Candy cane vapes work best when peppermint stays crisp, the candy note stays readable, and the cooling does not turn harsh after repeated pulls. Our testing focused on flavor accuracy, throat hit, vapor production, draw, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability.
Table of Contents
Final Verdict
If you want the most dependable candy cane experience, the safest split is simple: choose a dedicated holiday-style disposable when you want a ready-made peppermint candy profile, or choose a refillable pod when you want steadier control over draw and sweetness. In our testing, the Vaporesso XROS 4 was the most reliable overall because it kept the peppermint clean, stayed consistent through long days, and traveled well without much fuss.
Top Picks
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaporesso XROS 4 | Very consistent flavor; pocket-friendly | Needs refills; pod upkeep | Daily carry, flavor-first | 4.5 |
| RAZ LTX 25000 Christmas Edition | Strong candy cane profile; feature-rich | Chunkier body | Heavy users, feature lovers | 4.5 |
| Geek Bar Pulse X 25K Christmas Edition | Smooth peppermint; easy mode switching | Bigger than simple disposables | Long sessions, balanced draw | 4.5 |
| Geekvape Wenax Q Pro | Smooth MTL to RDL flexibility | A bit more menu learning | Controlled draw, steady flavor | 4.4 |
| Uwell Caliburn G3 | Clean, accurate peppermint delivery | Smaller battery than larger pods | Simple daily pod use | 4.4 |
| OXBAR Magic Maze Pro 10K | Adjustable wattage helps tune mint | Needs restraint to avoid sharpness | Tinkerers, dialed-in draws | 4.3 |
| VOOPOO Argus P2 | Solid build; stable power options | Boxier in-pocket feel | MTL/RDL adults who like controls | 4.3 |
| Breeze Pro 2000 | Dead-simple; very pocketable | Limited lifespan; no recharging | Fast grab-and-go | 4.3 |
| Innokin Klypse | Easiest carry; clean, mellow draw | Lower power ceiling | Minimalists, short sessions | 4.2 |
| Viva G6000 | Straightforward candy cane mint | Consistency varies by unit | Budget-minded long-puff users | 4.1 |
Candy Cane Vape Comparison Chart
| Device | Overall Score | Price | Device Type | Nicotine Setup | Battery Capacity | Liquid/Pod Capacity | Coil/Heating | Control Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaporesso XROS 4 | 4.5 | Varies | Refillable pod system | Depends on e-liquid | 1000mAh | 3mL | Mesh pod options | Airflow + power modes |
| RAZ LTX 25000 Christmas Edition | 4.5 | Varies | Rechargeable disposable | 50mg | 800mAh | 16mL | Dual mesh | Airflow + modes + screen |
| Geek Bar Pulse X 25K Christmas Edition | 4.5 | Varies | Rechargeable disposable | 50mg | 700mAh | 18mL | Dual mesh | Airflow + modes + screen |
| Geekvape Wenax Q Pro | 4.4 | Varies | Refillable pod system | Depends on e-liquid | 1200mAh | 2mL | Q pod series | Airflow + button/draw |
| Uwell Caliburn G3 | 4.4 | Varies | Refillable pod system | Depends on e-liquid | 900mAh | 2.5mL | Integrated coil pods | Button/draw + airflow |
| OXBAR Magic Maze Pro 10K | 4.3 | Varies | Rechargeable disposable | 50mg | 900mAh | 18mL | 1.0ohm mesh | Airflow + 11–15W |
| VOOPOO Argus P2 | 4.3 | Varies | Refillable pod system | Depends on e-liquid | 1100mAh | 2mL | Argus top-fill pods | Power + airflow + screen |
| Breeze Pro 2000 | 4.3 | Varies | Disposable | 50mg | 1000mAh | 6mL | Mesh | No adjustments |
| Innokin Klypse | 4.2 | Varies | Refillable pod system | Depends on e-liquid | 700mAh | 2mL | 0.8ohm mesh pod | No adjustments |
| Viva G6000 | 4.1 | Varies | Rechargeable disposable | 50mg | - | 6mL | Mesh | No adjustments |
How We Tested It
We used these devices in normal adult routines—commutes, desk breaks, errands, and evening sessions—and tracked flavor, throat hit, vapor production, airflow and draw, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability. For refillables, we kept the peppermint candy cane liquid profile consistent so the device differences stayed clearer. Vape and nicotine products are for adults only, and our experience notes are testing observations rather than medical advice.
