PHIX Vape Reviews: PHIX, PHIX V2 Basic Kit, PHIX Pro USB-C Tested

PHIX sits in a tight lane. It targets adult users who want a slim pod device with low friction. The lineup stays small, but the variations matter.

I focused on the device bodies, the charging approach, and the pod format. Then, I mapped those traits to everyday use patterns from a reliability angle.

Marcus watched for heat and stability under heavier use. Jamal stayed on pocket carry and day-to-day hassle. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed risk language and labeling boundaries.

Product Overview

Testing Team Takeaways

I kept coming back to one PHIX theme: closed pods plus a consistent MTL draw. That kind of setup usually cuts down user error. It also caps flexibility. A user who expects a wide airflow range will feel boxed in. A user who wants a steady “grab it, use it” loop will feel relieved.

Marcus pushed the conversation toward stability. He tends to notice when a small pod device gets warm, or when output fades after repeated pulls. In his words, “if the device can’t stay even when I chain it, I stop trusting it.” PHIX devices appear built around moderate, mouth-to-lung use, not high-output stress. That shows up in the small-battery class and the closed pod format.

Jamal framed it as pocket reality. He focuses on the charger, the mouthpiece comfort, and whether a device becomes “a task.” His line was, “if I need a special cable, I’m already annoyed.” That pushes PHIX Pro USB-C upward for him, since USB-C reduces the friction of daily charging.

Dr. Adrian Walker stayed on guardrails. He flags any wording that implies reduced harm. He also pushes clear adult-only framing. He tends to remind readers that nicotine exposure carries risk, and that persistent respiratory symptoms need clinical evaluation, not device swapping.

PHIX Vape Comparison Chart

What We Tested and How We Tested It

I used a consistent rubric, since PHIX is a small lineup. I scored Flavor, Throat Hit, Vapor Production, Airflow/Draw, Battery Life, Leak Resistance, Build Quality, Ease of Use, Portability on a 2.0–5.0 scale. I treated those scores as user-experience outcomes tied to hardware traits.

Flavor scoring came from the pod platform itself. PHIX pods are often described as ceramic-coil based. That tends to push a cleaner profile in many pod reviews, though it still depends on the liquid recipe and the user’s tolerance.

Throat hit scoring stayed subjective. I treated it as a “feel” output that varies with nicotine strength, draw style, and how fast a user takes pulls. I did not treat that experience as health guidance.

Vapor production stayed in the MTL lane. A slim closed pod system usually aims for discreet output, not large clouds. Marcus cared about consistency across repeated pulls. Jamal cared about smoothness during quick, frequent sessions.

Battery life scoring used published mAh figures, plus the reality of a small battery. A 280–320 mAh class device rarely feels “all day” for heavy users. It can feel fine for lighter users with spaced sessions.

Leak and condensation scoring leaned on closed pod design. A sealed pod reduces refill mistakes, yet mouthpiece condensation can still show up in many pod systems. Build quality scoring used materials notes, charging port durability, and “special cable” friction.

This is device-focused commentary. It does not replace medical advice.

PHIX Vapes: Our Testing Experience

PHIX Basic Kit

Our Testing Experience

This PHIX version reads like the brand’s original intent: an adult-focused pod device that stays slim, stays simple, and stays out of the way. Draw activation matters here. It removes a button failure point, yet it puts pressure on the sensor. In independent coverage, PHIX is described as responsive on draw, with LED indicators and a proprietary magnetic charging approach.

From my perspective, the biggest “test” on this kind of device is consistency across routine use. A commuter takes short pulls. Then a break happens. Next, a longer session happens at night. The device either keeps a stable feel, or it starts to fade. This PHIX sits in a smaller battery class in many listings. That pushes it toward shorter daily sessions. Heavy, repeated pulls tend to drain small cells fast. That is not a flaw by itself. It’s a constraint that needs matching.

Marcus looked at it like a stress test. He usually asks whether a device “stays stable” when used hard. He also watches case warmth. This PHIX does not present itself as a high-output tool. It runs a closed pod and an MTL draw. Under those circumstances, stability expectations should stay realistic. Marcus’s take landed on trust: “I’m not asking for clouds. I’m asking for the same hit every time.” That is the right bar for this device.

