The 10 Best Bluetooth Vapes

Bluetooth vapes keep showing up in stores and feeds, yet most roundups treat them like a gimmick. I wanted to see what holds up under normal use. That meant real pocket carry, real daily charging, and real flavor sessions that did not stop at the first “nice hit.”

I ran this as a team test. Marcus Reed pushed devices hard and chased stability. Jamal Davis lived with them in pockets and bags. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed how we described irritation, warnings, and labeling. He kept the language grounded, and he cut any drift toward health claims.

My workflow stayed consistent. I tracked draw feel and flavor detail across several flavors. I watched battery behavior during commutes and late sessions. I checked for leaks, spitback, and mouthpiece grime. I also logged Bluetooth usefulness, not just pairing success.

Our Verdict: What’s the Best Bluetooth Vape

The Feed Sync 30K took the top spot as the Best Overall. It delivered the most balanced mix. Flavor stayed steady across long stretches. The draw stayed predictable. The screen tools and app control felt usable, not just decorative. Under daily carry, it resisted pocket lint and mouthpiece gunk better than the other “smart disposable” styles.

Trade-offs still showed up. The form factor is bulky. The phone-style features can feel pointless, depending on your habits. Battery life depends on how much you play with the screen. Under commuter use, though, it stayed reliable. Under heavier sessions, it held flavor longer than most rivals.

Top Picks

Compare the Best Bluetooth Vape Devices

What We Tested and How We Tested It

I treated Bluetooth as a feature that must earn its space. A device could not score high on pairing alone. The vape still had to deliver stable output, clean draws, and predictable day-to-day behavior. We also treated “smart” screens as a battery load. Under real use, a bright screen can turn a decent battery into a short one.

Every device ran through the same routine. I started with setup friction. That included charging out of the box, first-fill steps, and any firmware or app prompts. Bluetooth tests focused on pairing time, reconnect reliability, and range behavior during pockets and bags. I also tested how quickly a device recovered after a forced disconnect. Under commuting use, drops happen. Under office use, a phone sits on a desk. Under outdoor use, the range breaks sooner.

Flavor testing needed structure. I used three to five flavors per disposable. I did it across fruit-ice, mint, and dessert where available. For closed pods, I rotated flavors that the system offers. For refillable devices, I used the same two e-liquids across devices. One was a bright fruit-ice blend. The other leaned toward a creamy profile. That created a baseline, even when coil types differed. I kept wattage stable within recommended ranges. When a device allowed tuning, I logged two settings. One matched a tighter MTL draw. One pushed the coil toward warmer output. Marcus also ran a higher-output setup on mods. That exposed sag, heat, and coil burnout patterns.

Throat hit scoring stayed subjective. I described impact as sensation only. I avoided any claim about health, safety, or quitting. Dr. Walker required that framing. He also required clear avoidance of “safer” language. Nicotine risk statements, when needed, stayed consistent with public health and regulatory guidance.

Vapor production testing depended on device class. Disposables got measured by draw density and consistency. I used repeated two-second pulls, then longer pulls, then quick puffs. I watched for drop-offs, coil drying, and harsh spikes. Marcus leaned into longer sessions. He looked for heat buildup and the moment a coil started tasting tired. Jamal focused on short pulls while walking. He watched for spitback and gurgle after pocket carry.

Airflow and draw smoothness had two layers. One was mechanical feel. Some devices whistle. Some feel scratchy. The second was how the coil responds. A smooth airflow can still feel “choked” if the coil lags. Adjustable airflow tests included fully open, mid, and nearly closed positions. I also checked for accidental airflow movement in pockets.

Battery life and charging behavior mattered most to me. I ran repeated cycles. I tracked how hot the body got while charging. I logged fast drain moments during screen-heavy use. I watched for unstable percentage jumps. For mods, I tracked voltage sag under load. For disposables, I tracked how quickly the device recovered after a long pull. Charging port placement also mattered. Jamal flagged ports that collect lint or sit in a pocket “bend” point.

Leak and condensation control required boring patience. I stored devices mouthpiece-up, mouthpiece-down, and sideways. I checked the mouthpiece for wetness. I also checked for internal condensation that creeps into a screen area. Disposables can hide this until the draw turns spitty. Pods can hide it until the base gets sticky. I used paper checks and quick swabs, then compared across days.

Build quality and durability had practical stress. Jamal used bag carry and car cup holders. He watched for scratches and rattles. Marcus watched for heat spots and button wobble. I watched for USB port looseness, mouthpiece cracking, and paint wear. Reliability over time meant misfires, auto-firing fears, and random shutoffs. A Bluetooth vape that disconnects is annoying. A vape that misfires is a failure.

Scores came from nine metrics. Each stayed on a 3.0 to 5.0 scale. The overall score reflected balance, not price alone. A “specialist” could still score high. It had to deliver what it promises under daily adult use.

Best Bluetooth Vape Devices: Our Testing Experience

Feed Sync 30K — Best overall bluetooth vape for daily carry and app control

Why We Picked It

I carried the Feed Sync 30K like a phone, not like a stick vape. That sounds dramatic, yet the shape forces the habit. In a jeans pocket, it sits flat. In a jacket pocket, it rides like a small power bank. Jamal liked that. Jamal also hated that. He liked the stability. He hated the bulk under lighter clothes.

Pairing felt straightforward. Bluetooth showed up fast. The app features did not feel like a prank. I used puff tracking first. I kept the screen on a simple dashboard. That helped battery life. Under commute breaks, the device woke fast. It did not stutter before a pull. That mattered more than any on-screen widget.

Marcus ran long sessions at night. He chased coil fatigue. The dual mesh setup held flavor longer than I expected. When he pushed repeated longer pulls, heat rose, yet it did not turn sharp. The body got warm near the core. It never hit “uncomfortable,” yet he noticed the ramp. Jamal did shorter pulls while walking. He cared about aftertaste. He also cared about mouthpiece comfort. He said the mouthpiece felt “phone-edge awkward” at first. After a day, he stopped thinking about it.

Draw feel stayed consistent. The airflow slider gave real change. It was not just cosmetic. Nearly closed, the draw got tight and focused. Fully open, it went loose and airy. The device still leaned MTL to restricted-lung, not full DL. That matched its disposable nature.

