Spaceman Vape Reviews: 10K Pro, Turbo 15K, Curve 18K & More

Spaceman vapes keep showing up in the same conversations where people want big puff counts without jumping into refillable gear. That pattern alone made me want to line them up and put the lineup under one consistent review lens.

I built this Spaceman vape reviews article around the same crew we use on VapePicks. I handle daily reliability checks and long-run behavior. Marcus pushes devices hard and watches heat shifts. Jamal keeps the focus on pocket carry and quick sessions.

Across the lineup, we kept the workflow steady. We focused on draw feel, flavor texture, airflow behavior, battery behavior, leak control, and mode changes. Notes stayed practical. No health claims. No quit promises.

Product Overview

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
Spaceman 10K Pro compact; adjustable airflow; simple screen shorter lifespan vs bigger models; less “room” for flavor layering commuters who want a smaller carry ~1220 4.1
Spaceman Turbo 15K strong flavor pop; easy draw; broad flavor set fewer controls; turbo can run warmer adults who want grab-and-go with a louder throat feel ~1018 4.0
Spaceman Curve 18K three modes; steady output; good screen boost drains faster; body feels larger in pocket adults who want mode control without complexity ~1525 4.2
Spaceman Prism 20K smooth mode stepping; solid flavor balance; adjustable airflow heavier carry; screen can feel “busy” flavor-focused adults who still want a firm throat feel ~1524 4.3
Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus dual-mesh feel; strong boost; clear screen can run warm in high use; bigger device heavy daily users who want higher output stability ~1626 4.4
Spaceman SP40000 wattage steps; ice control; long run time fixed airflow; large carry adults who want max lifespan and adjustable intensity ~1830 4.2

Testing Team Takeaways

I keep circling back to how Spaceman handles mode changes. The soft settings usually feel calmer on the throat. The boost settings feel sharper and louder. Under normal use, the screens help avoid surprise dry draws. That daily predictability matters more than the marketing number.

Marcus treated the higher-capacity models like stress tests. He kept chasing sustained output and watching case heat. His notes stayed blunt. “If it can’t stay stable when I chain it, I’m done with it.” On Nebula and SP40000, he liked the way power steps actually changed the draw weight. He also called out that boost use can turn warmth into the main story.

Jamal cared less about the biggest puff count. He cared about pocket behavior. He kept checking mouthpiece comfort, then he watched for condensation. “I need something I can throw in my pocket and forget about.” For him, 10K Pro stayed easiest to live with. SP40000 felt like a commitment, not a casual carry.

Spaceman Vapes Comparison Chart

Spec Spaceman 10K Pro Spaceman Turbo 15K Spaceman Curve 18K Spaceman Prism 20K Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus Spaceman SP40000
Device type disposable disposable disposable disposable disposable disposable
Puff range up to ~10K up to ~15K up to ~18K up to ~20K up to ~25K up to ~40K
Prefill capacity 16 mL ~16 mL 16.5 mL 18 mL 18 mL 20 mL
Nicotine strength 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Activation draw draw draw draw draw draw
Battery 800 mAh 800 mAh 1000 mAh 1000 mAh 1000 mAh 1000 mAh
Charging USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Coil mesh mesh mesh style mesh dual mesh dual mesh
Airflow adjustable adjustable airflow listed listed as draw feel tuning via modes adjustable adjustable fixed
Power control airflow only normal / turbo use pattern soft / norm / boost soft 15W / norm 18W / boost 20W soft 14W / norm 18W / boost 25W 10W / 16W / 20W / 26W
Screen smart display display listed 1.44 screen 1.77 screen 1.44 screen digital display
Flavor style cleaner, simpler punchy and sweet-forward balanced, mode-shaped layered, candy-forward options stronger intensity under boost strong intensity with ice control
Throat hit feel medium medium to strong medium medium medium to strong adjustable via wattage and ice
Vapor volume medium medium medium medium medium to high medium to high
Leak control average to good average good good good average to good
Best daily fit light to medium users grab-and-go users mode curious users flavor chasers heavy users long-haul users

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We used one scoring framework for every Spaceman device. Flavor scored on accuracy and texture, not just sweetness. Throat hit scored on controllability and consistency, not “strength.” Vapor production scored on stability and repeatability across short sessions. Airflow and draw scored on smoothness, then on how easy it felt to find a comfortable pull.

Battery life got judged under normal adult use patterns. That meant commutes, work breaks, and evening sessions. Charging behavior mattered too. I watched for odd heat. I watched for fast drain. Marcus pushed longer chains to see where output started sagging. Jamal kept checking whether pocket carry triggered mess, odor, or accidental discomfort.

