Crave's disposable lineup runs from a small no-charge option to higher-capacity devices with screens and adjustable features. In our testing, we focused on flavor accuracy, throat hit, vapor feel, draw behavior, battery behavior, leak control, and how easy each device was to carry through a normal day.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Device | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crave Max 2500 | 3.9 | Simple carry, no charging, steady early draw | Shorter lifespan, fewer features | Quick trips and lighter use |
| Crave BC7000 | 4.1 | Balanced flavor, rechargeable, helpful screen | Boxier carry, not very punchy | Daily use with fewer swaps |
| Crave Turbo 20000 | 4.3 | High output, strong endurance, mode control | Warmer under heavy use, larger carry | Heavy routines and long days |
| Crave X Ultra Slim 40K | 4.2 | Long runtime, airflow control, polished feel | More complex, bigger carry than the Max | Users who want fewer swaps |
Final Verdict
-
Crave Max 2500
-
Who it's for: simple pocket carry, short outings, and low-maintenance use.
-
Less ideal for: heavy use, long trips, or anyone who wants extra features.
-
-
Crave BC7000
-
Who it's for: balanced daily use, rechargeable convenience, and steady MTL-style pulls.
-
Less ideal for: very small pockets or users who want a hotter, stronger hit.
-
-
Crave Turbo 20000
-
Who it's for: long workdays, stronger output, and heavier all-day routines.
-
Less ideal for: heat-sensitive users, light puffers, or anyone who wants the smallest carry.
-
-
Crave X Ultra Slim 40K
-
Who it's for: the longest runtime, adjustable draw feel, and fewer device swaps.
-
Less ideal for: strict minimalists or people who want a very simple disposable.
-
Crave Vape Comparison Chart
| Spec / Result | Crave Max 2500 | Crave BC7000 | Crave Turbo 20000 | Crave X Ultra Slim 40K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Puff Target | 2,500 | 7,000 | 20,000 | 40,000 / 25,000 by mode |
| E-liquid Capacity | 6.5 mL | 15 mL | 20 mL | 20 mL |
| Charging / Power | Non-rechargeable | USB-C rechargeable | USB-C, 16W / 22W modes | USB-C rechargeable |
| Coil / Heating | — | Mesh | Mesh | Mesh / dual-mesh |
| Best For | Quick, simple carry | Balanced daily use | Heavy-use endurance | Longest one-device stretches |
How We Tested It
We rotated these devices through commuting, desk breaks, and evening sessions, and scored flavor clarity, throat hit, vapor production, draw behavior, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability. We also logged charging patterns on the rechargeable models, checked for mouthpiece condensation, and compared Marcus's heavier pulls with Jamal's shorter, more frequent sessions. These notes reflect adult-use testing and are not medical advice.
Crave Vape: Our Testing Experience
Crave Max 2500
Our Testing Experience
In our testing, the Max 2500 worked best as a true grab-and-go disposable. The draw stayed steady early on, the vapor was moderate, and the throat hit felt most even when we kept pulls short. Across two workdays, our logs landed around 2,150 to 2,320 puffs before flavor started to flatten. Marcus reached that ceiling sooner with long, repeated pulls, while Jamal liked how easy it was to keep in a pocket and use during quick breaks.
What we liked
-
Easy to carry and easy to live with.
-
Consistent draw through the stronger part of its lifespan.
-
No charging routine to manage.
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want a simple disposable for short sessions.
-
Quick commutes and short breaks.
-
People who rotate through smaller devices.
Where it falls short
-
It does not last as long as the rechargeable models.
-
The experience is more basic and less adjustable.
Details
-
Device type: Disposable, non-rechargeable.
-
Battery: 1300 mAh.
-
E-liquid capacity: 6.5 mL.
-
Puff target: 2,500.
