The 10 Best Spearmint Vape Devices

Spearmint is a narrow target. Many “mint” vapes drift into menthol ice, wintergreen, or candy chill. I wanted a list where spearmint stays recognizable on the tongue. That meant looking for a clean gum note, a soft herbal edge, and an exhale that does not turn sharp.

For this guide, I compared ten high‑visibility devices that sell in large numbers. I leaned on published spec sheets, long‑form reviews, and broad retailer listings. Marcus Reed focused on heavy‑use stress signals in the design. Jamal Davis focused on pocket behavior and daily carry details. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed language around risk and warnings.

Across devices, we tracked draw feel, airflow options, and coil style. We also weighed battery size, charge port type, and leakage controls. Flavor notes stayed subjective. In the end, the goal stayed simple. Pick a “best” device in each spearmint‑leaning niche for adult users.

Our Verdict: What’s the best Spearmint vape

Best Overall: Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint

This pick lands in the middle of the category. The shape stays pocketable. The draw is steady, and the coil style tends to hold spearmint clarity longer than many older cotton‑heavy builds. Battery size is typical, yet the USB‑C top‑ups keep it practical during commutes. The trade‑off is simple. It lacks advanced screens or modes. Adult users who want a straightforward spearmint‑forward disposable will fit best. Heavy users who chase extreme puff counts will prefer the large‑tank options.

Top Picks

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1220 4.7
Elf Bar BC5000 Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1222 4.5
Breeze Pro Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1420 4.2
RAZ CA6000 Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1218 4.3
Flum Pebble Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1420 4.1
Hyde Edge Recharge Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1218 4.0
Fruitia x Fume 8000 Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1828 4.4
RAZ DC25000 Jewel Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1525 4.6
Mr Fog Max Air MA8500 Double Spearmint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1825 4.3
Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K Cool Mint Spearmint stays clear; dependable draw; mainstream availability Flavor drift possible; local restrictions; disposable waste Adult nicotine users who want mint‑forward draw 1528 4.4

Compare the best Spearmint vapes

Device Overall Score Price Device Type Nicotine Range Activation Battery E‑Liquid Coil Airflow Flavor Focus Best For
Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint 4.7 1220 Rechargeable disposable Usually 5% salt nicotine Draw 650 mAh 13 mL Mesh Fixed Spearmint / gum‑mint clean spearmint gum vape for balanced everyday MTL
Elf Bar BC5000 Spearmint 4.5 1222 Rechargeable disposable Commonly 5% salt nicotine Draw 650 mAh 13 mL Dual coil or mesh listing varies Fixed Spearmint / gum‑mint classic spearmint vape for simple, no‑screen reliability
Breeze Pro Spearmint 4.2 1420 Disposable Often 5% salt nicotine Draw 1000 mAh 6 mL Mesh Adjustable Spearmint / gum‑mint pocket‑safe spearmint vape for short sessions
RAZ CA6000 Spearmint 4.3 1218 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw 650 mAh 10 mL Mesh Fixed Spearmint / gum‑mint crisp spearmint vape with an easy readout
Flum Pebble Spearmint 4.1 1420 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw ~600 mAh 10–14 mL (listing varies) Mesh Fixed Spearmint / gum‑mint soft‑touch spearmint vape for jacket pockets
Hyde Edge Recharge Spearmint 4.0 1218 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw 600 mAh 10 mL Coil type varies by batch Adjustable Spearmint / gum‑mint spearmint vape for adjustable airflow on a budget
Fruitia x Fume 8000 Spearmint 4.4 1828 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw 700 mAh 17–18 mL Mesh Fixed Spearmint / gum‑mint long‑run spearmint vape for flavor‑first clouds
RAZ DC25000 Jewel Spearmint 4.6 1525 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw ~800 mAh 16 mL Mesh Adjustable Spearmint / gum‑mint spearmint vape with modes and a real screen
Mr Fog Max Air MA8500 Double Spearmint 4.3 1825 Rechargeable disposable Varies by market, often 5% or 20 mg/mL Draw 600 mAh 17 mL Mesh Top adjustable Spearmint / gum‑mint spearmint vape for top‑airflow control
Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K Cool Mint 4.4 1528 Rechargeable disposable 5% salt nicotine Draw ~850 mAh 16 mL Triple mesh Adjustable Spearmint / gum‑mint high‑end spearmint‑leaning vape for extreme endurance

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We used the same scoring rubric across every device. It is built for adult nicotine users. The rubric stays focused on product behavior. It avoids health outcomes. It also avoids cessation language.

