts, which is common with this style of disposable.

Which flavors are the safest picks if you hate “perfume” notes?
Alaskan Mint was the cleanest and least floral in our set. Dragon Fruit Lemonade stayed sharper and less candy-heavy than berry blends when puff count climbed.

Is the draw more MTL or more DL?
With adjustable airflow, it sits in the middle. Tightening airflow can approach an MTL-leaning restriction, while opening it pushes it into a comfortable restricted DL style rather than a fully airy DL draw.

About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.