Jamal’s angle stayed practical. The magnetic charger can be convenient, yet it also creates dependency. If the charger is missing, the device becomes dead weight. He said, “I don’t want to hunt a special cable in a gym bag.” For users who keep a dedicated charger at home, that friction drops.

Dr. Walker’s guardrail here is straightforward. Do not treat nicotine delivery as “safe.” Do not treat throat sensation as health feedback. If coughing persists, clinical evaluation matters more than switching pods.

Draw Experience & Flavors

PHIX flavor delivery lives in the pod ecosystem. Many listings describe 1.5 mL pods and 5% nicotine in common markets, plus ceramic coil construction. That combination often produces a smooth, steady draw feel in the MTL lane, with a “tight enough” resistance that resembles a small pod system, not an airy device.

Cool Melon tends to read as a clean, sweet top note, then a colder finish. In the mouth, that kind of profile usually starts bright on the tongue. It can shift into a mild cooling film after the exhale. Users who dislike lingering sweetness often tap out early. Users who like a soft, candy-like edge usually stay.

Blue Raspberry usually lands sharper. The first seconds often feel like a tart candy hit. Then, the sweetness stacks. A ceramic-style pod often makes that tart note feel more defined, not muddy. Under quick pulls, though, some people report that candy profiles blur into “generic sweet.” That is a normal risk with bold fruit blends.

Hard Strawberry often reads like a syrupy strawberry candy. It usually hits the center of the mouth first. Then, it leaves a sticky sweetness at the back of the tongue. Jamal’s “between errands” use case fits this flavor. Short pulls often keep it pleasant. Long sessions can feel heavy for adults who dislike sweet saturation.

Original Tobacco sits on a different expectation. Many users pick PHIX for tobacco or menthol-tobacco flavors. In taste language, that kind of pod flavor tends to present as dry, slightly nutty, then faintly sweet. It aims to feel familiar. It rarely feels complex. Marcus usually grades tobacco flavors on whether they avoid “burnt paper” notes. He tends to prefer a cleaner, restrained profile.

Cool Grape often feels round and perfumy. It can feel like purple candy. With a cooling edge, it usually becomes more refreshing, yet the perfume note can push some users away. If a user expects “grape soda,” satisfaction rises. If a user expects “fresh grape,” disappointment shows up fast.

Ice Tobacco (or Tobacco Menthol in some listings) mixes a tobacco base with menthol cooling. That flavor is often chosen by adult users who want a sharper finish and a cleaner aftertaste. The mouth feel often shifts. The cooling effect can hide minor harshness. It can also make the nicotine feel more “present” for some adults, purely as subjective sensation.

Spearmint tends to sit softer than menthol. It often feels sweeter, with a gum-like note. It also tends to freshen the aftertaste. Jamal usually likes this kind of profile for all-day carry. It rarely becomes cloying.

If I had to pick the “best draw experience” flavors from this set, Cool Melon often wins for smoothness. Tobacco Menthol often wins for a crisp finish. That recommendation stays preference-based, not health-based.

Flavor naming and common pod options appear across PHIX retailer flavor lists and pod catalogs.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: often listed as battery-only pricing plus pods; many shops place the battery around the $20\text{–}$30 range
• Device type: closed pod system
• Nicotine strength options: commonly listed at 5% in many markets; some sellers mention multiple strengths depending on region
• Activation method: draw-activated
• Battery capacity: often listed around 280 mAh in review coverage
• Charging port and estimated charge time: magnetic USB-style charging in many kits; time varies by adapter output
• Coil type / resistance: ceramic coil often cited; some listings note about 1.4–1.5 ohm pod resistance
• Pod capacity: 1.5 mL
• Airflow style and adjustability: MTL-leaning draw; minimal adjustment
• Vapor production: moderate, discreet
• Leak resistance features: sealed pod, closed loop language in many listings
• Build materials: slim body with “aluminum-like” feel noted in review coverage
• Dimensions and weight: commonly listed around 110 mm height, slim profile
• Included accessories: often a magnetic USB charger with the battery
• Safety features: overcharge protection is frequently claimed by sellers
• Shipping: varies by retailer and region
• Flavor range (commonly listed): Cool Melon, Blue Raspberry, Hard Strawberry, Original Tobacco, Cool Grape, Ice / Ice Tobacco, Butterscotch, Spearmint

Core device and pod specs, including 1.5 mL pods, ceramic coil references, and battery class, appear in PHIX product coverage and listings.