Leak and condensation control stayed practical. We checked mouthpiece wetness. We checked gurgle behavior. Build quality covered body seams, mouthpiece fit, and screen durability in day-to-day handling. Ease of use included mode switching, screen readability, and end-of-life behavior. Portability covered size, pocket comfort, and carry weight.

Spaceman Vapes Our Testing Experience

Spaceman 10K Pro - The Pocket-First Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

I treated the 10K Pro like a daily carry baseline. It went into the same rotation where I normally test smaller disposables. Under commuter use, the device felt like it wanted clean, repeatable pulls. The screen became a quick check, not a distraction. I kept glancing at it before leaving the house, then I stopped thinking about it.

Marcus came at it differently. He tried to push it past the pace it naturally fits. After a faster chain, he backed off and said it out loud. “This one doesn’t want to be bullied.” That comment matched what the device felt like. Under heavier pulls, the draw stayed usable, yet the flavor felt flatter. The throat feel also turned sharper when he kept forcing long hits.

Jamal liked it more than Marcus did. Pocket carry stayed easy. The mouthpiece also felt comfortable for quick sessions between errands. He kept coming back to the airflow switch. “I can tighten it up just enough, then it stops feeling sloppy.” That small control mattered for him.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The 10K Pro draw sits in that middle band. It can lean tighter with airflow adjustment. It still stays smooth when you loosen it. In practice, that meant I could take short pulls without feeling like I was sipping through a straw. The throat feel also stayed predictable. It did not jump wildly from hit to hit.

Alphonso Mango felt bright and sweet. On inhale, it came off like mango flesh, not candy syrup. The throat feel stayed medium. The finish brought a slightly perfumed edge, which I noticed more on longer pulls. Marcus called it “mango up front, then a weird cologne tail.” Under softer pulls, that tail stayed quieter.

Blackberry Razz leaned darker. The first second of the draw tasted like berry skin, then it turned into a sweeter blend. It had a light tang at the end. Jamal liked it for quick hits. “Two pulls, then I’m done. It doesn’t linger weird.” That matched my notes too.

Pink Lemonade had a sharper top note. The inhale felt bright. The throat hit felt a touch cleaner than the candy flavors. After a few sessions, I noticed it stayed consistent, even when the battery dipped. That matters, since lemon profiles often go flat late.

Root Beer felt like the most polarizing option. It came with that soda-spice note. On inhale, it tasted like sweet root beer candy. On exhale, the spice tone stayed longer. Marcus liked the boldness. Jamal got tired of it faster. “It sticks to my mouth after the hit.”

Watermelon Ice came across as straightforward. The watermelon note felt soft and sweet. The cooling note stayed moderate. It did not stab the throat. That balance made it easy to use in short sessions.

White Grape Ice leaned crisp. The grape note felt like a chilled juice vibe. The cool finish did more work than the fruit. Under a tighter airflow setting, it felt cleaner. Under a looser setting, it felt sweeter.

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Pink Lemonade for a cleaner throat feel, then White Grape Ice for crisp pulls.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
easy pocket carry; adjustable airflow; readable screen; steady draw shorter run vs larger Spaceman models; flavor can flatten under heavy chains

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1220
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 800 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: 16 mL
  • Coil: 0.7 ohm mesh listed in product specs
  • Airflow: adjustable airflow switch
  • Screen: smart display with battery and e-liquid indicators
  • Output modes: not positioned as wattage-step device
  • Leak control: basic mouthpiece sealing, plus normal condensation behavior
  • Safety features: not consistently listed across retail spec sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Shipping: varies by retailer and region
  • Flavor examples we referenced in testing notes: Alphonso Mango, Blackberry Razz, Pink Lemonade, Root Beer, Watermelon Ice, White Grape Ice
  • Full flavor list in common listings includes: Alphonso Mango, Banana Cake, Black Mint, Blackberry Razz, Blue Haze, Clear, Dragon Mango Lemonade, Dragon Strawberry, Green Apple Razz, Juicy Rainbow Ice, Mixed Berries, Peach Mango, Pink Lemonade, Watermelon, Pineapple Passion Lemonade, Polar Ice, Root Beer, Strawberry Lime, Watermelon Ice, White Grape Ice

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.1 clean profiles at normal pace, then flatter under hard chains
Throat Hit 4.0 steady feel with airflow tuning, less control than mode devices
Vapor Production 3.9 consistent in short pulls, less satisfying for long draws
Airflow/Draw 4.2 adjustment helps, then it lands in a comfortable middle
Battery Life 3.9 fine for a smaller class device, still not a long-haul unit
Leak Resistance 4.0 normal condensation, few gurgle moments in short use
Build Quality 4.1 sturdy enough for daily handling, screen stayed readable
Ease of Use 4.4 simple workflow, screen helps, no learning curve
Portability 4.6 the easiest carry of this lineup in real pocket use
Overall 4.1 strong everyday option when you want a smaller Spaceman

Spaceman Turbo 15K - The Sweet-Punch Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

The Turbo 15K felt like the model built for quick satisfaction. That showed up in how the flavors hit early. It also showed up in how the device rewards short pulls. During work breaks, I kept using it in short bursts, then putting it away. That pattern fit the device better than long sessions.

