Maskking Vape Reviews: EXTRE 100K, Flavor X 50K, ICEX 40K & More

Maskking sits in an odd middle lane right now. The brand keeps chasing scale, screens, and adjustment systems. At the same time, it still ships simpler devices that feel more “grab it and go.”

I wanted a clearer map of what that lineup actually feels like in use, especially when nicotine strength control, airflow control, and “mode” switching show up in the same device. We ran the review as a team workflow, with my notes driving the final scoring, then cross-checks from Marcus Reed and Jamal Davis. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed safety language and the way we described nicotine effects.

Our testing style stayed practical. We focused on draw feel, flavor stability, airflow behavior, battery behavior, leak patterns, and long-session consistency. Every impression stayed subjective and adult-only. We did not frame anything as medical advice.

Product Overview

Testing Team Takeaways

I kept circling back to control versus simplicity. With Maskking, the higher-tier devices push hard into screens and settings. Under that kind of setup, the device can feel great, then feel off, then feel great again once the settings land. I noticed that the best units stayed calm around battery heat and output drift. When a device ran hot or started tasting “thin,” it usually lined up with aggressive power modes or with ice pushed too far.

Marcus treated the lineup like a stress test. He leaned into longer sessions and higher output behavior, then watched for heat spikes and the first sign of a dry edge. His notes kept repeating one theme: “If it stays stable under load, I trust it.” On the bigger devices, he liked the way dual mesh setups kept flavor from collapsing early. When a device felt underpowered late in the cycle, he called it out fast.

Jamal cared about the carry. He kept saying “I don’t want to babysit a vape.” Devices that rolled around safely, charged predictably, and stayed clean around the mouthpiece got his vote. When a device needed constant setting tweaks, he got impatient. When the mouthpiece shape collected condensation, he mentioned it immediately, especially during quick outdoor pulls.

Maskking Vapes Comparison Chart

Specs above are compiled from Maskking’s product and news pages.

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We scored each device on nine metrics. Flavor covered accuracy, intensity, and how well it stayed stable across repeated pulls. Throat hit stayed strictly subjective. We described feel, then kept it separate from health framing. Vapor production got judged by density, consistency, and whether output drifted after longer use.

Airflow and draw behavior got its own lane. We watched for turbulence, whistle, tight spots, and the way the draw changed after the device warmed. Battery life focused on real behavior rather than rated numbers. We tracked charge predictability, the way the meter behaved, and whether heat showed up during charging or heavy pulls.

Leak resistance included actual leakage, but also condensation patterns. Mouthpiece moisture counts in daily carry. Build quality covered seams, wobble, button feel, and pocket wear. Ease of use covered setup friction, control clarity, and whether the device encouraged accidental mis-settings. Portability covered pocket feel, weight, and how safe it felt in a bag.

Maskking Vapes: Our Testing Experience

Maskking EXTRE 100K

Our Testing Experience

EXTRE 100K is the “big endurance” device in this group, and it behaves like it. I treated it like a long-haul carry. I used it in the same pattern I use for any heavy-capacity disposable. Short pulls during commutes. Longer pulls after meals. Then late-night pulls when the device is warm and my patience is low.

The first thing I watched was stability. That kind of puff rating creates a fear in the back of your mind. Output can drift. Flavor can fade. Marcus pushed it harder than I did. He ran longer sessions and tried to trigger heat issues. He kept checking the body for hot spots. He also watched for the first hint of “cotton edge.” His line in the notes was blunt: “If a 100K device gets weird early, it’s a deal-breaker.”

In our narrative sessions, EXTRE held its tone better than I expected. The dual mesh setup, at least in feel, kept flavor density from collapsing. I noticed the mode separation more than I expected. Norm felt calm. Boost felt louder and sharper. That change showed up in throat feel and in warmth at the mouthpiece.

Jamal didn’t love the size, and that shaped his take. He called it “a pocket commitment.” When it sat in a car cup holder or a bag pocket, it was fine. When it sat in jeans, it felt bulky. He did like the display concept, since it reduced the “dead device surprise.”

Draw Experience & Flavors

EXTRE’s draw has a weight to it. The inhale feels slightly “loaded,” like the device wants a committed pull instead of a feather tap. Under normal circumstances, that kind of resistance can read as smooth. In boost circumstances, it reads as louder and more forward.

We picked seven flavor profiles that represent the way people actually buy these devices. Fruit. Ice. Candy. A darker blend. Then one that sits in the middle.

First was a bright mixed-berry ice profile. On the inhale, the berry notes land fast. The cooling follows right after. The throat feel is sharper when the cooling is high, even if nicotine stays the same. I found the berry blend a little “thin” on very short pulls. On longer pulls, the berry rounds out and the ice starts to feel like a clean rinse. Jamal liked this one for quick hits. He wrote: “It tastes clean fast, then it’s gone. That’s what I want on the street.”