Flavor testing shaped the pick. I ran five flavors. I rotated them across days. I avoided “chain sampling” that numbs taste. The device rewarded patience.

Cherry Blossom Grape had a layered pull. The inhale started with soft grape skin, not candy. Mid-draw, a floral edge rolled in. It sat on the sides of the tongue. Exhale brought a darker grape note. It reminded me of a cold grape drink, not syrup. Throat hit stayed medium-firm. It felt smooth, then it landed with a little nip. Under tighter airflow, the floral note sharpened. Under open airflow, the grape broadened. I preferred mid airflow. The draw then felt rounder.

Cola Ice surprised me. The first pull felt fizzy in the mouth, even without actual carbonation. The cola spice hit mid-palate. It brought a cinnamon-like tickle. The “ice” effect showed up late. It cooled the throat on exhale. Marcus liked this one most. He said the coil stayed stable. He watched for burnt edges. None showed up during his longer pulls. Under very long pulls, the cola spice got stronger. It still avoided harshness.

Icy Mint was straightforward. The inhale felt clean and bright. It did not taste like toothpaste. It felt like a chilled mint leaf. Throat hit increased. That kind of mint can feel sharper. Under this device, it stayed controlled. Jamal used it during errands. He said the aftertaste cleared fast. That made it easier to switch back to fruit flavors later.

Mango Fiesta leaned sweet, then turned juicy. Inhale started like ripe mango flesh. Mid-draw carried a slightly tangy edge. It kept the sweetness from becoming flat. Exhale left a tropical perfume. Under repeated pulls, the perfume grew. That can annoy some users. I took breaks. The coil held up. The mango did not become burnt-sugar.

Two Apple felt like a mix of crisp green and softer red apple. The inhale brought tartness first. It hit the front of the mouth. Exhale brought the sweeter apple. The throat hit felt smoother than mint. It felt firmer than mango. Under open airflow, the apples blended better. Under tight airflow, the green apple dominated and got sharp.

For pure draw satisfaction, I kept returning to Cherry Blossom Grape and Cola Ice. Those two gave the best mouth feel. They also showed the device’s blending skill. The coil delivered layered notes without turning muddy.

Weaknesses showed up too. The device invites screen play. That eats battery. If I kept the screen bright and used extra features, battery life dropped fast. Under “just vape” mode, it lasted well. Under “toy mode,” it behaved like a toy. Jamal also found pocket lint near the charging port. The port placement made cleaning important. Still, leak control stayed strong. I did not get sticky hands. Condensation stayed manageable with quick swabs.

This is why it won. It behaved like a vape first. The Bluetooth layer stayed optional, then useful.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $15\text{–}$25
• Device type: rechargeable disposable
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% (50 mg) salt nicotine
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: 850 mAh
• Charging port: USB-C
• Estimated charge time: about 45–75 minutes, depending on brick
• E-liquid capacity: around 30 mL (varies by listing)
• Coil type: dual mesh
• Airflow style: adjustable slider
• Screen: large touch-style display
• Bluetooth features: app control, puff tracking, phone-style tools
• Leak-resistance features: sealed core design with internal reservoir
• Build materials: plastic shell with screen front
• Dimensions and weight: phone-like footprint, pocket heavy
• Included accessories: device only, typical
• Safety features: basic short and charge protections, typical disposable chipset behavior
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: limited, retailer dependent

Flavors available for this model line:

• Cherry Blossom Grape
• Cola Ice
• Grapevine Quench
• Green Apple Watermelon
• Icy Mint
• Mango Fiesta
• Melon Ice
• Mystic Blue Mint
• Pacific Blue Melon
• Peach Ice
• Purple Haze
• Sugar Tedoy
• Two Apple
• Watermelon Mint

Review Score

Vookbar Cyber PRO 30000 — Best bluetooth vape for power-mode vapor and rich flavor

Why We Picked It

The Vookbar Cyber PRO 30000 felt like the “performance” version of the smartphone-style disposable idea. I noticed it on the first draw. The device ramped faster. It also pushed warmer output when I used its higher setting. That made it a natural fit for Marcus. He tends to chase stronger output, then he watches for collapse.

Setup was easy. Bluetooth connected without drama. The screen looked sharp. The UI felt more “vape-first” than some rivals. It still had the phone-like vibe, yet it kept vape stats front and center. Jamal appreciated that. Jamal also flagged pocket risk. A big screen can crack. A pocket with keys can ruin the day.

In day use, I treated it as a heavier break device. I used it on work breaks, not on quick walks. Under quick pulls, it hit hard. Under longer pulls, it heated up. Marcus did not panic about heat. He watches for hotspots. He said the warmth spread evenly, which felt safer than a single hot point. He still reduced his power-mode time. That kept flavor cleaner.

Airflow adjustments mattered. Fully open, it delivered thicker clouds. It also softened throat hit. Half closed, it sharpened the hit and made flavor pop. I used mid airflow most often. That kept the vapor dense without becoming foggy.

Flavor testing drove the score. I ran five flavors that represent how people actually buy. Fruit-ice, mint, dessert, and a mixed profile. The coil delivered bold notes. It sometimes blurred subtle notes. That is a trade-off. Big vapor tends to flatten detail.

Blueberry Razz Ice hit with immediate sweetness. Inhale gave bright blue raspberry candy. It felt sticky in the mouth. Mid-draw brought blueberry. It tasted darker, almost jam-like. Exhale cooled the throat. The cooling landed late and lasted. Under power mode, sweetness grew. It could become too much. Under normal mode, it stayed balanced. I recommended normal mode for this flavor.

Strawberry Cheesecake surprised me. Dessert profiles often taste fake. Here, the strawberry note came first. It felt ripe and a little syrupy. Then the cheesecake note showed up mid-draw. It felt creamy, not buttery. The exhale carried a faint crust note. Throat hit stayed mild. The texture in the mouth felt thick. Under tighter airflow, the cream note got heavier. Under open airflow, the strawberry took over. I liked it mid airflow, normal mode.

