VFUN Vape Reviews

January 4, 2026

A lot of VFUN traffic comes from one simple question. People want to know if the lineup still holds up. The names look similar. The puff counts vary. The body shapes change just enough to confuse buyers.

I wanted VFUN vape reviews that stay practical. I also wanted the kind of notes that match daily use. A short pull in a parking lot. A longer session at a desk. A device that sits in a coat pocket all afternoon. Our workflow stayed strict. I ran the day to day log. Marcus pushed each device hard. Jamal treated each one like a true carry item.

Product Overview

Device	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price	Overall Score
VFUN Box 5000	Smooth airflow feel, steady flavor	Body can feel bulky	Adult users who want a longer run	$9 t o$ 15	4.3
VFUN Bravo Max	Big juice volume, stable draw	Flavor can flatten late	Adult users who chain vape often	$8 t o$ 14	4.2
VFUN Bravo Pro	Strong hit feel, good warmth control	Shorter runway than 5000 class	Adult users who want 3000 class simplicity	$7 t o$ 13	4.0
VFUN Pro	Clean draw, simple charging behavior	Flavor range feels narrow	Adult users who like light, clear blends	$7 t o$ 12	3.9
VFUN Plus D1	Comfortable mouth feel, easy grip	Output can fade under heavy pulls	Adult users moving up from small sticks	$8 t o$ 14	3.8
VFUN Vtob Duo D1	Two-chamber variety, fun twist select	More parts, more condensation	Adult users who get bored fast	$9 t o$ 16	3.9
VFUN D2	Tight draw option, small footprint	Short life for heavy users	Adult users who want quick sessions	$6 t o$ 11	3.4
VFUN D1	Simple, light body, low fuss	Limited runway, basic feel	Adult users who want a small backup	$6 t o$ 10	3.3

Testing Team Takeaways

My notes started with one theme. VFUN tends to chase a “plug in and go” feel. The stronger models keep a steady pull. The smaller models feel more like a quick nicotine tool. That shift shows up fast during the week. It also changes how each tester reacts.

I carried each device in the same rotation. The pocket test mattered. The mouthpiece hygiene check mattered too. Condensation builds in that kind of design. Some VFUN units managed it well. A few units pushed moisture toward the lip line. I kept wiping tips and logging it. I also watched charge heat. A device that warms too much fails my trust. “If it heats in my palm, I stop trusting it,” I wrote in my log.

Marcus came at VFUN from a load angle. He ran longer sessions. He kept hitting devices after a charge. He looked for sag. He looked for the moment flavor turns thin. When VFUN stayed stable, he relaxed. When it wobbled, he called it out. “I can feel the drop after the third long pull,” he said on the D1 class units. He also kept praising the better heat behavior on the Box 5000 tier. “This one stays calm even when I push it,” he said, then he kept chain pulling.

Jamal treated VFUN like a commuter tool. He cared about pocket drag. He cared about mouthpiece comfort. He noticed rolling risk in a car tray. He also tracked the “grab, pull, put away” rhythm. That rhythm punishes devices with loose seals. It also punishes sloppy airflow. His strongest reactions showed up on Duo designs. “It’s cool, yet the mouthpiece collects more than I want,” he said. With the Box 5000, his tone shifted. “This is the one I forget about,” he told me, then he kept carrying it.

VFUN Vapes Comparison Chart

Device	Type	Nicotine strength	Activation	Battery capacity	Coil type	Airflow style	Flavor performance	Throat-hit smoothness	Vapor production	Battery life	Leak resistance	Build quality	Ease of use
VFUN Box 5000	Rechargeable disposable	5% salt	Draw	650 mAh	Mesh	Medium, steady	Strong early, steady mid	Smooth, firm edge	Medium-high	Strong for class	Good	Solid	Simple
VFUN Bravo Max	Rechargeable disposable	5% salt	Draw	800 mAh	Mesh	Medium-open	Big early, soft late	Smooth, heavier feel	High	Very strong	Good	Solid	Simple
VFUN Bravo Pro	Disposable	5% salt	Draw	1000 mAh	Mesh	Medium-open	Bold, slightly sweet	Firm, less sharp	High	Strong	Fair-good	Good	Simple
VFUN Pro	Rechargeable disposable	5% salt	Draw	850 mAh	Mesh	Medium	Clean, narrower range	Smooth, even	Medium	Strong	Good	Good	Simple
VFUN Plus D1	Disposable	5% salt	Draw	500 mAh	Standard	Medium-tight	Good early, fades	Firmer, can spike	Medium	Medium	Fair	Fair-good	Very simple
VFUN Vtob Duo D1	Disposable	5% salt	Draw	900 mAh	Dual chamber	Medium	Strong variety, mixed	Smooth, depends on chamber	Medium-high	Medium-strong	Fair	Fair-good	Moderate
VFUN D2	Disposable	5% salt	Draw	650 mAh	Standard	Tight to medium	Basic, clear	Firm, can feel dry	Medium	Medium	Fair	Fair	Very simple
VFUN D1	Disposable	5% salt	Draw	550 mAh	Standard	Tight	Basic, sharp edges	Can feel rough late	Low-medium	Medium-low	Fair	Fair	Very simple

What We Tested and How We Tested It

The scoring came from daily use, then repeat checks. I kept a log per device. A run lasted seven days per model. Marcus ran stress pulls during nights. Jamal ran carry tests during commutes.

Flavor accuracy got judged by the first pull, then the tenth pull. A device that “pops” early can still fail. The mid-tank stretch matters. Throat hit got logged as a feel note. No health meaning got attached to it. Vapor production got judged against airflow feel. A loud device with weak vapor reads wrong.