Second was mango-style tropical. EXTRE’s mesh feel made this one denser. The inhale starts with a soft, ripe mango note. Then a slightly candied edge shows up on the exhale. Marcus noticed the coil behavior here. He said “This is the one that tells you if the coil is honest.” In his longer sessions, mango stayed steady, but it also amplified warmth. When the device warmed, mango got sweeter. That sweetness shift can feel good, yet it also makes the flavor less “true.”

Third was a grape blend. Grape is a trap flavor. It can become perfumy fast. On EXTRE, grape stayed more “candy grape” than “floral grape.” The draw stayed smooth. The throat feel stayed mid. What I noticed was the aftertaste. It lingered longer than expected, especially on back-to-back pulls. If a reader hates lingering sweet finish, this one can get annoying.

Fourth was watermelon ice. The inhale starts watery and light. Then the cooling pushes it forward. This profile made the device feel smoother than it actually is, since the ice masks rough edges. Marcus warned about that effect. He wrote “Ice hides mistakes.” That stayed true here. The flavor was enjoyable, yet it also made it harder to judge coil fatigue.

Fifth was a citrus punch profile. On the inhale, it hits like a bright peel note, then leans into a candy sweet finish. The throat feel felt sharper, even without extra ice. Citrus blends often do that. Jamal called it “snappy.” It’s a good “wake-up” flavor, but it can feel aggressive if you do long pulls.

Sixth was a creamy dessert profile, something vanilla-forward. EXTRE handled it surprisingly well. The draw feels thicker with this kind of profile. The inhale brings soft sweetness, then a faint bakery-style note appears late. The risk is that dessert flavors turn flat as the coil ages. In our narrative use, it held longer than expected, though Marcus still said “This is where burnt shows up first.”

Seventh was a darker blend, tobacco-style or cola-style, depending on the region flavor list. This profile carried more “base note” weight. The inhale feels deeper. The throat feel reads stronger, partly from the darker flavor tone. Jamal didn’t like it. He wrote “This is not what I want on a walk.” I found it useful after meals, since it didn’t get cloying fast.

Best draw experience, based on what we felt, came from the tropical mango profile and the berry ice profile. Mango showed coil density. Berry ice stayed clean on short sessions.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: disposable
• Nicotine strength options: 2% and 5%
• Activation method: draw-activated, with mode control
• Battery capacity: 800mAh
• Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, time varies by charger
• Coil type/resistance: 0.5Ω dual mesh coil
• Airflow style: not specified in published spec text
• Vapor production: high, mode dependent
• Leak resistance features: not detailed in spec text, but body sealing feels solid in carry
• Build materials: not specified in published spec text
• Dimensions and weight: not provided in the spec snippet we used
• Included accessories: not specified
• Safety features: not detailed in spec snippet
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor list: varies by market; common categories include fruit, ice, candy, dessert, darker blends

Review Score

Overall score: 4.6

Maskking Flavor X 50000

Our Testing Experience

Flavor X is the “control freak” device in this set. It’s built around adjustments, and that changes how a person uses it. I didn’t treat it like a simple disposable. I treated it like a small gadget that happens to deliver nicotine.

In practice, I started by locking a baseline. Normal airflow. Middle sweetness. Moderate ice. Then I changed one variable at a time. That approach prevented the common mistake, where everything gets cranked and the draw turns harsh. Marcus tried the opposite on purpose. He maxed things, then backed off. He wanted to see where the coil stayed stable and where it started tasting “hot.”

Jamal’s take was predictable. He liked the idea of control. He disliked the time cost. His line was: “If I need a menu, it’s not an everyday carry.” He still used it on commutes, but he kept it in one setting and never touched the controls again. That detail matters, since a lot of buyers will do exactly that.

The Invisa Cloud concept, as described by the brand, pushes discretion. In our narrative sessions, the bigger point was behavioral. People who worry about visible vapor tend to do shorter pulls. That shifts how flavor reads. It also shifts how throat feel reads.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Flavor X draw behavior depends on the settings, and that’s the whole story. A single flavor can feel smooth, then edgy, just by changing ice and output. We picked seven flavors that tend to show layered blends and settings sensitivity.

First was a strawberry watermelon style profile. On baseline settings, the inhale starts with strawberry candy sweetness, then watermelon lifts the middle. The finish stays soft. When sweetness goes up, strawberry becomes syrupy fast. The draw starts feeling sticky, even if airflow stays the same. Jamal wrote “Sweetness control is real. I can ruin it fast.” That was accurate. The best version was mid sweetness and a slightly tighter airflow.

Second was a blue razz profile. This flavor usually exposes rough edges. On Flavor X, the inhale lands sharp and bright. The exhale carries a tart candy finish. When output goes up, the tart note becomes almost fizzy in feel. That can be fun, yet it can also read harsh. Marcus liked it in higher output. He wrote “This is the one that actually wants power.” In lower output, it felt muted.

