The 10 Best Menthol Vapes

Menthol can expose weak hardware fast. A thin coil tune makes it sharp. A loose pod seal makes it wet. A hot chipset makes it bite.

I picked ten devices that show up everywhere in real buying carts. Some are disposables. Some are closed pods. Some are refillable pods. Each one got pushed through the same carry routine.

I ran the plan with Marcus Reed and Jamal Davis. Marcus leans into higher output. Jamal lives on pocket carry. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed wording on safety and claims. I tracked battery behavior, leaks, draw feel, and how menthol holds up.

Our Verdict: What’s the best Menthol vape

Best Overall: Geek Bar Pulse — Best Screen-and-Mode Menthol vape

Across the ten, it stayed the most consistent under normal daily use. Menthol stayed crisp instead of turning thin. The airflow felt smooth in both modes. The screen also reduced guesswork mid-day. It is still a disposable, though. That trade-off matters for cost and waste. For adult users who want strong menthol clarity with low fuss, it ranked first.

Top Picks

Device Pros Cons Ideal For Price Overall Score
Geek Bar Pulse Dense flavor, clear screen, strong mint options Disposable cost, larger body Menthol fans who want punchy draws 1525 4.6
Vaporesso XROS 4 Clean flavor, stable pods, strong daily carry Pods are consumables, setup needed Refillable menthol salts with control 2540 4.5
Vaporesso LUXE XR Max Huge battery, strong vapor, wide coil range Bulkier, more settings Heavy users who want cool RDL/DL menthol 3545 4.4
OXVA XLIM Pro Tight airflow control, sharp flavor Small pod capacity, pod wear varies MTL menthol precision 2025 4.4
Uwell Caliburn G3 Smooth draw, strong coils, easy carry Smaller battery than some peers Beginners who want refillable menthol 2028 4.4
Elf Bar BC5000 Easy, reliable, wide mint catalog Disposable cost, no real tuning Simple menthol grab-and-go 1222 4.4
Lost Mary OS5000 Soft mouthfeel, smooth cooling Disposable, less airflow tuning Cooler menthol without harsh edges 1222 4.4
VOOPOO Argus P2 Feature set, stable output, solid build Pods are 2 mL common, more steps Pocket pod with modes 2035 4.4
Vuse Alto Very consistent pods, clean swaps Smaller battery, limited flavors Closed-pod menthol consistency 1020 4.3
JUUL Device Compact, simple, strong portability Low vapor, limited tuning Tight draw menthol in a tiny device 1020 4.2

Compare the best Menthol vapes

Device Device Type Nicotine Range Activation Battery Pod / Liquid Coil Airflow Style Menthol Strength Feel Price Overall Score
Geek Bar Pulse Rechargeable disposable 5% common Draw 650 mAh Pre-filled Dual mesh Mode-based Bold, icy, flavor-dense 1525 4.6
Elf Bar BC5000 Rechargeable disposable 50 mg common Draw 650 mAh 13 mL listed Mesh Fixed Smooth, sweet-leaning mint 1222 4.4
Lost Mary OS5000 Rechargeable disposable 5% listed Draw 650 mAh 13 mL listed Mesh Fixed Rounded cooling, softer bite 1222 4.4
Vuse Alto Closed pod 1.8–5% varies Draw 350 mAh listed 1.8 mL pod Pod coil Tight MTL Clean menthol, steady hit 1020 4.3
JUUL Device Closed pod 3–5% options Draw Compact ~0.7 mL pod Pod coil Tight MTL Crisp, light vapor 1020 4.2
Vaporesso XROS 4 Refillable pod User-chosen Draw / button 1000 mAh 3 mL listed Integrated pod coil Adjustable Accurate menthol, less sweetness 2540 4.5
Uwell Caliburn G3 Refillable pod User-chosen Draw / button 900 mAh 2.5 mL listed Integrated mesh Adjustable Smooth mint detail, clean finish 2028 4.4
OXVA XLIM Pro Refillable pod User-chosen Draw 1000 mAh 2 mL listed Integrated pod coil Side AFC Tight menthol snap, precise 2025 4.4
VOOPOO Argus P2 Refillable pod User-chosen Draw 1100 mAh 2 mL listed Integrated pod coil Adjustable Cool RDL option, stable output 2035 4.4
Vaporesso LUXE XR Max Pod-mod User-chosen Button 2800 mAh 5 mL listed GTX replaceable MTL to DTL pods Big, cold vapor with room 3545 4.4

Key spec references: Geek Bar Pulse (puff modes and screen).
Elf Bar BC5000 (battery and capacity listing).
Vaporesso XROS 4 (battery and pod capacity listing).
Uwell Caliburn G3 (battery and pod capacity listing).
OXVA XLIM Pro (battery listing).
VOOPOO Argus P2 (battery listing).
Vuse Alto (battery and pod listing).
JUUL U.S. authorization and menthol pod listings.
Vaporesso LUXE XR Max (battery and pod capacity listing).