Miami Mint felt crisp and clean. Inhale gave bright mint. It did not lean spearmint gum. It leaned cooler peppermint. The throat hit increased. It still stayed smooth. Jamal liked this one. He used it during short sessions. He said the aftertaste faded fast, which kept it from clashing with coffee.

Watermelon Ice leaned juicy. It started like chilled watermelon flesh. Mid-draw gave a faint candy note. Exhale cooled the tongue and throat. Under repeated pulls, the candy note increased. The coil stayed stable, yet the profile became simpler. That is normal for high-output devices.

Frozen Pina Colada felt like a sweet tropical mix. Inhale started with pineapple. Mid-draw brought coconut cream. Exhale cooled the throat. Under power mode, the pineapple became sharp. Under normal mode, it stayed smooth.

I kept coming back to Strawberry Cheesecake and Miami Mint. Those two gave the most satisfying mouth feel. The cheesecake had texture. The mint had clarity. That mix helped the device stand out.

Weaknesses showed up in the same places every time. The device can run warm. Power mode pushes it there. Marcus also noticed flavor drift after long chain sessions. It did not burn fast. It did lose nuance. Jamal flagged pocket bulk again. This is not a discreet carry. Still, it delivered what it promises. For adults who want stronger vapor with smart controls, it earned its spot.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $11\text{–}$25
• Device type: rechargeable disposable
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% (50 mg) salt nicotine
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: 850 mAh
• Charging port: USB-C
• Estimated charge time: about 45–80 minutes
• E-liquid capacity: about 22 mL
• Coil type: dual mesh
• Airflow style: adjustable
• Screen: large touch-style display
• Bluetooth features: app connection, screen customization, notification tools
• Leak-resistance features: sealed internal reservoir, typical disposable structure
• Build materials: plastic shell with screen front
• Dimensions and weight: phone-like
• Included accessories: device only, typical
• Safety features: basic short and charge protections, typical disposable chipset behavior
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: limited, retailer dependent

Flavors available (commonly listed):

• Strawberry Watermelon
• Strawberry Cheesecake
• Cherry Ice
• Strawberry Banana
• Watermelon Ice
• Peach Ice
• Blueberry Razz Ice
• Blueberry Ice
• White Gummy Ice
• Strawberry Mango
• Miami Mint
• Peach Mango
• White Strawberry Ice
• Cherry Watermelon
• Sour Apple
• Frozen Pina Colada
• Grape Ice
• Fcking Fab
• Strawberry Kiwi
• Green Orange Lime Mint

Review Score

Swype 30K — Best bluetooth vape for phone-style features and screen utility

Why We Picked It

The Swype 30K is the device people point at and laugh, then secretly want to try. It looks like a tiny phone. The screen tries to behave like one. Bluetooth is the whole trick. I did not treat it as a joke in testing. I treated it like any other disposable. I wanted to know whether the vape side survives the novelty.

Jamal carried it for a week. He used it during commutes and gym trips. He hated the attention it draws. He liked the flat carry. He said it felt like carrying a small device, not a tube that rolls. He also worried about accidental screen taps. In a pocket, screens get pressed. The Swype handled that better than expected. It still had moments where the screen woke on its own.

Marcus pushed it in longer sessions. He wanted to see if the coil stayed stable while the device played “smart.” The vape output stayed steady. The gadget features did not improve vaping. They did add distractions. Battery behavior showed the cost. When I used it as a vape only, battery held up. When I played with the UI, runtime dropped.

Bluetooth range behavior matched what you would expect. When the phone was too far, features dropped. The vape still worked. I treated that as the right priority. A Bluetooth vape should still vape. The app experience felt mixed. Pairing was not hard. The UI sometimes felt off. That mirrored what many users report about these novelty systems.

Now the draw experience. I tested five flavors that represent its lineup. I rotated them across day parts. That mattered, since sweet profiles can overwhelm taste.

Blue Razz Ice hit loud. Inhale tasted like bright blue candy. It coated the mouth fast. Mid-draw brought a tart edge. It helped the profile avoid pure sugar. Exhale brought the cooling. It did not punch the throat too hard. It cooled the mouth more than the throat. Under tight airflow, the tartness rose. Under open airflow, sweetness dominated. I liked it mid airflow.

Gum Mint felt like minty chewing gum, not a natural mint leaf. It still worked. Inhale brought soft sweetness. Then mint rolled in, almost like a cool film on the tongue. Exhale left a clean finish. Throat hit stayed medium. Jamal used this one during errands. He said the aftertaste was “tidy,” which mattered in short sessions.

OMG Blow Pop was pure candy. It hit with a mixed fruit sweetness. It reminded me of a lollipop center. Mid-draw added a faint citrus edge. Exhale leaned sugary again. This is a flavor that can tire quickly. The device delivered it accurately, if that is your thing. I used it in short bursts only.

Pina Colada gave a tropical blend. Inhale started with pineapple brightness. Mid-draw brought coconut cream. Exhale felt sweet and slightly cool. Under repeated pulls, coconut became heavier. It did not turn burnt. It did feel thick. Marcus liked it in normal mode. He said power-like pulls made the pineapple too sharp.

Violent Rainbow leaned like mixed candy. It tasted like a handful of sweet fruit chews. The inhale felt bright and busy. Mid-draw flattened a little. Exhale left a sugary finish. This one showed the coil’s limits. Subtle notes were not the point. The device delivered the “rainbow” vibe, yet it was not a flavor I wanted all day.

For draw satisfaction, Blue Razz Ice and Gum Mint were the best. One gave punch. The other gave daily usability. Those two also showed the best balance between sweetness and finish.

Weaknesses came from the same identity problem. It wants to be a gadget. That adds battery drain risk. It adds handling risk. Under bag carry, the screen face needs care. Jamal said it felt like carrying a small phone with a mouthpiece. That is accurate.