Candy Cane Vape: Our Testing Experience
Vaporesso XROS 4
Our Testing Experience
In our testing, the XROS 4 gave the most reliable candy cane result among the refillables. It kept peppermint bright, held the candy note longer than most pods, and stayed clean in a pocket during normal day-to-day use. It still asks for refills and basic pod upkeep, but it was the easiest refillable to trust for steady flavor over a full day.
What we liked
-
Stable candy-cane flavor
-
Clean MTL draw with little spitback
Who it is best for
-
Commuters and flavor-first MTL users
Where it falls short
-
Needs refills and routine pod care
-
Not built for high-output DL use
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Steady flavor | Needs refilling |
| Clean draw | Pod wear changes performance |
| Easy to carry | Not for DL clouds |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Refillable pod system
-
Battery capacity: 1000mAh
-
Pod capacity: 3mL
-
Coil/pod: XROS mesh pod options
-
Activation: Button + draw
-
Charging: USB-C
-
Airflow: Adjustable
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.7 | Bright and balanced |
| Throat Hit | 4.5 | Firm, smooth |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Dense MTL |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Easy to tune |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | Solid day use |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Mostly clean |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Well finished |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Simple upkeep |
| Portability | 4.7 | Excellent carry |
| Overall | 4.5 | Best refillable overall |
RAZ LTX 25000 Christmas Edition
Our Testing Experience
Our testing showed the RAZ delivered the clearest holiday-style disposable profile. The peppermint candy cane note came through fast, and the screen, airflow, and modes made it easier to keep the sweetness and cooling in check. The trade-off is size: it feels bigger in a pocket, and Boost mode can sharpen the mint if you keep pulling without a break.
What we liked
-
Most on-theme candy cane profile
-
Useful mode and airflow control
Who it is best for
-
Heavy users who want runtime and features
Where it falls short
-
Bulkier than simple disposables
-
Boost mode can get sharp
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong candy-cane flavor | Larger body |
| Adjustable airflow and modes | Boost can feel sharp |
| Helpful screen | Less stealthy |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Rechargeable disposable
-
Nicotine strength: 50mg
-
E-liquid contents: 16mL
-
Puff modes: Regular 25,000 / Boost 15,000
-
Battery: 800mAh (USB-C rechargeable)
-
Coil: Dual mesh
-
Controls: Airflow + mode/button control + screen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.7 | Most festive profile |
| Throat Hit | 4.6 | Crisp in Regular |
| Vapor Production | 4.7 | Strong output |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Easy to adjust |
| Battery Life | 4.6 | Good endurance |
| Leak Resistance | 4.4 | Minor moisture |
| Build Quality | 4.6 | Sturdy finish |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | More features to learn |
| Portability | 4.2 | Noticeable bulk |
| Overall | 4.5 | Best feature disposable |
Geek Bar Pulse X 25K Christmas Edition
Our Testing Experience
The Pulse X leaned smoother than the RAZ in our testing. PepperMintz stayed rounded over longer sessions, and switching modes helped keep the mint from drowning out the sweet side. It is still a large disposable, but the draw stayed stable and the flavor stayed easier to live with during repeated daily use.