What We Tested and How We Tested It

Every device ran through the same baseline. Each one had a short warm-up window. Then it moved into daily rotation. I kept notes on repeatability. Marcus logged heavy sessions. Jamal logged pocket carry and quick hits.

Flavor testing started with menthol-forward options. For disposables and closed pods, we stayed inside the brand’s catalog. For refillables, we used the same two menthol liquids. One was a clean menthol. One was a sweeter mint blend. That gave a stable reference point.

Draw feel got checked at three points. First, the first ten pulls after a fresh charge or fresh pod. Next, mid-life, after normal pocket carry. Afterwards, low-battery behavior. Marcus watched for heat rise. Jamal watched for gurgle after quick sessions. I watched for output wobble and misfires.

Throat hit got treated as subjective. Nicotine strength differences can dominate the sensation. Airflow can shift it too. We described the feel in plain terms. We did not frame it as health advice. Dr. Walker required that boundary.

Vapor production got judged by density at normal pulls. We avoided stunt pulls. Marcus also tested longer pulls on devices that allow it. If the device got hot, that got logged. If the mouthpiece got wet, that got logged.

Airflow and draw smoothness came from two uses. One was slow, MTL pulls. The other was quicker, casual pulls. Jamal’s routine exposed whistles and turbulence. Marcus exposed restriction limits under higher output.

Battery life was not a lab number. It was real carry behavior. I tracked how many sessions I got per charge. I also watched charging heat, charge speed, and port wobble. Abnormal warmth mattered. A steep battery drop mattered.

Leak and condensation control got measured by inspection. We checked the pod bay. We checked the mouthpiece. We also checked pocket lint behavior. A device that stays clean in a pocket matters under real circumstances.

Build quality and durability came from handling. Buttons, doors, pods, and finish got evaluated. Jamal did pocket drop checks from waist height onto a hard surface. That was limited. We did not try to break devices.

Ease of use included setup time, learning curve, and day-two friction. A device can feel great. It can still be annoying. Refills, pod swaps, charging cables, and screens all mattered.

Reliability over time included misfires, blinking errors, and taste drift. Marcus was strict on coil fade. Menthol can hide coil burn early. We treated that as a risk. When a device masked wear, we noted it.

Menthol vapes: Our Testing Experience

Geek Bar Pulse — Best Screen-and-Mode Menthol vape

Why We Picked It:

Menthol demands clarity. This device pushed clarity hard. I kept it in a jacket pocket during commutes. The screen reduced that nagging doubt. Battery icon stayed visible. Liquid indicator stayed visible. That changed how I carried it. I took fewer “test pulls” just to check life.

Marcus treated it like a stress toy. He leaned into the higher output mode. He watched for heat around the body. Warmth showed up, yet it stayed controlled. The draw did not collapse late in the battery. That mattered for his profile. Jamal cared about pocket feel. The shape is larger than a stick. It still stayed manageable. He flagged the glossy areas for scratch pickup.

Now the draw experience, which is where menthol either lands or fails. With Miami Mint, the first inhale felt dry and clean. Cooling hit the tongue first. Then it moved up the throat. The mint stayed forward, but it avoided toothpaste notes. On exhale, the cooling lingered. It did not spike into a sharp edge. The mouth feel stayed “fluffy,” not wet. That kind of texture matters under quick sessions.

With Cool Mint, the cooling felt brighter. The mint note leaned greener. The inhale carried a sharper top note. Then, after two seconds, a softer sweetness showed up. That sweetness can be a pro or a con. I preferred it in shorter pulls. In longer pulls, it started to feel candy-like.

With Watermelon Ice, the menthol acted like a frame. Fruit sat inside it. The inhale opened with cold air feel. Watermelon arrived mid-draw. It stayed juicy. The exhale gave a chilled finish, with less mint and more “ice.” That helped Jamal. He dislikes heavy mint. He still wanted cooling.

With Orange Mint Savers, the mint played backup. Orange came first. Cooling carried the citrus. The draw stayed smooth, yet the flavor felt more layered. Marcus said the higher mode made citrus pop. He also said it ran warmer, which is expected.

Two flavors stood out for pure menthol draw quality. Miami Mint delivered the cleanest mint line. Cool Mint delivered the strongest cooling bite. For adult users who want screen feedback and strong menthol presence, this one earned its slot.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Strong menthol clarity, consistent flavor Disposable cost adds up
Screen reduces guesswork Larger body than slim sticks
Mode option changes density Limited control beyond modes
Good leak control for a disposable Flavor list can overwhelm new users

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: typical 1525 range
  • Device Type: rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine Strength Options: 5% common listing
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 650 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, typical under 60 minutes
  • Coil Type/Resistance: dual mesh, dual core listing
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: pre-filled, screen shows e-juice level
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: mode-based airflow change
  • Flavor Range: large catalog with mint, ice, fruit-ice options
  • Vapor Production: high in the stronger mode
  • Leak-Resistance Features: sealed disposable structure
  • Build Materials: molded shell with integrated screen
  • Dimensions and Weight: pocketable, but chunkier than a stick
  • Safety Features: typical protections are not fully disclosed
  • Shipping, Return Policy, Warranty: seller-dependent for disposables
  • Flavors available (sample set from brand page): Miami Mint, Cool Mint, Blue Mint, Watermelon Ice, Orange Mint Savers, IceyMintz, PepperMintz, Forest Mint variants depend on region, many fruit-ice options