Review Score

PHIX V2 Basic Kit

Our Testing Experience

PHIX V2 shows up as the mainstream “current” baseline in many kit listings. It keeps the closed pod idea, then leans into battery indicator clarity and a commonly listed 320 mAh battery. Some sellers describe USB charging on the V2 kit, while others still highlight magnetic charging depending on region and listing quality.

For an adult user, this version tends to feel like the practical PHIX pick. Jamal’s day-to-day pattern pushes that. He does short pulls during commutes. He also does quick sessions between tasks. Under that use, small changes in battery behavior become noticeable. A device that drops off sharply at the end of the charge feels annoying. A device that signals clearly feels calmer. Jamal described that preference as “I want a warning before it dies, not a surprise.”

Marcus took it back to durability and heat. A 320 mAh cell still sits in a small class, yet it can smooth out the day if the user is not chaining it. Marcus typically watches for warmth during repeated pulls. With an MTL pod system, the expectation is moderate heat, not hot spots. Still, if a device warms through the case, he notices fast. His quote stayed blunt: “warm is fine, hot is not.” That framing matches Dr. Walker’s general safety posture around electronics.

I looked at V2 as a reliability problem, not a flavor problem. The pods drive the flavor. The device drives consistency, charging convenience, and long-term “does it keep working.” Under that lens, V2’s advantage is predictability. The closed system reduces user mistakes. It also forces the user to accept PHIX pod pricing.

Dr. Walker’s reminder stays consistent. Nicotine products carry addiction risk. Youth access prevention matters. Labeling matters. Claims like “harmless vapor” do not belong in a serious device review.

Draw Experience & Flavors

Since V2 stays compatible with PHIX pods, the draw feel and flavor profiles stay tied to that pod hardware. Pods are widely listed as 1.5 mL, commonly sold at 5% nicotine in many markets, and frequently described with ceramic-coil construction. Under normal MTL use, that style often creates a steady draw resistance and a consistent flavor hit per pull, especially for adults who take slower, softer puffs.

Cool Melon on V2 tends to feel like an “easy” option for many adults. The mouth feel often starts with sweetness on the lips. Then, the cooling element sits on the back of the tongue. Under frequent short sessions, the flavor usually stays stable. Under longer sessions, sweetness fatigue can show up.

Blue Raspberry tends to feel louder. The tart note often hits first. Then the sweetness climbs. Some adults like that sharp opening. Other adults call it “too candy.” Jamal’s view usually splits by context. During a quick walk, candy flavors can feel fun. During long desk sessions, they can feel tiring.

Hard Strawberry tends to lean syrupy. It often leaves a lingering sweet film. That lingering feel can be a positive for users who want a flavor that “stays.” It can be negative for users who want a clean mouth reset between pulls.

Original Tobacco tends to serve adults who want something restrained. The taste often feels drier and less sweet. That profile can reduce flavor fatigue. Marcus often prefers tobacco profiles for that reason. He also watches for harshness. A tobacco flavor that turns “peppery” can feel unpleasant. A ceramic-style pod sometimes keeps it smoother, though liquid design still controls most of it.

Cool Grape tends to sit perfumy. It can feel like grape candy. It also tends to pair well with a cooling edge. Some adults find that cooling edge makes the aftertaste cleaner. Others find the perfume note too strong.

Ice Tobacco or Tobacco Menthol tends to feel crisp. The cooling element can sharpen the finish. Adults who want a cleaner mouth feel often like that. Adults who dislike menthol often avoid it fast.

Spearmint tends to feel softer than menthol. It usually lands like mint gum. For many adults, this is the safest “all-day carry” flavor because it does not build sweetness fatigue as quickly.

Best draw experience picks, based on typical adult preference patterns: Spearmint for all-day carry. Tobacco Menthol for a clean finish. Cool Melon for a softer sweet-cool balance.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: many kits list in the ~$20\text{–}$35 range depending on seller
• Device type: closed pod system
• Nicotine strength options: commonly 5% by listing; some sellers mention multiple strengths by region
• Activation method: draw-activated
• Battery capacity: 320 mAh widely listed for V2 kits
• Charging: some V2 listings describe USB charging; many PHIX listings highlight magnetic charging depending on kit version
• Coil: ceramic-style pod coil is frequently referenced across PHIX coverage
• Pod capacity: 1.5 mL
• Output style: MTL-leaning
• Flavor range (common): Cool Melon, Blue Raspberry, Hard Strawberry, Original Tobacco, Cool Grape, Ice Tobacco, Spearmint, Butterscotch

Review Score

PHIX Pro USB-C Device

Our Testing Experience

PHIX Pro exists for one reason: daily friction. It moves PHIX into USB-C charging, with seller listings calling out a 320 mAh battery, a metal base, charge indicator behavior, and pass-through capability. Jamal’s priorities align with this version, since he values easy charging in real life. He tends to lose proprietary cables. He tends to keep USB-C cables everywhere. Under that lifestyle, USB-C stops being a feature and becomes the baseline.