Marcus treated it like a heat and stability probe. He leaned into longer chains and watched how warmth built. After a few rounds, he said “turbo is fun, but it pays you back with heat.” When he backed down to a calmer pace, he liked it more. The device stopped feeling edgy. The flavor stayed clearer.

Jamal cared about one thing first. Would it work as a walk-around vape. It did. The body sat fine in pocket carry. The main downside for him came from sweetness. “It tastes great, then my mouth feels coated.” That happened more on candy blends. Mint and lemonade blends felt cleaner.

Draw Experience & Flavors

The Turbo 15K draw feels easy. It tends to pull smoothly even with short airflow adjustment. In practice, that means fewer misfires during quick hits. The throat feel sits in the medium band, then it turns sharper when you push longer pulls. That shift is what Marcus kept noticing.

Alaskan Mint felt like the cleanest palate reset. On inhale, it hit with a cold mint note. It stayed firm without feeling harsh. The throat hit felt steady. After the exhale, the mouth feel stayed dry, not syrupy. Jamal wrote “this is the one I don’t regret in the car.” That makes sense, since sweet flavors can feel sticky mid-commute.

Blue Razz Lemon came on loud. The inhale brought bright berry candy. Then lemon sharpened the finish. The throat feel felt punchier than the fruit alone. Marcus liked it for short hits. “It hits fast. Then it gets annoying if I chain it.” That tracked my notes too.

Florida Lemonade leaned brighter than expected. It felt like lemon with sugar. The draw stayed smooth. The throat feel felt cleaner than the candy blends. It also stayed consistent later in the battery. I usually watch lemonade profiles go dull. This one held longer.

Peach Berry Ice had a soft peach tone, then a mixed berry sweetness. The cool finish smoothed the back of the throat. Under quick pulls, it felt balanced. Under longer pulls, sweetness built up. Jamal called it “good, then too much.”

Strawberry Mint Candy tasted like sweet strawberry first. Mint followed after the exhale. The mint did not fully clean the sweetness, yet it helped. I noticed it can feel strong in the mouth after several sessions.

Triple Mango leaned thick and sweet. The mango note felt candy-heavy. It did deliver a strong flavor wall. Marcus liked it as a “big flavor” option. He also noted it can push throat feel into harsh territory when used too aggressively.

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Alaskan Mint for clean pulls, then Florida Lemonade for a bright, steady throat feel.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
strong flavor hit; easy draw; many flavors; simple workflow fewer controls; sweetness can feel heavy; turbo use can run warmer

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1018
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 800 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: commonly listed around 16 mL
  • Coil: mesh coil commonly listed
  • Airflow: adjustable airflow listed in common specs
  • Screen: battery and e-liquid display listed in common specs
  • Output modes: normal and turbo behavior shown in listings
  • Leak control: normal condensation behavior for this class
  • Safety features: not consistently listed across retail spec sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Flavor set examples: Alaskan Mint, Blue Razz Lemon, Cherry Paradise, Dr. Cherry, Florida Lemonade, Honolulu Blue, Peach Berry Ice, Strawberry Mint Candy, Triple Apple Ice, Triple Mango, Watermelon Chill, Watermelon Kiwi
  • Full flavor lists can vary by region and retailer

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.2 big front-loaded flavor, then sweetness fatigue on some blends
Throat Hit 4.0 medium feel, then sharper under long pulls
Vapor Production 4.0 solid output for quick sessions, less “thick” than high-watt devices
Airflow/Draw 4.1 easy pull, fewer misfires in quick hits
Battery Life 3.8 fine for class, still not built for extreme all-day chains
Leak Resistance 3.9 average condensation control, mouthpiece can feel damp later
Build Quality 4.0 sturdy enough, screen stays readable in daily handling
Ease of Use 4.4 simple, no learning curve, quick flavor access
Portability 4.2 pocketable, though not as small as 10K Pro
Overall 4.0 best fit when you want quick flavor punch

Spaceman Curve 18K - The Mode-Switch Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

Curve 18K felt like the first “step up” where mode control becomes a daily tool. I used soft mode for workday sessions. I used normal mode when I wanted more presence. Boost mode came out mostly at night, when I could pay attention to heat and battery behavior.