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.8 Mint notes stayed dense, even late battery.
Throat Hit 4.6 Cooling felt firm without harsh scratch.
Vapor Production 4.8 Strong mode delivered thick, cold clouds.
Airflow/Draw 4.7 Smooth pull with low whistle risk.
Battery Life 4.3 Solid for a disposable, screen helps pacing.
Leak Resistance 4.6 Mouthpiece stayed drier than most disposables.
Build Quality 4.5 Screen and shell felt consistent in daily carry.
Ease of Use 4.7 No setup, screen gives simple feedback.
Portability 4.2 Carryable, yet bulkier than slim pods.
Overall 4.6 Most balanced menthol experience in the set.

Vaporesso XROS 4 — Best Refillable Menthol vape for daily carry

Why We Picked It:

Refillables win when menthol needs precision. This device pushed that kind of control. I ran it as my “desk to car” carry. It slipped into pockets easily. The aluminum body felt solid. The battery stayed predictable.

Marcus used it as a reality check. He does not baby pods. He chain-pulled during evening sessions. The pod kept up better than older slim pods. Heat stayed moderate. Jamal focused on mouthpiece comfort and pocket lint. The pod top stayed clean. The draw did not get noisy after a day.

For the draw experience, refillables show texture more honestly. With a clean straight menthol salt, the inhale felt crisp, almost like chilled air through a narrow straw. Cooling landed on the front palate. Then it slid backward. The exhale felt dry, not syrupy. That dryness is what many menthol users chase.

With a spearmint blend, the inhale carried a soft sweetness. The mint note felt rounder. Cooling stayed present, yet less sharp. Jamal preferred this one. It felt “easy” between errands.

With a menthol tobacco liquid, the device showed separation. Tobacco came first. Menthol arrived next. It did not blur into one note. The throat hit felt firmer here. That came from the liquid more than the device. Dr. Walker pushed us to keep that clear.

The pod airflow adjustment mattered. Tightened down, the menthol felt concentrated. Opened up, the cooling spread out. The sensation changed from “needle point” to “broad fan.” That kind of shift is hard to get from disposables.

Weakness showed up in one predictable place. Pods are consumables. After heavy use, the menthol started to flatten. Marcus noticed it sooner. He runs longer pulls. When the cotton started to tire, cooling stayed, but the mint note dulled. That is normal. It is still a cost.

For adult users who want a menthol device that can pivot between tight MTL and looser pulls, this ranked near the top.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Clean menthol detail with refillable liquids Pods wear, flavor fades over time
Stable battery for its size Setup and refilling add steps
Adjustable airflow supports tight MTL Not ideal for very high watt tastes
Solid build for pocket carry Needs spare pods on trips

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: commonly 2540 range
  • Device Type: refillable pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: user-chosen via liquid
  • Activation Method: draw and button options vary by setup
  • Battery Capacity: 1000 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, 2A listed
  • Coil Type/Resistance: XROS pods listed in 0.4Ω, 0.6Ω, 0.8Ω, 1.0Ω, 1.2Ω
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: 3 mL listed, CRC versions may differ
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: adjustable airflow control
  • Flavor Range: depends on liquid used
  • Vapor Production: moderate to strong, depending on pod
  • Leak-Resistance Features: pod fit and seals, depends on handling
  • Build Materials: aluminum alloy listed
  • Dimensions and Weight: compact, about 51.5 g listed
  • Included Accessories: device, pods, cable varies by kit
  • Safety Features: typical chipset protections are implied
  • Shipping, Return Policy, Warranty: seller and region dependent
  • Flavors available for this vape: refillable, depends on e-liquid choices

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.7 Menthol showed clean edges and good separation.
Throat Hit 4.5 Tight draw gave a firm, controlled hit.
Vapor Production 4.2 Solid density, not a cloud device.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Adjustment changed menthol feel in useful ways.
Battery Life 4.4 Reliable day carry for MTL routines.
Leak Resistance 4.4 Stayed clean with normal pocket use.
Build Quality 4.6 Body and pod fit felt sturdy.
Ease of Use 4.5 Simple interface, refill adds effort.
Portability 4.6 Slim shape worked for daily carry.
Overall 4.5 Best refillable balance for menthol control.

Vaporesso LUXE XR Max — Best Big-Battery Menthol vape for heavy sessions

Why We Picked It:

Menthol can shine with more airflow and more power. This device gave that option. I ran it at home, then in the car, then at the desk. The battery rarely stressed me out. That’s the point of 2800 mAh.

Marcus used it as his main stress tool. He ran higher output coils. He watched for hot spots. The body warmed, yet it stayed manageable. Jamal did not love the size. He still liked the grip. He said it felt “like a small gadget,” not a stick.