I evaluated this device like a commuter tool. A commuter wants stable carry. A commuter also wants fast recovery when the battery dies. The Pro device’s USB-C listing details suggest it aims to reduce the “charger problem.” That matters more than it sounds. The moment a user needs a special cable, usage compliance drops. Users then charge less. Then they run dead more often. Jamal’s blunt version: “dead devices come from annoying charging.”

Marcus stayed on stability and heat. USB-C does not change output by itself, but it changes user behavior. People tend to top-up more often when the cable is easy. That can reduce deep discharge cycles. It can also reduce “end of battery” harshness, since the device spends less time at low charge. Marcus framed it as “if I can top it up fast, I don’t push it to the bitter end.” That reduces annoyance for heavy users.

The Pro still stays closed-system. That means the device cannot escape pod pricing or pod availability. It also means the device still sits in an MTL lane. Adults who want a loose draw will not get it here. Adults who want a small, simple pod device will.

Dr. Walker’s angle stays on risk framing. Device quality matters, yet nicotine exposure still carries harm risk. He also highlights battery incidents as a known issue in vaping products broadly, with charging behavior being a common context for incidents in public health reporting. That does not label PHIX as dangerous. It frames why charging discipline matters.

Draw Experience & Flavors

PHIX Pro stays compatible with PHIX pods in seller catalogs. That means the flavor set remains the PHIX pod set, not a new Pro-only system. The “draw experience” still reads like MTL: a tighter pull, a moderate output, and a focus on consistency.

Cool Melon remains a smooth entry point. In mouth feel, it tends to start sweet and cool. The cooling finish can make the aftertaste feel clean, which helps during repeated short sessions. That pattern matches Jamal’s usage, where he wants a flavor that does not feel heavy after three quick pulls.

Blue Raspberry remains louder. The first moment tends to feel sharp. The sweet base then takes over. For adults who like candy profiles, this feels direct. For adults who prefer subtle flavors, it can feel aggressive. A tighter MTL draw can intensify that “pop,” since the flavor arrives more concentrated per pull.

Hard Strawberry stays candy-leaning. It tends to coat the tongue. Under desk use, some adults end up wanting water after a few pulls. That is not a device issue. It is the profile style. Jamal tends to call these flavors “fun but short-session.”

Original Tobacco stays the “quiet” option. It tends to keep sweetness restrained. It also tends to reduce flavor fatigue. Marcus often prefers that. He also uses tobacco profiles to judge “cleanliness.” A tobacco flavor that turns harsh at the end of a charge cycle can feel worse. The Pro’s easier charging can reduce time spent in low-battery output states, which can help subjective smoothness in real use patterns.

Cool Grape remains a divisive one. Adults who like grape candy enjoy it. Adults who dislike perfume notes bounce off it. In a tight MTL pull, perfume notes can feel stronger. That is something to keep in mind.

Ice Tobacco or Tobacco Menthol remains the “crisp finish” option. The cooling element can reset the mouth between sessions. It also can make the aftertaste feel shorter. Adults who dislike menthol will not enjoy it.

Spearmint remains the steady pick. It tends to feel softer than menthol. It can sit as a daily flavor without building sweetness fatigue.

Best draw experience picks for the Pro, under a real carry routine: Spearmint for all-day carry. Original Tobacco for low-fatigue use. Cool Melon for a smooth sweet-cool balance.