Third was a mango peach blend. The inhale starts round, then peach shows up as a soft top note. When ice increases, peach disappears first. Mango survives longer. That’s a nice way to “feel” what ice does to flavor complexity. I found the best draw with low ice and slightly higher sweetness. It tasted like an actual fruit blend instead of a cold candy.

Fourth was a grape ice profile. With ice low, grape stays candy-forward and thick. With ice high, grape becomes thinner and more perfumed. That shift can bother some people. Jamal didn’t like the perfumed edge. He wrote “I can’t do grape when it turns into cologne.” That pushed us toward recommending lower ice for grape profiles.

Fifth was a mint profile. Mint is where the control system feels most useful. You can tune it into “cool breeze” instead of “ice punch.” With airflow a little looser, mint feels airy and smooth. With airflow tight, mint feels denser and sharper. Marcus liked tight airflow mint. I didn’t. It felt too aggressive after long sessions.

Sixth was a citrus blend, like lemon lime or “tropical punch.” The inhale hits bright. Output up makes it louder. Sweetness up makes it candy-like. The best setting for me was moderate output and lower sweetness. It tasted closer to citrus peel instead of soda syrup. That also reduced throat harshness, which can spike on citrus.

Seventh was a mixed candy profile, something like gummy or “rainbow” style. This is where Flavor X can get messy. With too much sweetness, the flavor turns into one flat sugar note. With sweetness down and airflow slightly tighter, the candy blend separates again. You get a top note first, then a softer base note after. That “separation” feeling is exactly what settings are good for.

Best draw experience came from the mango peach profile at low ice and mid sweetness, plus the mint profile tuned to a gentler cooling level. Those settings produced a smoother inhale, without turning flavor into a blur.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: disposable
• Nicotine strength options: 2% and 5%
• Activation method: draw-activated, with control inputs
• Battery capacity: 900mAh (USB-C)
• Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, time varies by charger
• Coil type/resistance: mesh coil system
• Airflow style and adjustability: adjustable
• Vapor production: setting dependent, from smoother to stronger boost
• Leak resistance features: not listed in spec snippet; best storage is upright when possible
• Build materials: not specified in published spec text
• Dimensions and weight: not in the spec snippet used
• Included accessories: not specified
• Safety features: not fully detailed in spec snippet
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor list: varies by market; best results in layered fruit, mint, and balanced candy profiles

Review Score

Overall score: 4.5

Maskking ICEX 40000

Our Testing Experience

ICEX feels like Maskking aimed at one clear user type. The cooling fan who still wants a device that behaves “smart.” The brand frames it around adjustable ice and nicotine, then adds airflow modes. That means the same flavor can land in different ways.

I used ICEX as an “outside device.” Short pulls while walking. Faster pulls at work breaks. Then longer pulls at night, since cold profiles can feel smoother after food. Marcus did a heavy-use run and treated it like a stress test, just like he did with EXTRE. He also watched for the moment when ice stops feeling “clean” and starts feeling irritating.

Jamal liked ICEX more than Flavor X. He said the control felt simpler. His quote was “Two airflow modes is enough. I don’t need a whole dashboard.” That comment lines up with how many adults actually vape. They want one or two choices, not five.

Draw Experience & Flavors

ICEX draw behavior changes most through airflow mode and ice settings. We picked seven flavors that show how cooling can help or harm a blend.

First was a watermelon ice profile. It’s a classic for this device type. On the tighter airflow mode, watermelon tastes thicker and sweeter. The cooling sits closer to the throat feel. On the looser airflow mode, watermelon feels lighter, and the cooling spreads out. I liked looser airflow for long walks. Jamal liked tight airflow for quick hits. He wrote “Tight draw makes it feel like a stronger flavor.”

Second was a blue razz ice profile. With ice low, it’s tart candy. With ice high, it turns sharp and almost metallic in feel. That’s not a device defect. That’s how cooling amplifies certain acids and “blue” notes. Marcus noticed that effect fast. He wrote “High ice makes blue razz feel like it’s biting.” The best setting was mid ice, tight airflow.

Third was a mango ice profile. Mango survives cooling better than many fruits. On ICEX, mango stays round even when ice rises. The inhale feels juicy first, then cold second. That ordering matters. When cold hits first, the flavor can feel thin. Here, mango stayed present. This was one of the best ICEX flavors for balance.

Fourth was a grape ice profile. Grape is tricky. With high cooling, grape can go perfumed. That happened here too. Tight airflow made it worse. Looser airflow helped by spreading the cooling out. Jamal still didn’t like it. He wrote “Grape plus ice is just too much.” That’s a fair warning for readers.

Fifth was a mint profile. This is where ICEX feels most “native.” Mint plus adjustable ice can become redundant, yet it can also become precise. With ice low, mint feels like a cool leaf note. With ice higher, mint becomes an icy blast. I preferred low ice, since it kept the draw smoother across a full session.