For draw experience, this kind of pod-mod changes menthol texture. With a straight menthol freebase in a DTL pod, the inhale felt wide and cold. Cooling spread across the tongue. It did not spike. The vapor volume made it feel thicker. The exhale carried a long, chilled tail.

With a mint gum style liquid, sweetness grew with power. I had to dial wattage down. At higher settings, it turned sticky. At lower settings, it felt clean. That’s the tuning story of this device. It gives you knobs. It also demands you use them.

With a menthol fruit blend, the cold acted like a fog. Fruit came in waves. Marcus said higher vapor volume made fruit taste “bigger.” He also noted coil life shifts. Heavy menthol can hide early coil fatigue. When the cotton started to dry, the warning sign was a thin mint note, not an obvious burn.

Weakness is day-to-day simplicity. This device takes more attention. Pods, coils, wattage, and fill routine all add friction. Jamal called it “not the one I grab on a rush.”

For adult users who want cold vapor with room to breathe, this one belongs in the list.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Massive battery supports long menthol sessions Bulkier pocket carry
Strong vapor with DTL option More settings and parts
Wide coil range supports tuning Coil changes add upkeep
Clearer cold texture at higher airflow Not ideal for minimalists

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often 3545 range
  • Device Type: pod-mod
  • Nicotine Strength Options: user-chosen via liquid
  • Activation Method: button-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 2800 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, 2A listed
  • Coil Type/Resistance: GTX coils, 0.2Ω and 0.4Ω listed among options
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: 5 mL listed
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: pods support MTL or DTL styles
  • Flavor Range: depends on liquid used
  • Vapor Production: strong, especially on lower resistance coils
  • Leak-Resistance Features: depends on pod choice and coil seating
  • Build Materials: typical Vaporesso body build, varies by finish
  • Included Accessories: device, pods, coils, cable varies by kit
  • Safety Features: chipset protections implied
  • Shipping, Return Policy, Warranty: seller dependent
  • Flavors available for this vape: refillable, depends on e-liquid choices

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 Menthol stayed clear after wattage tuning.
Throat Hit 4.4 Can be smooth or firm, depending on settings.
Vapor Production 4.8 High output delivered thick, cold vapor.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Airy pull suited menthol “wide chill.”
Battery Life 4.8 2800 mAh felt close to set-and-forget.
Leak Resistance 4.2 More parts means more chances for user error.
Build Quality 4.6 Solid feel, stable doors and pods.
Ease of Use 4.1 Coils and settings add friction.
Portability 3.8 Carryable, yet not discreet in pockets.
Overall 4.4 Best choice for heavy menthol sessions.

OXVA XLIM Pro — Best Tight-Draw Menthol vape for precision

Why We Picked It:

Menthol can get muddy when airflow is sloppy. This device let us clamp down the draw. I carried it during work breaks. It lived in my pocket without drama.

Marcus used it for sharper testing. He wanted to see if menthol stays “snappy” under longer pulls. He found it stayed stable at sensible wattage. Jamal liked the slim profile. He flagged one issue: 2 mL pods can feel small if you vape often.

Draw experience leaned into detail. With clean menthol salt, the inhale felt tight and cold. Cooling arrived quickly. The throat hit felt defined. The exhale stayed dry. It left a short chill on the lips. That kind of sensation is what many menthol users call “fresh.”

With a sweet mint liquid, the device kept sweetness under control. It did not turn syrupy, unless wattage climbed too far. The mint note stayed forward. Cooling stayed steady.

With a menthol berry blend, the berry showed up as a thin ribbon. Menthol framed it. Jamal liked this pairing. He said it felt “light” between errands.

Strength came from airflow control. A tiny slider shift changed the whole feel. That mattered more than I expected. Tight, it gave concentrated cooling. Opened, it felt airy and less biting. Under that kind of adjustment, you can match mood.

Weakness is pod economy. If you vape like Marcus, you refill often. If you want one fill to last half a day, this kind of capacity can frustrate you.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Very precise airflow for menthol concentration 2 mL pod capacity can feel limiting
Strong flavor accuracy with salts Pods are consumables
Slim pocket carry More refills for heavy users
Consistent output in normal ranges Not a cloud-focused device

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often about 2025
  • Device Type: refillable pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: user-chosen via liquid
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 1000 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C, 2A listed
  • Coil Type/Resistance: pods listed around 0.6Ω and 0.8Ω, plus other compatible options
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: 2 mL listed
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: side airflow control
  • Flavor Range: depends on liquid used
  • Vapor Production: moderate
  • Leak-Resistance Features: depends on pod seating and handling
  • Build Materials: zinc alloy and PCTG listed
  • Included Accessories: device, pods, cable, lanyard varies
  • Safety Features: typical protections implied
  • Flavors available for this vape: refillable, depends on e-liquid choices

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.6 Menthol stayed crisp with strong separation.
Throat Hit 4.4 Tight draw delivered a defined feel.
Vapor Production 4.3 Enough density without overheating.
Airflow/Draw 4.6 Slider changes were meaningful, not cosmetic.
Battery Life 4.3 Reliable for MTL day use.
Leak Resistance 4.3 Stayed clean with normal carry.
Build Quality 4.5 Solid body feel, stable pod fit.
Ease of Use 4.4 Simple, yet refilling adds a step.
Portability 4.6 Slim and pocket-friendly.
Overall 4.4 Best for menthol precision.

