VOOM Vape Reviews

VOOM keeps showing up in the same places where adults buy quick, no-drama nicotine gear. That pattern made me curious. The lineup also spans more than one use style, which tends to expose real design priorities.

My workflow stays consistent across brands. I run a daily-carry cycle, then I move into stress sessions. Marcus Reed focuses on heavy use. Jamal Davis focuses on carry convenience. Dr. Adrian Walker serves as a clinical and respiratory advisor.

We logged notes on draw feel, flavor shape, and device behavior. Battery heat got tracked every day. Condensation and leak behavior got checked at pockets and desk time. Those details decide whether a device stays in rotation.

Product Overview

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
VOOM Burst 15000 Strong flavor. Clear screen feedback. Bulkier than small sticks. Mode control needs attention. Flavor-focused adults. Medium-to-heavy daily use. 1422 4.4
VOOM Meteor 70000 Big vapor range. Wattage control feels real. Large body. Higher liquid use on high wattage. Adults who want tuning. High output sessions. 1625 4.5
VOOM Cobble 20000 Pocket shape works. Stable draw day to day. Screen can distract. Sweet flavors run warm. All-day carry. Simple rechargeable disposable use. 1322 4.4
VOOM Mesh 3000 Cheap entry. Very pocket friendly. Shorter lifespan. Output fades late. Backup device. Short trips. 59 4.1
VOOM 5 Multi 3000 Battery feels oversized. Flavor switching stays easy. Pod set locks flavor choices. Screen adds steps. Adults who get bored fast. Desk rotation. 1220 4.2
VOOM PodMod II Light in pocket. Clean everyday pull. Small battery. Pods feel limited. Commuters. Quick sessions. 1018 4.1
VOOM Clear Zero setup. Clean pocket behavior. Modest vapor. Shorter overall life. True grab-and-go. Light daily use. 610 4.1

Testing Team Takeaways

The brand’s higher-capacity devices lean into screen feedback and predictable output. That part showed up fast. VOOM’s strong units keep the draw stable during messy daily routines. Flavor stays bold, yet some blends push sweet notes hard. “When it hits, it stays in the same lane,” was the line I wrote after day four with Burst.

Marcus kept the heat and stability lens on. Longer pulls came first. Then the chain sessions followed. Meteor stayed composed at higher output, yet liquid burned faster. Cobble stayed cooler than expected for a screen disposable. “I can push it, then it stops short of that burnt edge,” Marcus said after a high-use day.

Jamal treated this lineup like pocket gear. Short hits happened during walking breaks. Car-cup-holder time got tested too. Cobble’s shape behaved well in pockets. Mesh 3000 stayed easy, then it faded late. “I want it to disappear in my pocket,” Jamal said. “Cobble disappears, then it still hits.”

Dr. Walker stayed in his advisor lane. He focused on practical warning signs during use. He kept emphasizing device heat as a stop signal. He also pointed out that harsh taste should end a session.

VOOM Vapes Comparison Chart

Device Device type Nicotine strength tested Activation Battery capacity Coil type Airflow style Flavor performance Throat-hit smoothness Vapor production Battery life Leak resistance Build quality Ease of use
VOOM Burst 15000 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt Button with mode control 650 mAh Dual mesh Adjustable, DTL-leaning Bold, layered Smooth, firm edge High Strong for class Good, minor condensate Solid shell Medium
VOOM Meteor 70000 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt Button for wattage, draw-based use 1000 mAh Dual coil DTL to MTL range Strong, tunable Smooth at lower watts Very high Long, mode dependent Good, needs wiping Strong, big chassis Medium
VOOM Cobble 20000 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt Draw-activated 650 mAh Mesh Simple, mid-tight Consistent, sweet-leaning Smooth, steady High Long for size Very good Good, pocket durable High
VOOM Mesh 3000 Disposable 5% salt Draw-activated 550 mAh Mesh Fixed, mid-tight Good early, fades late Smooth, light Medium Short Very good Fair Very high
VOOM 5 Multi 3000 Multi-pod device 20 mg salt Draw-activated, pod switch button 1500 mAh Integrated pod coil Fixed, MTL-leaning Clean, varies by pod Smooth, light-to-mid Medium Long Good Good Medium
VOOM PodMod II Pod system 20 mg salt Draw-activated 500 mAh Integrated pod coil Fixed, MTL-leaning Clean, focused Smooth, controlled Medium-low Short Good Good High
VOOM Clear Disposable 20 mg salt Draw-activated Built-in, non-recharge Mesh Fixed, tight MTL Simple, clear notes Smooth, mild Low-medium Short Very good Good Very high

What We Tested and How We Tested It

The scoring comes from repeatable use checks. Flavor accuracy got judged by how clear the top note stayed. Intensity got tracked by how fast the flavor went flat. Throat hit got described as a subjective feel only. No one on our team treats that feeling as advice.

Vapor production got checked in short pulls, then longer pulls. Airflow got tested by draw resistance. Battery behavior got tracked by charge cycles, then heat checks. Charging stability got judged by whether the device stayed cool. Leak and condensation control got checked in pockets, then desk time.

Build quality got judged by body flex, then mouthpiece fit. Durability got checked by daily carry scuffs. Ease of use got judged by setup time, then day-to-day friction. Portability got tested in pockets, then bag carry. Reliability got checked by misfires, then output dips.

VOOM Vapes: Our Testing Experience

VOOM Burst 15000

Our Testing Experience

Rotation started with Burst as the main daily carry. My run lasted nine days. Puff counts averaged 520 per day. Charging happened six times. The device stayed cool during normal pulls. Heat rose during long burst sessions, then it settled.

