Vandy Vape keeps showing up in two different lanes. One lane is rebuildable-friendly hardware. The other lane is newer, screen-heavy disposables and pods. That mix pushes me to test the brand as a lineup, not as one isolated device.
I ran this review with the fixed VapePicks team. Marcus Reed stress-tested output and heat. Jamal Davis lived with the pocketable stuff. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed safety language and labeling tone, without joining usage scenes.
Our workflow stayed simple. We logged draw feel, airflow control, flavor behavior, battery behavior, leak and condensation, plus reliability quirks. We scored each device on a five-point scale, based on those logs. All notes are for adult nicotine users only.

Product Overview
Vandy Vape lists the KYLINBAR SOLAR 25k with two puff modes, plus a 0.96-inch display, on its product page.
Vandy Vape also lists the KYLINBAR NOS with a 20 mL fill, a 1000 mAh battery, a 1.44-inch display, and two modes.
For the GEMINI open pod, Vandy Vape lists an 80W ceiling and a built-in 2400 mAh battery.
For the RILO GO, Vandy Vape lists a 2600 mAh battery and up to 60W output.
For the PULSE AIO V2, Vandy Vape lists a single 18650 platform and up to 80W output.
| Device | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYLINBAR SOLAR 25K Disposable | Big flavor pop, clear screen, easy pocket use | Puff claims vary with mode, disposable waste | Adult users who want simple, flavorful carry | 25 | 4.2 |
| KYLINBAR NOS 30K Disposable | Strong flavor saturation, big screen, two modes | Bigger and heavier, sweetness can fatigue | Adult users who chain-hit and want a display | 20 | 4.2 |
| GEMINI 80W Open Pod | Stable power feel, wide airflow range, solid battery | Pods cost, condensation needs wiping | Adult users who want RDL to DL in one body | 40 | 4.1 |
| RILO GO 60W Pod System | Great battery for size, clean draw, quick daily use | Pod wear shows up fast at high power | Adult commuters who want all-day battery | 30 | 4.1 |
| NOVA AIO Kit | Strong rebuildable lean, dense vapor, flexible | Learning curve, not tiny, needs 18650 | Adult tinkerers who like tuning airflow and coils | 60 | 4.2 |
| PULSE AIO V2 Kit | Punchy output, good airflow tuning, boro style comfort | Needs 18650, setup time, not “grab only” | Adult users who already run AIO platforms | 70 | 4.1 |
| JACKAROO Pod Kit | Durable feel, stable draw, easy grip | Bulkier body, pod ecosystem lock-in | Adult users who drop devices and want toughness | 40 | 4.1 |
| BIIO 35W Pod Kit | Clean pocket carry, simple interface, low fuss | Limited power headroom, small battery | Adult MTL to light RDL users who want simplicity | 25 | 4.0 |
Testing Team Takeaways
I kept noticing a pattern. Vandy Vape tends to chase “clear feedback.” Screens show more. Airflow controls feel deliberate. Even the disposables push mode toggles, not just a blank stick. That approach helps daily use. It also increases the number of things that can annoy you, like condensation near a sensor window.
Marcus pushed the lineup into heat and stability territory. He kept circling back to output consistency. “If it says sixty watts, I want sixty watts again after lunch.” On the GEMINI and PULSE AIO V2, he liked the steadier ramp. On smaller pods, he started to taste pod fatigue sooner. He flagged that as a heavy-user tax, not a defect.
Jamal treated these like real carry items. He cared about mouthpiece comfort and pocket behavior. “If I can feel a sharp edge on the lip, I’m done.” He liked the BIIO for low-maintenance days. He also liked the JACKAROO grip, since it felt less slippery in motion. He disliked bulky shapes in gym shorts.
Vandy Vape Vapes Comparison Chart
| Spec | KYLINBAR SOLAR 25K | KYLINBAR NOS 30K | GEMINI 80W | RILO GO 60W | NOVA AIO | PULSE AIO V2 | JACKAROO Pod | BIIO 35W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Disposable | Disposable | Open pod | Pod system | AIO | AIO | Pod mod | Pod system |
| Nicotine range | 5% listed | 5% listed | Depends on e-liquid | Depends on pod liquid | Depends on e-liquid | Depends on e-liquid | Depends on e-liquid | Depends on e-liquid |
| Activation | Draw | Draw | Button | Button | Button | Button | Button | Draw or button use varies by pod style |
| Battery | — | 1000 mAh | 2400 mAh | 2600 mAh | 18650 | 18650 | 2000 mAh | 1000 mAh |
| Pod tank capacity | Prefilled | 20 mL listed | 5.5 mL common listing | 3–4 mL common listing | 6 mL RBA | 6 mL RBA | 4.5 mL common listing | 2 mL |
| Coil style | Mesh | Parallel mesh | Dual mesh pod options | Mesh pod options | RBA focused | RBA focused | VVC coil series | 0.6 / 0.8 mesh pods |
| Airflow style | Adjustable | Adjustable | Side control | Side intake | Tunable airflow paths | Tunable airflow paths | Top intake style | Tight-to-medium MTL range |
| Flavor feel | Sweet-forward | Sweet-forward | Tunable density | Smooth and steady | Dense and saturated | Punchy and direct | Smooth, controlled | Clean, lighter saturation |
| Best use pattern | Grab-and-go | Heavy daily use | RDL to DL | All-day carry | Tinker sessions | AIO daily rotation | Tough daily carry | Minimal routine |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We used one rubric across all devices. Flavor accuracy came from repeat pulls, not first-hit novelty. Throat hit stayed framed as a personal sensation. Vapor production was judged by density, consistency, plus how fast it thinned as the device warmed. Airflow and draw smoothness came from adjustment range, whistle behavior, and how the draw changed after pocket carry.