Flavor
We treated flavor as a sensory report. We looked for spearmint identity. We noted sweetness level. We tracked cooling level. We watched for flavor “mud” after many draws. We also watched for off‑notes that can show up late.

Throat hit
We described throat hit as a feel on inhale. We did not turn that feel into advice. We treated “smooth” as a mix of draw resistance and vapor temperature. We treated “sharp” as sudden sting at the back of the throat.

Vapor production
We evaluated vapor output as a practical signal. More vapor can mean higher consumption. Less vapor can mean weak wicking. We matched output to the device’s intent. Tight MTL does not need huge clouds.

Airflow and draw smoothness
We tracked how the airflow path feels. Some devices pull like a cigarette. Others pull airy. We also noted turbulence. A noisy draw often points to poor airflow shaping. An uneven draw can hint at coil wetting issues.

Battery behavior
Battery behavior includes runtime and stability. We watched for fast drain on higher output modes. We tracked charge port type. We tracked charge time when listed. We also flagged designs that place heat near the mouthpiece.

Leak and condensation control
We watched for two issues. One issue is liquid weeping. Another issue is condensation pooling. Mouthpiece design matters here. Top airflow can help, yet it can also dry the coil if tuned badly. We scored higher when a device design includes clear airflow paths that reduce spitback.

Build quality and durability
We judged fit, finish, and seam quality. We also judged mouthpiece feel. A poor seam can open in a pocket. A soft coating can feel good, yet it can trap lint. We weighed those trade‑offs.

Ease of use and maintenance
Disposables are simple by design. Still, indicators matter. A simple battery light can prevent dead‑in‑pocket moments. A screen can help, yet screens add failure points. We scored ease of use as the effort required to keep performance stable.

Portability
Portability includes size, shape, pocket comfort, and accidental damage risk. Jamal’s notes weigh heavily here. A device that rolls in a car console gets marked down. A device with sharp edges also gets marked down.

Reliability over time
Reliability is the hardest to judge without long use. We used repeated reports from established reviewers and broad user feedback. We also looked for patterns. Burnt taste patterns matter. Misfire patterns matter. Any safety concerns must be treated seriously. Dr. Walker’s role stays clinical. He frames risk in neutral terms. He also reminds readers to seek medical care for persistent symptoms.

best Spearmint vapes: Our Testing Experience

Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint

Why We Picked It

This device sits in the “daily driver” lane. That lane matters for spearmint. A mint profile gets tiring when the draw turns harsh. A calmer platform helps.

I focused on how the shell behaves in pockets. The curved body reduces hard edges. Jamal kept returning to that point. He wanted something he can carry during commutes. He also wanted a mouthpiece that stays comfortable on short pulls.

Marcus pushed it harder in longer sessions. He watched for heat buildup near the top. The reported behavior tends to stay stable. That fits the design. A mid‑size battery with USB‑C supports frequent top‑ups.

On draw feel, the pull tends to land in a tight MTL zone. The airflow feels guided, not airy. Spearmint likes that. The flavor sits on the front of the tongue. A tighter pull keeps the sweetness from spreading too wide.

Flavor notes varied across listings. Still, the common thread stayed clear. Spearmint reads like gum. It leans sweet. Cooling stays present, yet it does not dominate. When the coil stays wet, the inhale feels smooth. The exhale leaves a clean mint finish.

I compared that spearmint profile against other mint‑leaning flavors in the same platform. Lemon Mint often pushes a sharper citrus edge. It can cut through palate fatigue. Watermelon Ice shifts sweet and cold, then spearmint fades. Blue Razz Ice stays candy‑heavy. It hides any herbal mint note.

Under normal use, Spearmint stayed the best draw profile here. It keeps the identity intact. It avoids heavy menthol bite. That matters for adult users who dislike throat sting.

Weakness shows up in the same place as many compact disposables. It has no power modes. It has no airflow switch. If the draw feels too tight, there is no adjustment. Heavy users may also burn through liquid fast during long pulls. That is not a flaw of the brand. It is the nature of a 13 mL disposable.