Pros & Cons

KEY SPECS & FLAVORS

• Price: commonly listed around the mid-$20stomid-$30s depending on shop
• Device type: closed pod system
• Nicotine strength options: depends on pod region; 5% is widely listed in many markets
• Activation method: draw-activated
• Battery capacity: 320 mAh listed
• Charging: USB-C
• Charge indicator: multi-color indicator behavior described by some sellers
• Coil: pod system frequently described as ceramic coil construction
• Pod capacity: 1.5 mL
• Airflow: MTL-leaning
• Safety features: overcharge protection chip commonly claimed in listings
• Flavor range (common PHIX pods): Cool Melon, Blue Raspberry, Hard Strawberry, Original Tobacco, Cool Grape, Ice Tobacco, Spearmint, Butterscotch

Review Score

Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes

The most balanced score lands on PHIX Pro USB-C. The “specialists” show up in two places. Portability stays strong for every PHIX body. Ease of use stays strong for every PHIX body. The weakest trade-off stays battery class, especially for heavy all-day use.

Best Picks

• Best PHIX Vape for Daily Carry Convenience: PHIX Pro USB-C Device
  USB-C charging reduces friction in real life. The build notes look stronger. The scores reflect that, especially in battery life and build quality.

• Best PHIX Vape for Simple MTL Routine: PHIX V2 Basic Kit
  V2 stays simple. It also tends to show clearer mainstream kit positioning. Adult users who want plug-and-go MTL usually fit here.

• Best PHIX Vape for Minimalist Backup Device: PHIX (Original / Basic Battery)
  This is the “keep it as a backup” pick. The device stays slim and simple. The main compromise is charging dependency and the smaller battery class in many listings.

How to Choose the PHIX Vape?

PHIX is a closed pod lane. The first decision is whether that lane fits your habits. A refillable user usually wants more tuning. A closed pod user usually wants less maintenance.

Vaping style matters. PHIX leans MTL. A user who prefers a tight draw will adapt fast. A user who prefers airy DL will feel restricted.

Nicotine tolerance matters. Many PHIX pod listings emphasize 5% options in some markets. That can feel intense for some adults. It can feel normal for others. Pick strength based on your current nicotine pattern, not on online bravado.

Battery needs matter. A lighter user can live with 280–320 mAh. A heavy user will recharge often. Under that use, USB-C becomes important.

Portability matters. All PHIX devices stay slim. Jamal’s carry test favors the Pro version, since chargers become universal.

Maintenance preference matters. Closed pods reduce mess. They also lock you into pod supply and price.

Practical matching, based on the devices here:

• Adult user who wants the least charging friction, under commute life: PHIX Pro USB-C Device.
• Adult user who wants a simple closed pod setup, with mainstream kit positioning: PHIX V2 Basic Kit.
• Adult user who wants a slim backup device for occasional use: PHIX (Original / Basic Battery).

Limitations

PHIX does not serve every adult user type. The lineup stays small. The format stays closed pod. That narrows who should even consider it.

A high-output user will not get what they want here. Marcus’s stress-focused lens makes that clear. Small-battery closed pods are not designed for long, high-frequency sessions. A heavy user can still use PHIX, yet charging becomes frequent. Flavor fatigue also becomes more likely with sweet pods.

A tuning-focused user will feel limited. Airflow control is minimal. Power control is not the point of PHIX. A user who likes to dial wattage or adjust a wide airflow range will not feel satisfied.

A budget-first user can feel squeezed over time. Device bodies are not the main cost. Pods become the main cost. If pod pricing runs high in your area, value drops. If pod availability becomes spotty, the device becomes a paperweight.

A user who prefers low-nicotine options may struggle by region. Some listings emphasize 5% pods. Some sellers mention multiple strengths, yet access varies. A user who wants very low nicotine, or nicotine-free options, may have fewer choices depending on where they live.

A user who wants refillable flexibility will not get it here. Closed pods remove refill mistakes. They also remove refill freedom. That trade-off is real.

Every device in this category still involves nicotine-related risk. Adult-only use remains the baseline. Dr. Walker’s framing stays firm on that point.

Is the PHIX Vape Lineup Worth It?

PHIX offers a narrow promise. The promise is a slim body. The promise is simple pods. The promise is MTL consistency. Those points appear across PHIX device coverage and seller positioning.

A buyer gets strong portability. Jamal’s day-to-day lens fits the lineup. A PHIX device sits in a pocket without fuss. A user gets a low-maintenance routine. Pods click in. Draw activation removes a button step.

A buyer also gets constraints. The battery class stays small. Many listings place PHIX bodies around 280–320 mAh. A heavy user will recharge. That is a fact. Value then depends on charging ease. That is where PHIX Pro USB-C earns its place. A USB-C cable is everywhere. A proprietary cable is not.