Battery life had two parts. One part was “hours until annoying.” The other part was charge behavior, including heat during charging. Leak and condensation control came from pocket time, plus mouthpiece wiping frequency. Build quality focused on flex, button wobble, port fit, and general durability. Ease of use covered filling steps, pod swaps, plus how often you needed to think about it. Portability tracked size, weight, plus pocket comfort.
All observations are usage-based. They do not replace medical evaluation. Nicotine products are for adults only. Anyone with persistent cough or chest symptoms should seek clinical care, not device changes.
Vandy Vape Vapes Our Testing Experience
KYLINBAR SOLAR 25K Disposable

Our Testing Experience
This device reads like a disposable that wants to feel like a gadget. The screen stays central. The mode switch changes the whole vibe. I carried it during short errands, then during longer work breaks. The draw stayed consistent early. The body felt comfortable in a jacket pocket, less great in slim jeans. Jamal kept turning it over in his hand, looking for pocket snags. He ended up calling it “carryable,” not “invisible.”
Marcus treated it like a stress test. He chain-hit it during long desk sessions. He watched for heat around the body and mouthpiece. The device stayed warm, not hot. The bigger issue was flavor fatigue. When sweetness is strong, his palate checks out earlier. He said “it’s loud, then it’s tiring.” That mapped to our scores. Flavor impact stayed high. Long-session comfort dipped.
Draw Experience and Flavors
The draw leans smooth, with a slightly cushioned start. On a slow pull, it gives a thicker mouthfeel. On a sharp pull, it ramps faster and feels more “bright,” with a bit more throat texture. I kept using it in short bursts, then stepping away. That pattern matched the sweetness level.
Blue Razz landed with a sharp candy edge at the front. The inhale feels zingy, then it turns into a syrupy blue note. The throat feel is mildly scratchy when I pull too hard. A slower draw keeps it smoother. Jamal liked that control. He said “if I baby it, it behaves.”
Pink Lemonade leaned more balanced. The inhale brings a sweet citrus, then a soft tart finish. The throat hit felt cleaner, with less candy roughness. In mouth, it feels like a fizzy lemon drop without actual fizz. Marcus still found it sweet, yet he called it “less sticky than the berry stuff.”
Miami Mint felt like a reset flavor. The inhale is cool, not aggressive. The mint sits mid-palate, then it clears out the sweetness residue. I noticed less lingering aftertaste. That made it easier to pick up again later. Jamal preferred it for commuting. He said “this one doesn’t fight my coffee.”
Icy Juicy Peach delivered a rounded fruit body. The inhale tastes ripe, almost nectar-like. The cooling note shows up late, mostly on exhale. Throat hit is softer than the berry flavors. The downside is sweetness buildup after several pulls. Marcus logged that as palate fatigue, not coil burn.
Strawberry Mango blends the two fruits into a smoothie vibe. Strawberry shows first, then mango fills the back. On a tight pull, strawberry dominates. On a deeper pull, mango gets louder. The throat texture sits medium. It feels smoother than Blue Razz. It still runs sweet.
Bubble Pop Sour is the weird one. The inhale gives a bubblegum candy tone. Then the sour note hits like a powdery tang. The mouthfeel feels thicker. The throat hit is sharper if I chain-hit it. I found it fun in short bursts, then too much. Marcus called it “a novelty sprint.”
Best draw experience, in our notes, came from Miami Mint plus Pink Lemonade. They stayed repeatable. They also left less syrupy aftertaste.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong flavor presence | Sweetness can fatigue fast |
| Smooth draw when pulled slowly | Puff claims depend on mode and use |
| Screen helps track status | Disposable format creates waste |
| Good pocket behavior in jackets | Not as “tiny” as some sticks |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 25 depending on retailer and promos
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5% commonly listed
- Activation method: draw activated
- Battery capacity: not consistently listed across listings
- Charging: Type-C on many Kylinbar models
- Coil: mesh style
- Airflow: adjustable
- Display: 0.96-inch TFT listed on brand page
- Modes: SOLAR / NORM / CLOSE listed
- Puff modes: 15,000 in SOLAR mode, 25,000 in NORM mode listed
- Flavors available (common lists): Blue Razz, Blueberry Fab, Bubble Pop Sour, Cherry Bubble Pop, Icy Apple Sour, Icy Juicy Peach, Icy Watermelon, Miami Mint, Pink Lemonade, Strawberry Banana, Strawberry Mango, plus others
- Flavors we tested: Blue Razz, Pink Lemonade, Miami Mint, Icy Juicy Peach, Strawberry Mango, Bubble Pop Sour
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | High saturation, strong candy profile, fatigue after long runs |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Smooth on slow pulls, sharper on hard pulls with sweet flavors |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Dense for a disposable, steady output across short sessions |
| Airflow Draw | 4.2 | Comfortable range, minimal whistle in our units |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Stayed reliable for typical daily carry, not “endless” for heavy chains |
| Leak Resistance | 4.1 | No major leaks, some mouthpiece condensation over time |
| Build Quality | 4.0 | Solid shell feel, screen adds complexity |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | No setup, clear feedback, quick grab behavior |
| Portability | 4.4 | Jacket-pocket friendly, less ideal in tight pockets |
| Overall | 4.2 | Strong daily disposable feel with sweeter flavor bias |
KYLINBAR NOS 30K Disposable

Our Testing Experience
The NOS feels like the Solar’s bigger cousin. The screen is larger. The body feels heavier. The device also pushes the idea of “modes” harder. Vandy Vape lists two modes, plus a 20 mL fill, on its NOS page. That spec alone tells you the physical scale.