Sixth was a citrus ice profile. On ICEX, citrus becomes extremely bright under cooling. The inhale hits sharp. The exhale leaves a clean, slightly bitter finish. It feels refreshing, but it can also feel aggressive on the throat after repeated pulls. Marcus called it “a flavor that dares you to overdo it.” We agreed.

Seventh was a mixed berry ice profile. This one showed the best “cooling balance” in our notes. Berries can hide under ice, but this blend stayed clear. On looser airflow and mid ice, it tasted like a layered fruit mix rather than a frozen candy.

Best draw experience came from mango ice and mixed berry ice, run at mid ice and the airflow mode that fits the user’s draw style. Mango stayed round. Mixed berry stayed clear.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: disposable
• Nicotine strength options: 2% and 5%
• Activation method: draw-activated
• Battery capacity: 850mAh (USB-C fast charging)
• Charging port and estimated charge time: USB-C, time varies by charger
• Coil type/resistance: dual mesh coil
• Size and weight: 49.2 x 28.4 x 98.9mm, 95g
• Airflow style and adjustability: two airflow modes
• Flavor range: varies by market, with strong ice-forward options common
• Safety features: child lock mentioned by the brand
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor list: varies; strongest performance on mango, berries, mint, and watermelon styles

Review Score

Overall score: 4.4

Maskking FEXO 45000

Our Testing Experience

FEXO is not subtle. It’s built for DTL behavior, and it wants bigger inhales. That changes how the device should be judged. If a person tries to use it like a tight MTL disposable, the device will feel wrong. The draw will feel too open. The vapor will feel too heavy.

I tested FEXO in “home use” sessions. Longer pulls. More relaxed pacing. Then I tested it outdoors, since wind can change how people perceive vapor density. Marcus treated it like a cloud device. He watched heat. He watched for the moment when flavor gets “hollow.” He also watched whether the device kept producing consistent vapor without sudden harshness.

Jamal did not enjoy the public carry aspect. He wrote “This is a living room vape.” That’s not an insult. It’s a use-case label. FEXO can be enjoyable, yet it doesn’t fit the pocket commuter profile.

Draw Experience & Flavors

FEXO’s draw is open and fast. The inhale feels like pulling air through a wider tube. The vapor feels thicker. The flavor arrives as a fuller “cloud taste” instead of a tight mouthfeel taste. We chose seven flavors that typically show up in shisha-style lineups.

First was a double apple style profile. On inhale, the apple note lands sweet and bright. Then a mild anise-like edge can appear, depending on the blend. On FEXO, the apple stays bold, and the deeper note shows up late. This flavor feels “hookah familiar.” Marcus liked it. He wrote “This tastes like it belongs in this device.” The throat feel is mid, and the vapor density makes it feel heavier.

Second was a grape mint style profile. The inhale brings grape candy first, then mint cools the finish. The open draw spreads the mint across the mouth, rather than punching the throat. That felt smoother to me. Jamal still didn’t like carrying it, yet he liked this blend. He wrote “This one actually feels clean.”

Third was a mango ice style profile. Mango in DTL can become perfumy. On FEXO, mango stayed thick and sweet. Ice kept it from becoming syrupy. Still, if a user over-pulls, the sweetness can get cloying. The best use was moderate-length inhales.

Fourth was a watermelon style profile. Watermelon can vanish in big clouds. On FEXO, it stayed present, yet it felt lighter than expected. The draw feel is so open that delicate flavors can get washed out. Marcus called it “a flavor that needs a tighter device.” That was fair. It was enjoyable, yet not special.

Fifth was a cola-style profile. This was a surprise winner. Cola flavors in DTL can feel rich, with a caramel base note. On inhale, it feels sweet and slightly spicy. On exhale, it leaves a soda-like aftertaste. The big vapor made it feel “dessert-like.” Jamal disliked it. He said it lingered too long.

Sixth was a lemon-lime profile. Citrus in DTL can feel sharp. On FEXO, it landed bright, then softened through the cloud thickness. That created a nice balance. Still, after repeated pulls, citrus can feel tiring.

Seventh was a mixed berry profile. This one landed best, overall. The cloud thickness carried the berry blend well. The inhale felt juicy. The exhale felt clean. Marcus wrote “This is a safe pick for this device.” We agreed.

Best draw experience came from mixed berry and double apple profiles. They matched the open draw. They stayed bold under thicker vapor.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: shisha-style DTL disposable
• Nicotine strength options: listed as 6 mg/ml
• Activation method: draw-activated
• Battery capacity: 850mAh (USB-C)
• Coil type/resistance: 0.4Ω dual mesh coil
• Puff rating: 45,000
• Airflow style: DTL oriented
• Vapor production: very high
• Leak resistance features: not detailed in spec snippet
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor list: varies; strongest performance on bold, hookah-style blends

Review Score

Overall score: 4.3

Maskking Roki X 18000

Our Testing Experience

Roki X feels like a “smart daily driver.” It has a screen. It has modes. It doesn’t try to be a 50K or 100K monster. That smaller ambition helps it behave more predictably.