What we liked
-
Smooth peppermint profile
-
Mode switching helps manage intensity
Who it is best for
-
Long sessions and balanced mint flavor
Where it falls short
-
Larger than basic disposables
-
Less candy-forward than sharper holiday options
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Smooth mint delivery | Not ultra-compact |
| Modes help tuning | Candy note is lighter |
| Consistent draw | Premium-size bulk |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Rechargeable disposable
-
Nicotine level: 50mg
-
E-liquid contents: 18mL
-
Puff modes: Regular 25,000 / Pulse 15,000
-
Battery: 700mAh (USB-C rechargeable)
-
Coil: Dual mesh
-
Controls: Airflow + modes + screen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6 | Smooth and readable |
| Throat Hit | 4.5 | Clean, not bitey |
| Vapor Production | 4.6 | Dense in Pulse |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.6 | Stable control |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | Solid for class |
| Leak Resistance | 4.4 | Minor condensation |
| Build Quality | 4.5 | Feels premium |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Quick learning curve |
| Portability | 4.2 | Bigger footprint |
| Overall | 4.5 | Best smooth disposable |
Geekvape Wenax Q Pro
Our Testing Experience
The Wenax Q Pro was the most adjustable refillable in the group. A tighter MTL pull made the candy side more obvious, while a looser draw pushed the peppermint forward and made it feel colder. In our testing it held flavor definition well, but the smaller pod and extra controls make it a more hands-on choice than simpler daily pods.
What we liked
-
Airflow makes candy vs. mint easy to tune
-
Good flavor stability across pod options
Who it is best for
-
Users who want to fine-tune MTL to RDL
Where it falls short
-
Smaller pod means more refills
-
More settings than simple pods
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable airflow | Smaller 2mL pod |
| Consistent flavor | More menu learning |
| Daily-durable build | Not the lightest |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Refillable pod system
-
Battery: 1200mAh
-
Max output: 30W
-
Pod capacity: 2mL
-
Activation: Draw or button
-
Charging: USB-C
-
Airflow: Adjustable
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Keeps mint defined |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Smooth, tunable |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Good RDL step-up |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.5 | Wide useful range |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | Reliable day use |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Manageable condensation |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Travel-ready |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Extra options |
| Portability | 4.5 | Easy carry |
| Overall | 4.4 | Best tunable refillable |
Uwell Caliburn G3
Our Testing Experience
The Caliburn G3 handled candy cane liquids with a clean, straightforward feel. In our testing, the peppermint stayed crisp, the sweet note stayed readable, and the draw remained predictable as the pod broke in. It is one of the simplest refillable options here, although the smaller battery and pod size mean more frequent charging and filling than larger devices.
What we liked
-
Clean peppermint delivery
-
Predictable everyday draw
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want a simple flavor-first pod
Where it falls short
-
Smaller battery than bigger pod devices
-
Pod capacity means more refills
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Clean flavor | Smaller battery |
| Easy to use | Refills more often |
| Comfortable MTL draw | Not for big clouds |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Refillable pod system
-
Battery: 900mAh
-
Max output: 25W
-
Pod capacity: 2.5mL
-
Coil: Integrated coil pods
-
Activation: Button and draw
-
Charging: USB-C
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6 | Clean and clear |
| Throat Hit | 4.4 | Firm, smooth |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Solid MTL |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.5 | Consistent pull |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Enough for most |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | Normal condensation |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Light but sturdy |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Low-friction |
| Portability | 4.6 | Easy pocket carry |
| Overall | 4.4 | Best simple refillable |
OXBAR Magic Maze Pro 10K
Our Testing Experience
This was the easiest disposable for dialing mint intensity. At modest power it stayed balanced, but when we pushed it harder the peppermint got noticeably sharper and thinner. The screen and wattage control were genuinely useful, though, so adults who like to tune a draw will get more out of it than anyone looking for a pure grab-and-go device.