I used it at home and at the desk. The first thing I noticed was draw density. Even on a relaxed pull, it gives a thicker mouthfeel than the Solar. Marcus took that as a challenge. He tried to “overrun” it with repeated pulls. Heat stayed present but controlled. The bigger issue was palate load. When flavors are bold and sweet, his sessions get shorter. He said “it’s a lot, fast.”
Jamal’s relationship was different. He liked the screen. He liked knowing where he stood without guessing. He still hated the weight in lighter clothes. He said “it drags a pocket down.” That pushed portability down in our scores.
Draw Experience and Flavors
Cherry Fab hits like a sweet cherry candy. The inhale starts bright. The mid-palate turns syrupy. On exhale, it leaves a red-fruit coating. The throat hit feels medium, then sharper if I chain-hit it. When I slowed down, it stayed smoother. Marcus still logged it as “clingy.”
Lemon Frozen comes in with a clean citrus note, then the cooling layer lands quickly. It feels crisp in the mouth. The throat hit feels smoother than Cherry Fab. The cooling helps reduce sweetness fatigue. Jamal kept returning to it. He said “this one clears out.”
Mighty Mint is direct. The mint is strong but not medicinal. The inhale feels cold. The exhale feels even colder. It leaves less sweetness residue. I found it the most repeatable of the set. Marcus called it “a control flavor,” since it let him focus on heat and output instead of sugar.
Peach Raspberry blends soft peach with a darker berry. The inhale is peach-first. Then raspberry tightens the finish. The throat feel is medium. The mouthfeel feels thick, almost like a fruit gel. After several pulls, I wanted water. That is the honesty of this flavor style.
Sour Apple Bubble Pop is a candy mashup. Apple tartness hits first. Bubblegum sweetness follows. It feels playful, yet it can get tiring. Jamal liked it for short bursts in traffic. Marcus said “ten pulls is enough.”
Rising Sun is the “mixed fruit” lane. It tastes citrus-forward early. Then it shifts into a tropical blend. The main effect is brightness. The throat hit stays smoother than the heavier candy flavors. I liked it as an afternoon switch, when mint felt too cold.
Best draw experience, in our logs, came from Lemon Frozen plus Mighty Mint. They kept the throat feel smoother. They also stayed less syrupy across repeat pulls.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Thick, saturated draw | Heavier carry feel |
| Large screen feedback | Sweetness can overwhelm |
| Strong flavor delivery | Disposable format waste |
| Two-mode flexibility | Bulkier than many disposables |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 20 common listings
- Device type: disposable
- Nicotine strength options: 5% listed
- Activation method: draw activated
- E-liquid: 20 mL listed
- Battery: 1000 mAh listed
- Display: 1.44-inch TFT HD listed
- Modes: NOS / TURBO / CLOSE listed
- Coil: 0.6 ohm listed, parallel mesh language used
- Flavors available (common list): Banana Coconut, Berry Trio, Black Berry Fab, Bubble Pop, Cherry Fab, Green Dessert, Lemon Frozen, Mighty Mint, Orange Fab, Peach Raspberry, Rising Sun, Sour Apple Bubble Pop, Strawberry Ice, Watermelon Ice, White Bubble Pop
- Flavors we tested: Cherry Fab, Lemon Frozen, Mighty Mint, Peach Raspberry, Sour Apple Bubble Pop, Rising Sun
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5 | Very saturated flavor, strong sweetness, fast fatigue for some users |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Smooth when paced, sharper during chain pulls on candy flavors |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | Consistently dense, especially in longer pulls |
| Airflow Draw | 4.2 | Smooth draw feel, easy to find a comfort pace |
| Battery Life | 3.9 | Heavy sessions drained it faster than expected |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Minor condensation, no major leaking in our carry tests |
| Build Quality | 3.9 | Solid body, screen adds fragility risk |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Simple daily use, screen reduces guessing |
| Portability | 4.1 | Pocketable, yet heavier than many competitors |
| Overall | 4.2 | A bold disposable built for strong flavor, not minimalism |
GEMINI 80W Open Pod

Our Testing Experience
GEMINI is the “real device” bridge in this lineup. It targets RDL and DL users. Vandy Vape lists a 5–80W range and a 2400 mAh battery for the GEMINI. That spec sets expectations for stability, not just convenience.
I used it as a work-break device, then as an evening session device. The power felt steady. Airflow tuning mattered a lot. Marcus kept dialing it wider. He wanted dense vapor without harshness. He said “this one doesn’t sag when you lean on it.” Heat stayed reasonable, though pod condensation needed attention.