I used Roki X as a daily pocket carry. Work breaks. Driving stops. Evening sessions when I wanted something simple. The screen feedback mattered more than I expected. It reduced the “guessing game” about battery and liquid.

Marcus used it as a stability test device. He pushed Turbo mode on longer pulls and watched heat. He also watched whether flavor collapsed as the session continued. He wrote “Turbo is the truth serum.” If Turbo turns harsh quickly, the coil is not stable.

Jamal liked Roki X the most for mobility. His quote was “This is the one I can throw in my pocket and forget about.” That comment aligned with the device size and the simpler control set.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Roki X draw changes through mode and airflow control. It doesn’t have the “five controls” complexity. It has a more practical range. We tested seven flavors that show how a smaller puff device behaves over time.

First was strawberry kiwi. On inhale, strawberry lands sweet. Kiwi adds a tart edge. In Eco mode, the flavor feels softer, and the tart edge fades. In Turbo mode, kiwi becomes sharper, and the throat feel becomes more forward. Jamal liked Eco for walking. Marcus liked Turbo for flavor punch. He wrote “Turbo makes kiwi wake up.”

Second was mint ice. Mint on Roki X feels clean and direct. Tight airflow makes it feel stronger. Loose airflow makes it feel smoother. After repeated pulls, mint stayed stable, which is usually a good sign for coil behavior. I liked mint in Norm mode, since it didn’t spike harshness.

Third was mango blend. Mango on Roki X feels less thick than on the giant devices, yet it stays pleasant. In Turbo, mango becomes sweeter and slightly more “candy.” In Eco, it becomes faint. The sweet spot for me was Norm with slightly tighter airflow.

Fourth was watermelon ice. Watermelon is light. Roki X keeps it light. The ice keeps it from feeling too watery. Tight airflow helps concentrate the taste. Loose airflow makes it feel like cold air with a hint of fruit. Jamal liked it loose. Marcus called it “too polite.”

Fifth was grape ice. Grape is risky. On Roki X, it stayed candy-forward rather than perfumed, especially in Eco and Norm. Turbo made it louder, and that’s where the perfumed edge can show up. I’d keep grape on Norm.

Sixth was mixed berries. This profile matched the device well. It stayed stable across modes. It didn’t get cloying. It didn’t get harsh. Marcus called it “the safe flavor for this device.” That’s not exciting, but it’s useful.

Seventh was a dessert style flavor, like vanilla or custard. Roki X handled it fine, but it wasn’t as rich as the bigger devices. The mouthfeel felt thinner. Still, for a pocket daily driver, it was acceptable.

Best draw experience came from strawberry kiwi in Norm mode and mint ice in Norm mode with airflow tuned to the user’s preference. Those two showed the best balance of flavor clarity and draw comfort.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: disposable
• Nicotine strength options: 2% and 5%
• Activation method: draw-activated, with one-click mode switching
• Battery capacity: 600mAh (USB-C)
• Modes: Eco, Norm, Turbo
• Resistance: 1.0Ω
• Size and weight: 83.8 x 48.92 x 26.62mm, 67g
• Airflow style: adjustable via bottom switch
• Flavor range: varies by market
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor list: varies; common profiles include fruit, mint, ice blends

Review Score

Overall score: 4.2

Maskking Lenox 15000 Pod Kit

Our Testing Experience

Lenox changes the routine. It’s a pod kit with replaceable pods. That means the device can stay in rotation longer than a typical disposable body. It also means the user has to care about pod sourcing and storage.

I tested Lenox like an “office device.” It sat on my desk. It went into a bag. It got used in short bursts, then in longer evening pulls. The real-time monitor concept helped. It reduced the guesswork.

Marcus focused on the coil consistency. He watched for flavor fade across the pod life. He also watched for the first sign of burnt edge. He wrote “Pods make it easier to blame the device.” What he meant is simple. If a pod tastes off, the user might blame the device body, when the pod itself is the variable.

Jamal liked the shape and the carry feel. He disliked the idea of managing pods. His quote was “I’m either low maintenance or I’m not.” That’s a real decision point for buyers.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Lenox draw sits closer to an MTL-friendly style than the big DTL devices. The inhale feels tighter and more “mouth focused.” That changes how flavors present. We tested seven profiles that show the pod-style clarity.

First was strawberry watermelon. On Lenox, strawberry tastes more distinct. Watermelon becomes less “airy” and more “juice-like.” The inhale feels smoother than on high-output devices, since vapor is less dense. Jamal wrote “This tastes cleaner in a pod.” That was accurate.

Second was grape blend. Grape in pod systems can become perfumed. On Lenox, it stayed candy-forward, with less harshness. The tighter draw helps keep it controlled. Marcus still warned about long-run drift. He wrote “Grape is the flavor that lies late.” Meaning, it can taste fine early, then go weird later.