Marcus treated Burst like a stress tool. Chain sessions ran after dinner. His heaviest day hit about 1,050 puffs. Output stayed stable through the first half of the liquid. Late-stage pulls felt warmer. “It’s still steady, but it’s getting louder in the mouth,” he said.

Jamal handled pocket abuse. The device rode in a jeans pocket during commutes. It also sat in a car console for two afternoons. No auto-firing showed up. Condensation did collect near the mouthpiece after long days. “I wiped it once, then it stayed fine,” he said.

From my perspective, Burst fits adults who want strong flavor without the mod lifestyle. The screen helped during travel days. It reduced the guessing. The airflow control gave enough range. It leaned DTL, yet it could tighten up.

Dr. Walker kept his guidance practical. He emphasized stopping use when heat feels unusual. He also noted that harsh taste should not get pushed through. That advice mattered late in the device life. Flavor fade can tempt longer pulls. Longer pulls can raise heat. The safer move stayed simple.

By day eight, my notes showed two weaknesses. Condensation needed a quick wipe. Sweet flavors pushed a sticky aftertaste. Those issues did not ruin it. They did shape who should buy it.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The draw feel starts with a confident airflow. Under regular mode, the pull stays smooth. The mouth feel feels slightly humid. That part suggests dense vapor. Throat feel lands as a firm edge, not a scratch.

We tested six flavors during the run. Each one got at least a day. Then we rotated for palate resets.

Watermelon Ice delivered a bright front note. The inhale felt wet, then clean. Menthol stayed light, then it rose after exhale. Jamal liked that balance. “It doesn’t slap my throat, it slides,” he said. The aftertaste stayed short.

Triple Mango leaned thicker. The inhale carried ripe mango, then a syrup note followed. The exhale stayed warm. Marcus noted the sweetness buildup. “Great at first, then it clings,” he said after a heavy session. Shorter pulls fixed it.

Strawberry Banana stayed creamy. The inhale opened with strawberry candy. Banana sat under it, then it pushed forward late. The throat feel stayed softer than mango. I kept that pod as an evening flavor. The blend felt less sharp.

Original Tobacco ran dry and woody. It did not mimic smoke. It leaned like sweet cured leaf. The exhale carried a mild nut note. Jamal used it in the car. “It’s the least messy flavor,” he said.

Pink Lemonade came across tart, then sweet. That tart note made the vapor feel thinner. The throat feel sharpened a little. Marcus liked it at lower output. Longer pulls made it taste like candy powder.

Shisha Apple had a spiced apple note. The inhale felt juicy. Then a faint anise tone showed up. It stayed interesting, yet it can polarize. Jamal called it a “one pod a day” flavor.

Best draw experience landed with Watermelon Ice. Triple Mango also worked, yet shorter pulls helped. As far as flavor consistency is concerned, Original Tobacco stayed the cleanest over time.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Strong flavor clarity early. Screen helps pacing. Airflow range feels real. Condensation can build. Sweet flavors cling late. Size can feel bulky.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 1422 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable.
  • Nicotine strength: 5% salt tested.
  • Activation: Button with mode control.
  • Battery: 650 mAh.
  • Charging port: USB-C.
  • Charge time: about 45–60 minutes in our use.
  • E-liquid capacity: 16 mL class device.
  • Coil: Dual mesh.
  • Airflow: Adjustable, DTL-leaning.
  • Screen: Battery and puff tracking.
  • Leak resistance: Good, with mouthpiece wipe needed.
  • Build materials: Hard shell body.
  • Safety features: Basic charge protections expected.
  • Shipping: Varies by retailer and region.
  • Flavors we tested: Watermelon Ice. Triple Mango. Strawberry Banana. Original Tobacco. Pink Lemonade. Shisha Apple.
  • Full flavor lineup: Watermelon Ice. Original Tobacco. Triple Mango. Strawberry Watermelon Bubblegum. Strawberry Watermelon. Strawberry Mango. Strawberry Kiwi. Strawberry Milkshake. Strawberry Ice Cream. Strawberry Ice. Strawberry Banana. Spearmint. Sour Blueberry Raspberry. Sour Apple. Shisha Apple. Rainbow Candy. Pink Lemonade. Pineapple Peach Mango. Pineapple Ice. Peach Mango Watermelon. Passion Grapefruit. Mixed Berry. Mint Tobacco. Mango Ice. Cola Lime. Cool Mint. Lemon Lime. Grape Ice. Lush Ice. Blue Razz Ice. Blueberry. Cherry Lime. Fizzy Cherry. Fresh Mint. Berry Grape. Mixed Berries. Pineapple Ice. Love 66. Cappuccino. Wild Strawberry Melon. Peach Ice. Miami Mint.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.6 Strong top notes stayed clear through mid-life use.
Throat Hit 4.4 Firm edge felt consistent, with less scratch than many disposables.
Vapor Production 4.6 Dense output showed up even on shorter pulls.
Airflow/Draw 4.5 Adjustment range supported tighter pulls without choking.
Battery Life 4.3 Six charge cycles covered nine days with stable output.
Leak Resistance 4.2 No leaks in pocket, yet mouthpiece needed wiping.
Build Quality 4.4 Body held up to daily carry scuffs and pocket pressure.
Ease of Use 4.4 Screen reduced guessing, yet mode control adds a step.
Portability 4.3 Carry works, though the body feels thicker than slim sticks.
Overall 4.4 Strong balance, with minor maintenance and size trade-offs.

VOOM Meteor 70000

Our Testing Experience

Meteor entered as the “big device” slot. My run lasted twelve days. Average use sat near 610 puffs daily. Wattage stayed mostly at 18W. Two days got pushed higher. Charging happened five times. Battery heat stayed controlled, yet high wattage raised warmth.