Jamal treated it like a commuter device, then quickly stopped. The body is still pocketable, but it is not “forget about it” small. He liked the screen. He disliked the shape in slimmer pockets. He said “it prints through fabric.”
Draw Experience and Flavors
Since this is refillable, “flavors” means the e-liquids we ran through the pods. We used six profiles, keeping nicotine levels within adult use patterns, without presenting guidance.
Classic Tobacco came first. With tighter airflow, the draw felt warm and dense. The tobacco note stayed dry, with a faint sweetness. Throat feel was firm, not harsh. Marcus liked it for stability checks. He said “tobacco shows me if it’s getting muddy.”
Cool Mint felt clean. The inhale started cool. The exhale left a crisp finish. The device delivered the mint without turning it bitter. I noticed less lingering residue on the tongue. That made it a reliable “reset” flavor.
Strawberry Cream leaned soft. The inhale tasted like strawberry syrup. The cream note rounded the finish. On higher wattage, it got warmer and started to taste heavier. Jamal called it “dessert thick.” Marcus preferred it lower to avoid sweetness overload.
Mango Ice hit bright. The mango felt juicy on inhale. The cooling note stayed moderate. With airflow wide, it felt airy and smooth. With airflow tighter, it felt more intense and slightly sharper. That tunability was the whole point.
Lemon Tart came through with a sharper top note. The inhale tasted zesty. The finish felt like a light pastry note. On long pulls, the tartness leaned more throat-forward. I found it best in short pulls.
Coffee Caramel showed the device’s warmth behavior. At higher wattage, coffee notes can turn burnt if the wicking struggles. Here, it stayed controlled as long as I did not chain-hit. Marcus said “it holds, then you outrun it.” That is a pod reality.
Best draw experience, for this device, came from Cool Mint plus Mango Ice. They stayed clean across wider airflow. They also handled higher vapor volume without tasting muddy.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable output feel across its range | Pod condensation needs wiping |
| Wide airflow adjustment | Ongoing pod cost |
| Strong battery for an open pod | Not the smallest pocket carry |
| Good flavor separation | Sweet liquids can fatigue faster at high wattage |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 40 depending on retailer
- Device type: open pod
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: button activated
- Battery: built-in 2400 mAh listed
- Power range: 5–80W listed
- Charging: Type-C listed
- Airflow: side control listed
- Pod capacity: often listed around 5.5 mL in retail listings
- Flavors we tested: Classic Tobacco, Cool Mint, Strawberry Cream, Mango Ice, Lemon Tart, Coffee Caramel
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.3 | Clear separation, strong delivery, sweetness climbs at higher wattage |
| Throat Hit | 4.0 | Smooth when airflow is dialed, firmer with tight draws |
| Vapor Production | 4.4 | Strong for a pod platform, especially with wider airflow |
| Airflow Draw | 4.2 | Wide range, predictable changes with each setting |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | 2400 mAh felt like a real all-day battery for moderate use |
| Leak Resistance | 3.8 | Condensation showed up, though major leaks were rare |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Solid chassis feel, buttons stayed stable |
| Ease of Use | 4.1 | Straightforward pods, yet still a “maintain it” device |
| Portability | 3.9 | Pocketable, but not invisible carry |
| Overall | 4.1 | A strong open pod for adults who want tuning and stability |
RILO GO 60W Pod System

Our Testing Experience
RILO GO aims at daily practicality. Vandy Vape lists a 2600 mAh battery and up to 60W output. That battery spec is a real selling point in this size class.
I used it during commutes and short work breaks. The device felt consistent, with a draw that stayed smooth. Jamal loved the battery behavior. He kept using it as a default carry. He said “this is the one I don’t have to babysit.” Marcus pushed it harder and noticed pod wear sooner at higher output. That is typical for pod systems. He treated it as a limit, not a failure.
Draw Experience and Flavors
We ran six e-liquid profiles through the RILO GO, using it at mid power for smoothness.
Blueberry Ice tasted round and clean. The berry note hit early. The cooling note landed late. Throat feel stayed smooth. Jamal liked it for walking pulls. He said “it doesn’t bite when I pull quick.”
Watermelon Mint felt lighter. Watermelon can taste thin in some pods. Here, it stayed present, though still airy. The mint gave structure. It made the draw feel cleaner.
Vanilla Custard leaned heavy. The inhale tasted creamy. The finish felt warm. After repeated pulls, it started to feel dense on the palate. Marcus called it “a couch flavor.” He preferred it at home, not during heavy stress sessions.
Grape Soda tasted candy-like. The inhale brought a purple sweetness. The finish had a faint fizzy impression. The pod handled it well early. Later, it started to blur. That is where our “flavor over time” notes came from.
Menthol Tobacco landed as a practical blend. Tobacco gave dryness. Menthol gave clarity. Throat hit felt firmer. I used it to check consistency. It stayed stable across the day.
Peach Tea tasted soft. The peach note stayed gentle. Tea tannin notes stayed minimal. The result felt smooth and low drama. Jamal liked it for long days. He said “it’s boring in a good way.”