In this category, it wins on balance. The spearmint tastes like spearmint. The draw stays consistent. The form factor fits daily carry.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1220
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: Usually 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 650 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 13 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Fixed
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.8 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.5 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.6 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.7 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.6 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.4 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.7 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.9 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.5 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.7 Weighted blend of category scores.

Elf Bar BC5000 Spearmint

Why We Picked It

This platform remains a reference point. Many later disposables copied its size. That makes it a useful baseline for spearmint.

Jamal focused on reliability cues. He likes devices that do not ask questions. The BC5000 stays simple. It slides into a pocket. It also resists accidental activation, since it is draw‑only.

Marcus looked for coil longevity patterns in reports. The BC5000 shows a common trend. Flavor stays strong early. Later, sweetness can flatten. Mint can turn “cool air” instead of mint leaf. That shift happens when the coil runs hot or the liquid runs low.

Spearmint on this device often reads like a clean gum note. Some batches lean sweeter. Others lean greener. When the blend lands right, the inhale feels calm. The throat hit stays present, yet it does not spike. That makes it easier for longer evenings.

To judge draw experience beyond spearmint, I compared a few popular flavors that sit near mint. Miami Mint often adds a light citrus edge. Blue Mint can drift toward wintergreen. Lemon Mint can feel sharper on inhale.

Spearmint stayed the most direct mint choice in that set. It does not play games. The draw keeps a tight MTL feel. Vapor output stays moderate. It does not flood the mouth with dense vapor.

The main trade‑off is feature set. There is no screen. There is no airflow slider. A device like that is less “fun” on paper. Yet for adult users, simplicity can be the point. It also reduces parts that fail.

The other trade‑off is the confusing spec landscape. Listings vary on coil wording. Some call it dual coil. Others call it mesh. That mismatch makes careful buying harder. In practice, the performance range stays similar. Flavor output stays strong. The draw stays steady.

For a spearmint‑first user who wants a familiar disposable, this device earns its place.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1222
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: Commonly 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 650 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 13 mL
  • Coil: Dual coil or mesh listing varies
  • Airflow: Fixed
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.6 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.3 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.4 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.5 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.4 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.2 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.5 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.7 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.3 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.5 Weighted blend of category scores.

Breeze Pro Spearmint

Why We Picked It

Not every spearmint fan wants a long‑tank brick. Some adult users want short sessions. They also want a device that feels stable in a pocket. This is where Breeze Pro fits.

Battery size stands out. Listings often show 1000 mAh. That is high for this size class. Juice volume stays smaller than the 5000‑puff crowd. The result is simple. You recharge less. You replace the device sooner.

Jamal liked that rhythm. He vapes in short bursts. A two‑thousand puff target aligns with that style. He also noticed the adjustable airflow. A small adjustment changes the spearmint feel. A tighter pull pushes gum sweetness forward. A looser pull spreads cooling across the palate.

Marcus treated it as a stress test for heat. A larger battery can allow longer pulls. That can push the coil. Reports suggest the mesh coil keeps up. Still, long pulls can mute the mint. Spearmint loses detail when vapor gets too warm.

Draw experience on Spearmint is direct. The inhale hits with a sweet mint edge. Then a clean cooling note follows. The exhale leaves a faint sugar note. It resembles spearmint gum more than mint tea.

I compared three nearby flavors to map the platform. Gum Mint has more candy chew. Cool Mint often adds stronger ice. Mint‑fruit blends can hide spearmint behind sweetness.

Spearmint stayed the clearest mint read. It also stayed less icy than many “ice” blends. That makes it easier for repeated draws.

The weakness is obvious. The puff count is lower. For heavy users, that means frequent replacements. It also means more cost over time. Another drawback shows up in the mouthpiece shape. Some users love it. Others feel it sits wide.

For adults who want spearmint with airflow control, this is a strong pick.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1420
  • Device type: Disposable
  • Nicotine options: Often 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 1000 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 6 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Adjustable
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.3 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.0 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.1 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.2 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.1 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 3.9 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.2 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.4 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.0 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.2 Weighted blend of category scores.

RAZ CA6000 Spearmint

Why We Picked It

This device sits in the “value long‑run” lane. It aims beyond 5000 puffs. It also adds a simple e‑liquid indicator. That helps adult users avoid dry pulls.

Jamal cared about the duckbill mouthpiece. It tends to sit comfortably during quick pulls. He also liked that the indicator reduces guessing. Dead‑in‑pocket moments are annoying.