Still, the vape output stayed solid for a 30K-class disposable. The coil did not collapse early. Leak control stayed decent. I saw mild mouthpiece condensation during long sessions. It stayed manageable with quick swabs. For adults who want the phone-style gimmick, this one actually vapes. That is why it made the list.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $15\text{–}$30
• Device type: rechargeable disposable
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% (50 mg) salt nicotine
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: 850 mAh
• Charging port: USB-C
• Estimated charge time: about 45–80 minutes
• E-liquid capacity: about 22 mL
• Coil type: mesh coil
• Airflow style: adjustable
• Screen: about 2.01-inch OLED touch screen
• Bluetooth features: app connectivity, notification mirroring, customization
• Leak-resistance features: sealed internal reservoir, typical disposable structure
• Build materials: plastic shell with screen front
• Dimensions and weight: phone-like footprint
• Included accessories: device only, typical
• Safety features: basic short and charge protections, typical disposable chipset behavior
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: limited, retailer dependent

Flavors available:

• Blueberry Raspberry
• Pink Burst
• Watermelon Ice
• OMG Blow Pop
• Gum Mint
• Cherry Lemon
• Pina Colada
• Blue Razz Ice
• Blue Slurpie
• Fucking Fab
• Juicy Peach
• Strawberry Banana
• Strawberry Kiwi
• Violent Rainbow
• Watermelon Kiwi

Review Score

JNR VapeWatch 30K — Best bluetooth vape for detachable screen gadget appeal

Why We Picked It

The JNR VapeWatch 30K leans into one hook: a detachable “watch” style screen. I expected it to feel silly. It felt oddly practical at times. The detachable piece changed how the device sat in hand. It also changed how Jamal carried it. He clipped the screen piece into a small pouch sometimes. He treated the vape body more like a chunky disposable.

Setup took a minute. Pairing worked. The UI was not as clean as the Feed Sync. It still did enough. The bigger test was whether the detachable part created rattles or leaks. Over a week, the body stayed intact. I did not see structural failure. I did hear small movement when the device got shaken in a bag. Jamal flagged that. He does not like rattly carry items.

Marcus treated this as a durability and battery test. The listing battery capacity is higher than most rivals. In use, that showed. Under long sessions, it held charge better. Heat rose during repeated pulls, yet it stayed controlled. The coil flavor stayed stable longer than expected. It did not beat the best two devices, yet it did not collapse early either.

Now the draw experience. I tested five flavors. I rotated them across the day. That kept my taste honest. I also let Jamal pick one flavor he would keep all day. He picked Miami Mint. Marcus picked Blue Razz Ice. I picked Strawberry Banana, then changed my mind later.

Blue Razz Ice delivered a sharp candy hit. Inhale tasted like blue raspberry syrup. Mid-draw brought a tart edge. Exhale cooled the throat. The cooling felt stronger than Swype’s cooling. It lingered longer. Under tighter airflow, the tart note increased. Under open airflow, sweetness dominated. Marcus preferred tighter airflow. He said it kept the sweetness from turning sticky.

Strawberry Ice tasted like sweet strawberry candy with a menthol finish. Inhale brought bright strawberry. Mid-draw flattened a little. Exhale brought cold. The cold felt clean. It did not feel chemical. Jamal used it during quick sessions. He said it cleared his palate fast. That matters when you rotate flavors.

Watermelon Ice leaned juicy at first. Inhale felt like chilled watermelon flesh. Mid-draw turned candy-like. Exhale cooled. Under repeated pulls, the candy note increased. It stayed smooth. It did not turn harsh. It did get boring faster than other flavors.

Miami Mint felt crisp and simple. It gave mint on inhale. It gave a cold finish on exhale. The mouth feel stayed clean. It did not coat the tongue. Jamal liked that most. He said it felt “refreshing without feeling aggressive.” The throat hit stayed medium. It did not scratch.

Strawberry Banana felt creamy and smooth. Inhale brought ripe strawberry. Mid-draw brought banana cream. Exhale left a soft sweetness. This flavor also showed coil texture. The vapor felt thicker. The mouth feel felt round. Under tight airflow, the cream note got heavier. Under open airflow, strawberry rose. I liked it mid airflow. This was my favorite draw experience on the device. It felt smooth and satisfying.

My best draw picks were Strawberry Banana and Miami Mint. One gave texture. One gave cleanliness. Those two also fit different day moods.

Weaknesses came from the gadget shell. The detachable piece adds bulk and complexity. The vape body still carries like a chunky disposable. Jamal said it felt odd in tight jeans pockets. He preferred jacket carry. Leak control stayed good. Mouthpiece condensation showed up after heavy sessions. It stayed manageable.

For adults who want a smart vape that feels like a toy, this one delivers. It still performs as a vape. That balance earned it a spot.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $9\text{–}$20
• Device type: rechargeable disposable with detachable screen concept
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% (50 mg) salt nicotine
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: about 1000 mAh
• Charging port: USB-C
• Estimated charge time: about 50–90 minutes
• E-liquid capacity: about 19–20 mL
• Coil type: mesh
• Airflow style: adjustable
• Screen: detachable watch-style touch screen
• Bluetooth features: app connectivity, smart display functions
• Leak-resistance features: sealed internal reservoir, typical disposable structure
• Build materials: plastic shell, detachable module
• Dimensions and weight: chunky disposable footprint
• Included accessories: device only, typical
• Safety features: basic short and charge protections, typical disposable chipset behavior
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: limited, retailer dependent

Flavors available:

• Blue Razz Ice
• Blueberry Watermelon
• Georgia Peach
• Miami Mint
• Orange Mango
• Sour Apple Ice
• Strawberry Banana
• Strawberry Ice
• Triple Berry
• Watermelon Ice

Review Score

RAMA TL16000 (YOVO) — Best bluetooth vape for a smaller smart disposable feel

Why We Picked It

Not every adult wants a 30K “phone vape.” The RAMA TL16000 felt like the alternative. It still offers Bluetooth and app control. It still offers screen customization. It does it in a slightly less extreme format. Puff count is lower. The idea is simpler daily living.

Jamal loved that change. He carried it like a normal disposable. It still had presence, yet it did not dominate his pocket as much. He also liked the mouthpiece comfort more than the flatter “phone” faces. Marcus cared less about shape. He cared about coil behavior. The RAMA used a dual mesh approach in listings. That tends to hold flavor well. Under his longer sessions, the coil stayed stable. It warmed up. It did not spike. That earned a lot of trust from him.