Marcus liked the device more than he expected. He kept leaning on mode changes, then he watched how it behaved under repeated use. His key line came after a longer session. “Normal mode is the real mode.” Under boost, he liked the first few pulls. He also noticed warmth building faster.

Jamal’s focus stayed on carry. The Curve body feels larger than 10K Pro. It still carried fine in a jacket pocket. In tighter pants pockets, it felt noticeable. He also watched mouthpiece comfort and screen readability outdoors. “The screen saves me from guessing.” That comment tracked my notes.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Curve’s draw changes more than you expect when you change modes. Soft mode feels calmer. The draw feels smoother. The throat feel stays medium. Boost mode adds edge. It can also make sweet flavors feel thicker in the mouth.

Apple Mango Melon tasted like layered fruit candy. Apple hits first. Mango follows. Melon rounds out the exhale. On soft mode, it felt balanced. On boost, mango became louder and slightly perfumed. Jamal said “soft mode is the only way I’d keep this one.”

Blueberry Watermelon felt softer. Blueberry stayed sweet and rounded. Watermelon lifted the finish. The throat feel stayed mild. It worked well for quick sessions. It also stayed consistent later in the battery.

Cherry Fizz delivered a bright cherry note with a “sparkle” impression. That fizz sensation felt more like a light acidity than actual carbonation. On normal mode, it felt fun. On boost, it got sharper. Marcus called it “good, then it turns into cherry candy heat.”

Gummy Peach felt thick and candy-forward. The inhale gave a gummy sweetness. Peach stayed on the exhale. After a few sessions, it felt coating. Jamal got tired of it fast. Marcus liked it in short hits.

Sour Apple Ice tasted like green apple candy with a cooling finish. The “sour” impression felt like a tart note up front. The cool finish smoothed the throat. This one stayed cleanest in the mouth for me.

Triple Raspberry leaned darker and tangy. It felt like berry skin and candy. Under boost, it became intense. Under soft, it became more balanced. Marcus liked it at higher output, since it kept flavor clarity.

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Sour Apple Ice for crisp, clean pulls, then Blueberry Watermelon for steady sessions.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
three modes; stable draw in normal; clear screen; broad flavor list boost drains faster; larger carry; sweetness builds in some flavors

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1525
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 1000 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: 16.5 mL
  • Coil: mesh-style listing in common specs
  • Airflow: not always described the same way; draw feel shifts mainly via modes
  • Screen: 1.44 smart LED display with battery and e-liquid indication
  • Output modes: soft, normal, boost
  • Leak control: generally solid; condensation still appears with sweet blends
  • Safety features: not consistently listed across retail spec sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Flavor list shown in common listings includes: Apple Mango Melon, Black Peach Lemon, Blue Peach Mango, Blue Razz Tang, Blueberry Watermelon, Cherry Fizz, Dragon Blue Razz, Gummy Peach, Prism Mint, Sour Apple Ice, Sour Grape Bubble Gum, Sour Watermelon Patch, Straw Razz Cherry, Triple Raspberry, Watermelon Dragon

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.2 soft mode preserves balance, boost intensifies but can feel thick
Throat Hit 4.1 mode changes actually shift throat feel in a predictable way
Vapor Production 4.1 boost adds volume, normal stays steady for daily sessions
Airflow/Draw 4.1 smooth pull, mode steps do the main tuning work
Battery Life 4.0 1000 mAh helps, boost still drains noticeably
Leak Resistance 4.1 better control than smaller class devices, still condensation late
Build Quality 4.2 body feels sturdy, screen stays readable in handling
Ease of Use 4.2 modes are simple, screen reduces guessing
Portability 3.9 carryable, yet it feels bigger in tighter pockets
Overall 4.2 strong daily pick if you want simple mode control

Spaceman Prism 20K - The Flavor-Balanced Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

Prism 20K is the model where I felt the most “finished” tuning. The device does not just hit hard. It tries to stay smooth while still delivering flavor. I kept using soft mode during the day, then I moved to normal at night. Boost came out when I wanted a louder draw.

Marcus liked the way boost behaves on Prism. He said “this boost feels usable, not chaotic.” That was his way of saying the power jump did not immediately ruin flavor. He still noticed warmth rise when he pushed longer chains.

Jamal’s notes stayed focused on carry and mouthpiece comfort. Prism feels heavier than 10K Pro. It still carried fine in a jacket pocket. He liked the adjustable airflow more than he expected. “I can keep it tight enough to feel like a real MTL pull.” That mattered in his short sessions.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Prism’s draw feels smoother than Turbo 15K. It also feels less “sticky sweet” on many blends. Soft mode keeps the throat feel calmer. Boost mode sharpens the throat feel, then it raises warmth. In day-to-day use, normal mode felt like the best middle.