Marcus looked at the mesh coil notes. He tends to see mesh as more stable under repeated use. Spearmint can show coil fatigue fast. A mesh build often keeps mint sharper longer.

On draw feel, the airflow lands medium‑tight. It does not feel as tight as some OS5000 units. It also does not feel airy. Spearmint comes through with a crisp top note. Then a slightly sweet mid note follows. Cooling sits in the background.

This device also handles spearmint in a “cleaner” way than many candy mints. The blend feels less syrupy. Adult users who dislike sugar‑heavy profiles tend to prefer that.

I checked how the platform handles other profiles that can stress coils. Fruity ice blends can gunk up coils. When that happens, spearmint turns dull. Reports suggest this model stays fairly consistent until late.

The weak point sits in portability. The body is chunkier than a BC5000. It can print in thin pants. Jamal flagged it for gym shorts. It also has fewer “premium” features than newer screen devices.

For a spearmint‑forward disposable that adds an indicator, it earns a niche win.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1218
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 650 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 10 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Fixed
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.1 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.2 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.3 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.2 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.0 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.3 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.5 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.1 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.3 Weighted blend of category scores.

Flum Pebble Spearmint

Why We Picked It

Flum Pebble is a carry‑comfort device. The rounded body changes daily use. Jamal kept pointing to that. He cares about edges. He also cares about finish. A soft coating reduces slip. It also feels less cold in winter.

Spec listings vary across sellers. Some show 10 mL. Some show 14 mL. Puff count stays near six thousand. Battery listings also move around. That variation matters. It suggests multiple runs. It also suggests reseller copy issues.

Still, the core experience is consistent across reports. Draw activation is simple. The airflow sits medium. Vapor is smooth for the class.

Spearmint flavor here leans gentle. The inhale starts sweet. Then a soft herbal mint note emerges. Cooling stays light. That makes it less icy than many mint disposables. Adult users who dislike “ice” will notice.

Marcus tested the concept of long pulls. He worries about heat in rounded bodies. A soft coating can hide warmth. Reports still suggest acceptable heat control. The device is not a high‑power unit. That helps.

I compared Spearmint against a few Flum profiles that share mint notes. Icy mint options push colder exhale. Watermelon lemon mint adds fruit sugar. Spearmint stays the cleanest draw in the set.

The downside is clarity late in the tank. When liquid is low, mint can fade. Sweetness can take over. A screen device can help avoid that. This device has no screen. It asks you to judge by feel.

For adult users who want comfort in hand, and a softer spearmint, this device makes sense.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1420
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: ~600 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 10–14 mL (listing varies)
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Fixed
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.2 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 3.9 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.0 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.1 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.0 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 3.8 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.1 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.3 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 3.9 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.1 Weighted blend of category scores.

Hyde Edge Recharge Spearmint

Why We Picked It

Hyde Edge Recharge is a known name. It is also older than many newer screen devices. That can be good. It often means fewer complicated parts.

This device shows up with adjustable airflow in many listings. Jamal values that. He can tighten the pull for a cigarette‑like hit. He can loosen it while walking outdoors.

Marcus treated it as a durability check. Older designs sometimes show weak seals. That can lead to condensation in the mouthpiece. Reports are mixed. Some users get clean runs. Others get a bit of spitback late.

Spearmint blend on this device reads classic. It is minty. It feels cool. It also stays close to gum. When airflow is tightened, the spearmint feels thicker on the tongue. When airflow opens, the cooling takes over.

Battery and port details vary by seller. Some list micro‑USB. That is dated. It also means slower cable availability. USB‑C is easier today. If a unit ships with micro‑USB, that becomes a practical drawback.

I compared Spearmint against fruit‑mint mixes from the same line. Fruit blends can feel sticky. They can also leave residue on the coil. Spearmint stays cleaner. Coil life tends to benefit.

The weakness is feature age. There is no screen. There is no liquid indicator. There is also uncertainty across production runs. Adult buyers should read packaging carefully. That matters for nicotine strength labels too.

For a budget spearmint vape with airflow control, it remains a reasonable pick.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1218
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 600 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 10 mL
  • Coil: Coil type varies by batch
  • Airflow: Adjustable
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.1 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 3.8 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 3.9 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.0 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 3.9 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 3.7 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.0 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.2 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 3.8 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.0 Weighted blend of category scores.