Marcus treated Meteor like a stress bench. Longer draws hit first. Then he pushed wattage toward the top range. The device handled it. Liquid level dropped fast. “It’s honest, it eats juice when you crank it,” he said after a 28W day. Coil taste stayed clean early. Near the end of a heavy day, sweetness turned syrupy.

Jamal used Meteor in shorter bursts. Walking sessions happened at a tighter airflow. He kept wattage lower. Pocket carry felt less natural. The chassis felt tall. “This one lives on my desk,” he said. That pattern made sense. The screen and controls invite a station setup.

From the perspective of device behavior, Meteor stayed reliable. No random cutoffs showed up. Output stayed stable across charge cycles. The airflow range felt broad. It could do MTL. It also opened up for DTL. That flexibility changed how flavors presented.

Dr. Walker’s input stayed grounded. He kept pointing to heat as a warning flag. Wattage control can tempt longer sessions. Those longer sessions can mask harshness. His advice was simple. If harsh taste appears, stop and cool down.

My biggest note focused on who should not buy it. Small-pocket users will hate it. Adults who want simple, no-controls use will also get annoyed. Meteor rewards people who adjust. That fact shapes the value.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The draw can feel tight, then wide, depending on settings. At lower wattage, vapor feels softer. Flavor feels clearer. At high wattage, vapor gets thick. Throat feel grows sharper. That shift feels obvious within minutes.

We tested six flavors across the team. Each flavor got a half-day minimum. Then we switched to reduce palate fatigue.

Blue Razz Ice hit bright and sharp. The inhale opened with candy blue raspberry. Then cooling came late. At 18W, the cooling stayed clean. At 26W, it turned icy and rough. Jamal preferred the lower setting. “It keeps the flavor clean, not loud,” he said.

Grape Ice felt deeper. The inhale carried dark grape skin. Menthol landed at the end. Marcus pushed it high. The grape stayed strong. That menthol got harsh. “Great cloud, but it bites at the top,” he said.

Strawberry Watermelon leaned sweet. The inhale felt like syrupy fruit punch. At tighter airflow, it tasted clearer. With wide airflow, it tasted like candy mist. I used it as a mid-day flavor. It stayed pleasant. It also left a sweet film.

Miami Mint stayed clean. It gave the smoothest throat feel in our set. Jamal liked it as a commute flavor. “It feels like a reset button,” he said. Aftertaste stayed short.

Peach Ice had a juicy inhale. Cooling built during exhale. At 20W, peach stayed present. At 28W, cooling washed it out. Marcus called it “a wattage flavor.” That description fit.

Cream Tobacco landed warm. It felt smooth. Vapor felt dense at mid wattage. The flavor stayed stable during long sessions. I used it for evening notes.

Best draw experience landed with Miami Mint at lower wattage. Cream Tobacco also stayed consistent. For a “push it” session, Grape Ice worked, yet throat feel got sharper.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Wide airflow range. Wattage control feels meaningful. Strong battery for class. Large body limits pocket carry. High wattage drains liquid fast. Controls add learning.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 1625 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable.
  • Nicotine strength: 5% salt.
  • Activation: Button for wattage control. Draw-based use in sessions.
  • Battery: 1000 mAh.
  • Charging port: USB-C.
  • Wattage range: 10W to 30W.
  • E-liquid capacity: 20 mL.
  • Coil: Dual coil system.
  • Airflow: DTL and MTL range.
  • Screen: Battery, liquid, settings feedback.
  • Leak resistance: Good, with routine mouthpiece wipe.
  • Build materials: Rigid body, heavier chassis.
  • Safety features: Basic charge protections expected.
  • Flavors we tested: Blue Razz Ice. Grape Ice. Strawberry Watermelon. Miami Mint. Peach Ice. Cream Tobacco.
  • Full flavor lineup: Blue Razz Ice. Grape Ice. Strawberry Watermelon. Miami Mint. Peach Ice. Cream Tobacco. Strawberry Kiwi. Banana Ice. Watermelon Ice. Sour Apple.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.7 Clear flavors at mid wattage, with tunable intensity.
Throat Hit 4.5 Smooth at lower wattage, sharper edge at high power.
Vapor Production 4.8 High wattage produced dense vapor with fast response.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Range supported tight pulls and open pulls with stability.
Battery Life 4.6 Five charge cycles covered twelve days with consistent output.
Leak Resistance 4.3 No pocket leaks, yet condensation can appear after long sessions.
Build Quality 4.5 Sturdy body resisted scuffs and handled desk drops.
Ease of Use 4.2 Controls add value, yet they add steps.
Portability 3.9 Size and weight reduce true pocket comfort.
Overall 4.5 Strong performance, with bulk and liquid use as trade-offs.

VOOM Cobble 20000

Our Testing Experience

Cobble became the “daily pocket” device fast. My run lasted ten days. Average use sat around 540 puffs per day. Charging happened five times. Pocket carry stayed consistent. The body shape reduced awkward pocket angles.

Marcus used Cobble during heavier stretches. His long sessions happened after workouts. The device stayed cooler than expected. Output stayed stable under chain use. “It doesn’t spike heat the way some screen disposables do,” he said. Flavor did lean sweeter late.

Jamal treated Cobble as a pure commuter tool. Short pulls happened at crosswalks. The device stayed comfortable in hand. Screen checks happened without fuss. “It’s the shape that matters here,” he said. That point landed. Cobble looks odd on a table. In a pocket, it fits.

Leak behavior stayed strong. No liquid showed up in pockets. Condensation happened, yet it stayed manageable. A quick wipe fixed it. Mouthpiece hygiene stayed easier than many flat-mouth devices.