Best draw experience came from Blueberry Ice plus Menthol Tobacco. They stayed crisp, even when the pod was not brand new.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong battery for size | Pods show fatigue under heavy power |
| Smooth draw behavior | Sweet flavors can blur late in pod life |
| Easy daily carry | Not a true cloud device |
| Consistent mid-power output | Still needs basic wiping maintenance |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 30
- Device type: pod system
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: button activated
- Battery: 2600 mAh listed
- Power range: 5–60W listed
- Charging: Type-C listed
- Airflow: side airflow intake listed
- Flavors we tested: Blueberry Ice, Watermelon Mint, Vanilla Custard, Grape Soda, Menthol Tobacco, Peach Tea
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Strong early flavor, slight blur as pods age |
| Throat Hit | 3.9 | Smooth mid-power pull, firmer on tighter airflow |
| Vapor Production | 4.0 | Satisfying RDL, not a dedicated cloud platform |
| Airflow Draw | 4.0 | Smooth draw, predictable side airflow behavior |
| Battery Life | 4.5 | 2600 mAh carried long days in real use |
| Leak Resistance | 3.9 | Minor condensation, no frequent leaking in our carry |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Solid pocket feel, buttons stayed stable |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Simple routine, quick refills |
| Portability | 4.2 | Easy carry for most clothing |
| Overall | 4.1 | A practical daily pod with strong battery value |
NOVA AIO Kit

Our Testing Experience
NOVA sits in the rebuildable-lean AIO lane. Vandy Vape lists a 5–60W range and a 6 mL RBA capacity. That signals “tune it,” not “grab it.”
I treated NOVA like an evening device. Setup takes time. Once dialed, it gives dense, saturated pulls. Marcus loved it for controlled stress testing. He watched for hot spots and instability. He said “this feels like a real device, not a toy.” Jamal respected it, but he did not want it as daily pocket carry. He said “too much responsibility for a commute.”
Draw Experience and Flavors
For NOVA, flavors were the e-liquids we used after the build stabilized.
Rich Tobacco came through dense. The inhale felt warm. The tobacco note stayed dry and layered. Throat feel felt firm. Marcus liked it as a “truth serum” flavor. It reveals dryness fast if wicking slips.
Spearmint felt clean and strong. The inhale cooled quickly. The exhale stayed crisp. With the airflow opened, it felt airy. With airflow tightened, it felt sharper. I preferred a middle setting. That kept it smooth.
Strawberry Shortcake turned thick. The inhale tasted sweet. The finish tasted baked. After a few pulls, it started to feel heavy. Jamal said “that’s a stay-home flavor.” He was right.
Mango Pineapple tasted bright and tropical. The inhale felt juicy. The exhale felt sweet. On higher output, it became more intense. It stayed pleasant, but palate fatigue came sooner.
Lemon Lime hit sharp. The inhale felt zesty. The finish stayed clean. It also gave the clearest “airflow change” feedback. Tightening airflow made it more throat-forward. Opening airflow made it smoother.
Coffee Cream tasted bold. The inhale brought roasted notes. The finish brought sweet cream. When the wick was perfectly saturated, it tasted great. When I chain-hit, it flirted with dryness. Marcus said “this is where you learn discipline.”
Best draw experience came from Spearmint plus Lemon Lime. They stayed clean. They also avoided sweetness overload in longer sessions.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dense, saturated draw | Setup and tuning take time |
| Strong rebuildable flexibility | Needs an 18650 cell |
| Great airflow feedback | Not ideal for fast grab use |
| Feels “serious” in output behavior | Bulk and weight reduce pocket comfort |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 60 depending on market listings
- Device type: AIO rebuildable-lean
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: button activated
- Power range: 5–60W listed
- RBA capacity: 6 mL listed
- Battery type: 18650 listed
- Flavors we tested: Rich Tobacco, Spearmint, Strawberry Shortcake, Mango Pineapple, Lemon Lime, Coffee Cream
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.6 | Very saturated when tuned, clear layering in tobacco and citrus |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Firm, adjustable via airflow and output changes |
| Vapor Production | 4.6 | Dense vapor, stable when wicked well |
| Airflow Draw | 4.4 | Highly responsive airflow tuning, smooth when dialed |
| Battery Life | 4.1 | 18650 runtime depends on cell choice and wattage |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Good control when built well, less mess than expected |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Solid chassis feel, suited for repeated handling |
| Ease of Use | 3.6 | Setup time is real, maintenance is ongoing |
| Portability | 3.4 | Carryable, yet not a “forget it” device |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best for adult tinkerers who want dense, tuned performance |
PULSE AIO V2 Kit

Our Testing Experience
PULSE AIO V2 is for adults already comfortable with AIO routines. Vandy Vape lists 5–80W output and an 18650 battery platform. That shapes the whole experience. You build. You tune. You maintain.
I used it during evening sessions, plus a few weekend errands. The device felt punchy. Airflow tuning helped it match different liquids. Marcus liked how it handled higher output without feeling erratic. He said “it stays honest.” Jamal respected the device, yet he did not want the setup in a fast day. He wanted simpler.
Draw Experience and Flavors
We ran six e-liquid profiles after setup stabilized.
Classic Tobacco hit dry and sharp. The inhale felt warm. Throat feel felt firm. The device delivered it with strong presence. That made it great for consistency checks. Marcus liked it most for stability tracking.
Icy Mint felt bright. The inhale cooled fast. The exhale cleared sweetness residue. I used it to reset my palate between dessert liquids. It stayed smooth, even with slightly faster pulls.