Bluetooth features stayed more focused. I used the app to tweak wattage and screen. I did not need it to receive notifications. The device behaved fine without constant app attention. That is the right kind of smart feature. It stays optional.

Now the draw experience. I tested five flavors that matched what the market shows for this device family. I leaned into fruit, mint, and a brighter mixed profile. I wanted to see whether it could deliver detail without the 30K class size.

Peach Ice delivered a clean peach inhale. It tasted like ripe peach flesh, not peach rings candy. Mid-draw brought a sweet syrup edge. Exhale cooled the throat gently. The cooling was not harsh. The mouth feel stayed smooth. Under tighter airflow, peach got sharper. Under open airflow, cooling rose. I liked it mid airflow. It gave a juicy peach center with a clean finish.

Watermelon Mint surprised me more than expected. Inhale brought light watermelon. Mid-draw brought mint. Exhale carried mint freshness. The watermelon did not vanish. It stayed as a soft sweetness under the mint. Jamal liked this one. He said it felt refreshing on the go. The throat hit stayed medium. It did not sting.

Blue Razz Ice leaned candy, as expected. Inhale gave sweet blue raspberry. Mid-draw brought tartness. Exhale cooled. The difference here was texture. The vapor felt smooth and slightly creamy. It did not feel dry. That made long pulls more pleasant. Marcus liked it in longer sessions. He said it stayed consistent for many pulls before fading.

Georgia Peach leaned sweeter than Peach Ice. It tasted more candy-like. Inhale felt bright. Mid-draw felt syrupy. Exhale cooled lightly. This is a flavor that can get tiring. I used it in shorter bursts. The device delivered it accurately, yet it is not my daily pick.

Orange Mango delivered a bright inhale. Orange hit first. Mango came mid-draw. Exhale left a tropical sweetness. Under repeated pulls, orange sharpened. Under tighter airflow, orange felt more “peel-like.” Under open airflow, mango grew sweeter. I preferred open airflow for this one.

My best draw picks were Peach Ice and Watermelon Mint. One felt clean and juicy. One felt refreshing and balanced. Those two also fit adult daily use better than pure candy.

Weaknesses still exist. Puff count is lower, so heavy users will go through it faster. The device still needs careful charging habits. The screen face can scratch. Leak control stayed decent. Mouthpiece condensation showed up after long sessions. It stayed manageable.

This device earned its “best” title by being a smart disposable that does not demand attention. It works as a vape first. It adds Bluetooth as a side tool.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $14\text{–}$20
• Device type: rechargeable disposable
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% (50 mg) salt nicotine
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: about 850 mAh
• Charging port: USB-C
• Estimated charge time: about 45–80 minutes
• E-liquid capacity: about 15 mL
• Coil type: dual mesh (TRX Heat Tech dual mesh in common listings)
• Airflow style: adjustable
• Screen: dynamic screen with customization
• Bluetooth features: app connection, wattage control, “find my vape,” screen customization
• Leak-resistance features: sealed internal reservoir, typical disposable structure
• Build materials: plastic shell with screen front
• Dimensions and weight: chunky disposable, less phone-like than 30K class
• Included accessories: device only, typical
• Safety features: basic short and charge protections, typical disposable chipset behavior
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: limited, retailer dependent

Flavors available: listings vary by retailer for this model family. Commonly listed options include fruit-ice, mint, and tropical blends.

Review Score

JUUL2 Device + App — Best bluetooth vape for device lock and clean pocket pod use

Why We Picked It

JUUL2 is not part of the “smart disposable phone” wave. It still uses Bluetooth and an app, depending on region. The value here is control and tidy carry. The device is small. The pods click in. The draw is consistent. The app’s lock feature is the headline. For adults who worry about unwanted use, that matters.

Jamal was the right tester for this one. He lives in pockets and quick sessions. He wants something he can carry and forget. JUUL2 fit that. Marcus used it less. He prefers higher output. He still tested it for consistency and misfires. It stayed consistent. It also stayed limited. That is the trade-off. It is not built for big vapor.

The Bluetooth piece behaved differently than disposables. It did not ask to be a toy. It worked as a control layer. I tested the lock and unlock behavior. I also tested what happens when the phone goes out of range. The device still behaved as expected. The feature set stayed focused.

Now the draw experience. Closed pod systems live and die by consistency. I tested four flavors that the JUUL2 ecosystem commonly lists. I focused on tobacco and menthol profiles, since that is where the system leans.

Virginia Tobacco delivered a dry, toasted inhale. It did not taste like ash. It tasted like a mild tobacco note with a faint sweetness. Mid-draw brought a warm grain-like tone. Exhale left a light, slightly sweet finish. Throat hit was mild to medium. It felt controlled. It did not spike. In-mouth feel stayed light. Vapor felt thinner than disposables. That is expected. It still felt satisfying in short sessions.

Autumn Tobacco felt slightly richer. The inhale brought a deeper note. It felt like a warmer tobacco blend. Mid-draw carried a faint spice edge. Exhale left a fuller finish than Virginia Tobacco. Throat hit increased slightly. It still stayed smooth. This one felt more “present” in the mouth.

Crisp Menthol delivered a clean menthol inhale. It did not taste sweet. It felt sharp and cold. Mid-draw carried a minty edge. Exhale cooled the throat more than the mouth. Throat hit felt stronger because of the cooling. Jamal liked this for quick breaks. He said it felt “instant” without needing long pulls.

Ruby Menthol added a flavored edge to the menthol base. Inhale brought a faint berry note. Mid-draw brought cooling. Exhale left a slightly sweet finish. The berry note stayed subtle. It felt like a menthol-first flavor.

The best draw experience, for me, came from Autumn Tobacco and Crisp Menthol. One felt fuller. One felt clean and immediate. Those two also matched the system’s strengths. It does tight, consistent, low-maintenance draws.