Uwell Caliburn G3 — Best Beginner Refillable Menthol vape

Why We Picked It:

Some devices make refillables feel like homework. This one stayed simple. I used it as my “loaner mindset” device. If someone asked, “What’s easy,” this is that kind of answer.

Marcus tested whether it holds stability under longer sessions. It did, within its normal range. Jamal liked the mouthpiece feel. He said it sat well between quick pulls.

For draw experience, menthol came through clean. With straight menthol salt, inhale felt smooth, not raspy. Cooling landed mid-palate. Then it moved down the throat. Exhale stayed tidy. The finish did not cling.

With a peppermint blend, the mint note felt thicker. It leaned closer to candy cane, yet it avoided the chalky vibe. Cooling stayed steady. Jamal preferred this profile.

With a menthol tea style liquid, the device showed subtlety. That surprised me. You could taste the “herbal” edge. Cooling framed it. It did not crush it.

Weakness showed up in battery scale. 900 mAh is fine. It is not endless. A heavy user will charge daily. That is real life.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Easy refillable learning curve Battery is smaller than some peers
Smooth menthol delivery with clean finish Pods wear over time
Good pocket carry shape Limited for big DTL pulls
Consistent day-to-day draw Small screen is basic

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often around 2028
  • Device Type: refillable pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: user-chosen via liquid
  • Activation Method: draw and button options exist by setup
  • Battery Capacity: 900 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C
  • Coil Type/Resistance: integrated mesh pods, 0.6Ω, 0.9Ω, 1.2Ω listed
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: 2.5 mL listed
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: adjustable airflow
  • Flavor Range: depends on liquid used
  • Vapor Production: moderate
  • Leak-Resistance Features: pod seals and fit
  • Build Materials: aluminum alloy listed
  • Included Accessories: device, pods, cable varies
  • Safety Features: typical protections implied
  • Flavors available for this vape: refillable, depends on e-liquid choices

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.6 Menthol stayed smooth and detailed.
Throat Hit 4.4 Firm with tighter airflow, still controlled.
Vapor Production 4.1 Good for MTL, not built for clouds.
Airflow/Draw 4.5 Adjustable draw stayed smooth.
Battery Life 4.2 One-day light carry, daily charging for heavy use.
Leak Resistance 4.2 Clean pod bay with normal use.
Build Quality 4.4 Solid feel, good fit and finish.
Ease of Use 4.4 Beginner-friendly refill routine.
Portability 4.7 Light, slim, easy pocket carry.
Overall 4.4 Best starter refillable for menthol.

Elf Bar BC5000 — Best Budget Menthol vape for easy grab-and-go

Why We Picked It:

This device shows up everywhere. That visibility matters. I used it as the baseline disposable. I wanted to see if menthol stayed clean across days.

Marcus used it for steady chain pulls. He found it stayed consistent, though it could thin near the end. Jamal liked the light weight. He said it felt easy in pockets.

For draw experience, Miami Mint leaned sweet and cool. Inhale felt soft. Cooling arrived gently. Exhale gave a lingering mint candy finish. It is less “dry menthol,” more “mint blend.”

With cooler ice profiles, the cooling felt stronger than the mint note. That gave a fresher finish. Jamal liked that. He avoids heavy mint flavors.

With fruit-ice styles, menthol framed the fruit. The device delivered a smooth, even draw. It did not sputter. Condensation stayed low for a disposable.

Weakness is control. You get what it gives. If the draw is too open, you cannot fix it. If you want less sweetness, you have to switch flavors.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Easy disposable menthol access No tuning or airflow control
Smooth draw with low fuss Disposable cost over time
Wide flavor catalog including mint lines Sweetness can dominate menthol purity
Portable and simple Flavor can thin near end-of-life

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often 1222
  • Device Type: rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine Strength Options: 50 mg listed on major listings
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 650 mAh listed
  • Charging Port and Estimated Charge Time: USB-C
  • Coil Type/Resistance: internal coil, mesh commonly reported
  • Pod/Tank Capacity: 13 mL listed
  • Airflow Style and Adjustability: fixed
  • Flavor Range: large catalog, mint and ice options included
  • Vapor Production: moderate
  • Leak-Resistance Features: sealed disposable body
  • Flavors available (examples): Miami Mint and other mint/ice variants depend on region

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.5 Strong sweetness with clear cooling.
Throat Hit 4.4 Smooth, medium punch at common strength.
Vapor Production 4.3 Consistent, not extreme.
Airflow/Draw 4.3 Easy pull, limited control.
Battery Life 4.2 Solid for the size, needs top-ups.
Leak Resistance 4.4 Stayed fairly dry for a disposable.
Build Quality 4.2 Basic shell, consistent enough.
Ease of Use 4.8 Almost zero learning curve.
Portability 4.5 Light and pocket-friendly.
Overall 4.4 Best budget-style menthol disposable feel.