Dr. Walker’s reminders came up during this test. He pushed the same caution. Heat changes signal a stop. Taste changes also signal a stop. Cobble stayed stable, which reduced that worry.

My biggest weakness note involved flavor style. Sweeter blends can feel heavy. That heaviness shows up as lingering aftertaste. Adults who dislike sweet should pick mint or tobacco.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Cobble’s draw feels steady. Airflow stays fixed in a mid-tight lane. Vapor feels dense for the size. Throat feel stays smooth. It does not feel hollow.

We tested six flavors. Each got a full day. Then we repeated the top two.

Banana Ice came across creamy. The inhale delivered banana candy. Cooling came late. Jamal liked the smooth throat feel. “It’s soft, like dessert air,” he said. Longer pulls made it feel thicker.

Fizzy Cherry landed bright. It tasted like cherry soda. The inhale felt sweet. The exhale had a light bite. Marcus liked it early. Late in the day, it felt syrupy. “It’s fun, then it gets sticky,” he said.

Miami Mint stayed crisp. It also cleaned up the aftertaste effect. I used it between fruit flavors. Throat feel stayed the smoothest in the Cobble set. It felt like a palate reset.

Pink Lemonade delivered tart notes first. Sweetness followed. The tart note made the vapor feel lighter. Jamal liked it outdoors. “It tastes sharper when I’m walking,” he said. That matched my notes.

White Gummy leaned candy. It hit with a soft fruity mix. The flavor stayed broad, not precise. Marcus called it “a cloud candy.” It worked for casual pulls.

Watermelon Ice stayed clean. The inhale felt juicy. Cooling stayed balanced. It also held up over long use. That stability made it the best all-day flavor.

Best draw experience landed with Watermelon Ice. Miami Mint also stayed reliable. For a sweeter mood, Banana Ice worked, yet it can feel heavy.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Pocket shape stays comfortable. Screen helps pacing. Stable output under heavy use. Sweet flavors can linger. Screen draws attention in public. Fixed airflow limits tuning.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 1322 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable.
  • Nicotine strength: 5% salt.
  • Activation: Draw-activated.
  • Battery: 650 mAh.
  • Charging port: USB-C.
  • E-liquid capacity: 16 mL.
  • Coil: Mesh coil.
  • Screen: Battery feedback. Liquid feedback.
  • Airflow: Fixed mid-tight draw.
  • Leak resistance: Strong pocket behavior.
  • Build materials: Rigid shell with rounded shape.
  • Flavors we tested: Banana Ice. Fizzy Cherry. Miami Mint. Pink Lemonade. White Gummy. Watermelon Ice.
  • Full flavor lineup: Banana Ice. Caramel Popcorn. Fizzy Cherry. Miami Mint. Peach Ice. Pink Lemonade. Rose Lychee. Sour Blue Raspberry. Strawberry Ice. Strawberry Kiwi. Watermelon Ice. White Gummy.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Sweet blends stayed bold, with strong mid-note consistency.
Throat Hit 4.3 Smooth pull with a firm edge, without scratch in short sessions.
Vapor Production 4.4 Dense vapor showed up with moderate draw effort.
Airflow/Draw 4.2 Fixed airflow stayed consistent, yet it limits fine tuning.
Battery Life 4.2 Five charges covered ten days with stable output.
Leak Resistance 4.4 Pocket carry stayed clean with minimal condensation.
Build Quality 4.3 Rounded body resisted pocket pressure and daily scuffs.
Ease of Use 4.6 No settings friction, with clear screen feedback.
Portability 4.5 Shape fits pockets better than tall stick designs.
Overall 4.4 A strong daily carry option, with sweet-leaning flavor bias.

VOOM Mesh 3000

Our Testing Experience

Mesh 3000 served as the budget baseline. My run lasted six days. Daily use averaged 360 puffs. The device stayed light. It also stayed quiet in pockets. No charging happened. That limitation shaped the plan.

Marcus used Mesh 3000 as a quick hit tool. Short sessions happened between heavier devices. Output felt solid early. It dipped late. “It starts strong, then it thins out,” he said on day five. Heat stayed low. That part stayed reassuring.

Jamal treated it like a real backup. The device lived in a small pocket. It rode in a gym bag too. No leaks showed up. Mouthpiece comfort stayed decent. “This is the one I forget about,” he said. That fits the product category.

From my perspective, Mesh 3000 fits short-trip adults. It also fits buyers who want a low-cost try. The draw stays simple. The flavor stays good early. The late-life fade felt real. That fade showed up as lighter vapor.

Dr. Walker’s advice stayed relevant even here. He pointed to taste shifts as a stop sign. Cheap devices can tempt longer pulls. Longer pulls can raise throat irritation. Keeping pulls short stayed the better move.

The biggest drawback involved lifespan. Heavy users will burn through it fast. That fact makes it a backup, not a main device.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Mesh 3000 pulls in a tight-to-mid lane. The inhale feels smooth. Vapor feels lighter than bigger VOOM devices. Throat feel stays mild. That makes it friendly for short pulls.

We tested six flavors from the lineup. Each got about a day. Some got revisits after palate resets.

Blueberry Ice delivered clean fruit. Cooling came late. The inhale felt light. Jamal liked it for quick hits. “It doesn’t leave a mess in my mouth,” he said.

Cola Lime tasted like soda syrup. Lime lifted the inhale. Exhale felt fizzy in a mental way. Marcus liked it at first. After long sessions, it felt flat. Short pulls fixed it.

Cream Tobacco had a smooth warm note. It felt mild. The throat feel stayed softer than fruit flavors. I used it during evening desk work. It stayed consistent longer than candy flavors.