Fruitia x Fume 8000 Spearmint

Why We Picked It

This device is built for long sessions. It carries a large liquid load. That matters for spearmint. Mint can stay consistent when the coil stays well fed.

Jamal treated it as a “bag carry” device. It is larger than a BC5000. It can feel bulky in slim pockets. In a backpack, it is easy.

Marcus focused on heat behavior under repeated pulls. A larger tank invites longer use. Reports suggest the 700 mAh battery and mesh coil keep output steady. Still, long sessions can warm the body.

Spearmint in this platform often reads bright. The inhale hits with sweet mint first. A clean cooling note follows. The exhale stays crisp. It does not lean strongly wintergreen. That keeps spearmint identity clearer.

I also looked at other flavors in the lineup. Blue Slushy and Bomb Pop are sweet and cold. White Gummy is candy. Those profiles can drown the palate. Spearmint offers a reset. It feels “cleaner” after heavy fruit.

The mouthpiece shape matters here. A wide mouthpiece can gather condensation. Reports suggest manageable control, yet it is still a long‑run disposable. Wipe habits matter.

The trade‑offs are size and price. It costs more up front. It also adds waste in a bigger format. Adult users who want endurance may accept that.

In the spearmint lane, it wins as a long‑run flavor device. It also suits heavier draw patterns.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1828
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 700 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 17–18 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Fixed
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.2 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.3 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.4 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.3 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.1 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.4 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.6 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.2 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.4 Weighted blend of category scores.

RAZ DC25000 Jewel Spearmint

Why We Picked It

If you want features, this is the obvious lane. The device uses a screen. It also offers output modes. That changes the spearmint experience in a real way.

Jamal liked the screen. He can see juice level and battery level. That matters in a pocket. No surprise dead device. He also liked the airflow control. He could set it tighter for MTL.

Marcus used the “boost” concept to judge heat risk. Higher output can warm vapor. Spearmint can turn sharp when that happens. Reports suggest boost mode thickens vapor. It also makes cooling feel stronger. Some adult users love that. Others feel it tires the throat.

In regular mode, the spearmint profile stays calmer. Gum sweetness sits forward. Herbal mint follows. Cooling stays in the back. The exhale feels clean.

Boost mode shifts the profile. The inhale becomes denser. Sweetness spreads wider. Cooling snaps harder on exhale. It can feel more like “mint ice gum.” It can also flatten the herbal note.

From a user fit view, this is a spearmint device for people who like control. It is also for heavy users. Puff ratings target extreme longevity.

The downside is bulk. A screen device often grows in size. Jamal noted pocket printing. He also noted extra failure points. Screens can break. Mode switches can fail.

Another drawback is the temptation to chain vape. A high‑puff device invites it. Adult users should set their own limits.

For spearmint lovers who want a screen and modes, this is the category leader.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1525
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: ~800 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 16 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Adjustable
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.7 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.4 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.5 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.5 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.3 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.6 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.8 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.4 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.6 Weighted blend of category scores.

Mr Fog Max Air MA8500 Double Spearmint

Why We Picked It

Top airflow is the headline here. Condensation is a common spearmint annoyance. A top airflow path can reduce pooling near the mouthpiece. It can also change draw feel.

Jamal cared about that. He hates a wet mouthpiece during commuting. He also liked the mouthpiece material call‑outs in listings. Comfort matters in daily use.

Marcus focused on airflow effect on coil wetting. Top airflow can pull less liquid toward the coil on hard pulls. That can raise dry‑hit risk. Reports suggest this model keeps up when users avoid long dry pulls.

Double Spearmint aims at a stronger mint presence. It usually reads sweet and cool. It also carries a second mint layer that feels greener. That is the “double” effect in many blends.

On inhale, the mint hits quickly. It can feel like a soft mint candy. Then a fresh spearmint note rises. The exhale stays cool. Cooling does not feel like menthol punch. It feels like clean air.

I compared it against other MA8500 flavors with heavy sweetness. Those can gunk up coils. Spearmint tends to stay cleaner. That supports longer use.

The trade‑off is size. A 17 mL tank device is not tiny. It also costs more than small disposables. Another trade‑off is market variation in nicotine labels. Some markets list 20 mg/mL. Others list 50 mg. Adult buyers must read the box.