What we liked
-
Adjustable wattage changes the flavor balance
-
Strong output when dialed in
Who it is best for
-
Users who want control without a refillable setup
Where it falls short
-
High power can make mint too sharp
-
More fiddly than simple disposables
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Adjustable wattage and airflow | Can get harsh up high |
| Strong feature set | More fiddly |
| Good flavor when tuned | Needs dialing in |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Rechargeable disposable
-
Nicotine strength: 5% (50mg)
-
Prefilled capacity: 18mL
-
Battery: 900mAh
-
Max puffs: 10,000
-
Coil: 1.0ohm mesh
-
Controls: Adjustable wattage (11–15W) + airflow + screen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Great when tuned |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Smooth mid-range |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Strong for size |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Real control |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | Adequate with recharge |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Generally tidy |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Solid disposable |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Easy after setup |
| Portability | 4.3 | Pocketable |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best adjustable disposable |
VOOPOO Argus P2
Our Testing Experience
The Argus P2 felt like the toughest refillable in the group. In our testing, candy cane liquids came through best at moderate power, where the sweet note stayed intact and the draw stayed steady. It is boxier than the slim pod options, but it handled everyday knocks well and never felt fragile in a bag or pocket.
What we liked
-
Sturdy daily build
-
Balanced flavor at moderate power
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want a tougher refillable with some control
Where it falls short
-
Boxier carry than slim pods
-
2mL pod needs frequent top-offs
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Durable build | Boxier carry |
| Adjustable power | 2mL refills |
| Stable draw | Some learning curve |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Refillable pod system
-
Battery: 1100mAh
-
Output: 5–30W adjustable
-
Pod capacity: 2mL
-
Pods: Top-fill cartridges
-
Charging: USB-C
-
Display: OLED screen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Sweetness holds |
| Throat Hit | 4.3 | Smooth, controllable |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Strong compact output |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.4 | Comfortable range |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | Reliable for most |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Generally clean |
| Build Quality | 4.5 | Tough feel |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 | More controls |
| Portability | 4.2 | Pocketable, boxy |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best durable refillable |
Innokin Klypse
Our Testing Experience
The Klypse was the softest and easiest carry in the lineup. It delivered a gentle mint-candy profile rather than a hard icy hit, and the cap kept the mouthpiece cleaner in a pocket. That simplicity is the point here, but it also means lower power, lighter vapor, and less headroom than the stronger refillables.
What we liked
-
Excellent portability
-
Gentle, easygoing mint profile
Who it is best for
-
Minimalists and short-session users
Where it falls short
-
Limited output and battery headroom
-
Not built for bigger vapor
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very portable | Smaller battery |
| Clean, mellow flavor | Not for big vapor |
| Quick daily use | More frequent refills |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Refillable pod system
-
Battery: 700mAh
-
Output: Up to 16W
-
Pod capacity: 2mL
-
Coil: Integrated 0.8ohm mesh
-
Activation: Draw-activated
-
Charging: USB-C
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Light but clean |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Gentle |
| Vapor Production | 3.9 | Limited output |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2 | Relaxed MTL |
| Battery Life | 3.8 | Best for lighter use |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Cap helps |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Solid value |
| Ease of Use | 4.8 | Almost no learning |
| Portability | 4.8 | Outstanding carry |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best ultra-portable pick |
Breeze Pro 2000
Our Testing Experience
The Breeze Pro worked best as a no-settings disposable. It did not have the depth of the larger premium devices, but in our testing the candy cane style stayed approachable and the draw stayed consistent for quick, casual pulls. The fixed format keeps things simple, although once the device is spent there is nothing to tune or recharge.
What we liked
-
Very simple operation
-
Pocket-friendly for short sessions
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want the easiest candy cane disposable
Where it falls short
-
Limited lifespan
-
No tuning or recharging
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very simple | No tuning |
| Compact carry | Finite 2K lifespan |
| Approachable mint profile | Non-rechargeable |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Disposable
-
Nicotine: 5% (50mg)
-
E-liquid capacity: 6mL
-
Puff count: 2,000
-
Battery: 1000mAh (non-rechargeable)
-
Coil: Mesh
-
Activation: Draw-activated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Simple candy-cane profile |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Smooth for mint |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Good quick pulls |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.1 | Consistent draw |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Finite by design |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Mostly clean |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Sturdy enough |
| Ease of Use | 4.7 | As simple as it gets |
| Portability | 4.6 | Easy pocket carry |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best no-fuss disposable |
Viva G6000
Our Testing Experience
The Viva G6000 delivered a straightforward candy cane mint without much drama. In our testing it was easy to live with, and the rechargeable, longer-puff format made it more practical than a small one-and-done disposable. It did not match the best devices for nuance or consistency, but it stayed serviceable for adults who just want a simple mint-candy option.