Cali Lemonade hit bright and clean. The inhale gave a lemon note with sugar behind it. The throat feel stayed crisp. It did not feel scratchy. On boost, it got sharper. On soft, it tasted smoother.

Candy Trio tasted like mixed candy. It delivered sweetness quickly. The blend still kept some separation between notes. After repeated sessions, it felt coating. Jamal said “it’s fun, then it’s too much.” That fit the candy profile.

Blue Razz Ice came on strong. Blue raspberry candy hits first. Cooling follows. The cool finish also cleans up the sweetness. Marcus liked it for quick hits. He also said “this is the one that survives boost.” The cooling keeps it from turning harsh.

Miami Mint felt like a daily-driver mint. It tasted clean and cool. The throat feel stayed medium, then smoother than expected. It also left less sweetness behind, which helped in frequent use.

Rainbow Belt tasted like sour candy. The inhale felt tangy. The exhale turned sweeter. On soft mode, it stayed balanced. On boost, it became sharper, then it started to feel like the “sour” note was doing more work.

Triple Strawberry tasted like strawberry candy. It felt thick. The throat feel became heavier during longer sessions. Jamal used it less after day two.

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Miami Mint for clean daily pulls, then Blue Razz Ice for strong flavor with a controlled finish.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
balanced draw; useful mode steps; adjustable airflow; strong flavor set heavier carry; screen can feel busy; sweet flavors can fatigue

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1524
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 1000 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: 18 mL
  • Coil: mesh coil
  • Airflow: adjustable airflow
  • Screen: 1.77 smart LED display with indicators
  • Output modes: soft 15W, norm 18W, boost 20W
  • Leak control: generally good; sweet blends still create condensation over time
  • Safety features: not consistently listed across retail spec sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Flavor list shown in common listings includes: Apple Kiwi Ice, Banana Cake, Berry Cake, Blue Razz Ice, Blue Razz Watermelon, Cali Lemonade, Candy Trio, Cherry Bomb, Dark Grapefruit, Miami Mint, Pineapple Watermelon, Prism Mint, Rainbow Belt, Strawberry Mint Candy, Triple Grape, Triple Strawberry

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 clear blending, less “syrup” feel than punchier models
Throat Hit 4.2 mode steps change feel without turning erratic
Vapor Production 4.1 normal stays steady, boost adds volume without immediate collapse
Airflow/Draw 4.3 adjustable airflow helps find a comfortable pull quickly
Battery Life 4.0 solid for class, boost still shortens runway
Leak Resistance 4.2 good control, only late-stage condensation issues
Build Quality 4.3 sturdy body, screen stays useful in daily handling
Ease of Use 4.2 clear controls, screen supports quick checks
Portability 3.9 carryable, yet it feels heavier than smaller models
Overall 4.3 best fit for flavor-focused adults who want control

Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus - The Heavy-Use Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

Nebula 25K Plus is where Marcus finally stopped complaining about headroom. The device offers a stronger boost setting, then it pairs that with dual mesh behavior. I used it as the “evening device,” where longer sessions happen. In that context, the screen helped, since the device can drain faster under boost.

Marcus pushed it hardest. He leaned into boost, then watched for heat spots. His comment stuck. “This one actually wants to run.” He still noted warmth. He also noted that flavor stayed stronger deeper into the tank than he expected.

Jamal treated it like a carry challenge. It is larger. It is also more “techy.” He still liked the screen clarity. He also liked normal mode for short sessions. “Boost is cool, but I don’t need it in the street.” That was his way of saying mobility and comfort matter.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Nebula’s draw feels more substantial than Prism. Soft mode feels calmer. Normal mode becomes the best “all day” setting. Boost mode raises intensity. It also raises warmth. Dual mesh behavior feels like faster flavor saturation at the start of the pull.

Dragon Blue Razz hit with a bright candy front. It then turned into a deeper fruit note. The throat feel stayed medium. Under boost, the candy top note got louder. Marcus liked it, then he backed off after longer sessions.

Blueberry Watermelon stayed smooth. It did not turn harsh under normal mode. The berry note felt soft. Watermelon lifted the end. Jamal liked it for short sessions.

Sour Watermelon Patch leaned tangy. On inhale, the sour note felt like a quick bite. The exhale turned sweeter. Under boost, the sour note became sharp. Under soft, it became balanced.

