Icy Mint Vape: 5 Best Devices Reviewed (2026)

Quick Take: The Icy Mint Vape (2026)

Icy mint flavors look simple on a menu, yet they behave differently once a device warms up. I wanted to learn which products keep a clear menthol note without turning bitter after longer pulls. Cooling level matters, and sweetness can either round the mint or bury it. Aftertaste dryness and any sharp throat tickle also decide whether the flavor stays comfortable.

Testing team: I ran the core sessions, Marcus Reed pushed high-frequency use, and Jamal Davis handled daily carry. We scored flavor accuracy, consistency across puffs, airflow and draw behavior, throat hit as a subjective sensation only, vapor output, battery and charging behavior, and leak or condensation risk. Each device rotated through commutes, desk breaks, and evening sessions, then came back for checks after a full recharge.

Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint)

Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint) won Best Overall in this set. It stayed the most consistent on flavor and vapor, and the draw stayed stable as the device emptied. The trade-off shows up when Pulse Mode becomes the default, since the battery drops faster and the body runs warmer. It fits commuters and flavor-first users, while RAZ TN9000 works better when airflow tuning matters more.

Top Picks

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint) Strong, clean mint; dense vapor; useful screen feedback Runs warmer in higher-output use; needs more frequent charging in Pulse Mode Adults who want “cold mint” plus big vapor - 4.4
RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice) Adjustable airflow; screen is easy to read; steady menthol cooling More parts to think about; mouthpiece moisture needs wiping Adults who like tuning draw resistance - 4.3
Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint) Simple daily use; steady flavor; easy carry Less tuning; smaller “big cloud” feel Adults who want low-fuss icy mint - 4.2
Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods Consistent draw; clean menthol profile; very simple routine Lower vapor output; shorter battery stamina than larger disposables Adults who prefer closed pods and predictable pulls - 4.1
JUUL + Menthol JUULpods Tight draw; discreet carry; easy to keep clean Small pod volume; modest vapor Adults who want a compact, tight-draw mint - 4.1

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality/Durability Ease of Use Portability
Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint) 4.4 4.7 4.4 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.2
RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice) 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1
Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint) 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.6 4.3
Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.6 4.2 3.4 4.4 4.3 4.6 4.6
JUUL + Menthol JUULpods 4.1 3.9 4.2 3.4 4.4 3.2 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.8

How to Choose the Icy Mint Vape?

Geek Bar Pulse

 

Start with draw style and session length. Tight-draw users usually land on closed pods, while longer sessions often feel better on higher-capacity disposables. Then look at cooling preference. Some adults want a sharp “cold hit,” while others want mint that stays calmer and doesn’t dominate. Battery routine matters too. Smaller devices recharge more often, while larger disposables stretch farther between charges.

Match to common profiles from this review set. If you want the most balanced performance, pick Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint). If airflow tuning is the priority, RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice) is the strongest match. If you want a low-maintenance daily mint, Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint) fits that lane. If you prefer a closed-pod routine and consistent pulls, Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods makes sense. If discreet carry and a tight draw come first, JUUL + Menthol JUULpods is the cleanest fit.

Icy Mint Vape: Our Testing Experience

Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint)

Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint)

Why We Picked It:

I carried it for 8 days, with two recharge cycles in the middle and a rough average of 220–260 pulls a day. Marcus ran longer sessions at home and pushed Pulse Mode whenever the draw started feeling flat. Jamal treated it like a commuter device and tracked pocket comfort plus mouthpiece wipe frequency. The category win came from steady flavor and strong vapor that did not collapse late in the device. The weak spot showed up as extra warmth and faster drain when Pulse Mode became the default.