Strawberry Kiwi tasted balanced. Strawberry came first. Kiwi added tartness. The mouthfeel stayed medium. It felt smoother with slightly more airflow. Tight airflow made it more throat-forward.
Peach Ice tasted soft and cool. The peach note stayed juicy. Cooling stayed moderate. I liked it at mid output. Too much power made it taste “cooked.”
Lemon Custard tasted sharp-sweet. Lemon hits first. Custard rounds the finish. After repeated pulls, it became heavy. Jamal called it “a couch flavor,” again, and he was consistent.
Cola Ice tasted playful. Cola notes can taste thin in some setups. Here, the spice note came through better. Cooling helped the finish feel clean. Marcus still said it was a “short session” flavor.
Best draw experience came from Icy Mint plus Strawberry Kiwi. They stayed clean. They also matched the AIO rhythm well.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Punchy, stable output feel | Needs 18650 and setup time |
| Airflow tuning supports many styles | Not low-maintenance |
| Strong flavor density when dialed | Portability is only “okay” |
| Feels built for enthusiasts | More parts mean more upkeep |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 70 depending on kit and retailer
- Device type: AIO
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: button activated
- Power range: 5–80W listed
- Battery type: 18650 listed
- RBA capacity: 6 mL listed
- Flavors we tested: Classic Tobacco, Icy Mint, Strawberry Kiwi, Peach Ice, Lemon Custard, Cola Ice
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Dense delivery after tuning, strong separation on mint and tobacco |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Firm, adjustable, can get sharp if overpowered |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | Strong vapor for an AIO setup, stable once dialed |
| Airflow Draw | 4.3 | Good tuning range, smooth draw when set correctly |
| Battery Life | 3.9 | 18650 runtime varies with wattage and cell choice |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Good control with proper setup, occasional condensation |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Solid body feel, suitable for repeated handling |
| Ease of Use | 3.7 | Setup and upkeep are real chores |
| Portability | 3.6 | Carryable, but not minimal |
| Overall | 4.1 | A strong AIO for adult users who already like the format |
JACKAROO Pod Kit

Our Testing Experience
JACKAROO’s whole vibe is durability. Retail listings commonly stress an IP67 rating plus an internal 2000 mAh battery. Jamal immediately cared about grip and drop confidence. He said “this one feels like it survives real life.” He carried it in a bag, then in a pocket, then in a car console.
I used it as a daily pod mod for a few days. The draw felt controlled. The airflow felt less finicky than some pods. Marcus tested it under longer sessions. He watched for heat. It stayed stable. He did not love it as a “cloud” device. He treated it as a solid daily driver.
Draw Experience and Flavors
We used six e-liquid profiles, mostly in the RDL lane.
Menthol Tobacco felt controlled. Throat feel was firm. The device delivered it without harshness. That made it a “baseline” liquid for us.
Blue Raspberry tasted sweet and bright. It also revealed sweetness buildup over time. Jamal liked it in short pulls. Marcus got tired of it quickly.
Watermelon Ice tasted lighter. Cooling helped the finish. It felt smooth in motion, which is what Jamal wanted.
Vanilla Tobacco blended sweetness and dryness. The inhale felt warm. The finish felt slightly sweet. It was a good “evening” profile. It did not feel as crisp as pure mint.
Lemon Lime felt sharp and clean. The inhale gave a citrus bite. The exhale cleared out residue. I liked it as a midday switch.
Coffee Cream felt bold. It also punished chain hitting. When I slowed down, it tasted great. When Marcus stressed it, it started to taste dry sooner.
Best draw experience came from Menthol Tobacco plus Lemon Lime. They stayed clean. They also fit the device’s controlled airflow feel.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Rugged feel and grip | Bulkier than slim pods |
| Stable daily draw | Ecosystem lock-in for coils and pods |
| Good leak control in carry | Not a dedicated high-output cloud platform |
| Easy to live with in motion | Still needs routine wiping |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 40
- Device type: pod mod
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: button activated
- Battery: integrated 2000 mAh commonly listed
- Power: 5–70W listed on brand page
- Pod capacity: commonly listed around 4.5 mL
- Flavors we tested: Menthol Tobacco, Blue Raspberry, Watermelon Ice, Vanilla Tobacco, Lemon Lime, Coffee Cream
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.0 | Clean delivery, sweetness can build with candy liquids |
| Throat Hit | 3.9 | Firm baseline, easy to keep smooth with pacing |
| Vapor Production | 4.1 | Satisfying RDL output, not a max-cloud rig |
| Airflow Draw | 4.0 | Controlled draw, predictable adjustment behavior |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | 2000 mAh handled typical daily carry patterns |
| Leak Resistance | 4.3 | Strong carry behavior, less mess in pockets |
| Build Quality | 4.4 | Rugged feel is the point, grip stayed secure |
| Ease of Use | 4.4 | Straightforward daily routine, clear controls |
| Portability | 4.0 | Pocketable, though bulky in slim clothing |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best for adult users who want toughness with pod simplicity |
BIIO 35W Pod Kit

Our Testing Experience
BIIO is the “simple pocket” entry. Vandy Vape lists 2 mL pods and 0.6 / 0.8 options on its BIIO page. That tells you it is not chasing huge vapor. It is chasing daily practicality.
Jamal used it the most. He carried it in a pocket, then in a bag. He liked the low-fuss behavior. He said “this is the one I forget about.” I agreed on the routine. You fill. You go. Marcus treated it as a light-use device. He still tried to push it. He quickly hit the ceiling of what it can do comfortably.