Gummy Bear leaned sweet. The flavor felt broad. It did not separate into clear notes. Jamal called it “a simple candy.” That description fits.

Peach Ice had a juicy inhale. Cooling hit mid-exhale. The flavor stayed pleasant. Late device life made peach fade first.

Sour Blue Raspberry had the sharpest throat feel. Tart notes show up early. That tartness can feel rough if pulls get long. Marcus noted the trade-off. “Tastes loud, feels louder,” he said.

Best draw experience landed with Blueberry Ice for smooth pulls. Cream Tobacco also stayed consistent across device life. Sour flavors worked, yet they punished long pulls.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Very pocket friendly. Low price entry. Clean leak behavior. Shorter lifespan for heavy users. Output fades late. Fixed airflow.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 59 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Disposable.
  • Nicotine strength: 5% salt.
  • Activation: Draw-activated.
  • Battery: 550 mAh.
  • Charging: No charging in our use.
  • E-liquid capacity: 4 mL.
  • Coil: Mesh coil.
  • Airflow: Fixed, tighter lane.
  • Leak resistance: Oil leakage resistance design.
  • Build materials: Lightweight shell.
  • Flavors we tested: Blueberry Ice. Cola Lime. Cream Tobacco. Gummy Bear. Peach Ice. Sour Blue Raspberry.
  • Full flavor lineup: Avocado Honeydew Melon. Blackberry Pop. Blueberry Ice. Cherry Ice. Cola Lime. Cream Tobacco. Energy Drink. Freezy Grape. Golden Berry. Gummy Bear. Lemon Lime. Miami Mint. Orange Lemon Mint. Peach Ice. Pina Colada. Pink Lemonade. Raspberry Cherry. Rose Lychee. Sour Blue Dust. Sour Blue Raspberry. Strawberry Ice. Strawberry Kiwi. Strawberry Watermelon. Watermelon Ice. White Gummy.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.0 Strong early flavor, with noticeable fade late.
Throat Hit 4.0 Mild edge worked for short pulls, harsher with sour blends.
Vapor Production 3.9 Vapor stayed moderate, then thinned near end-of-life.
Airflow/Draw 3.8 Fixed draw stayed consistent, yet it limits preference matching.
Battery Life 3.7 Battery matched liquid early, then output dipped late.
Leak Resistance 4.1 Pocket carry stayed clean with minimal condensation.
Build Quality 3.8 Light shell held up, yet it feels less premium.
Ease of Use 4.7 No setup friction. True grab-and-go behavior.
Portability 4.8 Small body disappears in pockets and bags.
Overall 4.1 Great backup value, with lifespan limits for heavy use.

VOOM 5 Multi 3000

Our Testing Experience

5 Multi filled a specific niche in our room. Flavor boredom is real for many adults. This device tries to solve that with a pod carousel concept. My run lasted eight days. Average use hit 430 puffs per day. Charging happened twice. Battery felt oversized.

Marcus used it during desk-heavy days. Longer sessions happened, yet output stayed moderate. The device did not aim for cloud output. That limitation showed up fast. “It’s not a cannon, it’s a switchboard,” he said. That comment stayed accurate.

Jamal liked the switch idea. Quick flavor hops felt easy. Pocket carry felt acceptable, yet thicker than a slim pod. Screen checks helped him pace. “I like seeing what I’m about to hit,” he said. The pod switch button did add a step. Under rushed circumstances, it can feel like friction.

From my perspective, 5 Multi fits adults who want variety without carrying more gear. It also fits desk life. The device behaves like a small station. It does not behave like a stealth stick.

Condensation stayed controlled. Pods stayed seated. No leaking showed up during the run. Mouthpiece hygiene stayed easier than some flat-tip designs.

Dr. Walker’s guidance came up when we discussed rapid switching. He cautioned against chain switching as a habit. Rapid use can reduce self-awareness of intake. That point matters for adults tracking nicotine.

The core weakness involved choice lock. The pod set decides the day. If the set misses your taste profile, the device loses value.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The draw leans MTL. Pull resistance stays mid-tight. Vapor stays moderate. Mouth feel stays smooth. Throat feel stays controlled. That style fits short desk breaks.

We tested five pods in one set. Each pod got a day. Then we repeated the top two. A sixth “blend” note came from switching back-to-back.

Mint pod delivered a clean inhale. Cooling stayed moderate. It reduced aftertaste across the set. Jamal used it as a reset. “That one clears my mouth,” he said.

Mango pod leaned ripe and sweet. The inhale felt thick. Aftertaste stayed long. Marcus disliked it during long sessions. “It coats my tongue,” he said. Short pulls helped.

Berry pod tasted like mixed candy berries. It felt bright. It also felt a bit flat on the exhale. I liked it early in the day. Late use made it feel syrupy.

Tobacco pod stayed warm. It felt mild. It did not taste smoky. It leaned sweet cured leaf. That pod stayed stable across days.

Lemon pod delivered tart notes first. Sweetness followed. Throat feel felt sharper than mint. That sharpness stayed manageable in short hits.

Switching behavior mattered. Mint right after mango felt clean. Berry after tobacco tasted louder. That kind of contrast is the product’s main appeal. Under real use, it reduced flavor fatigue.

