Apollo’s hardware selection in this test group runs from compact pods to warmer, higher-output pen kits. In our testing, the biggest differences came down to flavor accuracy, draw feel, battery life, leak control, and how each device held up once it became part of a normal daily routine.
On this page
Product Overview
| Device | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2) | 4.2/5.0 | Steady all-around performance; roomy tank; simple power behavior | Larger than mini pods; still needs coil changes | Refillable users who want a dependable daily kit |
| VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM | 4.1/5.0 | Pocket-friendly; easy top-fill; clean MTL draw | Small pod capacity; limited output ceiling | Commuters and minimalist pod users |
| Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit | 4.2/5.0 | Flexible pod options; strong battery life; useful screen | More interface than some users want; less pocket-light | Users who want pod versatility without a full mod |
| Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit | 4.1/5.0 | Warm, dense vapor; adjustable airflow; one-button use | Bulkier tube body; heat builds on long pulls | DL-leaning users who still want a simple kit |
Final Verdict
-
OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2)
-
Who It’s For: refillable users who want steady all-day performance without fiddly settings
-
Who It’s Not For: shoppers who want the smallest carry or refuse coil changes
-
-
VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM
-
Who It’s For: quick MTL sessions, quiet daily carry, and simple refillable use
-
Who It’s Not For: cloud-first users or anyone who takes long, heavy chain pulls
-
-
Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit
-
Who It’s For: users who want more control, stronger battery life, and the option to switch draw styles
-
Who It’s Not For: strict minimalists who do not want a screen or menu time
-
-
Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit
-
Who It’s For: users who want warmer, denser hits with simple controls and adjustable airflow
-
Who It’s Not For: stealth-carry users, strict MTL fans, or anyone sensitive to heat on longer pulls
-
Apollo Vape Comparison Chart
| Item | OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2) | VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM | Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit | Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 4.2/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 |
| Price | $39.95 | $14.99 | $29.95 | $17.95 |
| Device Type | Refillable kit (battery + tank) | Refillable pod system | Refillable pod kit | All-in-one pen-style kit |
| Battery Capacity | 1700 mAh | 1000 mAh | 1300 mAh | 1600 mAh |
| Liquid Capacity | 3 mL | 2 mL | 3 mL | 3 mL |
| Coil/Pod Resistance | 0.5Ω + 1.0Ω included | 1.2Ω pod included; 0.8Ω compatible | 0.8Ω preinstalled + 0.4Ω spare; supports 0.4/0.6/0.8/1.2Ω | 0.15Ω meshed coil |
| Charging | MicroUSB | USB-C | USB-C (Type-C 5V2A) | MicroUSB |
| Best For | Balanced refillable daily driver | Simple MTL carry | Feature-forward pod versatility | Warm, higher-output simplicity |
How We Tested It
We ran each device through the same daily pattern described in our testing process: short commute pulls, quick mid-day sessions, and longer evening use. In those runs, we tracked flavor clarity, throat hit, vapor production, airflow feel, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability.
Marcus Reed pushed heavier sessions to expose heat buildup and output drop-offs. Jamal Davis focused on pocket carry and quick-hit practicality. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed the language so the final notes stayed grounded in actual use rather than medical claims. Nicotine products are for adults only.
Apollo Vape: Our Testing Experience
OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2)
Our Testing Experience

In our testing, the OHM GO felt like the least temperamental refillable kit in the group. The Portal tank took about 2.9 mL before it felt properly full, and the preinstalled 0.5Ω coil read about 0.52Ω on our meter. That small variance never changed how it performed. What mattered more was how steady it stayed once filled: flavor held up, output stayed even, and the tank remained clean in bag carry.
Marcus liked that it did not start strong and then sag after a few longer pulls. Jamal’s main note was size. It is not tiny, but it still felt easy to live with because it was not messy and did not feel fragile. For a refillable user who wants a calmer, more predictable kit, this was the easiest one to settle into.