Black Peach Lemon felt layered. Peach sweetness came first. Lemon tightened the finish. The throat feel stayed crisp, then slightly sharper under boost. I kept using it on normal mode, since that kept it clean.

Prism Mint felt like a cooling mint with a clean finish. It handled boost better than candy profiles. That is a pattern across these devices. Cooling blends often “save” the throat.

Triple Raspberry delivered darker berry intensity. Marcus liked it at higher output. He said “it doesn’t disappear when I hammer it.” That is a good sign for heavy users.

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Prism Mint for clean output under higher use, then Black Peach Lemon for layered pulls without syrupy fatigue.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
strong output range; dual mesh feel; clear screen; good flavor intensity can run warm under boost; larger carry; boost drains faster

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1626
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 1000 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: 18 mL
  • Coil: dual mesh coils
  • Airflow: adjustable airflow
  • Screen: 1.44 digital display with animations in listings
  • Output modes: soft 14W, norm 18W, boost 25W
  • Leak control: generally good; condensation still rises with sweet blends at high output
  • Safety protections: commonly described as present in review listings, not always detailed in retailer sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Flavor list shown in common listings includes: Apple Mango Melon, Black Peach Lemon, Blue Peach Mango, Blue Razz Tang, Blueberry Watermelon, Cherry Fizz, Dragon Blue Razz, Gummy Peach, Prism Mint, Sour Apple Ice, Sour Grape BG, Sour Watermelon Patch, Straw Razz Cherry, Triple Raspberry, Watermelon Dragon

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 dual mesh feel keeps intensity deeper into use
Throat Hit 4.3 strong control via modes, boost adds edge and warmth
Vapor Production 4.4 higher output supports heavier sessions without fast collapse
Airflow/Draw 4.2 adjustable airflow helps, still feels best at medium resistance
Battery Life 4.1 1000 mAh helps, boost can drain noticeably
Leak Resistance 4.2 good control, condensation rises with heavy chains
Build Quality 4.3 solid body feel, screen stays readable in daily handling
Ease of Use 4.2 mode switching is simple, screen supports quick checks
Portability 3.8 larger carry, better in bags or jacket pockets
Overall 4.4 best fit for heavy adult users who want headroom

Spaceman SP40000 - The Long-Haul Control Spaceman Vape

Our Testing Experience

SP40000 changes the vibe of the lineup. It adds wattage steps. It also adds ice and nicotine control features in listings. It still keeps fixed airflow. That fixed airflow became the main dividing line in our notes.

I used it as a desk device. The larger body sat better on a table. I could glance at the display. Wattage steps gave me a way to tune intensity without changing airflow.

Marcus treated it like a stability test. He liked the wattage steps right away. He also called out that fixed airflow limits how “tight” you can make it. His line was simple. “Great power steps, but I can’t tune the pull.” Under heavy use, he watched heat rise at the higher settings.

Jamal saw it as a portability compromise. He said “this is not a pocket forget device.” He used it in a car cupholder or bag. He liked the display clarity. He also liked that lower wattage settings can feel calmer.

Draw Experience & Flavors

SP40000 draw feels open, since airflow is fixed. It also feels smoother at lower wattage. When you step wattage up, the throat feel sharpens. Vapor also thickens. Flavor saturation comes faster on higher settings, yet sweetness fatigue can show up sooner.

Lemon Pop felt bright and candy-like. At lower wattage, it tasted smoother. At higher wattage, it turned sharper, then it felt more “bitey” on the throat.

Cherry Pomegranate tasted like darker fruit with tart edges. The pomegranate note gave it a dry finish. Marcus liked it at mid wattage, since it stayed intense without getting harsh.

Fresh Mint felt like the cleanest profile. It stayed stable across wattage steps. It also left less sweetness behind. Jamal preferred it for quick sessions in the car.

Juicy Peach Watermelon felt soft and sweet. Peach leads. Watermelon lifts the finish. At higher wattage, sweetness got heavy. At lower wattage, it stayed more balanced.

Sour Mango Honey Dew delivered a weird mix in a good way. Mango hits first. The honeydew note cools it down. The sour note stays light. Under mid wattage, it felt most natural.

White Grape Ice stayed crisp. Cooling helped keep the draw clean, especially when wattage rose. Marcus said “this is the one that doesn’t get gross when I crank it.”