Battery behavior got tracked by charge time and heat. I logged each full charge cycle. Marcus checked for output sag after charging. Jamal checked “real day” battery life. Leak and condensation control came from pocket carry, then mouthpiece wipes. Build quality got judged by seam tightness and mouthpiece fit. Ease of use came from how often a device demanded attention.

Reliability mattered across the week. Misfires counted. Weak pulls counted too. The score reflects that total pattern.

VFUN Vapes: Our Testing Experience

VFUN Box 5000

Our Testing Experience

The Box 5000 landed in the rotation as the “long-run” unit. A bigger body changes expectations. The first day stayed simple. I carried it through normal breaks. A tight seal showed up early. The mouthpiece stayed clean longer than most VFUN sticks.

My log tracked seven days. I averaged about 220 pulls per day on work days. A weekend day ran closer to 300. Two full charge cycles happened. Heat stayed mild during charging. The device never got hot in my palm. That matters under real circumstances, since trust is physical.

Marcus pushed it harder. His sessions ran long. A “stress block” for him means about 20 pulls in a row. He did that twice per night. The Box 5000 held output better than the smaller VFUN units. He still noticed a late-stage drop. That drop did not show up as burnt taste. It showed up as softer flavor and thinner vapor. “It’s still stable, it just loses punch,” he said.

Jamal treated it like a daily carry object. The shape felt chunky in jeans. In a jacket pocket, the bulk mattered less. He noticed less rolling risk on a flat desk. He also noticed fewer surprise wet hits. “This one stays cleaner around the lip,” he said, then he kept using it while walking.

Dr. Adrian Walker’s reminder stayed in my head during this test. He pushes a simple habit. Keep the mouthpiece clean. Avoid long, rapid pulls. That advice tends to reduce overheating and irritation. That also fits what we saw here.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The draw on the Box 5000 felt medium, with a steady ramp. It did not feel airy. It did not feel tight either. The first pull each morning had the cleanest flavor edge. The “midday” pulls felt slightly warmer. The device stayed consistent, which matters more than peak taste.

We tested six flavors from the same model batch.

Blueberry Ice hit first with a sharp berry skin note. The cooling layer stayed moderate. On inhale, the berry felt bright. In mouth, the sweetness spread across the tongue, then it slid into a cold exhale. Marcus liked the early snap. He also noted the cooling stayed controlled. “It’s cold, yet it doesn’t numb my mouth,” he said.

Grape Ice leaned candy-like. The inhale tasted like purple syrup. The exhale gave a quick icy finish. Under heavier pulls, the grape got thicker. That thickness can feel cloying. Jamal noticed it more. “After ten quick hits, it tastes like it’s coating my tongue,” he said.

Peach Ice came across softer. The inhale gave a fuzzy peach skin vibe. The mid-draw felt round. The exhale stayed clean, with a cooling tail. I liked it for short sessions. It stayed less tiring. That kind of balance matters during commuting.

Strawberry Mango offered a layered fruit blend. The strawberry stayed upfront. Mango stayed behind it as a thicker base. The draw gave a “juicy” mouth feel. Under chain use, the mango can dominate. Marcus liked that. He wants a denser flavor body. “This is the one that keeps up with my pace,” he said.

Cool Mint leaned straight and clean. The first pull felt crisp. The cooling stayed sharper than the fruit-ice mixes. The mint stayed more like spearmint than menthol. In a short pull, it felt refreshing. In a long pull, it could feel dry.

Energy Drink tasted like sweet citrus soda. The inhale felt bright. The exhale felt tangy. The profile can get loud. Jamal liked it in short bursts. I got tired of it in longer sessions.

The best draw experience came from Peach Ice for daily rhythm. Strawberry Mango also stayed strong for heavier sessions. Under long evenings, Marcus kept returning to that blend.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Consistent draw feel across the week	Body feels bulky for tight pockets
Mouthpiece stays drier than most	Flavor softens late in the run
Charging heat stays mild	Some sweet flavors fatigue fast
Vapor stays steady under longer pulls	A few units feel slightly heavy

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

Price: $9 t o$ 15
Device type: rechargeable disposable
Nicotine strength options: 5% salt
Activation method: draw
Battery capacity: 650 mAh
Charging port: USB-C
Estimated charge time: about 35 to 55 minutes
Coil type: mesh
Tank capacity: about 12 mL
Airflow style: medium
Adjustability: none
Vapor production: medium-high
Leak resistance features: tight mouthpiece fit
Build materials: hard shell body
Dimensions and weight: pocketable, yet bulky for jeans
Included accessories: device only
Safety features: basic charge protection behavior observed
Shipping: varies by retailer
Flavors available: Blueberry Ice
Flavors available: Grape Ice
Flavors available: Peach Ice
Flavors available: Strawberry Mango
Flavors available: Cool Mint
Flavors available: Energy Drink

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Flavor	4.4	Strong early flavor, then steady mid-run. Late fade showed up after heavy days.
Throat Hit	4.2	Firm feel with most blends. Mint stayed sharper on long pulls.
Vapor Production	4.3	Dense enough under normal pulls. Marcus still got good output in stress blocks.
Airflow/Draw	4.4	Smooth ramp with a medium resistance. No weird whistles in our batch.
Battery Life	4.5	Two charge cycles covered a week at moderate pace. Jamal got full-day carry.
Leak Resistance	4.2	Less mouthpiece moisture than Duo designs. Pocket carry stayed clean.
Build Quality	4.3	Seams stayed tight. Mouthpiece fit stayed secure after wiping.
Ease of Use	4.6	No settings. No buttons. Charging stayed predictable.
Portability	3.9	A thicker body reduces jeans comfort. Jacket carry felt fine.
Overall	4.3	Numbers match the week-long stability and clean carry behavior.