What we liked
-
Flavor stayed consistent across a full tank in our rotation
-
Power delivery stayed steady without extra setup
-
The 3 mL tank cut down on refill breaks
Who it is best for
-
Adult refillable users who want steady, repeatable performance
-
People who take longer sessions and dislike output swings
-
Anyone willing to trade a little size for fewer refills
Where it falls short
-
Larger carry than most mini pod systems
-
Coil changes are easy, but still count as upkeep
-
Less discreet than a smaller quick-hit pod
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Steady flavor and vapor across longer sessions | Bulkier than mini pod systems |
| 3 mL tank reduces refill frequency | Requires periodic coil replacement |
| Self-adjusting power keeps it simple | Not a stealth-first carry |
Details
-
Price: $39.95
-
Device type: refillable kit (battery + tank)
-
Battery: 1700 mAh; self-adjusting 5W–50W
-
Tank capacity: 3 mL (practical fill in our tests: about 2.9 mL)
-
Included coils: 0.5Ω (measured about 0.52Ω) and 1.0Ω spare
-
Connection: 510 threading
-
Charging: MicroUSB pass-through
-
Controls: 5-click on/off with LED battery indicator
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.2 | Clean and consistent across longer sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Present without turning harsh in our rotation |
| Vapor Production | 4.3 | Full enough to feel satisfying without getting unruly |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0 | Comfortable, though not the most adjustable |
| Battery Life | 4.4 | Handled a full day well for a refillable kit |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Stayed tidy through carry and repeated refills |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Solid in hand with no flimsy feel |
| Ease of Use | 4.3 | Self-adjusting behavior keeps the learning curve low |
| Portability | 3.8 | Carryable, but not truly pocket-invisible |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best low-fuss refillable option in the group |
VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM
Our Testing Experience

The XROS MINI was the quickest device to settle into. In our testing, the 2 mL pod filled to about 1.9 mL before it felt full enough, and the included 1.2Ω pod read between 1.17Ω and 1.19Ω across our checks. In actual use, it delivered the cleanest small-device MTL draw in the group and stayed tidy in a pocket.
Jamal liked it most for commute use because it disappeared into a pocket and did not ask for much attention. Marcus ran into the obvious limit: smaller capacity and a smaller battery mean heavier chain users can outpace it. Used in shorter sessions, though, it stayed smooth, quiet, and predictable.
What we liked
-
Easy top-fill and a consistently clean MTL draw
-
Light, pocket-friendly size
-
Restrained vapor that stayed tidy instead of feeling wet
Who it is best for
-
Adult users who prefer MTL pacing
-
People who vape in short sessions throughout the day
-
Anyone who wants a simple refillable pod with very little fuss
Where it falls short
-
2 mL capacity means more refill stops for heavier use
-
Not built for large vapor output
-
Long chain sessions expose its size limits quickly
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very portable and simple | Small pod capacity |
| Smooth, consistent MTL draw | Not a cloud-first device |
| USB-C charging is convenient | Heavy users will outpace it |
Details
-
Price: $14.99
-
Device type: refillable pod system
-
Battery: 1000 mAh
-
Output: 11–16W
-
Pod capacity: 2 mL (practical fill in our tests: about 1.9 mL)
-
Included pod: 1.2Ω (measured about 1.18Ω); compatible with 0.8Ω pod
-
Charging: USB-C
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.1 | Clear and tidy for MTL-focused use |
| Throat Hit | 3.9 | Smooth, but less punchy than higher-output kits |
| Vapor Production | 3.7 | Deliberately restrained |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.0 | Natural-feeling pull for quick sessions |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Strong for its size, but not a marathon device |
| Leak Resistance | 4.2 | Stayed clean in pocket carry |
| Build Quality | 4.3 | Solid chassis feel for a compact pod |
| Ease of Use | 4.5 | Straightforward fill-and-go rhythm |
| Portability | 4.6 | One of the easiest daily carries in the group |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best commute-first option |
Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit
Our Testing Experience

The Wenax Q Ultra felt like a pod kit for people who want more control without carrying a full mod. The screen adds a learning curve at first, but once we settled in, the practical benefits showed up quickly. Our pods filled to about 2.8 to 2.9 mL, the 0.8Ω pod read about 0.82Ω, and the spare 0.4Ω pod landed near 0.41Ω. In real use, it gave us the broadest range of draw styles in this group.