Best draw experience picks from what we tested: Fresh Mint for clean output across settings, then White Grape Ice for a crisp finish at higher wattage.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
wattage steps; long lifespan feel; display clarity; ice control feature fixed airflow limits draw tuning; large carry; higher wattage can run warmer

Key Specs & Flavors

  • Price: common online range ~1830
  • Device type: disposable
  • Nicotine options: typically 5%
  • Activation: draw-activated
  • Battery: 1000 mAh
  • Charging: USB-C
  • E-liquid capacity: 20 mL
  • Coil: dual mesh coils
  • Airflow: fixed airflow
  • Screen: digital display with battery and e-liquid indicators
  • Wattage steps: 10W, 16W, 20W, 26W
  • Ice / nicotine control: listed feature in product descriptions
  • Leak control: average to good; fixed airflow means you can’t tighten draw to reduce condensation the same way
  • Safety features: not consistently detailed in retailer spec sheets
  • Included accessories: device only
  • Flavor list shown in common listings includes: Blackberry Razz, Blue Razz Ice, Cherry Pomegranate, Clear, Fresh Mint, Juicy Peach Watermelon, Lemon Pop, Pink Lemonade, Root Beer, Sour Mango Honey Dew, Strawberry Kiwi, Watermelon Ice, White Grape Ice

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.3 strong saturation at mid wattage, then sweetness fatigue at high
Throat Hit 4.2 wattage steps give control, higher settings sharpen the feel
Vapor Production 4.4 higher wattage increases volume in a predictable way
Airflow/Draw 3.7 fixed airflow limits tuning, open pull won’t fit everyone
Battery Life 4.3 1000 mAh plus tuning helps stretch use
Leak Resistance 4.0 decent control, yet open draw can increase mouthpiece moisture
Build Quality 4.2 solid feel, display stays useful in longer ownership
Ease of Use 4.1 wattage steps are easy, still more “settings” than simple models
Portability 3.6 large carry, better as bag or desk device
Overall 4.2 best for adults who want long run time with intensity control

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality/Durability Ease of Use
Spaceman 10K Pro 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.2 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.4
Spaceman Turbo 15K 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.4
Spaceman Curve 18K 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2
Spaceman Prism 20K 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.2
Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2
Spaceman SP40000 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.4 3.7 4.3 4.0 4.2 4.1

Prism 20K looks most balanced across day-to-day use. Nebula 25K Plus turns into the “heavy-use specialist.” SP40000 becomes the longevity and intensity-control pick. 10K Pro stays the portability winner. Turbo 15K stays the quick punch device. Curve 18K sits between simple carry and mode control.

Best Picks

  • Best Spaceman Vape for Heavy Daily Use: Spaceman Nebula 25K Plus
    It held flavor intensity under higher use. The vapor score stayed strong. Marcus also kept calling the output stable.

  • Best Spaceman Vape for Flavor Balance: Spaceman Prism 20K
    It scored highest for flavor. It also stayed smooth across modes. Jamal liked the airflow tuning for short sessions.

  • Best Spaceman Vape for Long Haul Control: Spaceman SP40000
    It gives wattage steps when you want intensity shifts. Battery life scored high. The fixed airflow creates trade-offs.

How to Choose the Spaceman Vape?

Start with draw style. Tight pulls matter for some adults. Adjustable airflow helps there. If you prefer open pulls, fixed airflow may still work.

Next, pick intensity control. If you want simple use, 10K Pro or Turbo 15K fits. If you want mode steps, Curve 18K fits. Prism 20K gives the cleanest “mode feel” in daily use. Nebula 25K Plus fits higher output use patterns. SP40000 fits adults who like wattage steps more than airflow tuning.

Then look at sweetness tolerance. Candy blends fatigue faster. Mint and lemonade blends often feel cleaner. That pattern showed up in our sessions.

Match typical adult user profiles to the lineup.

A light nicotine user who wants something simple often fits 10K Pro. Short pulls feel comfortable. Pocket carry stays easy.

A former heavy smoker who wants a stronger throat feel often fits Nebula 25K Plus. Boost mode adds edge. Normal mode still feels steady.

A flavor-focused adult often fits Prism 20K. It kept flavor clearer. It also avoided syrupy mouth feel better than punchier models.

A commuter who needs all-day reliability often fits Curve 18K or Prism 20K. The screens reduce guessing. Normal modes feel consistent during short sessions.

A “settings person” who wants intensity steps often fits SP40000. Wattage steps give control. Fixed airflow needs acceptance.

Limitations

Spaceman’s lineup leans heavily into disposable high-capacity devices. That design choice limits certain use cases. Refillable pod users who want lower waste will not find that style here. Rebuildable users also get no path here.

Fixed airflow on SP40000 creates a clear mismatch. Tight-draw adults may not enjoy it. That is not a minor point. Draw feel shapes throat feel and comfort.

The larger models can push pocket carry into annoyance. Jamal kept calling that out. Bigger bodies work better in bags or jackets. Tight pockets become uncomfortable.