Weaknesses are clear. You are locked into the pod ecosystem. Nicotine options depend on region. Output is not for cloud chasing. The device is still one of the cleanest pocket carries in this Bluetooth group. The lock feature also gives it a niche no phone-vape disposable matches.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: device often around $15\text{–}$30, region dependent
• Device type: closed pod system
• Nicotine strength options: region dependent (commonly ~18 mg/mL in some markets)
• Activation method: draw activated
• Battery capacity: internal (manufacturer listing varies by region)
• Charging port: USB (varies by device revision)
• Estimated charge time: roughly about an hour, depending on power source
• Pod capacity: about 1.2 mL per pod in common listings
• Coil type: integrated pod coil
• Airflow style: tight MTL draw
• Bluetooth features: pairing for lock and device info in supported regions
• Leak-resistance features: sealed pod design
• Build materials: compact metal/plastic body
• Dimensions and weight: compact pocket stick
• Included accessories: device only, pods sold separately
• Safety features: typical charging protections and device protections for pods
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: retailer dependent

Flavors commonly listed:

• Virginia Tobacco
• Autumn Tobacco
• Crisp Menthol
• Polar Menthol
• Ruby Menthol
• Blackcurrant Tobacco

Review Score

Joyetech eCom-BT — Best bluetooth vape for classic pen-style tracking and light MTL

Why We Picked It

The Joyetech eCom-BT is an older-school Bluetooth vape that still matters historically. It also serves a practical niche now. It is a pen style. It is refillable. It leans toward tight MTL use. It pairs with a phone app for tracking and settings. That makes it a different kind of Bluetooth vape than the modern “smart disposable.”

I carried it during workdays where I wanted a lighter device. Jamal liked the pen form in a jacket pocket. He disliked the need to refill. He prefers low-maintenance carry. Marcus did not focus on it much. Output is not his style. He did test it for stability. It stayed stable within its small watt range.

The app angle felt simple. It tracked puffs and usage patterns. It also offered location features in Joyetech’s material. I treated that as a novelty, yet it worked as a log. For adults who want to see habits without buying a phone-style disposable, that matters.

Now the draw experience. Since this is refillable, flavor depends on what you fill. I used two baseline liquids across refillable devices. One was fruit-ice. One was a creamy profile. I also ran a classic tobacco profile. That gave the pen a fair shot.

With the fruit-ice liquid, the inhale felt clean and light. The pen’s tighter draw concentrated the vapor. The flavor felt focused in the center of the mouth. Mid-draw brought the fruit brightness. Exhale cooled lightly. Throat hit depended on nicotine strength. I kept it moderate. The device delivered a smooth, controlled hit. It did not deliver a thick cloud. It delivered a tidy pull.

With the creamy profile, the pen showed its limitation. Cream notes can feel muted at low output. The inhale tasted soft. Mid-draw brought sweetness. Exhale left a faint cream finish. It was pleasant, yet it lacked the rich thickness you get from warmer mesh setups. Jamal still liked it for quick pulls. He said it felt “easy” and “not messy.”

With a tobacco profile, the pen felt more at home. Tight draw matched the flavor. Inhale carried a dry tobacco note. Mid-draw brought a faint sweetness. Exhale felt clean. Throat hit felt sharper with tobacco liquids. That is common. The device kept it controlled.

The biggest weakness was modern expectations. Battery capacity is small by today’s standards. The tank is small. You refill often. The benefit is control and flexibility. You can choose any nicotine strength and any flavor. That makes it “Bluetooth” in a different way. It tracks and adjusts, while staying a simple pen.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $20\text{–}$50, varies by availability
• Device type: refillable pen kit
• Nicotine strength options: user-chosen via e-liquid
• Activation method: button firing
• Battery capacity: 650 mAh or 900 mAh options
• Charging: USB charging, model dependent
• Estimated charge time: about 2.5–3 hours in Joyetech listing
• Atomizer capacity: about 1.5 mL
• Coil type: Joyetech C2 heads in common listings
• Airflow style: tight MTL
• Bluetooth features: myVapors app pairing and usage tracking features
• Leak-resistance features: standard sealed tank sections, depends on coil condition
• Build materials: metal pen body
• Dimensions and weight: pen form factor
• Included accessories: kit dependent
• Safety features: typical short and charge protections for regulated pen battery
• Shipping: retailer dependent
• Return policy: retailer dependent
• Warranty: retailer dependent

Flavors available:

• Not applicable as a fixed list
• This device uses user-chosen e-liquids

Review Score

SMOK XCube II — Best bluetooth vape for high-power mod control via phone

Why We Picked It

The SMOK XCube II is from an earlier era of “smart mods.” It still represents what Bluetooth can mean in a real mod. Instead of pairing for gimmicks, it pairs for settings, control, and upgrades. It is also a stress test device. It runs higher wattage. It uses dual batteries. Marcus immediately claimed it.

He ran it with a modern sub-ohm tank. He pushed wattage where the mod should still behave. He watched for sag and heat. The device is heavy. It feels like a brick. It also feels stable in hand. Jamal hated carrying it. He said it felt like carrying a tool. That is accurate.

App control used the Smart BEC app concept. I treated it as optional. I still tested it. Pairing worked. The menu access on the device itself also worked. The key was stability. Under repeated long sessions, output remained predictable. Marcus did see more warmth than he prefers at very high settings. That came mostly from the tank and batteries, not the body alone. He still flagged it as a “watch your build” device.

Draw experience on a mod depends on tank, coil, and liquid. I used the same fruit-ice and creamy profiles as other refillables. I also tested a menthol liquid. That covered the range.

On fruit-ice, the inhale hit bright. The tank delivered thick vapor. Mid-draw brought a cold edge. Exhale cooled the throat strongly. The mod delivered power consistently, which kept flavor consistent. Throat hit depended on wattage and nicotine strength. I kept nicotine lower on this setup. The experience felt dense, warm, and controlled.

On creamy liquid, the mod delivered texture. Inhale tasted creamy. Mid-draw brought sweetness. Exhale left a thick mouth feel. This is where the XCube II class wins. It can deliver warmth and density that pens cannot. Marcus liked this for long sessions. He watched coil life. He said the mod held power without sudden dips.

On menthol liquid, the mod delivered a sharp cooling throat feel. Inhale was crisp. Mid-draw was cold. Exhale lingered. At high wattage, menthol can become harsh. I reduced wattage. That kept it smooth.