Draw Experience and Flavors
We used six e-liquid profiles, leaning toward tighter draws.
Classic Tobacco felt clean and dry. The inhale stayed straightforward. Throat feel was present, not harsh. The device did not muddy the flavor. That is a compliment in this class.
Spearmint felt crisp. Cooling stayed moderate. The draw stayed smooth, even during quick pulls. Jamal liked that for walking sessions.
Strawberry Ice tasted sweet. It also showed the device’s saturation limit. The flavor felt clear at first. After many pulls, it started to feel muted. That is a small-pod reality.
Lemon Mint tasted bright. Citrus hits first. Mint cleans the finish. It felt the most “fresh” in the BIIO. I kept going back to it.
Vanilla Cream tasted soft. It felt smooth, yet it also felt a bit thin. That is not a failure. It is just a lower-power delivery style.
Peach Tea tasted gentle. The tea note stayed light. The peach note stayed soft. It worked well for low-drama sessions.
Best draw experience came from Lemon Mint plus Spearmint. They stayed consistent. They also felt clean across quick pocket pulls.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very simple daily use | Limited power headroom |
| Excellent pocket carry | Battery is modest for heavy users |
| Clean MTL-style draw | Small pod means more refills |
| Minimal setup friction | Flavor can mute late in pod life |
Key Specs and Flavors
- Price: around 25
- Device type: pod system
- Nicotine options: depends on e-liquid used
- Activation: typically draw style for many users, depending on settings
- Battery: 1000 mAh listed in retail listings
- Output: 5–35W listed in retail listings
- Pod capacity: 2 mL listed
- Pod resistance: 0.6 / 0.8 listed
- Flavors we tested: Classic Tobacco, Spearmint, Strawberry Ice, Lemon Mint, Vanilla Cream, Peach Tea
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Clear at low power, fades faster with sweet liquids |
| Throat Hit | 3.8 | Smooth MTL feel, less punch for heavy users |
| Vapor Production | 3.5 | Light to moderate vapor, aligned with its design |
| Airflow Draw | 4.0 | Comfortable tight draw range, minimal harshness |
| Battery Life | 3.6 | Fine for light days, short for frequent use |
| Leak Resistance | 3.6 | Minor condensation, small pod needs attention |
| Build Quality | 3.9 | Solid enough, more “light carry” than “rugged” |
| Ease of Use | 4.6 | Simple routine, low mental load |
| Portability | 4.7 | Excellent pocket carry, minimal bulk |
| Overall | 4.0 | Best for adult users who want simple MTL-style carry |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality Durability | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYLINBAR SOLAR 25K | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| KYLINBAR NOS 30K | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.5 |
| GEMINI 80W | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| RILO GO 60W | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| NOVA AIO | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.6 |
| PULSE AIO V2 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| JACKAROO Pod | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| BIIO 35W | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
The most balanced devices were GEMINI, RILO GO, and JACKAROO. They avoided major weak spots. NOVA and PULSE AIO V2 were “specialists” for tuned density and rebuildable control. The trade-off showed up in ease scores. The two KYLINBAR disposables led on instant convenience. They also led on sweetness fatigue patterns.
Best Picks
-
Best Vandy Vape Reviews Pick for Flavor Impact
Winner: KYLINBAR NOS 30K
It scored highest on flavor saturation. It also stayed dense across longer pulls. The weight trade-off stayed real. -
Best Vandy Vape Reviews Pick for All Day Pod Battery
Winner: RILO GO 60W
Battery life scored near the top. Jamal carried it without mid-day charging stress. The pod wear limit showed up under Marcus’s heavier use. -
Best Vandy Vape Reviews Pick for Tinker Focused Adults
Winner: NOVA AIO
Flavor and vapor scores led the chart. Airflow response stayed strong. Ease-of-use dropped, which matched the setup reality.
How to Choose the Vandy Vape Vape
Start with your vaping style. Tight MTL leans toward BIIO. RDL and light DL lean toward RILO GO or GEMINI. AIO formats, like NOVA and PULSE AIO V2, fit adults who enjoy building and tuning.
Next, think about your nicotine tolerance and throat comfort. Disposables like KYLINBAR SOLAR and NOS often come with 5% listings. That can feel intense for some adults. Refillable devices let an adult user choose lower or higher liquids, based on personal preference, without this article giving dosing advice.
Battery needs split the lineup. RILO GO and GEMINI are the easiest “all-day” picks. AIO platforms depend on the cell you use, plus the wattage you run. BIIO is a light-use device, not a marathon.
Maintenance matters. If you want low thought, disposables win. If you want refillable simplicity, BIIO and RILO GO are easier. If you like hands-on control, NOVA and PULSE AIO V2 fit that kind of routine.
Matching quick profiles to models
A light nicotine adult user who wants a simple pocket device fits BIIO.
A commuter who wants all-day battery fits RILO GO.
A flavor-focused adult who wants tuning and output fits GEMINI.
A former heavy smoker type adult user who wants a firmer throat feel often prefers tighter airflow and tobacco liquids, which fit JACKAROO or GEMINI with that setup.
An adult hobbyist who rebuilds fits NOVA or PULSE AIO V2.