Lost Mary OS5000 — Best Smooth-Mouthfeel Menthol vape

Why We Picked It:

Some menthol devices feel sharp. This one tends to feel rounded. I used it during evening sessions. That’s where harsh edges show up.

Marcus ran it hard to see if the smoothness hides coil fade. He found flavor stayed stable, then dipped late. Jamal liked the hand feel and mouthpiece comfort.

Draw experience with Forest Mint felt soft and cool. Inhale started with a mild mint note. Cooling arrived next, more like chilled air than a sting. Exhale left a clean finish, with less candy sweetness.

With mint-ice profiles, cooling built up over a few pulls. The device felt more comfortable in longer sessions than sharper disposables. Jamal said it was easier to use back-to-back.

With fruit-ice styles, cooling supported fruit. It stayed smooth. It did not feel jagged.

Weakness is still the disposable reality. No tuning. End-of-life flavor drop can arrive suddenly.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Rounded, smooth menthol draw No airflow tuning
Comfortable mouthpiece feel Disposable cost over time
Good portability Flavor drop late-life can be abrupt
Low maintenance Less control over sweetness

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often 1222
  • Device Type: rechargeable disposable
  • Nicotine Strength Options: 5% listed
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 650 mAh listed
  • Charging Port: USB-C listed
  • Puff Count: 5000 listed
  • Coil Type: mesh listed
  • E-liquid Capacity: 13 mL listed
  • Airflow: fixed
  • Flavors available (example shown): Forest Mint, plus other mint/ice variants by market

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Smooth mint tone, less sharp bite.
Throat Hit 4.5 Cooling felt firm, yet not scratchy.
Vapor Production 4.3 Steady medium density.
Airflow/Draw 4.2 Easy pull, little control.
Battery Life 4.2 Typical 650 mAh disposable pattern.
Leak Resistance 4.3 Stayed clean in pockets.
Build Quality 4.2 Solid enough for daily use.
Ease of Use 4.7 Straightforward disposable routine.
Portability 4.4 Pocketable shape, light carry.
Overall 4.4 Best for softer menthol texture.

Vuse Alto — Best Closed-Pod Menthol vape for consistency

Why We Picked It:

Closed pods can feel boring. They can also feel stable. I used it for “no-thought” mornings. Pop in a pod. Go.

Marcus found the output limited. He still respected the steadiness. Jamal liked the pocket carry. He also liked how little mess it created.

Draw experience with Menthol pods felt clean and steady. Inhale delivered a cool, straightforward menthol note. Vapor is lighter than big disposables. The cooling still landed clearly. Exhale stayed crisp. It did not feel syrupy.

The throat hit felt firm in higher strength pods. That is nicotine-driven. The airflow stayed tight. That tightness made menthol feel concentrated.

Weakness is variety. Menthol is menthol here. If you want layered mint profiles, this is not that system.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Very consistent menthol pod experience Smaller battery than many devices
Clean swaps, low mess Limited flavor variety
Tight draw suits menthol concentration Vapor output is modest
Good portability Ongoing pod cost

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: often 1020 for kits in online shops
  • Device Type: closed pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: varies by pod, 24 mg and 50 mg listings exist on retailers
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 350 mAh listed
  • Charging Port: magnetic USB listed
  • Pod Capacity: 1.8 mL listed
  • Coil Type: internal pod coil
  • Airflow Style: tight MTL
  • Flavor Range: limited, menthol is a core option

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.1 Clean menthol, less layered complexity.
Throat Hit 4.4 Tight draw supports a firm hit.
Vapor Production 4.0 Light-to-medium output.
Airflow/Draw 4.1 Consistent tight pull, little tuning.
Battery Life 3.8 Needs frequent charging for heavy use.
Leak Resistance 4.6 Pods stayed clean with low condensation.
Build Quality 4.3 Durable enough for daily carry.
Ease of Use 4.8 Simple pod swap routine.
Portability 4.5 Compact, easy pocket carry.
Overall 4.3 Best for closed-pod menthol steadiness.

JUUL Device — Best Authorized Menthol vape for tight-draw minimalism

Why We Picked It:

JUUL stays relevant for one reason. It is tiny. It is consistent. It also sits inside a narrower U.S. authorization story for menthol pods.

I used it as the “smallest possible” menthol tool. Marcus found it underpowered. That was expected. Jamal loved the portability. He said it disappears in a pocket.

Draw experience with Menthol pods felt crisp, yet light. Inhale delivered a clean menthol line. Vapor stayed thin compared with modern disposables. Cooling still hit the throat. Exhale felt short and tidy. It was not a long, foggy chill. It was a quick snap.

That snap worked for short sessions. It worked in a car. It did not satisfy Marcus for long sessions.