Boost modes bring warmth. Marcus noticed it across devices. That warmth may bother heavy chain users. It can also make sweet flavors feel heavier in the mouth.

Flavor range is wide, yet many profiles tilt sweet. Adults who dislike sweet flavors may feel boxed in. Mint and lemonade options help. The lineup still leans candy-forward.

Nicotine risk remains present across the lineup. That is true even when devices feel smooth. These products remain adult-only. They are not for non-users. They are not for pregnant individuals.

Is the Spaceman Vape Lineup Worth It?

Spaceman devices aim at convenience. They also aim at high puff counts. That shows in every model here. The lineup stays disposable-focused.

The 10K Pro fits daily carry. The body stays smaller. The screen reduces guessing. The draw stays smooth with airflow tuning. That makes it worth it for commuters.

Turbo 15K pushes flavor upfront. Sweet blends hit hard. Mint and lemonade feel cleaner. The trade-off shows up during longer sessions. Sweetness can feel heavy. Warmth rises when you push it.

Curve 18K adds mode control. Soft mode feels calmer on the throat. Normal mode stays steady. Boost adds intensity. Battery drain rises under boost. That is the cost of higher output.

Prism 20K feels more balanced. Flavor stays clearer across modes. Airflow tuning helps match draw preference. The device still feels heavier in pocket carry. That is a daily-life trade.

Nebula 25K Plus fits heavy use. Dual mesh behavior supports intensity. Boost mode delivers stronger output. Heat can rise under chains. Portability drops. That becomes the main limitation.

SP40000 targets long-run use. Wattage steps give intensity control. Ice control features show up in listings. Battery behavior looks strong for this class. Fixed airflow limits draw tuning. That limits who will enjoy it.

Price value depends on your use pattern. Light users may waste capacity. Heavy users may appreciate the runway. Mid-range users often fit Prism or Curve best.

Value stays practical for adult nicotine users who want convenience. That conclusion fits the scores. Nebula and Prism lead for performance feel. 10K Pro leads for carry. SP40000 leads for control and longevity.

Pro Tips for Spaceman Vape

  • Keep pulls shorter when using higher modes. Warmth rises with long draws.
  • Use soft or normal mode during commutes. It reduces harshness.
  • Wipe the mouthpiece daily. Condensation builds over time.
  • Avoid leaving the device in a hot car. Battery stress rises under heat.
  • If a flavor starts tasting dull, lower the mode. That can reduce “burnt” impressions.
  • Charge with a reputable USB-C cable. Avoid cheap fast-charge bricks.
  • Store the device upright when possible. That helps reduce mouthpiece wetness.
  • Switch to mint or lemonade flavors when sweetness fatigue hits.
  • Stop using a device that shows abnormal heat. Replace it instead.

FAQs

What is the realistic lifespan of Spaceman disposables?
It depends on session length and mode use. Soft modes stretch use. Boost modes shorten use. Heavy chain patterns shorten lifespan faster.

How often does condensation show up?
Sweet flavors tend to create more mouthpiece wetness. Longer pulls increase it. Daily wiping keeps it manageable.

Do the mode settings really change the experience?
Yes, on Curve, Prism, and Nebula. Soft feels calmer. Boost feels sharper. Battery drain rises under higher output.

How long does the battery last in real use?
10K Pro and Turbo can feel like “half-day to day” devices for many adults. Curve, Prism, and Nebula stretch longer. SP40000 can stretch longest, depending on wattage.

How often do these devices leak?
Major leaks were not the main pattern in our notes. Mouthpiece condensation was the main issue. Upright storage helps.

Which Spaceman model fits a tighter draw preference?
10K Pro and Prism help more, since airflow adjustment lets you tighten draw. SP40000 stays fixed and more open.

How should an adult choose nicotine strength?
Use label guidance and personal tolerance. Avoid chasing stronger feelings through higher use.

Are disposables or refillables easier to maintain?
Disposables remove coil changes and refills. Maintenance still exists. Mouthpiece cleaning still matters. Charging habits still matter.

What causes a burnt or dry taste on high-capacity disposables?
Long pulls at higher output can outpace wicking. Sweet flavors can worsen it. Lowering output often reduces that sensation.

Sources

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Library of Medicine NCBI Bookshelf. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507171/
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults A Report of the Surgeon General. 2016. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/tobacco/sgr/e-cigarettes/index.htm
  • Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine without smoke Tobacco harm reduction. 2016. https://www.rcp.ac.uk/media/xcfal4ed/nicotine-without-smoke_0.pdf
  • World Health Organization. Electronic cigarettes E-cigarettes. 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WPR-2024-DHP-001
About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.