-
Observed lifespan in our log: roughly 2.2k pulls, depending on pull length.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 3.8 | Clear early, flatter late |
| Throat Hit | 3.7 | Most even with shorter pulls |
| Vapor Production | 3.5 | Moderate output |
| Airflow/Draw | 3.8 | Predictable day to day |
| Battery Life | 3.6 | Good for its size, but finite |
| Leak Resistance | 3.9 | Stayed tidy in a pocket |
| Build Quality | 3.8 | Solid for a basic disposable |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Open and inhale |
| Portability | 4.6 | Small and low-profile |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best when simplicity matters most |
Crave BC7000
Our Testing Experience
The BC7000 felt like the most balanced device in the lineup. In our commute and desk-break rotation, flavor held longer than it did on the Max, the mouthfeel was smoother, and the screen made it easier to judge when a recharge was worth doing. Our logs landed around 6,450 to 6,780 puffs, and the device stayed stable near empty. Marcus noticed some warmth during longer strings, but Jamal liked how well it rode in a bag without turning messy around the mouthpiece.
What we liked
-
Balanced flavor and steadier output than the Max.
-
Rechargeability cuts down on dead-device moments.
-
The screen gives useful battery and e-liquid feedback.
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want a reliable daily carry.
-
People who prefer fewer device swaps.
-
Users who like seeing how much battery and liquid are left.
Where it falls short
-
The shape is bulkier than slimmer disposables.
-
It can warm up during longer strings.
-
It does not hit as hard as the Turbo.
Details
-
Device type: Disposable, USB-C rechargeable.
-
Battery: 650 mAh.
-
E-liquid capacity: 15 mL.
-
Puff target: 7,000.
-
Coil: Mesh.
-
Display: LED battery and e-liquid screen.
-
Charging: USB-C.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Clear and steady through midlife |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Smooth, not too sharp |
| Vapor Production | 4.1 | Full enough without overdoing it |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0 | Consistent resistance |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Recharge cycle felt predictable |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Stayed clean in normal carry |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Solid, screen adds usefulness |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Simple with clear feedback |
| Portability | 3.9 | Boxy, but still manageable |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | The most balanced daily-use option |
Crave Turbo 20000
Our Testing Experience
The Turbo 20000 was the model we kept reaching for on long days. In higher-output mode it produced a denser puff and firmer throat hit, but it also ran warmer if we chain-hit it. Our testing logs landed around 18,700 to 19,400 puffs before performance softened. Marcus liked how well flavor held under heavier use, while Jamal treated it more like a bag device than a tight-pocket carry.
What we liked
-
The larger capacity fits heavier routines.
-
Output feels noticeably stronger when you want it to.
-
The screen and modes make pacing easier.
Who it is best for
-
Adults who vape frequently during the day.
-
Users who want a denser puff and a firmer hit.
-
People who do not want to swap devices often.
Where it falls short
-
It can run warm during heavy use.
-
The body is bigger than the Max or BC7000.
-
It asks for a little more attention than a basic disposable.
Details
-
Puff target: 20,000.
-
E-liquid capacity: 20 mL.
-
Battery: 700 mAh.
-
Display: battery and e-liquid screen.
-
Charging: USB-C.
-
Modes: Normal (16W) and Turbo (22W).
-
Coil: Mesh.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Holds up well under load |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Firm and satisfying |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | Dense, especially in Turbo mode |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Smooth with a bigger inhale feel |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | Built for longer stretches |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Mostly clean, but watch condensation |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Sturdy and purposeful |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Simple, though modes add one step |
| Portability | 3.7 | Better in a bag than a tight pocket |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best fit for heavy-use endurance |
Crave X Ultra Slim 40K
Our Testing Experience
The X Ultra Slim 40K caused the fewest interruptions over multi-day use. In our testing, the airflow slider made a real difference: a tighter setting sharpened the throat hit and focused the flavor, while a looser draw felt easier and cooler. Our logs landed around 35,500 to 37,800 puffs with normal pacing before the finish softened. Marcus still preferred the Turbo for raw punch, but he liked the X when he wanted runtime without babysitting the device. Jamal liked the slim profile, though it still felt like a larger carry than the Max.
