In our testing, Innokin’s lineup stayed practical: tighter, cigarette-like MTL options plus a few kits with room for more control. The biggest strength was steady, low-fuss performance. The tradeoff was that the simplest pods gave up some tuning and long-session comfort.
On this page
Product Overview
| Device | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innokin CoolFire Z80 Starter Kit With Zenith II Tank | 4.3/5.0 | Tunable modes; dependable tank; broad power range | External battery; bulkier carry | One-device daily MTL/RDL users |
| Innokin Endura Apex Starter Kit | 4.2/5.0 | Very simple; focused MTL draw; stable routine use | Limited tuning; pen-style limits | Newer MTL users who want minimal fuss |
| Innokin Sceptre 2 Pod System Starter Kit | 4.2/5.0 | Pocket-friendly; dual activation; flexible airflow | More wipe-downs than a tank kit; lower ceiling | Commuters who switch MTL/RDL often |
| Innokin Klypse Pod System Starter Kit | 4.1/5.0 | Ultra-compact; buttonless; very easy carry | Smaller battery; fixed output | Short sessions and stealthy carry |
Final Verdict
-
Innokin CoolFire Z80 Starter Kit With Zenith II Tank
-
Best for:
-
All-day primary use
-
Adults who want useful tuning options
-
-
Less ideal for:
-
People who want zero maintenance
-
Minimal-pocket carry
-
Anyone avoiding loose batteries
-
-
-
Innokin Endura Apex Starter Kit
-
Best for:
-
Straightforward MTL use
-
Button-and-go habits
-
Short daily sessions
-
-
Less ideal for:
-
Cloud-focused users
-
People who want menus or modes
-
Anyone who dislikes refilling
-
-
-
Innokin Sceptre 2 Pod System Starter Kit
-
Best for:
-
Commuter carry
-
Switching between tighter and looser draws
-
Adults who like draw or button activation
-
-
Less ideal for:
-
High-power vaping
-
Anyone who never wants to wipe condensation
-
People who prefer bigger tanks
-
-
-
Innokin Klypse Pod System Starter Kit
-
Best for:
-
Quick errands
-
Ultra-light pockets
-
Simple MTL routines
-
-
Less ideal for:
-
Long heavy sessions
-
People who want airflow adjustment
-
Users who worry about battery life
-
-
Innokin Vape Comparison Chart
| Item | Innokin CoolFire Z80 Starter Kit With Zenith II Tank | Innokin Endura Apex Starter Kit | Innokin Sceptre 2 Pod System Starter Kit | Innokin Klypse Pod System Starter Kit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Box mod + tank kit | Pen-style starter kit | Pod system kit | MTL pod system |
| Activation | Button | One-button | Button or auto-draw | Auto-draw, buttonless |
| Power behavior | 6–80W with FØ and Refresh modes | Two power levels | Normal and Boost modes | Fixed 16W output |
| Battery setup | 1×18650 (not included) | 1800mAh built-in | 1400mAh built-in | 700mAh built-in |
| Liquid capacity | 5.5ml | 3.0ml | 3.0ml | 2.0ml |
| Airflow style | Tank airflow control | Adjustable airflow control | Side airflow for MTL/RDL | Fixed MTL-focused draw |
| Best for | One-kit home base setup | Simple MTL daily driver | Grab-and-go flexibility | Minimal carry, short sessions |
How We Tested It
We used each device through the same how we test vapes routine: morning commutes, short desk-break sessions, and longer evening runs. We rotated liquids and tracked flavor, throat hit, vapor production, airflow and draw feel, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability. Marcus pushed longer sessions to watch heat and output stability, while Jamal focused on pocket carry, quick pulls, and how each device handled movement. That gave us a clear read on where each kit stayed steady, where upkeep showed up, and who each one suited best.
Innokin Vape: Our Testing Experience
Innokin CoolFire Z80 Starter Kit With Zenith II Tank
Our Testing Experience
The Z80 quickly became the desk device. Once I filled the Zenith II tank in the morning, it stayed consistent through the kind of stop-and-start use that exposes weak tanks fast. In our testing, the draw felt cleanest in a tighter MTL setup, with stable warmth and very little drift in flavor from one break to the next.
Marcus pushed it harder with longer sessions and mode changes, and the kit still felt controlled instead of jumpy. Jamal’s takeaway was simpler: it is carryable, but it still feels like a mod-and-tank kit, not a pocket pod. That is the tradeoff for the larger tank, wider power range, and replaceable battery.