What we liked
-
Straightforward candy cane mint
-
Rechargeable long-puff format
Who it is best for
-
Budget-minded users who want simplicity
Where it falls short
-
Less layered than the top picks
-
Consistency can vary by unit
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple candy-cane flavor | Less refined layering |
| Rechargeable | Consistency varies |
| Long-puff category | Few premium controls |
Details
-
Price: Varies by retailer
-
Device type: Rechargeable disposable
-
Nicotine: 5.0% (50mg) by volume
-
E-liquid per device: 6mL
-
Puff count: Approximately 6,000
-
Coil: Mesh
-
Flavor option tested: Candy Cane Mint
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Simple mint-candy |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Smooth when paced |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Good for class |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0 | Basic draw |
| Battery Life | 4.2 | Rechargeable helps |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Average control |
| Build Quality | 3.9 | Functional, not premium |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Simple daily use |
| Portability | 4.3 | Easy carry |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best budget long-puff option |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaporesso XROS 4 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.7 |
| RAZ LTX 25000 Christmas Edition | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 |
| Geek Bar Pulse X 25K Christmas Edition | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Geekvape Wenax Q Pro | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Uwell Caliburn G3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OXBAR Magic Maze Pro 10K | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| VOOPOO Argus P2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Breeze Pro 2000 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Innokin Klypse | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Viva G6000 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
The most even performers were the XROS 4, RAZ LTX 25K, and Pulse X 25K because each stayed strong across flavor, draw, and day-to-day stability. The clearest single-purpose wins came from the Klypse for portability, the Magic Maze Pro for tuning control, and the Breeze Pro 2000 for simple grab-and-go use.
How to Choose the Candy Cane Vape?
Start with format. A dedicated candy cane disposable is the easier pick if you want the flavor profile ready to go, while a refillable pod makes more sense if you want better long-term control and don’t mind basic upkeep. If mint usually feels too sharp, prioritize adjustable airflow or lower-power MTL use. For the simplest daily refillables, look at the XROS 4, Caliburn G3, or Klypse. For heavier use or more controls, the RAZ LTX 25000, Pulse X 25K, Magic Maze Pro 10K, and Wenax Q Pro are the stronger fits.
Pro Tips for Candy Cane Vape
-
Keep candy cane flavors at lower-to-mid power so the peppermint stays clean.
-
Use a tighter draw when you want more candy sweetness and less icy bite.
-
Pause between pulls; chain-vaping flattens the sweet side faster than the mint.
-
Wipe the mouthpiece and refillable pod area often to keep mint flavors tasting fresh.
-
Refill pods before they run nearly dry so the finish does not turn stale or sharp.
-
Avoid hot cars and direct sun; peppermint flavors usually thin out after heat exposure.
FAQs
Does “candy cane” always mean menthol-heavy?
No. The better versions feel like peppermint candy first, with the cooling acting as the finish rather than the whole point.
Why does candy cane flavor sometimes get sharp after a while?
Peppermint usually takes over once the sweet side fades, especially during long chain pulls or higher-power use.
Are refillable pods better for candy cane flavor than disposables?
They can be if you want to control airflow and power, but they also need refills, pod care, and a liquid that matches the profile you want.
What’s the easiest option for quick, short sessions?
The Breeze Pro 2000 and Innokin Klypse are the easiest picks here when you want a fast, low-friction pull-and-go option.
How do I keep the sweetness from disappearing?
Use shorter pulls, keep airflow a little tighter, and avoid pushing wattage past the point where the mint starts to dominate.
About the Author: Chris Miller