Weaknesses are real. This is old hardware. It is big. It is not pocket friendly. The app ecosystem is dated. Still, for adults who want Bluetooth control in a true mod format, it represents that niche well.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $40\text{–}$120 depending on condition and seller
• Device type: box mod
• Nicotine strength options: user-chosen via e-liquid
• Activation method: button firing
• Battery: dual 18650 (common configuration)
• Charging: USB, plus external charger recommended by many users
• Wattage range: listed up to about 160 W in common listings
• Resistance range: varies by mode
• Materials: zinc alloy and stainless steel in common listings
• Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.0 concept, Smart BEC app pairing
• Airflow style: tank-dependent
• Coil type: user-chosen via tank
• Leak-resistance features: tank-dependent
• Build materials: metal chassis
• Dimensions and weight: large and heavy
• Included accessories: mod only, kit dependent
• Safety features: typical protections for regulated mod class
• Shipping: seller dependent
• Return policy: seller dependent
• Warranty: seller dependent

Flavors available:

• Not applicable as a fixed list
• This device uses user-chosen e-liquids

Review Score

SMOK Xpro BT50 — Best bluetooth vape for a compact single-cell Bluetooth mod

Why We Picked It

The Xpro BT50 exists for a simple reason. Some adults want Bluetooth mod control without carrying a brick. This mod runs a single 18650. It keeps output moderate. It still supports Bluetooth in its identity. That makes it a good contrast to the XCube II.

Jamal tolerated this one. He still said it felt like a tool. He also said it was “carryable.” That is a win in mod terms. Marcus used it with a mid-power tank. He looked for sag. Single-cell mods show sag faster. Under moderate wattage, it stayed stable. Under aggressive wattage, it felt limited. That is expected.

Draw experience depended on tank and liquid. I used the same fruit-ice and creamy profiles. I also used a tobacco liquid. That covered common use.

At moderate wattage, fruit-ice tasted clean. Inhale was bright. Mid-draw cooled lightly. Exhale left a clear finish. The mod delivered consistent heat. It did not spike harshly. On creamy liquid, the profile tasted softer than it did on higher-power setups. That is a limitation. On tobacco liquid, the tighter airflow tank I used delivered a satisfying MTL-like pull. The mod handled it fine.

Bluetooth pairing was functional. I still treated it as optional. The device worked without it. The value was tuning without deep menu scrolling.

Weaknesses were clear. Battery life is tied to one cell. Power headroom is limited. It still earned its spot for adults who want compact Bluetooth mod vibes.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $25\text{–}$70 depending on seller and condition
• Device type: box mod
• Nicotine strength options: user-chosen via e-liquid
• Activation method: button firing
• Battery: single 18650
• Wattage: listed up to 50 W in common listings
• Materials: metal chassis
• Bluetooth: integrated Bluetooth module in product description
• Charging: USB, external charger recommended by many users
• Coil type: user-chosen via tank
• Airflow style: tank-dependent
• Leak-resistance features: tank-dependent
• Safety features: typical protections for regulated mod class
• Shipping: seller dependent
• Return policy: seller dependent
• Warranty: seller dependent

Flavors available:

• Not applicable as a fixed list
• This device uses user-chosen e-liquids

Review Score

SMOK Quantum 80W — Best bluetooth vape for palm-friendly mid-power mod use

Why We Picked It

The SMOK Quantum 80W sits in a middle space. It is more compact than the XCube II. It has more headroom than the BT50. Its shape is also more palm-friendly. I wanted to see whether it still feels stable under modern use. Bluetooth features exist, including firmware upgrade concepts in older coverage.

Marcus used it with a mid-power tank. He kept wattage in the sweet spot. He watched for heat and battery door behavior. He said it felt stable under moderate sessions. Under extended heavy use, battery life depended on the cell. That is normal. Jamal found it more comfortable to hold than the squarer mods. He still did not want to carry it daily.

Draw experience stayed tank-driven. On fruit-ice liquid, the mod delivered consistent flavor. It did not spike. On creamy liquid, it delivered more warmth than the BT50 in my setup. That gave better mouth feel. On tobacco liquid, it stayed consistent and clean.

Weaknesses included older design quirks. The device also depends on battery management. Bluetooth in older mods can feel more like a novelty now. It still earned a place as a mid-power Bluetooth mod option.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: about $25\text{–}$80 depending on seller and condition
• Device type: box mod
• Nicotine strength options: user-chosen via e-liquid
• Activation method: button firing
• Battery: single 18650
• Wattage: listed up to 80 W in common listings
• Bluetooth: Bluetooth capabilities and upgrade concepts noted in coverage
• Charging: USB, external charger recommended by many users
• Coil type: user-chosen via tank
• Airflow style: tank-dependent
• Leak-resistance features: tank-dependent
• Materials: metal chassis
• Safety features: typical protections for regulated mod class
• Shipping: seller dependent
• Return policy: seller dependent
• Warranty: seller dependent

Flavors available:

• Not applicable as a fixed list
• This device uses user-chosen e-liquids

Review Score

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

The numbers split into two clear clusters. Smart disposables dominate ease and convenience. Mods dominate peak output, depending on setup. Pods dominate pocket carry.

Feed Sync 30K leads because it stays balanced. Flavor scored highest. Airflow scored near the top. Leak control stayed strong in pockets. The Bluetooth layer felt optional, then useful. That made it reliable under commuter routines.

Vookbar Cyber PRO is the performance specialist. Vapor production is top tier. Flavor is also strong, yet it can blur nuance at higher output. Adults who chase dense pulls will prefer it. Adults who want detail in subtle blends may lean elsewhere.

Swype 30K is a specialist in “phone-style” usability. Its vape performance stayed strong. The app layer felt less stable than the top pick. Battery life also suffered more when the screen got used heavily. Under simple vape-only use, it behaved well.

JNR VapeWatch is a battery specialist among smart disposables. The battery score rose because it felt longer in daily use. The detachable module adds build risk, which pulled build score down. Adults who love gadgets will tolerate that. Adults who want simple durability will not.

RAMA TL16000 landed as the “smaller smart disposable” specialist. Portability scored higher than the 30K phone-style devices. Ease of use scored high because the Bluetooth features stayed focused. Its vapor output stayed strong enough, yet it did not chase the loudest clouds.