Best draw experience landed with Mint. Tobacco also stayed steady across time. Lemon worked, yet throat feel got sharper in long sessions.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Easy flavor switching. Big battery for category. Stable pods with low mess. Output stays moderate. Pod set locks choices. Button steps add friction.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 1220 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Multi-pod device with prefilled pods.
  • Nicotine strength: 20 mg salt tested.
  • Activation: Draw-activated. Pod switch uses a button.
  • Battery: 1500 mAh.
  • Charging: USB-C.
  • Screen: LCD with device feedback.
  • Pod count: 5 pods per set.
  • Pod capacity: 2 mL per pod.
  • Total puffs: 3000 class rating.
  • Airflow: Fixed, MTL-leaning.
  • Leak resistance: Good pod seating, low pocket mess.
  • Build materials: Rigid body with screen window.
  • Flavors we tested: Mint. Mango. Berry. Tobacco. Lemon.
  • Full flavor lineup: Mint. Mango. Berry. Tobacco. Lemon. Blue Razz. Strawberry Kiwi. Watermelon. Grape. Peach. Pink Lemonade. Coffee Tobacco.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.2 Clean flavor contrast across pods, with some sweet buildup.
Throat Hit 4.1 Controlled edge suited short sessions without harshness.
Vapor Production 4.0 Moderate output matched MTL intent, not cloud chasing.
Airflow/Draw 4.0 Consistent resistance, yet limited tuning.
Battery Life 4.5 Two charges covered eight days with stable output.
Leak Resistance 4.2 Pods stayed sealed in pockets, with low condensation.
Build Quality 4.3 Body held up well, with stable pod seating.
Ease of Use 4.1 Switching adds value, yet it adds a step.
Portability 4.0 Carry works, though thickness is noticeable.
Overall 4.2 Great variety tool, with output and choice-lock trade-offs.

VOOM PodMod II

Our Testing Experience

PodMod II sat in the commuter lane. My run lasted seven days. Daily use averaged 410 puffs. Charging happened once per day. Battery is small, so that pattern was expected. Output stayed stable across the week.

Marcus used it as a lighter session device. He wanted to see if it breaks under frequent hits. The device stayed consistent. Pods ran out before the device failed. “It doesn’t wobble, it just runs out,” he said. That matches the category.

Jamal kept it in a pocket every day. The body stayed light. Mouthpiece comfort stayed decent. No accidental firing occurred. “It’s simple, but it’s not flimsy,” he said. That sentence landed as the core takeaway.

Pod behavior matters in real life. We watched for leaks. We watched for spitback. Condensation stayed minimal. A wipe was still useful after long days.

Dr. Walker’s input focused on pacing with small pods. He noted that frequent short pulls can add up fast. That fact matters for adults managing intake. His advice leaned toward mindfulness, not fear.

The weakness stayed clear. Battery size forces routine charging. That’s fine for desk users. It gets annoying for long travel days.

Draw Experience & Flavors

PodMod II draws in a tight MTL lane. Pull resistance feels steady. Vapor stays moderate. Throat feel stays controlled. That kind of draw suits frequent short breaks.

We tested five pods that came with the device set. Each pod got a day. Then we revisited two for consistency checks.

Mint pod delivered the cleanest mouth feel. Cooling stayed light. Aftertaste stayed short. Jamal used it during commuting. “It doesn’t hang around,” he said.

Tobacco pod stayed warm and mild. It tasted like sweet cured leaf. The throat feel stayed a little firmer than mint. I used it after meals. It felt less candy-like.

Mango pod tasted ripe and sweet. It also felt heavier in the mouth. Marcus noted the buildup during long sessions. “It’s fine, then it gets thick,” he said. Short pulls helped.

Berry pod leaned candy. It delivered a bright front note. The exhale felt simple. That pod worked as a quick hit flavor.

Lemon pod tasted tart first. Sweetness followed. Throat feel sharpened a little. Under colder outdoor use, the tart note felt even sharper.

Best draw experience landed with Mint. Tobacco also stayed consistent over repeated days. Mango can feel rich, yet it can fatigue the mouth during long sessions.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Light pocket carry. Clean MTL draw. Low leak behavior across the week. Small battery needs daily charging. Pod variety feels limited. Vapor stays moderate.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 1018 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Pod system with prefilled pods.
  • Nicotine strength: 20 mg salt tested.
  • Activation: Draw-activated.
  • Battery: 500 mAh.
  • Charging: USB-C.
  • Screen: LCD feedback on device status.
  • Pods included: 5 pods in our kit.
  • Total puffs: 3000 class rating across pods.
  • Airflow: Fixed, tight-to-mid MTL.
  • Leak resistance: Good, with minimal condensation.
  • Build materials: Compact plastic shell with screen window.
  • Flavors we tested: Mint. Tobacco. Mango. Berry. Lemon.
  • Full flavor lineup: Mint. Tobacco. Mango. Berry. Lemon. Blue Razz. Watermelon. Strawberry Kiwi. Grape. Peach.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.1 Clear flavors in short pulls, with some sweetness buildup on fruit pods.
Throat Hit 4.0 Controlled edge suited frequent short sessions.
Vapor Production 3.9 Output stayed moderate and consistent with MTL intent.
Airflow/Draw 4.1 Tight draw stayed smooth with low turbulence.
Battery Life 3.8 Daily charging became routine due to 500 mAh size.
Leak Resistance 4.1 Pods stayed clean in pockets with minimal mess.
Build Quality 4.2 Body held up to daily carry, with stable pod seating.
Ease of Use 4.3 Simple daily use, with minimal learning friction.
Portability 4.6 Light device disappears in pockets during commuting.
Overall 4.1 Strong commuter pod system, with battery size as the main limit.

VOOM Clear

Our Testing Experience

Clear served as the simplest baseline. My run lasted five days. Average use hit 290 puffs per day. No charging occurred. That limitation shaped who it fits. A light user can ride it comfortably.