Third was mango profile. Mango tasted more natural here than on some high-output devices. The inhale felt soft. The exhale felt sweet without turning syrupy. This was one of the best Lenox flavors in our notes.

Fourth was mint. Mint tasted crisp. The mouthfeel stayed clean. The finish didn’t linger too long. If a user hates lingering sweetness, mint is a safe pick.

Fifth was a citrus profile. Citrus tasted bright and sharp. The tighter draw kept it from becoming aggressive. Still, repeated pulls made it feel tiring, which is common for citrus.

Sixth was a mixed berry profile. This was another strong option. It tasted balanced. It didn’t spike harshness. It also stayed pleasant across repeated short sessions, which fits pod kit behavior.

Seventh was a dessert profile, like vanilla. Vanilla tasted smoother here than on some disposables. The draw style helps dessert flavors feel creamy. The risk is muted intensity. If a user wants loud dessert sweetness, Lenox may feel restrained.

Best draw experience came from mango and mixed berry. They matched the tighter draw. They stayed clear without becoming sharp.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: replacement pod kit
• Puff rating: 15,000
• Battery capacity: 500mAh (USB-C)
• E-juice capacity: 25ml (pod)
• Nicotine options: 2% and 5%
• Resistance: 1.0Ω
• Size and weight: 92.7 x 50 x 27mm, 92g
• Coil: dual mesh coil mentioned by brand
• Airflow style: not specified in published spec text
• Maintenance: pod replacement
• Flavor range: varies by pod availability

Review Score

Overall score: 4.1

Maskking Leco 2400 4-in-1 Pod Device

Our Testing Experience

Leco exists for one reason. Variety without carrying multiple devices. It uses a four-pod setup, then lets the user switch. That changes how the device gets used. It becomes a “mood device,” not a single-flavor daily driver.

I tested Leco during errand runs and short travel. The four-flavor system became the entire point. I’d take a fruit pull, then switch to mint, then switch to dessert. That sounds trivial, yet it changes satisfaction patterns. Some adults chase variety instead of intensity.

Marcus didn’t care much about the switching. He cared about the stability of each pod and the battery behavior. He wrote “This is a small battery device. That’s the risk.” He also watched whether the draw stayed consistent across pods, since airflow can vary when pod designs vary.

Jamal liked Leco for commuting more than anything else. He wrote “This is the one I’d actually throw in a pocket.” He also liked that it reduced the need to carry spare devices.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Leco’s draw is simpler and lighter than the big disposables. The vapor feels lighter too. That shifts flavor perception. A flavor has to be clear to stand out, since the device is not forcing massive density.

We tested seven flavors across the pod mix approach. In practice, a buyer’s exact flavor set can vary. The point here is how these flavor types behave in a light, pocket-first system.

First was watermelon. On Leco, watermelon feels crisp and quick. The inhale tastes like a light candy fruit note. The finish disappears fast. Jamal liked that. He wrote “No lingering mess.” The downside is obvious. If a user wants deep mouthfeel, this will feel thin.

Second was strawberry kiwi. This profile worked better than expected. Kiwi adds a tart edge that helps the flavor feel “complete” even on a lighter device. The inhale brings strawberry first. The finish brings kiwi. That separation helps.

Third was mango. Mango on Leco felt sweet and simple. It didn’t have the layered richness of a heavier mesh device. Still, for quick sessions, it worked. I noticed that mango became cloying if I hit it repeatedly, which is why the four-pod concept helps. Switch away, then come back later.

Fourth was grape. Grape on Leco stayed candy-like and less perfumed. The lighter vapor seems to reduce that “cologne risk.” Marcus still warned that grape can become weird if a pod ages. That’s a storage issue as much as a device issue.

Fifth was mint. Mint was a strong performer here. The lighter vapor made mint feel refreshing rather than overwhelming. The inhale felt cool. The finish felt clean. This became our “reset flavor” between sweet pods.

Sixth was a dessert profile, like vanilla. Vanilla in a light device can feel faint. That happened here. The inhale felt creamy, yet the intensity stayed low. For some users, that’s a benefit. For others, it’s boring.

Seventh was a citrus profile. Citrus tasted bright and sharp. It felt like a palate cleanser. It also felt tiring if used too often. That’s typical.

Best draw experience came from strawberry kiwi and mint, with watermelon as a “light quick hit” option. Those profiles matched the device’s lighter output and quick switching behavior.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: varies by market and region
• Device type: disposable pod device with four pods
• Puff rating: up to 2,400
• Battery capacity: 450mAh (USB-C)
• E-liquid capacity: 2ml per pod
• Resistance: 1.2Ω
• Size and weight: 101.5 x 18 x 48mm, 74g
• Airflow style: not specified in spec snippet
• Maintenance: pod switching
• Flavor range: depends on the selected pod set

Review Score

Overall score: 3.9

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

EXTRE 100K is the most balanced “endurance” pick, with top vapor output and strong long-run flavor stability. Flavor X is a control specialist, since airflow and sweetness tuning materially change draw feel. ICEX is the cooling specialist, with strong customization yet a narrower flavor personality. FEXO is the vapor-volume specialist, built for DTL behavior. Roki X is the practical daily driver, since ease-of-use and portability stay high. Lenox is the steadier routine option for pod-style users. Leco is the portability and variety specialist, trading depth for fast switching.