What we liked:
-
Stable draw and consistent output over long sessions
-
The Zenith II tank makes it easy to fill once and keep going
-
The extra modes feel useful rather than decorative
Who it is best for:
-
Adults who want one primary device at home or work
-
MTL users who sometimes open up to RDL
-
Anyone who wants control without going full hobbyist
Where it falls short:
-
The external 18650 adds cost and one more thing to manage
-
It takes more pocket space than a pod
-
The menus add a learning step for pure beginners
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong flavor stability with the included tank | Requires an external 18650 battery |
| Broad power range for different coils | Bulkier than pod systems |
| FØ and Refresh add real control | More settings than a simple starter |
| Large tank reduces refill frequency | Not a throw-in-pocket setup |
| Solid chassis feel |
Details
-
Device type: box mod + tank kit
-
Output range: 6–80W
-
Battery: 1×18650 (not included)
-
Charging: USB Type-C
-
Tank: Zenith II, 5.5ml
-
Coils included: 0.8ohm MTL and 0.3ohm RDL
-
Modes listed: Power, FØ, Refresh
Review Score
| Metric | Score (out of 5) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6/5.0 | Clean, consistent taste across long sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.4/5.0 | Satisfying without turning harsh in MTL use |
| Vapor Production | 4.2/5.0 | Strong for MTL/RDL, not a cloud-first kit |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.5/5.0 | Tank airflow gives useful range |
| Battery Life | 4.5/5.0 | Replaceable battery helps on long days |
| Leak Resistance | 4.4/5.0 | Stayed controlled with normal handling |
| Build Quality | 4.6/5.0 | Chassis feels durable and steady |
| Ease of Use | 3.9/5.0 | Battery management and modes add friction |
| Portability | 3.8/5.0 | Carryable, but clearly larger than a pod |
| Overall | 4.3/5.0 | Best if you want one steady daily kit with room to tune |
Innokin Endura Apex Starter Kit
Our Testing Experience
This was the kit I kept reaching for when I did not want to think. It felt like a straightforward MTL pen from the first fill: press the button, set the airflow, and settle into short, repeatable pulls. In our testing, it worked best when we treated it like an easy daily device instead of trying to force extra output out of it.
Flavor kept it in the rotation. The draw stayed focused, restart sessions felt clean, and the device was easy to keep tidy through normal workday use. Marcus liked how steady it stayed under repetitive use, and Jamal liked that the slim shape slipped into a pocket without much fuss. The real limit is adjustment: you get enough control to fine-tune the feel, not enough to change what the kit fundamentally is.
What we liked:
-
Simple one-button routine that is easy to learn
-
MTL draw stays steady through stop-and-go sessions
-
Airflow is easy to set and leave alone
Who it is best for:
-
Adults who want a straightforward MTL experience
-
People who vape in short sessions during the day
-
Anyone who values predictability over customization
Where it falls short:
-
There is less room to tune than on adjustable pods or mod kits
-
The pen format will not satisfy high-output preferences
-
It gives you fewer ways to troubleshoot a poor liquid match
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very easy daily operation | Limited tuning compared with more adjustable devices |
| Strong MTL flavor consistency | Not built for high vapor output |
| Built-in battery suits routine use | Pen style may not fit every carry preference |
| Adjustable airflow helps dial the draw | No advanced interface or deep mode set |
| Refilling and upkeep are straightforward |
Details
-
Device type: pen-style starter kit
-
Battery: 1800mAh built-in
-
Power settings: two levels
-
Liquid capacity: 3.0ml
-
Fill style: top fill twist cap
-
Airflow: bottom adjustable airflow
-
Charging: USB Type-C
Review Score
| Metric | Score (out of 5) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3/5.0 | Focused MTL flavor, especially in short steady sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.1/5.0 | Firm enough for MTL without feeling sharp |
| Vapor Production | 3.7/5.0 | Deliberately restrained, MTL-first output |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0/5.0 | Useful airflow control without much fuss |
| Battery Life | 4.2/5.0 | Handled full-day casual use well |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3/5.0 | Stayed clean with normal refills and carry |
| Build Quality | 4.2/5.0 | Simple construction that still feels durable |
| Ease of Use | 4.7/5.0 | One-button logic is hard to mess up |
| Portability | 4.4/5.0 | Easy to carry with little upkeep in motion |
| Overall | 4.2/5.0 | Best for adults who want a simple, reliable MTL pen |
Innokin Sceptre 2 Pod System Starter Kit
Our Testing Experience
The Sceptre 2 ended up being our walking-around device. On commutes and quick errands, it never forced one style of inhale. Tightened down, it gave a neat MTL pull with a clean throat hit. Opened up, it delivered a warmer and fuller puff without becoming unruly, which is why it worked well for light RDL use too.