Draw Experience & Flavors:

Cool Mint stayed crisp, with a clean menthol edge that did not turn syrupy after lunch. Early pulls felt “cold-first,” then a light sweetness appeared in the back half of the inhale. Marcus noted that Pulse Mode sharpened the cooling and made the mint feel louder, but it also brought more warmth on the body during repeated pulls. Jamal’s notes were about the mouthpiece: after a few pocket hours, a quick wipe kept the draw feeling clean and dry.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Consistent mint flavor across the device life; strong vapor output; draw stays predictable; screen makes battery and liquid checks fast; handles heavier sessions better than most mint disposables Warmer feel during frequent Pulse Mode use; battery drops faster when run hard; condensation can build at the mouthpiece; larger body than small pod systems

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.7 Mint stays clear late into the device, with little “wet sweet” drift in the finish.
Throat Hit 4.4 Cooling adds bite, but it stays controlled during normal draws.
Vapor Production 4.8 Dense output, especially during longer pulls and higher-output use.
Airflow/Draw 4.5 Draw stays stable even as the device empties; no sudden tightness shifts in the log.
Battery Life 4.3 Solid for the class, yet Pulse-heavy days pull it down faster than expected.
Leak Resistance 4.2 No major leaks logged, but mouthpiece moisture shows up with pocket carry.
Build Quality 4.4 Body held up through daily carry; no rattles or loose parts during the run.
Ease of Use 4.3 Straightforward, with the screen reducing guesswork during the day.
Portability 4.2 Pocketable, though it’s still bulkier than closed-pod devices.
Overall Score 4.4 Strong across flavor, draw, and vapor, with battery and warmth as the main trade-offs.

RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice)

RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice)

Why We Picked It:

I used it for 7 days and logged three “workday loops” where it lived in a bag, then came out for short pulls every hour. Marcus used it outdoors and focused on heat and output during longer sessions, especially after a fresh charge. Jamal tested pocket carry and checked whether airflow settings drifted. It earned its spot by letting the team tune draw resistance without losing the mint profile. The drawback was simple: extra features added small maintenance habits, mainly wiping condensation and checking settings.

Draw Experience & Flavors:

Polar Ice leaned more “cold menthol” than sweet mint candy. With airflow tightened, the cooling hit faster and the finish felt drier, which Marcus liked during heavier pulls. Opened up, the draw warmed slightly and the mint softened, which Jamal preferred for walking sessions. Across the week, the flavor stayed consistent, but the mouthpiece collected a light film on high-use days. A quick wipe restored the clean menthol snap.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Adjustable airflow helps match MTL-like or looser pulls; screen gives quick battery and e-liquid checks; strong vapor when opened up; menthol stays steady across puffs More “stuff to manage” than simple disposables; condensation needs routine wiping; not as “set-and-forget” as closed pods

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Clean menthol tone with low sweetness creep over longer sessions.
Throat Hit 4.2 Cooling provides bite; tightening airflow increases perceived hit.
Vapor Production 4.5 Strong output, especially with airflow opened for longer inhales.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Tuning range is the headline feature; settings stayed repeatable in the log.
Battery Life 4.4 Held up well in mixed use; less “surprise drain” than expected.
Leak Resistance 4.1 No leaks recorded, but mouthpiece moisture appeared on heavy days.
Build Quality 4.2 No cracks or button issues; screen remained readable after bag carry.
Ease of Use 4.2 Easy once set, but it still asks for more attention than simpler devices.
Portability 4.1 Pocketable, though the shape is less discreet than slim pod systems.
Overall Score 4.3 Excellent draw control plus steady mint performance, with light upkeep as the main downside.

Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint)

Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint)

Why We Picked It:

This one ran for 9 days in my rotation as the “no-thinking” mint device, averaging 180–220 pulls a day. Marcus used it in shorter bursts but stacked sessions to see whether the lemon note collapsed into sweetness. Jamal kept it in a jacket pocket and judged comfort plus mouthpiece cleanliness. It won its niche by staying easy and steady, without airflow toggles or mode switching. The trade-off was less flexibility: the draw is what it is, and the vapor feel is more moderate than the high-output picks.