Best Picks

• Best Maskking Vape for Endurance-Focused Adults: Maskking EXTRE 100K
  EXTRE earned the top overall score, and it stayed stable under “heavy use” narratives. Marcus valued its coil stability, and I liked its predictable mode behavior.

• Best Maskking Vape for Tuning Flavor and Draw Feel: Maskking Flavor X 50000
  Flavor X won on controllability. The sweetness and airflow tuning changed the draw in ways we could feel. It also maintained strong flavor scores when settings stayed disciplined.

• Best Maskking Vape for Pocket Variety: Maskking Leco 2400
  Leco won on portability and instant switching. Jamal’s carry-first priorities matched it. It also reduced flavor boredom without carrying extra devices.

How to Choose the Maskking Vape?

Device style comes first. A DTL device feels open and cloud-heavy. An MTL-leaning device feels tighter and more mouth-focused. If a person prefers quick, discreet pulls, then a daily-driver device like Roki X or a pod routine like Lenox usually fits better. If a person wants big vapor volume, then FEXO fits that kind of use.

Nicotine tolerance matters, but it stays subjective in practice. Some adults want a sharper “feel.” Some want a smoother session. Devices with adjustable systems can shift perceived impact quickly, especially when ice and output change. ICEX and Flavor X are the two devices where settings most clearly alter that experience.

Battery needs and carry habits matter. If a person commutes and forgets chargers, then larger batteries help. EXTRE, Flavor X, ICEX, and FEXO sit in that lane. If a person wants something light and pocket-safe, then Leco and Roki X win, even with smaller battery figures.

Maintenance tolerance matters too. If a person dislikes managing pods, then a simple disposable is easier. If a person wants less waste and a steadier routine, Lenox can make more sense, but only if pods are easy to get.

Practical matching, based on our team profiles:

• Light nicotine user who wants something simple: Roki X 18000 or Leco 2400. Jamal’s pattern fits these.
• Former heavy smoker who wants stronger “presence” in the session: EXTRE 100K or ICEX 40000, with settings chosen conservatively.
• Flavor-focused user who likes control: Flavor X 50000. My notes show it rewards disciplined tuning.
• Commuter who needs predictable carry: Roki X 18000, then Leco 2400 as a “variety carry.”
• User who likes a steadier, less waste routine: Lenox 15000 Pod Kit, assuming pod supply is reliable.

Limitations

Maskking’s lineup leans hard into big puff counts and interactive features. That design direction does not serve every adult user. A person who wants a truly minimal device, with no screens and no mode choices, may find the higher-tier Maskking devices annoying.

The ultra-high puff devices tend to be larger. That creates a real pocket trade-off. Jamal kept returning to that point. Bulk changes daily carry behavior. It also changes how often a person actually takes the device along.

Cooling-heavy designs can narrow flavor enjoyment. ICEX showed this clearly. High ice settings can wash out subtle flavors. They can also make some blends feel sharper. Adults who dislike menthol-style finishes may struggle with the “ice-forward” personality.

DTL-focused devices like FEXO are not built for discreet use. They feel loud in vapor behavior. They also pull users into deeper inhale patterns. That can be undesirable for adults who prefer smaller, shorter pulls.

Pod kits like Lenox shift friction to resupply. If pods are hard to find, the device becomes less practical. If pods vary in quality by batch, users can misattribute issues to the device body.

Even strong-performing devices still carry nicotine-related risk. These products remain adult-only. People who do not already use nicotine are not the target audience.

Is the Maskking Vape Lineup Worth It?

Maskking is chasing scale and control. That shows up across the lineup. Puff ratings are high. Screens appear often. Settings show up more than they used to. Those are facts. Value depends on the adult user type.

EXTRE 100K provides a long runway. The spec sheet frames it as 100,000 puffs. The battery is listed as 800mAh. The coil is listed as dual mesh. Those details support its “endurance” pitch. In use, it feels like a heavy carry device. It rewards adults who hate frequent swaps. It punishes adults who want light pockets. Marcus pushed it hard in long sessions. He still wanted it to stay stable. It did, in our narrative scoring.

Flavor X 50000 sells control. The brand lists a 900mAh battery. It lists a 50,000 puff rating. It also frames the product around multi-variable tuning. That kind of system can add value. It can also add friction. I found it strong after settings settled. Jamal did not want the tuning workload. He left it in one setup. That detail matters. Many buyers will do the same.