Jamal put the most real-world miles on it, bouncing between pocket carry and quick hand-to-pocket use. That is where pods usually become irritating, and this one stayed manageable. Marcus paid more attention to coil behavior and heat. He could get a warmer vape when he wanted it, but he also ran into the usual pod reality: if you chain it hard and never wipe it, condensation shows up sooner than it does on a tank kit.
What we liked:
-
Adjustable airflow makes MTL-to-RDL switching realistic
-
Button or auto-draw firing fits different habits
-
Pocket carry feels balanced and easy
Who it is best for:
-
Adults who want one pod for commuting and daily tasks
-
People who move between short MTL pulls and looser draws
-
Anyone who likes having both firing options
Where it falls short:
-
There is less top-end performance than on larger kits
-
It needs occasional mouthpiece and pod wipe-downs
-
The pod-and-coil ecosystem is less universal than a 510 tank
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong portability and grip | Lower ceiling than larger mod kits |
| Button or auto-draw flexibility | Condensation management is part of ownership |
| Side airflow supports both tighter and looser draws | Less fill-it-and-forget-it than a large tank |
| Boost and normal modes help tune the feel | Pods and coils add ongoing cost |
| Battery size suits daily carry |
Details
-
Device type: pod system kit
-
Battery: 1400mAh built-in
-
Liquid capacity: 3.0ml
-
Activation: manual or auto-draw
-
Power settings: Boost and Normal
-
Airflow: side airflow adjustment for MTL/RDL
-
Charging: USB Type-C
Review Score
| Metric | Score (out of 5) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2/5.0 | Clear flavor with good consistency for a pod |
| Throat Hit | 4.0/5.0 | Satisfying, especially with a tighter airflow setting |
| Vapor Production | 3.8/5.0 | Solid for a flexible pod, not a cloud device |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1/5.0 | The adjustment actually changes the feel |
| Battery Life | 4.3/5.0 | Strong daily endurance for its size |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0/5.0 | Generally controlled, but benefits from basic upkeep |
| Build Quality | 4.1/5.0 | Feels sturdy enough for everyday handling |
| Ease of Use | 4.4/5.0 | Dual activation lowers friction for most users |
| Portability | 4.5/5.0 | One of the easiest carries in the group |
| Overall | 4.2/5.0 | A flexible pod that fits real commuter use |
Innokin Klypse Pod System Starter Kit
Our Testing Experience
The Klypse was the easiest device in the group to carry without thinking about it. It is light, slim, and the buttonless setup disappears in use. I mostly used it for quick pulls while moving around, and that is exactly where it felt right: simple, clean, and predictable.
The flavor held up better than I expected from a tiny fixed-output pod. The draw stayed MTL-focused, and it felt more even than a lot of small devices do when the battery starts to dip. Jamal liked the magnetic cap because it kept the mouthpiece cleaner in a pocket. Marcus wanted more output and more airflow control, which is fair, but that also shows what this device is really for: short sessions, low fuss, and easy carry.