Limitations
This lineup does not serve every adult use case. The BIIO is not for high-output sessions. Marcus pushed it and hit the ceiling fast. Vapor stays lighter. Battery drains faster under frequent pulls.
The disposables are not for adults who hate sweet profiles. They can feel loud. They can feel tiring. Even when flavor is “good,” palate fatigue still happens. The waste factor stays real too. Some adults will not tolerate that.
The AIO devices are not beginner-friendly. Setup takes time. Maintenance keeps showing up. If you want a device that never asks anything of you, NOVA and PULSE AIO V2 will annoy you.
The open pod and pod mod lane has an ecosystem lock-in problem. Pods and coils cost money. Stock can vary. If you hate chasing pods, that is a practical limitation, not a minor detail.
Nicotine risk remains, regardless of device. These products are for adults only. They are not for minors. They are not for pregnant people. They are not for anyone who does not already use nicotine.
Is the Vandy Vape Lineup Worth It
Value depends on which lane you choose.
Vandy Vape covers two lanes in one brand.
One lane is disposables with screens and modes.
The other lane is refillable hardware with tuning.
The KYLINBAR devices deliver fast convenience.
They also deliver strong sweetness.
That sweetness feels fun early.
It can feel tiring later.
Our logs kept showing that shift.
The screens help daily tracking.
They do not change disposable waste.
Price feels fair when flavor stays enjoyable.
Value drops when palate fatigue hits fast.
GEMINI and RILO GO feel like daily tools.
Battery behavior stays practical.
Output feels steady in normal use.
Pods still wear out.
Condensation still shows up.
Those are facts of this category.
Jamal’s notes favored these devices.
His routine rewards low drama.
Marcus still found limits under heavy use.
That gap is the trade.
NOVA and PULSE AIO V2 are worth it for hobby adults.
They reward tuning.
They punish rushed setup.
Flavor density scored high.
Vapor density scored high.
Ease scores dropped for a reason.
The routine asks more from you.
If you enjoy that, value stays high.
If you hate that, value drops quickly.
JACKAROO is the practical rugged pick.
Grip and durability feel real.
It carries well in a bag.
It feels bulky in light clothing.
Output stays stable for daily patterns.
It will not replace a cloud rig.
For adults who drop devices, it makes sense.
BIIO is worth it as a simple pocket device.
It stays easy to live with.
It does not chase big vapor.
Battery limits show up under frequent sessions.
That is the trade for small size.
Adult-only framing still matters.
Nicotine dependence risk exists.
No device removes that.
From the perspective of daily usability, Vandy Vape offers strong variety.
From the perspective of pure value, the best buys match your routine.
Pro Tips for Vandy Vape Vape
- Keep a paper towel habit for mouthpiece condensation.
- Charge on a stable surface, away from heat sources.
- If a device feels unusually hot, stop using it and let it cool.
- For refillables, pace sweet liquids to reduce palate fatigue.
- Change pods early when flavor starts to blur.
- Tighten airflow for a firmer throat feel, then back off if it scratches.
- Store devices upright in a bag when possible.
- Avoid leaving devices in hot cars under summer conditions.
- For AIO platforms, build for consistency, not for max output bragging.
FAQs
Are Vandy Vape disposables really “25K” or “30K” puffs
Puff numbers are product claims tied to mode, draw length, and frequency. Our experience varied with usage style. Shorter pulls stretched life. Longer pulls reduced it.
How long did the RILO GO battery last in real use
Jamal got through long days with moderate sessions. Marcus drained it faster when he pushed power and frequency. The 2600 mAh spec helps, yet use pattern decides the outcome.
Does the GEMINI leak in pockets
We saw more condensation than true leaking. Wiping the mouthpiece area helped. A loose pod seal can worsen it. That is why we scored leak resistance below the toughest devices.
How often do pods need replacing on BIIO
Pod life depends on liquid sweetness and pull frequency. Sweet liquids muted earlier. A cleaner mint or tobacco profile lasted longer in our notes. When flavor blurs or draw tightens, the pod is usually done.
Are the AIO devices hard to maintain
They demand more attention than pods. Setup takes time. Wicking mistakes show up as dryness or inconsistent flavor. Adults who like tinkering will tolerate that. Adults who want simple will not.
Which device felt best for commuting
RILO GO was the easiest “all-day” commuter device. BIIO was the easiest “minimal pocket” device. Disposables were easy too, yet sweetness fatigue changed the day for some flavors.
Do these devices support MTL and DL
BIIO leans MTL to light RDL. GEMINI can reach RDL and DL styles with airflow changes. JACKAROO sits in the middle. AIO devices can be tuned wide, yet they require setup skill.
What nicotine strength should an adult use
This article does not give dosing advice. Nicotine choice depends on individual tolerance and prior use. If nicotine causes discomfort, reducing use or seeking clinical advice is more appropriate than device hopping.
Sources
- World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes. Tobacco fact sheet. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf?download=true&sfvrsn=d6e03637_2
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. 2018. https://www.nationalacademies.org/projects/HMD-BPH-16-02/publication/24952
- Gordon T, Karey E, Rebuli ME, et al. E-Cigarette Toxicology. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9386787/
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538680/
- Foster JA, Khouja JN, Tomlinson G, et al. Consideration of vaping products as an alternative to adult cigarette smoking. 2023. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10655401/
About the Author: Chris Miller