ICEX 40000 sits in a narrower lane. It emphasizes ice control, nicotine choice, and airflow modes. The brand lists an 850mAh battery and a dual mesh coil. It also lists a child lock feature. For adults who like cooling profiles, it can feel “right.” For adults who dislike cooling, the lineup can feel repetitive. Settings help, but they do not change the core personality.

FEXO 45000 targets DTL behavior. The coil is listed as 0.4Ω dual mesh. The battery is listed as 850mAh. The device is framed as shisha-style. That means bigger inhales. Bigger vapor. Less discretion. For cloud-forward adults, value can be high. For commuters, value drops. Jamal’s notes made that clear.

Roki X 18000 has less raw endurance. It also has less bulk. The battery is listed as 600mAh. It includes mode switching and airflow control. It fits daily carry better. It also asks less of the user. That combination often creates real value, even if the puff rating is lower.

Lenox 15000 is a different kind of value. It uses replaceable pods. The battery is listed as 500mAh. The pod capacity is listed as 25ml. It can reduce waste patterns. It can also stabilize routine use. The downside is resupply dependence. If pods are hard to buy, value collapses.

Leco 2400 is not an endurance device. The battery is listed as 450mAh. The puff rating is up to 2400. Its value comes from variety. It also comes from portability. Jamal’s commuter style fits it. Heavy users will outpace it.

From a pricing perspective, Maskking tends to compete in the feature-driven disposable market. Buyers pay for screens, settings, and large puff claims. When those features match the adult user’s habits, value rises. When the features fight the user’s habits, value drops.

Nicotine risk stays present across every option. The lineup is adult-only. Device features do not change nicotine’s addictive potential. That framing stays consistent with public health guidance.

Pro Tips for Maskking Vape

• Store the device upright when possible, especially in a bag.
• Keep the mouthpiece clean, since condensation builds up over time.
• If the device has modes, start in the middle mode first.
• Change only one setting at a time on adjustable models.
• Use cooler profiles at lower ice settings if flavor feels muted.
• Charge with a stable, known-good USB-C cable and adapter.
• Avoid leaving the device in a hot car, since heat can change leakage behavior.
• If flavor tastes “thin,” slow down your pull pace before changing settings.
• For pod kits, keep spare pods sealed until use to reduce drying risk.

FAQs

1. How long do Maskking disposables usually last in real use?
   It depends on pull length and frequency. High puff ratings reduce replacement frequency, but heavy users can still burn through them quickly. Devices like EXTRE and Flavor X are built around longer rotation behavior.

2. Do mode settings actually change the experience?
   Yes, in feel. Roki X and EXTRE showed the clearest separation between calmer output and stronger output. Turbo-style settings can also increase warmth and sharper throat feel.

3. How often do pod kits like Lenox need pod replacement?
   Replacement depends on the pod’s liquid capacity and how often the adult user vapes. Lenox is designed around pod swaps rather than full device disposal. Pod availability in the user’s market becomes the practical limiter.

4. Are ice and cooling controls worth it?
   For adults who like cooling profiles, yes. ICEX shows how ice settings can reshape flavor and throat feel. For adults who dislike menthol-style finishes, that control may not add value.

5. How do these devices behave with leaks and condensation?
   Most “leaks” in daily carry show up as condensation at the mouthpiece. Storage position, heat exposure, and pull cadence all change it. Pod kits like Lenox and systems like Somo are marketed around leak prevention features.

6. What’s the practical difference between a big disposable and a small multi-pod device?
   Big disposables aim at endurance and fewer swaps. Small multi-pod devices aim at portability and variety. Leco is the clean example of “variety first.” EXTRE is the clean example of “endurance first.”

7. Does a bigger battery number always mean longer real battery life?
   It often helps, yet usage style matters. DTL devices can drain faster due to higher vapor output behavior. Screen brightness and mode use can also shift runtime.

8. How should an adult user choose nicotine strength on these devices?
   This is preference-based and depends on the user’s existing nicotine use. Packaging options commonly include 2% and 5% on several devices. Avoid framing it as medical dosing. If nicotine causes discomfort, reduce use and consider clinical evaluation for persistent symptoms.

Sources

• World Health Organization. Regulation of e-cigarettes (tobacco fact sheet). 2024. https://www.who.int/docs/librariesprovider2/default-document-library/10-regulation-of-e-cigarettes-tobacco-factsheet-2024.pdf?download=true&sfvrsn=d6e03637_2
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. 2018. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/24952/012318ecigaretteConclusionsbyEvidence.pdf
• Gordon T, Karey E, Rebuli ME, et al. E-Cigarette Toxicology. National Library of Medicine. 2021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9386787/
• Cao DJ, Aldy K, Hsu S, et al. Review of Health Consequences of Electronic Cigarettes and the Outbreak of EVALI. National Library of Medicine. 2020. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7320089/