The Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit is built around a dual-battery box mod and a large sub-ohm tank, which puts it in the “high output, long sessions” lane. I reviewed it because the spec sheet and the protective, rubberized build suggest it’s meant for daily use, not just desk use. Battery handling, heat behavior at the recommended coil ranges, and leak/condensation control are the variables that decide whether this kit feels solid or annoying.
What is the Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit?
It’s a dual external-battery box mod kit paired with the iTank 2 sub-ohm tank. The manual lists 2 x 21700 or 2 x 18650 compatibility, 5–220W output, a 0.96" TFT screen, and Type-C 5V/2A charging. The included tank is listed at 8ml (2ml TPD) and uses GTi mesh coils (0.2Ω and 0.4Ω). The main risks sit in high-power use: heat buildup during chain hits, battery pairing mistakes, and messy condensation if you ignore basic upkeep.
Why choose the Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit?
This kit fits adult users who already like DTL or a more open restricted DTL draw and who want a setup that can run steady at mid-to-high wattage without feeling fragile. It also fits people who carry a device around, since the brand leans hard on the TPU “armored” shell and the uni-lock concept for carry safety.
Skip it if you want an ultra-tight MTL draw, if you only vape low wattage and want something compact, or if you dislike warm vapor at higher power. It’s also a poor match for anyone who wants a no-maintenance disposable, hates handling external batteries, or needs a light pocket setup for commuting.
How We Tested It
We used the kit for 3 days, with roughly 100–300 puffs per day, rotating between two common high-VG e-liquids at 3–6 mg nicotine. I scored flavor accuracy, puff-to-puff consistency, airflow/draw behavior, throat hit feel, heat stability, and leak/condensation risk. Marcus pushed longer chain sessions at higher wattage, while Jamal focused on pocket carry, locking habits, and day-to-day mess control.
Performance Scores of the Vape
Test window: 3 days. Usage: 100–300 puffs/day, mostly 50–75W range based on the included GTi coils.
Scoring: partly subjective (flavor, throat hit feel), partly observable (heat spikes, condensation, carry behavior, and whether seepage showed up around the base).
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Clear top notes on fruit profiles; the 0.2Ω coil stayed crisp longer when I avoided over-driving it past the suggested range. |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Noticeable at higher power with freebase; it stayed smoother in ECO than in PULSE during longer pulls. |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Dense output at 60–75W on the 0.2Ω coil; it ramps fast and stays consistent across a session. |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Bottom airflow felt smooth and predictable; small ring moves changed the draw in a way I could repeat. |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | Dual-cell setup kept voltage sag from feeling dramatic during normal use; high wattage chain hits still drained faster, as expected. |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | No true flooding in my run; I did see routine condensation that needed wiping at the base after heavy use. |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | The kit feels built for knocks, and the armored design goal is obvious in-hand. |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 | The fill action is simple and repeatable; locking is quick once you build the habit. |
| Portability | 3.4 | It’s large, and the tank footprint makes it feel top-heavy in some pockets. |
Overall score: 4.3 / 5.0
Our Testing Experience
Our Testing Results
I ran the included GTi 0.2Ω coil most of the time at 65–70W, then swapped to the GTi 0.4Ω coil at 50–55W to see how the kit behaves when you back the power down. Those settings stayed inside the manual’s suggested ranges, and the kit’s output felt stable when I repeated the same draw length back-to-back.
Marcus did the abuse testing: longer chain hits in PULSE and F(t), then short cooldowns, then repeats. The body warmed up but I didn’t see scary heat spikes; the heat I noticed mostly lived in the tank area after sustained pulls. Jamal treated it like a daily carry. He locked it before pocketing, checked for seepage after car rides, and kept an eye on the tank base. The uni-lock habit mattered in real use because the lock action is quick enough that you actually do it.
Draw Experience
For flavor notes, I used three everyday e-liquid profiles: a strawberry-watermelon fruit mix, a vanilla custard dessert, and a mango “ice” style liquid.