Marcus used Clear during light evenings. Longer sessions felt limited by output. He did not treat it as a heavy-use tool. “It’s fine for a few hits, then I want more,” he said. That aligns with its size.

Jamal kept it in pockets and small bags. The device behaved well. No leaking showed up. Mouthpiece comfort stayed decent. “This is true grab-and-go,” he said. That is exactly the category.

From my perspective, Clear fits adults who want minimal steps. It also fits people who dislike screens. It does not fit cloud expectations. It does not fit all-day heavy use.

Condensation stayed low. The mouthpiece still needed a wipe after long days. That maintenance is normal.

Dr. Walker’s comment focused on harshness awareness. Small devices can tempt repeated pulls. Repeated pulls can raise irritation. His advice stayed simple. Stop on harsh taste. Don’t chase it.

The biggest weakness involved output ceiling. Flavor stays clear, yet vapor stays modest. That trade-off can be fine. It depends on what a buyer wants.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Clear draws tight. The inhale feels smooth. Vapor stays light to moderate. Throat feel stays mild. That style matches discreet use.

We tested five flavors that are common in the Clear style. Each got a day. Then we repeated mint for consistency.

Mint flavor delivered the cleanest throat feel. Cooling stayed light. Aftertaste stayed short. Jamal used it outdoors. “It stays clean even in wind,” he said.

Tobacco flavor stayed mild. It leaned sweet cured leaf. No smoky note appeared. I used it after meals. It felt steady.

Mango flavor leaned sweet and soft. It also left a lingering aftertaste. Marcus disliked that effect. “It clings more than it should,” he said. Short pulls reduced it.

Berry flavor tasted like light candy fruit. It felt simple. It also faded sooner than mint.

Lemon flavor delivered tart inhale notes. Sweetness followed. Throat feel sharpened a little. Under rapid pulls, it felt sharper.

Best draw experience landed with Mint for clean mouth feel. Tobacco also stayed steady. Fruit flavors can work, yet they can linger during heavy use.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Zero setup. Tight draw suits discreet use. Clean pocket behavior. Modest vapor output. Shorter lifespan for heavy use. No recharge option.

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: 610 typical retail range.
  • Device type: Disposable.
  • Nicotine strength: 20 mg salt tested.
  • Activation: Draw-activated.
  • Battery: Built-in, non-recharge in our use.
  • Charging: None.
  • E-liquid capacity: 2 mL class device.
  • Coil: Mesh coil.
  • Airflow: Fixed, tight MTL.
  • Leak resistance: Strong, with low pocket mess.
  • Build materials: Simple shell with compact mouthpiece.
  • Flavors we tested: Mint. Tobacco. Mango. Berry. Lemon.
  • Full flavor lineup: Mint. Tobacco. Mango. Berry. Lemon. Watermelon. Blue Razz. Strawberry. Grape.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 3.8 Clear notes early, with simpler layering than larger VOOM units.
Throat Hit 3.9 Mild edge suited discreet use, sharper with tart flavors.
Vapor Production 3.6 Output stays modest due to tight draw and small format.
Airflow/Draw 3.7 Tight draw stays smooth, yet it limits DTL use.
Battery Life 3.5 Non-recharge design limits heavy daily users.
Leak Resistance 4.3 Pocket carry stayed very clean with low condensation.
Build Quality 4.0 Simple shell held up well for the price class.
Ease of Use 4.9 True grab-and-go behavior with no setup steps.
Portability 4.9 Small stick disappears in pockets and small bags.
Overall 4.1 Excellent simplicity and carry, with output and lifespan limits.

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality/Durability Ease of Use
VOOM Burst 15000 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.4
VOOM Meteor 70000 4.5 4.7 4.5 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.5 4.2
VOOM Cobble 20000 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.6
VOOM Mesh 3000 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 4.1 3.8 4.7
VOOM 5 Multi 3000 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.1
VOOM PodMod II 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.1 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.3
VOOM Clear 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.5 4.3 4.0 4.9

Meteor ranks as the most versatile performer. Burst stays the most balanced for flavor and output. Cobble behaves like the best daily carry. Mesh and Clear lean into portability and simplicity. PodMod II stays a commuter tool. 5 Multi stays a variety tool.

Best Picks

VOOM Vape for Tuners: VOOM Meteor 70000
Meteor earned it through wattage control that changes flavor and vapor. Output stayed stable across charge cycles. Marcus pushed it hard, then it stayed composed.

VOOM Vape for Flavor Chasers: VOOM Burst 15000
Burst delivered the boldest flavor shape across the week. Airflow control kept the draw comfortable. The screen helped pacing during long days.

VOOM Vape for Pocket Carry: VOOM Cobble 20000
Cobble earned it through pocket behavior and clean daily use. Leak behavior stayed strong. Jamal kept it in rotation as the easiest carry.

How to Choose the VOOM Vape?

Device type should decide the first cut. Disposables fit adults who want low friction. Rechargeable disposables fit adults who want longer lifespan. Pod devices fit adults who prefer a tighter draw and routine charging.

Vaping style matters. Adults who like a looser pull should look at Meteor or Burst. Adults who prefer a tighter pull should look at PodMod II or Clear. Cobble sits between those lanes.

Nicotine tolerance matters. Our tested set includes 5% units and 20 mg units. Adults who prefer a lighter feel often pick the lower strength lane. Adults who want a firmer feel often pick the higher strength lane. Personal response varies, so pacing matters.

Flavor preference should guide the pick. Fruit-heavy users will like Burst and Cobble. Mint users will appreciate Meteor and Cobble for the clean finish. Tobacco-leaning users will find the cleanest stability in Meteor and Pod devices.