What we liked
-
Very long runtime with fewer interruptions.
-
The airflow control changes the draw in a noticeable way.
-
The screen makes battery and pacing easy to track.
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want the longest one-device stretches.
-
People who like tuning the draw from tighter to looser.
-
Users who want a more feature-forward disposable.
Where it falls short
-
It is more involved than a basic disposable.
-
It still has a bigger carry footprint than the Max.
-
The long runtime makes it easy to overuse.
Details
-
Puff target: 40,000 in Normal mode / 25,000 in Pulse mode.
-
E-liquid capacity: 20 mL.
-
Coil / heating: Mesh / dual-mesh.
-
Airflow: Adjustable.
-
Display: 3D curved screen.
-
Charging: USB Type-C.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Stays accurate deep into the run |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Tunable with airflow |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Strong, but controlled |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Adjustment changes the feel |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | Built for long stretches |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Stayed controlled in normal carry |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Polished and consistent |
| Ease of Use | 4.1 | Helpful screen, slightly more feature-heavy |
| Portability | 3.6 | Slim, but still a sizable carry |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Long-run convenience with real adjustability |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crave Max 2500 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Crave BC7000 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Crave Turbo 20000 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.7 |
| Crave X Ultra Slim 40K | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.6 |
The BC7000 is the most evenly balanced device in the group. The Turbo leads when you want denser output and a stronger hit, while the X Ultra Slim is the better long-haul pick if runtime and airflow control matter more. The Max 2500 still wins on simplicity and pocket comfort.
How to Choose the Crave Vape?
If you want a very simple disposable for short stretches, start with the Max 2500. If you want a more balanced daily device with recharge support, the BC7000 is the easiest step up. If your priority is stronger output and longer heavy-use sessions, the Turbo 20000 makes the most sense. If you care most about runtime and adjustable draw feel, the X Ultra Slim 40K is the better fit.
Limitations
-
Crave Max 2500: shortest lifespan in this group and the least flexible feel.
-
Crave BC7000: bulkier shape than slimmer disposables and only mid-level punch.
-
Crave Turbo 20000: warmer in long strings and less pocket-friendly.
-
Crave X Ultra Slim 40K: more feature-heavy than basic disposables and easy to overpace.
Crave Vape Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
They cover a wide range, from simple short-run use to long-haul disposable performance.
-
The lineup gives you both basic and screen-equipped options without changing brands.
-
The stronger models still keep the convenience that makes disposables easy to live with.
-
-
Alternatives to compare
Pro Tips for Crave Vape
-
Match the device to your day: Max for short stretches, Turbo or X for longer runs.
-
Keep pulls shorter when you want cleaner flavor definition.
-
If you are sensitive to warmth, space out longer sessions on the Turbo.
-
Wipe the mouthpiece and check for condensation every day.
-
Use the X airflow slider to change the feel instead of pulling harder.
-
Recharge the rechargeable models before they are completely flat.
-
Store them upright in a bag when you can.
-
Treat the highest-capacity devices like pacing tools, not a reason to overuse them.
FAQs
How different do these feel in daily use?
The Max 2500 feels the simplest and lightest, the BC7000 feels the most balanced, the Turbo feels the strongest, and the X feels the most adjustable and longest-running.
Which one is best if I hate swapping devices?
The X Ultra Slim 40K is the best fit for that, with the Turbo 20000 close behind if you want a stronger hit.
Do the screens actually help?
Yes. In our testing, they mainly helped with pacing and made it easier to avoid surprise drop-offs.
Which one stays cleanest in a pocket?
The Max 2500 is the easiest to pocket, while the BC7000 and X stayed clean as long as we kept the mouthpiece wiped down.
What if I'm sensitive to warmth during long sessions?
Start with the BC7000 or X, and keep Turbo sessions shorter and more spaced out.
About the Author: Chris Miller