For a spearmint‑focused disposable that tries to manage condensation, it earns its slot.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1825
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: Varies by market, often 5% or 20 mg/mL
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: 600 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 17 mL
  • Coil: Mesh
  • Airflow: Top adjustable
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.1 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.2 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.3 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.2 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.0 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.3 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.5 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.1 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.3 Weighted blend of category scores.

Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K Cool Mint

Why We Picked It

This is the endurance monster in the group. It targets a very high puff count. It also uses a screen in many listings. Coil design is often listed as triple mesh.

Jamal treated it as a “bag device.” It is large. It is heavy for a pocket. In a car console, it fits fine. In a gym bag, it fits fine.

Marcus focused on heat. Triple mesh can produce dense vapor. Dense vapor can warm fast. The best reports describe acceptable stability. Still, long pulls can make mint feel sharper.

Cool Mint in this line is described as spearmint‑leaning. The inhale starts sweet. Then an arctic chill follows. The exhale stays icy. Spearmint identity shows up as a gum note under the chill.

For adult users who want pure spearmint, that can be a drawback. For users who like “cold mint,” it is a plus. This device sits closer to spearmint‑ice than plain spearmint.

I compared it mentally to smaller devices. Smaller devices often keep mint quieter. This device pushes output. It also pushes cooling.

The adjustable airflow helps. A tighter draw can reduce cold blast. It can also make the gum note more obvious. A looser draw increases cooling feel. It also spreads sweetness.

The trade‑off is obvious. It is a big disposable. That means higher cost, more waste. It also invites long use sessions.

For heavy users who want a spearmint‑leaning cold mint with extreme endurance, it fits.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Spearmint profile stays recognizable. Draw stays consistent for the device class. Hardware has mainstream availability. Disposable format adds waste. Mint clarity can fade near the end. Regional flavor limits can block shipping.

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: 1528
  • Device type: Rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine options: 5% salt nicotine
  • Activation: Draw
  • Battery: ~850 mAh
  • E-liquid capacity: 16 mL
  • Coil: Triple mesh
  • Airflow: Adjustable
  • Charging: USB‑C or micro‑USB, depending on model listing
  • Safety protections: Typically overcharge and short protection on rechargeable units
  • Warranty: Usually limited or none for disposables
  • Return policy: Varies by retailer
  • Available flavors: Spearmint line plus a broader fruit, ice, and tobacco set

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 Spearmint identity stays present through most of the tank.
Throat Hit 4.2 Mint cooling can feel sharper on longer pulls.
Vapor Production 4.3 Output matches the device intent and coil style.
Airflow/Draw 4.4 Draw stays steady with limited turbulence.
Battery Life 4.3 Battery size fits the listed liquid load and usage.
Leak Resistance 4.1 Condensation risk remains typical for disposables.
Build Quality 4.4 Fit and finish look solid for the price tier.
Ease of Use 4.6 Draw activation keeps operation simple.
Portability 4.2 Pocket fit depends on body size and edges.
Overall 4.4 Weighted blend of category scores.

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality Ease of Use Portability
Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint 4.7 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.7 4.9 4.5
Elf Bar BC5000 Spearmint 4.5 4.6 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.3
Breeze Pro Spearmint 4.2 4.3 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.0
RAZ CA6000 Spearmint 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.1
Flum Pebble Spearmint 4.1 4.2 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.1 4.3 3.9
Hyde Edge Recharge Spearmint 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.7 4.0 4.2 3.8
Fruitia x Fume 8000 Spearmint 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.4 4.6 4.2
RAZ DC25000 Jewel Spearmint 4.6 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.4
Mr Fog Max Air MA8500 Double Spearmint 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.1
Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K Cool Mint 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.4 4.6 4.2

Numbers tell a pattern. The mid‑size 5000‑puff class stays balanced. Lost Mary OS5000 and Elf Bar BC5000 sit here. Their scores lean steady across flavor, draw, and usability. They also keep portability acceptable. Adult commuters tend to like that shape.

RAZ DC25000 pushes higher overall. The score comes from features and control. The screen reduces guesswork. Modes let users tune output. That control can also create sharper throat feel. Boost mode users report stronger cooling. Regular mode stays calmer. Heavy users often prefer this device.

Fruitia x Fume 8000 and Mr Fog MA8500 show a different profile. Large liquid volume supports long sessions. Flavor can stay strong for longer. Portability drops. These bodies feel bulky in thin pockets. A bag carry fits better.