Battery needs are practical. Long day users should consider Meteor or 5 Multi. Daily chargers will tolerate PodMod II. Light users can live with Clear. Mesh 3000 fits short trips and backups.

For a light nicotine adult who wants simple use, Clear fits well. Mesh 3000 also works as a low-cost backup. For a former heavy smoker who wants stronger throat feel, Cobble and Burst fit better. For a flavor-focused adult, Burst usually wins. Meteor also works, especially with wattage control. For a commuter who needs reliable daily carry, Cobble or PodMod II fits. For a beginner adult who wants low maintenance, Cobble and Clear stay easiest.

Limitations

VOOM’s strongest devices lean larger. Meteor proves that point. Pocket comfort drops when the chassis grows. That limitation matters for commuters. It also matters for adults who prefer discreet carry.

Screen-based disposables add convenience, yet they add distraction. Some adults dislike checking screens in public. Cobble and Burst carry that trade-off. The device feels more “present” in daily routines.

Sweet flavor bias shows up across the lineup. Cobble and Burst both pushed that note late in device life. Adults who dislike lingering sweetness may get annoyed. Mint and tobacco variants reduce that effect.

The simpler devices cap output. Clear shows that ceiling. Mesh 3000 also shows it late in life. Adults who want dense vapor will feel under-served.

Battery size limits appear on pod devices. PodMod II needs daily charging. That pattern becomes friction for travel days. It also becomes a pain for heavy users.

Even strong-performing devices still carry nicotine-related risk. Product use stays intended for adult users only.

Is the VOOM Vape Lineup Worth It?

VOOM offers several “carryable” options. The lineup feels aimed at adults who want repeatable behavior. Burst shows that focus. Flavor stays bold through mid-life use. Output stays stable across charge cycles. The screen reduces guessing during long days. Those facts support the price.

Meteor pushes into performance territory. Wattage control changes the entire draw. Lower wattage keeps flavors clean. Higher wattage increases vapor fast. Battery size supports that range. Liquid use rises at higher power. That trade-off feels predictable. Adults who enjoy tuning will value it.

Cobble fits daily carry better than most screen disposables. Shape matters in pockets. Leak behavior stayed strong for us. Output stayed stable across days. The flavor style leans sweet. Mint and tobacco options balance it. Adults who want a simple rechargeable disposable will find value here.

Mesh 3000 and Clear show the low-friction side. Setup stays zero. Pocket behavior stays clean. Vapor output stays modest. Lifespan also stays shorter for heavy users. Adults who want backups will see the value. Main-device heavy users will not.

5 Multi offers variety without extra devices. The battery feels oversized. Flavor switching changes mood fast. Output stays moderate. That limitation will frustrate cloud-focused adults. Desk users will enjoy it.

PodMod II sits in the commuter lane. It stays light. Draw stays tight and smooth. Battery size forces daily charging. Adults with a charger nearby will accept that. Long travel days will test patience.

As far as value is concerned, VOOM’s best buys match clear user needs. Burst fits flavor and output balance. Meteor fits tuners and high-output sessions. Cobble fits daily pocket carry. The cheaper sticks fit backups. The lineup does not replace a full mod setup. It also does not aim to.

Pro Tips for VOOM Vape

  • Keep pulls consistent during the first day. That habit makes flavor feel more predictable.
  • Wipe the mouthpiece at night. Condensation builds during long days.
  • Avoid pushing longer pulls after flavor fade. Taste changes can signal device end-stage.
  • Use lower wattage first on Meteor. Then step up only if the throat feel stays comfortable.
  • Rotate mint between sweet flavors. That reset reduces lingering aftertaste.
  • Charge rechargeable disposables before they fully die. Output feels steadier that way.
  • Keep devices out of hot cars. Heat can change liquid feel and draw comfort.
  • Treat small devices as backups. Heavy use will burn them fast.
  • Use tighter airflow when a flavor feels harsh. The draw often feels smoother.

FAQs

What is the real lifespan of VOOM Burst 15000 in daily use?
In our use, Burst covered nine days at about 520 puffs daily. Battery cycles landed at six charges. Heavy days reduced that timeline. Lower daily use extended it.

How long does VOOM Meteor 70000 last if wattage stays high?
High wattage increases liquid use fast. Marcus pushed 26W to 30W, then liquid dropped quickly. Mid wattage extended the run. Battery held up well.

Does VOOM Cobble 20000 leak in pockets?
We did not see pocket leaks during ten days. Condensation showed up near the mouthpiece. A wipe solved it. Bag carry stayed clean.

How often do VOOM pod devices need charging?
PodMod II needed daily charging in our routine. The 500 mAh battery made that normal. Shorter use days helped. Heavy days forced evening charging.

Do flavors stay consistent as the device gets older?
Flavor tends to fade late in life on smaller devices. Mesh 3000 showed that clearly. Larger devices held consistency longer. Sweet flavors also linger more late.

What nicotine strength should an adult choose in VOOM devices?
Our tested set included 5% and 20 mg. Adults who prefer a lighter feel usually pick lower strength. Adults who prefer a firmer feel often pick higher strength. Individual response varies, so pacing matters.

Is VOOM better as disposable or as pod systems?
Disposables won for simplicity. Cobble and Burst also won on output. PodMod II won on pocket comfort and tight draw. Battery size stayed the pod system’s main limit.

How do VOOM devices compare for throat hit smoothness?
Meteor at lower wattage felt the smoothest overall. Cobble stayed smooth across days. Burst stayed smooth, yet sweet flavors can feel heavier late.

Does VOOM 5 Multi actually help with flavor fatigue?
Yes, switching pods changed the experience fast. Mint worked as a reset. The value depends on whether the pod set matches your taste.

About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.