Flavor value lives in the pod set. PHIX pods are widely listed at 1.5 mL. Many listings also emphasize 5% nicotine in some markets. That can feel strong for some adults. It can feel normal for others. The closed pod design reduces leak risk from refilling, yet it does not remove all condensation. Mouthpiece wipe-down still matters in any pod system.

Build quality looks better on the Pro listings. The metal base detail matters for daily durability. V2 sits close behind, based on mainstream kit listings. The original device can still work fine, yet the charging dependency becomes the daily annoyance.

Price value splits into two parts. Upfront device cost usually stays moderate. Ongoing pod cost can rise fast. A buyer should price pods first. Then the buyer should decide on the body.

Who gets the most practical value.
A commuter who wants a small pod device gets value, especially with PHIX Pro USB-C. A light-to-mid user gets value, especially with V2. A user who wants a backup device gets value, especially with the original battery.

Where value starts to drop.
A heavy user will feel battery limits fast. A tuning-focused user will feel boxed in. A budget-first user can feel squeezed by pod costs. A user who wants wide nicotine strength choice may face regional limits.

Nicotine remains addictive. Adult-only framing stays non-negotiable. That is the correct way to evaluate any nicotine device lineup.

Pro Tips for PHIX Vape

• Keep the mouthpiece area dry. Condensation builds in most pod systems.
• Clean the pod contacts with a dry swab. Pocket lint can interfere.
• Avoid leaving the device in a hot car. Electronics do not like heat.
• Use a reasonable charging adapter. Avoid cheap unknown chargers.
• If draw feels weak, check the pod seating. Reseat it firmly.
• Rotate flavors to reduce taste fatigue. Sweet pods can get heavy.
• Carry one spare pod, sealed. Then avoid “dry pod panic.”
• If the device acts hot, stop using it. Let it cool. Then reassess.
• Store pods upright when possible. This can reduce pooling near the mouthpiece.

FAQs

1) How long does a PHIX pod usually last for an adult user?
Many listings describe around 1.5 mL per pod. Usage varies. A lighter adult user can stretch pods longer. A heavier adult user will burn through pods quickly. Some sellers describe “puffs” estimates, yet real draw length changes that number.

2) Are PHIX pods refillable?
PHIX pods are typically described as non-refillable closed pods in many listings. That design reduces refill mess. It also removes refill flexibility.

3) Do PHIX devices run MTL or DL?
They are generally positioned as mouth-to-lung devices. The draw style is tighter. Output stays moderate.

4) What’s the real battery life like?
Battery listings often land around 280–320 mAh depending on device version. A light-to-mid user can often get through a day with top-ups. A heavier user will recharge more than once.

5) Which PHIX device is easiest to live with day to day?
Charging friction decides that for many adults. USB-C tends to be easier, since cables are common. That puts PHIX Pro USB-C ahead in daily convenience.

6) Do PHIX devices leak?
Closed pods often reduce leak problems tied to refilling. Condensation still can appear around the mouthpiece. A quick wipe usually keeps it manageable.

7) How often should an adult user replace pods?
Pods are replaced when flavor fades, draw changes, or the pod is empty. Heavy users replace pods more often. Sweet flavors can feel “muted” sooner for some adults, based on preference and taste fatigue.

8) Do PHIX pods come in different nicotine strengths?
Some sellers state multiple strengths by region, while many listings emphasize 5% options. Availability depends on local regulations and retailer stock.

9) What’s the biggest mistake new PHIX users make?
Charging friction gets ignored. People run dead, then blame the device. Picking USB-C can reduce that pattern. Keeping contacts clean also prevents “it stopped working” moments.

Sources

• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Academies Press. 2018. https://www.nationalacademies.org/projects/HMD-BPH-16-02/publication/24952
• U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Effects of Vaping. 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/e-cigarettes/health-effects.html
• World Health Organization. Urgent action needed to protect children and prevent the uptake of e-cigarettes. 2023. https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2023-urgent-action-needed-to-protect-children-and-prevent-the-uptake-of-e-cigarettes
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Labeling and Warning Statements for Tobacco Products. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/products-guidance-regulations/labeling-and-warning-statements-tobacco-products
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Premarket Tobacco Product Applications for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Guidance for Industry. 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/127853/download