On the 0.2Ω coil, the fruit mix came through bright, with a clean “wet” mouthfeel that didn’t turn dull fast when I stayed near 65W. The custard profile made the kit feel warmer and heavier, and it showed a thicker finish that lingered on the roof of my mouth. The iced mango was the one that exposed heat management; with longer pulls in PULSE, the cooling plus warmer vapor could feel sharp by the end of a chain. ECO mode smoothed that out, even though the hit felt a touch less punchy.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong vapor output with the included GTi mesh coils at their suggested wattage ranges | Large kit footprint; it’s not a “forget it in your pocket” setup |
| Dual-battery flexibility (21700 or 18650 with sleeves) supports longer sessions | External batteries add cost and add user responsibility |
| Tank fill action is straightforward and repeatable | Condensation still shows up with heavy use and needs wiping |
| Locking workflow is fast once it becomes routine | Lock slider can be over-used if you fidget with it during downtime |
| Armor-style outer build feels suited to daily handling | The tank height and full capacity make it feel top-heavy in some carries |
| Wide usable power range with the 0.4Ω coil for a cooler, calmer vape | At higher power, the tank area gets warm during chain sessions |
| Good “repeatability” from puff to puff when you keep draw length consistent | Flavor can flatten if you push wattage hard for long stretches |
| Official store pricing is clear when you buy direct | Retail pricing varies, and kit availability can shift |
Key Specs
- Device type: Dual external-battery box mod kit with sub-ohm tank
- Output power: 5–220W
- Battery configuration: 2 x 21700 or 2 x 18650 (external; sleeves included in box)
- Display: 0.96" TFT
- Charging: Type-C, DC 5V/2A (device-side charging support is listed; external chargers remain common for best practice)
- Tank: Vaporesso iTank 2
- Tank capacity: 8ml / 2ml (TPD)
- Included coils: GTi 0.2Ω mesh (pre-installed) and GTi 0.4Ω mesh (in-box)
- Suggested power (GTi platform): 0.2Ω: 60–75W; 0.4Ω: 50–60W
- Airflow: Adjustable airflow ring on the tank base
- Filling: Top cap button action with fill port access
- Locking: “Easy lock” via sliding the power/lock control; device lock also appears in the manual
- Modes (as listed): F(t), PULSE, ECO, plus temperature control options (Ni/SS/Ti)
- Dimensions (kit listing in manual): 157 × 56.5 × 34 mm
- What’s in the box (high-level): ARMOUR MAX mod, iTank 2, two GTi coils, extra glass, protective cover parts, Type-C cable, manuals
- Brand positioning claims: TPU “armored” protection, uni-lock concept, and AXON branding are emphasized in official marketing
- Price (direct listing reference): Vaporesso’s store listing shows $89.90 for the kit on the product page
Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit Vs. Alternatives
Pick this kit if you want a dual-battery setup with a high ceiling (220W), an included large-capacity tank (8ml), and a carry workflow that includes quick locking and a protective shell concept.
Two common alternatives in the same “powerful mod kit” lane: the Geekvape Aegis Legend 2 (L200) kit, which runs on dual 18650s and targets rugged use, and the VOOPOO Drag 4 kit, which also runs dual 18650s and focuses on a different tank/coil ecosystem.
Pro Tips for Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit
- Keep coil setup boring and consistent. Prime the coil, fill the tank, then wait the full soak time before the first real pulls. The manual explicitly calls out a wait period, and it matches what prevents early “dry” taste on a fresh mesh coil.
- Use the suggested power ranges as guardrails, not decoration. When I stayed inside the listed wattage window, the flavor stayed clearer and the coil stayed calmer. When I pushed above the range, the vapor got hotter and the taste flattened sooner.
- Build a carry habit around locking. Sliding the lock before pocketing reduced accidental-fire anxiety in real use, and it also made “throw it in a bag” feel less risky. The lock action is fast; that matters more than a clever menu option.
- Treat condensation as routine maintenance, not a crisis. After heavy sessions, wipe the tank base and the top area around the fill mechanism. The airflow ring sits at the bottom, and moisture tends to collect there over time with high-output use.
- Keep the tank upright during transport when it’s full. The iTank 2 capacity is large, which is convenient, but it also means you’re carrying more liquid mass that can shift when the device gets tossed around.
- Match your battery pair and keep them together as a set. With a dual-battery mod, uneven battery age or charge level shows up as earlier sag during hard pulls. It also creates the kind of “one cell drops faster” behavior that makes people distrust the device.
- Decide on a “daily” coil, then stick with it for a week before you judge the kit. The 0.2Ω coil rewards mid-to-high power and gives the most vapor. The 0.4Ω coil runs calmer and still hits hard enough for many adult users, especially with longer draws.
- Keep draw length consistent during troubleshooting. When people say a tank is “inconsistent,” it often tracks back to draw variation. This kit was easiest to evaluate when I repeated the same pull length and left airflow alone for several sessions.
- Don’t over-tighten the tank when you reinstall it. A snug fit avoids wobble, but cranking it down can make later removal annoying and can stress O-rings over time. The tank is meant to be removed for coil swaps and cleaning.
- If you use device-side Type-C charging, treat it as a monitored activity. The manual lists Type-C charging support and shows charging status behavior on-screen, which is useful, but charging habits still decide how predictable your battery routine feels week to week.
FAQs
Is the Vaporesso ARMOUR Max Kit a disposable?
No. It’s a refillable kit with an external-battery mod and a tank that you fill with e-liquid.
What wattage actually makes sense with the included coils?
The manual lists 60–75W for the GTi 0.2Ω mesh coil and 50–60W for the GTi 0.4Ω mesh coil. Those ranges lined up with where flavor stayed stable in my sessions.
Does it work with 18650 batteries?
Yes. The manual lists compatibility with 2 x 21700 or 2 x 18650, and the box contents include 18650 sleeves.
How do you fill the iTank 2 without making a mess?
Use the top cap button fill method and avoid rushing. After filling, lock it back down firmly, then give the coil time to soak before you take longer pulls.
Is the kit really 220W?
The manual lists an output power range of 5–220W for the ARMOUR MAX. Real use still depends on coil choice and how you vape, not the top number alone.
About the Author: Chris Miller