One big note on availability and regulation: the FDA announced marketing authorization for specific JUUL products, including menthol pods in 3% and 5%. That is a regulatory fact, not a performance claim.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Extremely portable, simple routine Low vapor output for many users
Tight draw concentrates menthol Limited tuning and airflow control
Consistent pod swaps Ongoing pod cost
Clear menthol “snap” Not ideal for heavy sessions

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: device often listed around $9.99 in the JUUL store
  • Device Type: closed pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: menthol pods listed at 3% and 5% in FDA authorization notice
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Pod Capacity: menthol pod listings show ~0.7 mL per pod
  • Charging: dock-style charging
  • Airflow Style: tight MTL
  • Flavor Range: menthol and tobacco focus for U.S. lineup

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.0 Clean menthol, limited depth.
Throat Hit 4.2 Tight draw gives defined sensation.
Vapor Production 3.8 Light output by modern standards.
Airflow/Draw 4.0 Very consistent tight pull.
Battery Life 3.7 Small device needs frequent charging.
Leak Resistance 4.5 Pods stayed tidy with low mess.
Build Quality 4.4 Solid, proven pocket durability.
Ease of Use 4.7 Simple pod routine, minimal settings.
Portability 4.7 Smallest carry advantage in the set.
Overall 4.2 Best tiny menthol device with tight draw.

VOOPOO Argus P2 — Best Feature-Rich Menthol vape in a pocket pod

Why We Picked It:

This device sits between simple pods and pod-mods. It gives modes. It still stays small. I used it as my “tinker a little” pocket carry.

Marcus liked the stability. He pushed longer pulls. He watched for weak delivery. It stayed steady. Jamal liked the pocket feel, though the finish can show wear.

Draw experience with menthol salt felt clean and punchy. Inhale brought cooling fast. The device delivered a slightly warmer vapor than ultra-tight pods. That warmth can make mint feel thicker. Exhale carried a longer chill.

With sweet mint, the flavor came forward more strongly in the higher mode. I had to dial back. Menthol can turn sticky if you push sweetness too hard.

Weakness is the small pod capacity. It is also the added complexity. Some adult users want zero thinking.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Modes add real tuning More settings than a basic pod
Solid battery for pocket use 2 mL pods require refills
Stable draw for menthol salts Finish can show pocket wear
Good build feel Not built for deep DTL clouds

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS:

  • Price: commonly 2035 depending on seller
  • Device Type: refillable pod system
  • Nicotine Strength Options: user-chosen via liquid
  • Activation Method: draw-activated
  • Battery Capacity: 1100 mAh listed
  • Charging Port: USB-C
  • Pod Capacity: 2 mL listed
  • Output: up to 30W listed
  • Airflow Style: adjustable
  • Flavor Range: depends on liquid used

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Flavor 4.4 Menthol stayed bold with good clarity.
Throat Hit 4.3 Firm hit, adjustable by power and airflow.
Vapor Production 4.2 Stronger than basic pods in higher mode.
Airflow/Draw 4.5 Smooth draw with useful adjustment range.
Battery Life 4.4 1100 mAh handled daily carry well.
Leak Resistance 4.3 Stayed tidy with proper pod seating.
Build Quality 4.5 Solid chassis and stable controls.
Ease of Use 4.3 Extra features add small learning curve.
Portability 4.3 Pocketable, slightly wider form.
Overall 4.4 Best pocket pod for feature balance.

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

Device Overall Score Flavor Throat Hit Vapor Production Airflow/Draw Battery Life Leak Resistance Build Quality/Durability Ease of Use Portability
Geek Bar Pulse 4.6 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.2
Vaporesso XROS 4 4.5 4.7 4.5 4.2 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.6
Vaporesso LUXE XR Max 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.2 4.6 4.1 3.8
OXVA XLIM Pro 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.6
Uwell Caliburn G3 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.7
Elf Bar BC5000 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.2 4.8 4.5
Lost Mary OS5000 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.7 4.4
VOOPOO Argus P2 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.3
Vuse Alto 4.3 4.1 4.4 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.6 4.3 4.8 4.5
JUUL Device 4.2 4.0 4.2 3.8 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.4 4.7 4.7

The “balanced” group lives near the top. Geek Bar Pulse stayed strong across flavor, vapor, and draw feel. Its battery score is lower than pod-mods. That is normal for a disposable. The screen reduced mid-day uncertainty. That matters in real carry.

XROS 4 sits as the most even refillable. It did not dominate one metric. It also did not fall apart in any metric. Menthol clarity stayed high. Airflow control shaped the feel. That made it flexible for different adult users.

LUXE XR Max is a specialist. Battery and vapor are the story. Menthol turns into a wide, cold fog with the right pod. Portability drops. Ease of use drops. Those are direct trade-offs.

Caliburn G3 and XLIM Pro land as “menthol precision” tools. They do not chase clouds. They chase draw quality. Jamal’s carry notes pushed both upward. Marcus still respected their stability.

Vuse Alto and JUUL land as “tight draw consistency” devices. They do not win on battery. They do not win on vapor. They win on low mess, predictable pulls, and tiny carry. Under certain routines, that kind of steadiness beats bigger vapor.

Elf Bar BC5000 and Lost Mary OS5000 sit as disposable comfort picks. They did not beat Pulse in density. They stayed easy. They also stayed portable. Flavor intensity stayed strong for the class.