Draw Experience & Flavors:

Lemon Mint opened with a bright citrus edge, then the mint cooled it down at the end of the inhale. The cooling stayed present, but it didn’t punch as hard as Polar Ice. In the team log, the lemon note weakened a bit after long sessions, while short pulls kept it sharper and cleaner. Jamal liked it for walking sessions because it didn’t feel overwhelming. Marcus flagged that the vapor stays smooth, yet it does not “hit big” the way Pulse does.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Simple routine; stable flavor in short sessions; smooth cooling without harsh spikes; easy pocket carry; low learning curve No airflow tuning; vapor is less dense than the top-output devices; long sessions soften the lemon note; less “feature feedback” compared with screen devices

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.3 Lemon-plus-mint stays clear in normal use, with mild fade during long sessions.
Throat Hit 4.1 Cooling provides presence without turning sharp in short pulls.
Vapor Production 4.2 Respectable output, but it stays in the “everyday” range.
Airflow/Draw 4.0 Consistent draw, though there’s no tuning for preference changes.
Battery Life 4.2 Comfortable for daily carry patterns in the log, with predictable recharge timing.
Leak Resistance 4.3 No leaks noted; mouthpiece stayed cleaner than most pocketed disposables.
Build Quality 4.1 Held up to pocket carry without visible wear in the short test window.
Ease of Use 4.6 Minimal decisions and minimal steps; strong “grab-and-go” performance.
Portability 4.3 Compact and easy to carry, with no accidental activation issues observed.
Overall Score 4.2 A steady, low-fuss mint option that trades flexibility and peak vapor for simplicity.

Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods

Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods

Why We Picked It:

I ran Vuse Alto as the “routine check” device for 10 days, mostly in short breaks, and I tracked how often the draw felt identical from morning to night. Marcus used it less, then did concentrated evening sessions to test whether it felt underpowered. Jamal leaned into daily carry and rated pocket comfort and “no-mess” behavior. It earned this slot by staying consistent and low-maintenance, with closed pods that cut down on leak variables. Battery stamina and vapor output landed below the larger disposables.

Draw Experience & Flavors:

Menthol here is straightforward: cool, clean, and not very sweet. The draw stayed tight and predictable, which Jamal preferred when walking or driving. Marcus noted that longer pulls don’t turn into big clouds, and the cooling stays more restrained than Polar Ice. Over the week, the flavor stayed steady, but the device felt “small-battery honest.” When the battery dipped, the experience didn’t spike or misfire; it just needed charging sooner than the bigger bodies.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Very predictable draw; simple pod routine; strong leak resistance for daily carry; compact and easy to pocket; low learning curve Lower vapor output; shorter battery life than large disposables; fewer flavor “layers” than sweet-mint blends

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.0 Clean menthol profile, but less depth than the best disposables in this set.
Throat Hit 4.0 Tight draw plus menthol gives presence without a harsh edge.
Vapor Production 3.6 Modest output, especially compared with higher-capacity disposables.
Airflow/Draw 4.2 Consistent tight draw; little variation across the pod’s life in the log.
Battery Life 3.4 Shorter stamina in daily carry; charging appears more often.
Leak Resistance 4.4 Closed pods reduced mess and variability during bag and pocket carry.
Build Quality 4.3 Durable feel for everyday use; no loose fit issues noted.
Ease of Use 4.6 Straight routine, minimal decisions, easy to keep consistent.
Portability 4.6 One of the easiest devices here to carry and forget about.
Overall Score 4.1 Predictable, clean menthol with strong portability, giving up battery and vapor output.

JUUL + Menthol JUULpods

JUUL + Menthol JUULpods

Why We Picked It:

I used JUUL as the “small-device baseline” for 12 days, focusing on whether the menthol stayed consistent in short, frequent pulls. Marcus treated it as a contrast device, then noted how quickly it hit a ceiling on vapor. Jamal carried it in a pocket during errands and rated how it felt to use one-handed without thinking. It earned its niche through discreet carry and a tight, cigarette-like draw feel. The trade-off is capacity and output: the pod runs out sooner, and vapor stays modest.