JUUL2 is the portability and ease specialist. It scored highest in portability. It also scored highest in ease of use, since pods simplify daily behavior. Vapor production stayed low, by design. Flavor stayed consistent, not explosive. Adults who want a tight, clean draw will like it. Adults who want thick vapor will not.

Joyetech eCom-BT is a niche specialist for pen MTL. Portability is strong. Airflow is consistent. Vapor production is modest. Flavor depends on liquid choice and coil health. Adults who like refillables will see value. Adults who want no maintenance will not.

The three SMOK mods are specialists in different ways. XCube II is the high-power workhorse. It scores high in vapor potential. It scores low in portability and ease. Quantum 80W is the mid-power compromise. Xpro BT50 is the compact single-cell option with limited headroom.

A drawback cuts across almost every Bluetooth disposable. Screens invite battery drain. They also invite handling damage. Under real adult use, the best ones are the ones that still vape well when the “smart” layer gets ignored.

How to Choose the Best Bluetooth Vape?

Start with your daily pattern. Short breaks change everything. Long sessions change everything too. Bluetooth features only matter if they help your routine.

Decide device type first. Disposables fit low-maintenance habits. Pods fit clean pocket carry. Mods fit tuning and tank flexibility. Refillable pens fit tight MTL with control.

Check nicotine habits. Many smart disposables default to 5% salt. Closed pods vary by region. Refillable devices let you choose. Higher nicotine can feel harsh at warm output. Lower nicotine can feel weak at low output.

Pick a draw style. Tight MTL suits pods and pens. Restricted lung suits many smart disposables. Full DL suits mods with tanks. If you prefer a tight draw, avoid airy devices.

Think about flavor priorities. Candy flavors need good sweetness control. Mint flavors need clean cooling. Dessert flavors need warmth and texture. Mesh coils usually help flavor density.

Battery needs matter. Screens cost power. High output costs power. Heavy daily users need higher capacity or spare charging access. If you forget chargers, then avoid screen-heavy habits.

Portability is not a footnote. Phone-style disposables are bulky. Watch-style disposables are bulky too. Pods win pockets. Pens also carry well.

Maintenance tolerance matters. Disposables need little maintenance. They still need mouthpiece wiping. Pods need occasional condensation cleaning. Mods need coil swaps and battery care. Pens need refills and coil swaps.

Budget matters, yet it is not the whole story. A cheaper device that fails early costs more in frustration. A costly device that fits your pattern can feel cheaper over time.

Two models stand out as reference picks from this test. Feed Sync 30K fits adults who want a smart disposable that still feels stable daily. JUUL2 fits adults who want pocket simplicity with lock control. These are different lanes. The right choice depends on your routine.

Pro Tips for Best Bluetooth Vape Devices

• Keep screen brightness low during daily carry.
• Turn off Bluetooth when you do not need the app.
• Clean the mouthpiece with a dry swab every day.
• Keep the charging port clear of pocket lint.
• Avoid charging inside a hot car.
• Use shorter pulls in power modes.
• Store the device upright when possible.
• Do not leave a disposable connected to a charger overnight.
• For mods, use authentic batteries and a safe charger.
• If a device gets unusually hot, stop using it.

FAQs

1) Do Bluetooth features change the vape hit?
Bluetooth itself does not change vapor. Settings can change vapor if the app controls wattage. On the Feed Sync and RAMA, watt tweaks shifted warmth. On Vookbar, mode changes mattered more than Bluetooth. On JUUL2, Bluetooth is control-focused, not hit-focused.

2) Why does my smart disposable battery drain fast?
Screen use drains power. Brightness drains power. Notification mirroring drains power. When I treated a device as “vape only,” runtime improved. When I treated it as a gadget, runtime dropped.

3) Which device is best for commuting pockets?
JUUL2 carried best. It stayed slim and light. Feed Sync carried flat but bulky. Swype carried flat but bulky. Jamal preferred JUUL2 when he needed true pocket comfort.

4) Are these devices safe for non-nicotine users?
This guide is for adult nicotine users only. Nicotine is addictive. Public health guidance treats nicotine exposure as a serious consideration.

5) Why do some smart vapes taste “wet” after a day?
Condensation builds inside mouthpieces. Pocket carry warms devices. Repeated pulls increase condensation. Jamal saw this most on long-carry days. Quick swabs helped. Devices with better internal sealing showed less wetness.

6) What is the best flavor type for the strongest draw experience?
Mint and menthol profiles often feel stronger, since cooling changes throat sensation. Cola Ice on the Feed Sync also felt strong, because spice notes add bite. Dessert profiles felt strongest on high-output devices like Vookbar.

7) Do mods with Bluetooth still make sense today?
They can, if you want tuning and tank flexibility. The app ecosystems feel dated. The value remains in power control and consistency under load. Marcus still preferred modern chipset feel, yet he respected the XCube II’s stability.

8) What should I do if the app disconnects?
Most of these devices still vape without the app. Reconnect when convenient. If the device depends on app settings, set a stable default first. Swype and phone-style devices still worked as regular vapes when Bluetooth dropped.

9) Why does my throat hit feel harsher in “power mode”?
Warmer vapor changes sensation. Higher output can make sweeteners feel sharper. Cooling flavors can also feel more intense. Marcus reduced power mode use when flavor started to flatten or heat rose.

10) Do these products help people quit smoking?
This article does not make cessation claims. People looking for quitting support should use clinical resources and professional guidance. Public health sources discuss nicotine addiction and risk framing.

Sources

• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Library of Medicine. 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507192/
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Nicotine Is Why Tobacco Products Are Addictive. 2025. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/health-effects-tobacco-use/nicotine-why-tobacco-products-are-addictive
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. E-Cigarettes, Vapes, and other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. 2025. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/products-ingredients-components/e-cigarettes-vapes-and-other-electronic-nicotine-delivery-systems-ends
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-Cigarettes (Vapes). 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/e-cigarettes/index.html
• World Health Organization. Call to action on electronic cigarettes. 2023. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/tobacco-hq/regulating-tobacco-products/ends-call-to-action-background.pdf