How to Choose the best Menthol vape?

Menthol preference comes in two forms. Some want pure mint. Others want “ice” behind fruit. That decision changes your device fit.

Device type matters early. Disposables remove setup. Costs rise over time. Closed pods stay clean. Flavor choice stays narrow. Refillable pods give control. They also require routine.

Vaping style matters. Tight MTL concentrates menthol. It can feel sharper. Restricted DL spreads cooling wider. It can feel smoother. Marcus leaned toward bigger airflow. Jamal leaned toward tight pulls on the move.

Nicotine tolerance matters. Higher strength can feel harsher. Cooling can amplify that sensation. Lower strength can feel smoother. It can also feel less satisfying for some adult users. Keep that distinction clear.

Battery needs shape daily behavior. A small battery fits a tiny device. It also pushes more charging. A big battery supports long sessions. It also adds bulk.

Maintenance habits decide whether refillables fit. If pods, coils, and bottles sound annoying, skip them. If control sounds appealing, move toward XROS 4 or XLIM Pro.

Based on this review, two models cover most adult needs.
Geek Bar Pulse fits adult users who want strong menthol flavor with near-zero steps. It also suits commuters who like the screen feedback.
Vaporesso XROS 4 fits adult users who want menthol accuracy with refill control. It also fits people who rotate liquids.

Pro Tips for best Menthol vape

  • Keep menthol devices upright in pockets when possible.
  • Wipe the mouthpiece daily with a dry tissue.
  • For refillables, let a fresh pod sit after filling.
  • Lower wattage if mint turns sticky or too sweet.
  • Tighten airflow if menthol feels too airy.
  • Open airflow if menthol feels too sharp.
  • Avoid leaving devices in a hot car.
  • Charge on a stable surface, not on bedding.
  • Replace pods when menthol gets thin and muted.
  • Carry a spare pod for long days.

FAQs

Which menthol device stayed the driest at the mouthpiece?
Vuse Alto stayed very clean in our pocket routine. JUUL also stayed tidy. Geek Bar Pulse did well for a disposable.

Why does menthol sometimes feel harsher late in a pod’s life?
Cooling can mask early coil wear. Flavor can flatten first. Then the throat feel can turn sharper.

Is “ice” the same as menthol?
In practice, “ice” often reads as cooling plus flavor. Pure menthol leans more mint-forward. Brands vary.

Which option fits a tight cigarette-like draw?
JUUL and Vuse Alto delivered the tightest pulls. XLIM Pro can get close with airflow tightened.

Which device handled heavy evening sessions best?
LUXE XR Max handled those sessions best. Battery and vapor output stayed strong.

Why did some mint flavors feel sweet instead of dry?
Many mint profiles add sweeteners or candy notes. Hardware can amplify sweetness at higher power.

Do refillables always taste better than disposables for menthol?
Not always. Refillables can taste cleaner and more exact. Disposables can hit harder out of the box.

How do I stop gurgling in a refillable pod?
Reduce overfilling. Keep it upright after filling. Take a few gentle pulls. Then wipe the mouthpiece.

What menthol profiles gave the best draw feel in this set?
Miami Mint on Pulse gave the boldest “cool mint” hit. Straight menthol salt on XROS 4 gave the cleanest dry chill.

Sources

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA authorizes marketing of tobacco- and menthol-flavored JUUL e-cigarette products. 2025. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/ctp-newsroom/fda-authorizes-marketing-tobacco-and-menthol-flavored-juul-e-cigarette-products
  • World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes: tobacco factsheet. 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf?download=true&sfvrsn=d6e03637_2
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2016. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/tobacco/sgr/e-cigarettes/index.htm
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. 2018. https://www.nationalacademies.org/projects/HMD-BPH-16-02/publication/24952
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-Cigarettes (Vapes). 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/e-cigarettes/index.html
About the Author: Chris Miller

Chris Miller is the lead reviewer and primary author at VapePicks. He coordinates the site’s hands-on testing process and writes the final verdicts that appear in each review. His background comes from long-term work in consumer electronics, where day-to-day reliability matters more than launch-day impressions. That approach carries into nicotine-device coverage, with a focus on build quality, device consistency, and the practical details that show up after a device has been carried and used for several days.

In testing, Chris concentrates on battery behavior and charging stability, especially signs like abnormal heat, fast drain, or uneven output. He also tracks leaking, condensate buildup, and mouthpiece hygiene in normal routines such as commuting, short work breaks, and longer evening sessions. When a device includes draw activation or button firing, he watches for misfires and inconsistent triggering. Flavor and throat hit notes are treated as subjective experience, recorded for context, and separated from health interpretation.

Chris works with the fixed VapePicks testing team, which includes a high-intensity tester for stress and heat checks, plus an everyday-carry tester who focuses on portability and pocket reliability. For safety context, VapePicks relies on established public guidance and a clinical advisor’s limited review of risk language, rather than personal medical recommendations.

VapePicks content is written for adults. Nicotine is highly addictive, and e-cigarettes are not for youth, pregnant individuals, or people who do not already use nicotine products.