What we liked:
-
The buttonless routine makes it genuinely effortless
-
The compact body works well in pockets and small bags
-
The magnetic cap helps with day-to-day cleanliness
Who it is best for:
-
Adults who vape in short, frequent sessions
-
People who want a true grab-and-go MTL pod
-
Anyone who wants a dependable backup device
Where it falls short:
-
The smaller battery is less comfortable for heavy use
-
The fixed output leaves no room to tune
-
The 2.0ml pod means more refills for frequent users
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Extremely pocketable and light | Smaller battery for heavy users |
| Simple draw-activated use | No power adjustment |
| Consistent MTL-style pull | No real airflow tuning |
| Magnetic cap helps keep the mouthpiece clean | More frequent refills with 2.0ml |
| Dependable backup-pod behavior |
Details
-
Device type: MTL pod system
-
Output: 16W fixed
-
Battery: 700mAh built-in
-
Liquid capacity: 2.0ml
-
Activation: automatic draw, buttonless
-
Charging: USB-C, 5V/1A
-
Feature: magnetic pod cover
Review Score
| Metric | Score (out of 5) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.0/5.0 | Good clarity for a small fixed-output pod |
| Throat Hit | 3.8/5.0 | Smooth MTL hit with less punch than larger kits |
| Vapor Production | 3.5/5.0 | Deliberately discreet output |
| Airflow/Draw | 3.9/5.0 | Comfortable MTL draw, but not adjustable |
| Battery Life | 3.6/5.0 | Fine for short sessions; heavy use drains it quickly |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1/5.0 | Solid day-to-day control with normal handling |
| Build Quality | 4.0/5.0 | Durable-feeling shell for the price bracket |
| Ease of Use | 4.8/5.0 | About as simple as it gets |
| Portability | 4.9/5.0 | The most pocket-friendly device here |
| Overall | 4.1/5.0 | Best as a grab-and-go pod or dependable backup |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
All performance scores below use a 5-point scale.
| Device | Overall | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innokin CoolFire Z80 Starter Kit With Zenith II Tank | 4.3/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 3.9/5.0 | 3.8/5.0 |
| Innokin Endura Apex Starter Kit | 4.2/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 3.7/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.7/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 |
| Innokin Sceptre 2 Pod System Starter Kit | 4.2/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 3.8/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 |
| Innokin Klypse Pod System Starter Kit | 4.1/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 3.8/5.0 | 3.5/5.0 | 3.9/5.0 | 3.6/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 4.8/5.0 | 4.9/5.0 |
Across our testing, the Z80 was the most complete all-around performer if you can live with the size and battery management. The Endura Apex was the easiest daily MTL pick, the Sceptre 2 offered the best balance of portability and draw flexibility, and the Klypse won pure convenience as long as you keep expectations in line with its small battery and fixed output.
How to Choose the Innokin Vape?
Start with how you choose a vape: session length, carry style, and how much control you actually want. In our testing, short MTL sessions favored the Klypse and Endura Apex, while longer stretches with fewer refills favored the Z80. If you want one device that can move between tighter and looser draws, the Sceptre 2 is the easiest fit. If you want a true home-base setup with more tuning headroom, the Z80 makes the most sense for people shopping the best mod vapes category.
Innokin Vape Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models:
-
Reliable MTL performance across several form factors
-
Practical airflow options without a lot of setup friction
-
Good day-to-day usability at approachable prices
-
A useful spread from ultra-compact pods to a full mod-and-tank kit
-
-
Alternatives to consider:
-
Vaporesso XROS-style pods if you want a widely available pocket system with strong flavor consistency
-
Uwell Caliburn options if you want a clean draw feel with easy day-to-day use
-
GeekVape Aegis-class kits if you care more about durability and higher output than compact carry
-
Pro Tips for Innokin Vape
-
Let fresh coils or pods sit after filling so the first session does not taste thin or scorched.
-
If flavor drops off mid-day, check the airflow and wipe the mouthpiece before blaming the coil.
-
Avoid overfilling; a little headspace helps limit gurgle and seepage.
-
Keep a tissue in your bag. Quick wipe-downs matter more on pods than most people expect.
-
On pod systems, wipe the contacts on both the pod and the device now and then.
-
Match the device to the session: small pods for quick pulls, tanks for longer stretches.
-
Do not try to force a tight MTL device to behave like a cloud kit. It usually just gets hot and messy.
-
If a device uses an external battery, battery condition becomes part of performance consistency.
FAQs
Which Innokin device felt most “set up once and forget”?
The CoolFire Z80 kit, mainly because the 5.5ml tank and replaceable battery made it the easiest device here to keep running through long stretches.
What’s the easiest Innokin option for pure MTL simplicity?
The Endura Apex. The one-button routine and steady MTL draw made it the easiest daily fit for adults who wanted very little friction.
Which Innokin pick is best for pocket carry?
The Klypse is the lightest and simplest carry. The Sceptre 2 is the better pick if you still want more airflow flexibility in a compact body.
If I want to switch between MTL and a looser draw, what fits best?
The Sceptre 2. In our testing, it handled that switch more naturally than the other pod here.
About the Author: Chris Miller