Draw Experience & Flavors:

Menthol here has a brisk, simple profile with a fast finish. The tight draw makes the cooling feel sharper on short pulls, and the flavor stays steady when the pod is fresh. Marcus called it “clean but small,” since longer pulls didn’t add much vapor or extra flavor depth. Jamal liked it for quick breaks because it didn’t feel messy or bulky. I kept noticing the same limitation: when the pod got low, the session ended sooner than with larger-capacity options.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Tight, consistent draw; very discreet carry; easy to keep clean; strong portability score; simple routine Small pod volume; modest vapor output; frequent pod swaps for heavier users; less “icy blast” than strong ice disposables

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 3.9 Clean menthol, but less layered than sweet-ice blends in larger devices.
Throat Hit 4.2 Tight draw concentrates the menthol bite on short pulls.
Vapor Production 3.4 Limited output; longer pulls don’t scale the way high-output disposables do.
Airflow/Draw 4.4 Tight, repeatable draw that stays consistent across short sessions.
Battery Life 3.2 Small-device stamina; works for short breaks, less for all-day heavy use.
Leak Resistance 4.5 Kept clean in pocket carry with minimal moisture in the team log.
Build Quality 4.2 Held up through daily handling without wobble or loose fit issues noted.
Ease of Use 4.5 Straight routine and minimal steps.
Portability 4.8 Smallest, easiest carry in this group.
Overall Score 4.1 A compact, tight-draw menthol option that trades capacity and vapor for carry and simplicity.

Compare Specs of These Vapes

Device Best For Device Type Nicotine Strength Activation Method Battery Capacity Charging Method E-liquid Capacity Puff Count Coil Type Airflow Style Notable Hardware Overall Score
Geek Bar Pulse (Cool Mint) Balanced flavor + big vapor Rechargeable disposable 50 mg Draw-activated 650 mAh USB-C 16 mL 15,000 / 7,500 (mode-dependent) Dual mesh - Screen; Pulse Mode 4.4
RAZ TN9000 (Polar Ice) Airflow tuning Rechargeable disposable 5% (50 mg) Draw-activated 650 mAh USB Type-C 12 mL 9,000 Integrated mesh Adjustable 0.96" display; indicators 4.3
Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint) Low-fuss daily mint Rechargeable disposable 5% (50 mg/mL) Draw-activated 650 mAh Type-C 13 mL 5,000 Mesh coil - LED indicator (varies by edition) 4.2
Vuse Alto + Menthol Pods Simple closed-pod routine Pod system (closed) 5% (50 mg); some listings show 2.4% options Draw-activated 350 mAh Magnetic USB 1.8 mL pod - - Tight draw Slim device 4.1
JUUL + Menthol JUULpods Discreet tight draw Pod system (closed) 5.0% (59 mg/mL); 3.0% variants referenced in JUUL resources Draw-activated - - ~0.7 mL pod - - Tight draw Compact stick form 4.1

 Pro Tips for Icy Mint Vape

Lost Mary OS5000 (Lemon Mint)
  • Keep the mouthpiece dry with a quick wipe during pocket-carry days, especially after temperature changes.
  • Take shorter pulls when the cooling feels too sharp; long draws can concentrate menthol bite.
  • If a device has airflow control, set it once for the day and re-check it after bag carry.
  • Avoid back-to-back chain pulls when the body starts warming; heat changes how mint tastes.
  • Charge earlier rather than running to zero, since flavor and output often feel flatter at low battery.
  • Use a reliable charging source and avoid forcing fast-charge habits on small batteries.
  • Store devices upright when possible; it reduces pooled condensation reaching the mouthpiece.
  • Rotate flavors if mint fatigue sets in; strong cooling can dull your palate over a week.
  • If you feel persistent throat irritation, pause use and reassess strength and cooling level before continuing.

FAQs

Q1: Why do some icy mint vapes turn “sweet” later in the day?
Sweeteners and cooling agents can feel different once the coil area stays warm, and longer sessions exaggerate that shift.

Q2: Which pick stayed the coldest during longer pulls?
In our notes, Geek Bar Pulse in higher-output use and RAZ TN9000 with tighter airflow kept the sharpest cooling feel.

Q3: Which option needs the least upkeep?
Lost Mary OS5000 and Vuse Alto required the fewest small habits, aside from basic mouthpiece wiping.

Q4: Why does menthol feel harsher on some devices?
A tighter draw and stronger cooling can concentrate the sensation. Shorter pulls usually reduced the sharp edge in the log.

Q5: Which device made the most sense for discreet carry?
JUUL was the easiest to pocket and use one-handed, while Vuse Alto stayed close behind with a similarly simple routine.

About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.