Marcus liked that he could open it up for a fuller pull without jumping to a larger device. Jamal still preferred the XROS for true pocket carry, but he found the Wenax easier to live with in a bag because the 1300 mAh battery removed most of the battery anxiety during errands.
What we liked
-
Broad pod support makes it easy to shift between vaping styles
-
Strong battery life for a pod kit
-
Flavor stayed lively even later in the day
Who it is best for
-
Adult users who want pod simplicity with extra tuning options
-
People who switch between tighter and airier draws
-
Users who want a more feature-forward device without full mod bulk
Where it falls short
-
The screen and UI are more than some people want
-
Less minimalist than the smallest pod systems
-
More settings means more room to over-adjust
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Wide resistance support for different draw styles | UI can feel like extra steps |
| 1300 mAh battery is strong for the class | Not the most pocket-minimal |
| 3 mL pods reduce refill interruptions | Easy to over-tune if you overthink settings |
Details
-
Price: $29.95
-
Device type: refillable pod kit
-
Battery: 1300 mAh
-
Output: up to 30W
-
Pod capacity: 3 mL (practical fill in our tests: about 2.85 mL)
-
Included pods: 0.8Ω preinstalled (measured about 0.82Ω) and 0.4Ω spare (measured about 0.41Ω)
-
Charging: USB-C (Type-C 5V2A)
-
Screen: 2.51-inch touch screen
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.4 | Bright, accurate flavor with strong coil behavior |
| Throat Hit | 4.2 | Easy to tune with pod choice and pacing |
| Vapor Production | 4.2 | Strong for a pod kit without getting chaotic |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Flexible enough to satisfy different preferences |
| Battery Life | 4.3 | Held up well across a normal day |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0 | Mostly clean, but pods still need mindful handling |
| Build Quality | 4.2 | Feels sturdy and well finished |
| Ease of Use | 4.1 | Easy after setup, though the UI adds a small learning curve |
| Portability | 4.0 | Still practical, just not truly tiny |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best pod-versatility pick |
Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit
Our Testing Experience

The Vape Pen V2 was the warmest and densest device in the lineup. In our testing, the 0.15Ω mesh coil read about 0.16Ω, the tank filled to roughly 2.9 mL, and the 1600 mAh battery kept a steady pace under normal use. The trade-off showed up as soon as we pushed it too hard: repeated long pulls made the vape noticeably warmer.
Marcus appreciated that it stayed simple even while producing more vapor than the others. Jamal liked the airflow ring because he could set the draw once and leave it alone. This kit makes the most sense when you treat it like a higher-output tube kit rather than a stealth pod.
What we liked
-
Dense vapor with a satisfying warm finish
-
The airflow ring gives useful tuning
-
Single-button use keeps the routine simple
Who it is best for
-
Adult users who prefer fuller vapor or a restricted-DL lean
-
People who want a simple kit without menus
-
Users who enjoy a warmer, denser hit
Where it falls short
-
Bulkier than compact pod systems
-
Heat builds during back-to-back long pulls
-
Less subtle than an MTL-focused pod
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong vapor output and warmth | Bulkier tube form factor |
| Airflow control ring is genuinely useful | Heat builds with chain pulls |
| Simple single-button operation | Less stealthy than small pods |
Details
-
Price: $17.95
-
Device type: all-in-one pen-style kit
-
Battery: 1600 mAh
-
Tank capacity: 3 mL (practical fill in our tests: about 2.9 mL)
-
Max output: up to 60W
-
Coil: 0.15Ω meshed coil (measured about 0.16Ω)
-
Airflow: dual slotted airflow control ring
-
Charging: MicroUSB
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.0 | Strong when paced well, but can flatten when overheated |
| Throat Hit | 4.1 | Noticeable and satisfying with warmer pulls |
| Vapor Production | 4.5 | The clear leader for dense output |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.3 | Easy to dial in with the ring |
| Battery Life | 4.0 | Solid for normal use; heavy sessions drain it faster |
| Leak Resistance | 3.8 | Usually fine, but higher-output kits need more attention |
| Build Quality | 4.1 | Feels sturdy in hand |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | Simple, but best when you pace it well |
| Portability | 3.9 | Carryable, though not as convenient as a tiny pod |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best warm-output pick without mod complexity |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.8 |
| VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
In our testing, the OHM GO kit and the Wenax Q Ultra were the most evenly balanced devices overall. The XROS MINI was the clear winner for portability and simplicity, but it gave up raw vapor output. The Vape Pen V2 led on vapor production, with the trade-off being faster heat buildup when we pushed longer pulls too close together.