Breeze Pro and Hyde Edge Recharge lean toward practical carry. Breeze Pro has a large battery for its puff class. It suits short sessions. Hyde adds airflow control, often at a lower price. It can feel dated. Port type can be micro‑USB. That is a real drawback.

Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K targets endurance. It tends to feel colder. It also pushes denser vapor. Adult users who chase “cold mint” will like it. Users who want plain spearmint may find it too icy.

Flum Pebble sits in a comfort lane. The soft feel matters for daily carry. Flavor leans gentle. It can fade late. It still suits adults who want a softer spearmint without aggressive ice.

No score is a safety guarantee. The numbers reflect product behavior and user‑facing performance. If irritation or persistent symptoms occur, medical evaluation matters.

How to Choose the best Spearmint vape?

Start with nicotine strength. Many spearmint disposables ship at 5% salt nicotine. That can feel intense. If tolerance is lower, then a lower strength matters. Some markets offer 2% or 0%. Packaging varies.

Next, decide on draw style. Tight MTL fits spearmint gum profiles. It keeps flavor focused. A looser draw spreads cooling. Users who like cold mint may prefer that.

Then look at device size. A 5000‑puff body fits pockets. A 20,000‑puff body often prints. Bag carry changes the math. Jamal’s view stays simple. If a device annoys you in a pocket, then you stop using it.

Check charging port type. USB‑C is easier today. Micro‑USB still appears on older designs. That is a hassle during travel.

Consider indicators. A screen helps. A simple light helps too. No indicator means surprises. A dry coil makes spearmint taste harsh.

Think about airflow control. Adjustable airflow helps tune throat feel. Fixed airflow is simpler. Some adults prefer that.

Budget matters, yet it is not the only factor. Lower price often means lower puff count. It can also mean older hardware.

For reference, two models stand out from this set. Lost Mary OS5000 Spearmint fits most adult users who want a simple spearmint draw. RAZ DC25000 Jewel Spearmint fits adults who want control, longer endurance, and screen feedback.

Pro Tips for best Spearmint vape

  • Keep mint devices away from heat in cars.
  • Wipe the mouthpiece daily, especially after long sessions.
  • Store the device upright in a pocket when possible.
  • Take shorter draws when the flavor starts to flatten.
  • Charge before the battery is fully drained.
  • Avoid charging on soft bedding or near liquids.
  • If the draw feels tight, clear the airflow with a gentle puff.
  • Use the indicator, then stop before the tank is empty.
  • Rotate flavors to reduce palate fatigue.

FAQs

What does “spearmint” usually taste like in a disposable?
Most blends aim at spearmint gum. Sweetness leads. Cooling follows. Herbal notes vary by brand.

Why does spearmint sometimes turn harsh near the end?
Liquid level drops. Coil wetting gets uneven. Mint cooling then feels sharper. Dry pulls also taste rough.

Is spearmint the same as menthol?
No. Spearmint is a mint flavor. Menthol is a cooling compound note. Many vapes mix them.

What device type keeps spearmint most consistent?
Mesh‑coil disposables tend to hold mint clarity longer. Consistency still varies by run.

Do screens change flavor?
A screen does not change flavor. It changes how you manage the device. You avoid dry pulls easier.

Why do some “cool mint” vapes taste less like spearmint?
Cooling can dominate. It masks the herbal mint note. The blend becomes “cold air” instead of mint.

Can I travel with these devices?
Rules vary by airline and region. Carry‑on rules often apply. Sealed storage reduces leaks.

How do I reduce condensation on mint vapes?
Shorter draws help. Keep the device upright. Wipe the mouthpiece. Top airflow designs can help.

What if nicotine feels too strong?
Stop using it. Choose a lower strength next time. Do not try to “push through” discomfort.

Sources

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Academies Press. 2018. https://www.nationalacademies.org/projects/HMD-BPH-16-02/publication/24952
  • World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes: tobacco factsheet. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Covered Tobacco Products and labeling and warning statement. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/labeling-and-warning-statements-tobacco-products/covered-tobacco-products-and-roll-your-own-cigarette-tobacco-labeling-and-warning-statement
  • Yang B, et al. The Role of the FDA-Mandated Addiction Warning and E-Cigarette Harm Beliefs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019. National Library of Medicine. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7174095/
About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.