How to Choose the Apollo Vape?
Start with inhale style and tolerance for upkeep. If you want refillable performance with a steady, forgiving feel, the OHM GO makes the most sense. If pocket carry and quick MTL sessions matter most, the XROS MINI is the easiest fit.
If you want more flexibility without jumping to a full mod, the Wenax Q Ultra gives you the widest tuning range in this group. If you want warmer, denser vapor with simple controls, the Vape Pen V2 is the direct pick. For commuters, the XROS MINI and Wenax Q Ultra stand out. For longer sessions, the OHM GO and Vape Pen V2 make more sense.
Limitations
-
OHM GO Vaping Kit (Version 2): larger carry, coil upkeep, and less stealthy use
-
VAPORESSO XROS MINI 16W POD SYSTEM: more frequent refills, lower output ceiling, and quicker limits for heavy users
-
Geekvape Wenax Q Ultra Kit: extra UI learning curve, less minimalist feel, and more room to over-adjust
-
Smok Vape Pen V2 60W Kit: more heat during chain use, bulkier carry, and less subtle daily use
Apollo Vape Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models:
-
They cover a practical spread from small MTL pods to warmer pen-style output
-
Battery options make sense across different device sizes
-
Each one has a clear daily-use role instead of overlapping too much
-
The lineup gives an easy learning path from simple pods to fuller-output kits
Alternatives to consider:
-
Uwell Caliburn devices remain a strong reference point for clean MTL flavor
-
Innokin Endura kits are still easy picks for beginner-friendly refillable use
-
Larger Vaporesso XROS variants offer a similar feel with more configuration options
Pro Tips for Apollo Vape
-
Match nicotine strength and PG/VG to the device style because higher output usually feels harsher at the same nicotine level.
-
Do not overfill pods or tanks; leaving a little headspace helps reduce seepage.
-
Give fresh coils or pods a few minutes after filling before the first pull.
-
For warmer kits, shorten your pulls and give the coil a brief reset between hits.
-
Keep mouthpieces clean because condensation changes draw feel fast.
-
Use airflow as a heat and throat-hit control, not only as a tight-versus-airy control.
-
Charge on a stable surface and avoid leaving devices charging unattended.
-
If flavor drops off, check airflow blockage and coil condition before blaming the liquid.
-
Carry a spare pod or small bottle if you rely on a 2 mL setup all day.
FAQs
Which one feels most set-and-forget day to day?
The OHM GO kit and the XROS MINI are the least fussy. The OHM GO is steadier for longer sessions, while the XROS MINI is easier for quick carry.
Which device is best for a tighter, cigarette-like draw?
The XROS MINI is the most naturally MTL-leaning device in this group, especially with the included 1.2Ω pod.
Which one makes the biggest vapor?
The Vape Pen V2 is the output leader, especially when the airflow is opened up and the pulls are paced with a little restraint.
If I hate menus, which should I avoid?
If you want the simplest routine, skip the Wenax Q Ultra’s screen-driven setup and stick with the OHM GO, XROS MINI, or Vape Pen V2.








About the Author: Chris Miller