For this review, we tested two Ruthless devices built for very different use patterns: the Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit for longer MTL sessions and the E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable for quick, low-effort breaks. Our testing focused on flavor accuracy, throat hit, draw feel, vapor output, battery behavior, leak resistance, and portability to see which one worked better as a daily carry and which one made more sense as a backup.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Device | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit | 4.1/5 | Smooth mesh-coil flavor, adjustable airflow, helpful display | Bulkier carry, more setup than a disposable, some condensation with hard use | Adults who want a longer-running MTL device with a little control |
| Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device | 3.9/5 | Simple draw-and-go use, easy pocket carry, consistent short-session performance | Short lifespan for frequent use, no tuning, flavor fades near the end | Adults who want quick MTL sessions with almost no friction |
Final Verdict
Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit
Who It’s For
-
Adults who want an MTL device that can handle repeated sessions through the day
-
Users who want small draw adjustments without moving into a more involved setup
-
People who like checking battery and liquid status at a glance
Who It’s Not For
-
Users who want the smallest possible one-piece disposable
-
Anyone who wants zero setup and no extra parts
-
Pocket-first users who care more about size than endurance
Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device
Who It’s For
-
Adults who want a small, predictable MTL hit for short breaks
-
People who do not want charging, refilling, or settings
-
Users who like a low-commitment backup or travel option
Who It’s Not For
-
Frequent users who go through small disposables quickly
-
Anyone who wants adjustable airflow or a stronger device feel
-
Users who expect flavor to stay equally strong from first puff to last
Ruthless Vape Comparison Chart
| Comparison item | Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit | Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 4.1/5 | 3.9/5 |
| Device Type | Prefilled pod kit with refill containers | Disposable pod device |
| Nicotine Strength | 20mg/ml | 20mg (2%) |
| E-liquid Capacity | 2ml pod + 2 x 10ml refill containers | 2ml |
| Battery/Charging | 600mAh, USB-C | 500mAh, no charging |
| Coil | 1.2 mesh coil | Integrated coil |
| Airflow/Draw | Adjustable airflow, MTL | Fixed MTL draw |
How We Tested It
We used both devices across commutes, desk sessions, and quick outdoor breaks. Our testing tracked flavor, throat hit, vapor production, airflow and draw, battery life, leak resistance, build quality, ease of use, and portability. Each tester kept to a normal cadence, then swapped devices so we could compare how each one handled different puff styles and whether performance dropped off later in the device’s life.
Ruthless Vape: Our Testing Experience
Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit
Our Testing Experience

In our testing, the Makaveli 24K felt like the better fit for longer, repeat sessions. Once assembled, it settled into a tight, steady MTL draw with a smoother texture than we expected from a 20mg device. The mesh coil kept the flavor blended rather than sharp, and small airflow changes actually made a noticeable difference. We kept the airflow near the middle most of the time; closing it down gave a firmer hit, while opening it slightly made the draw feel less restricted without losing the MTL character. Battery behavior stayed predictable across our test rotation. Most full charges landed just under an hour in our use, and the display helped avoid surprise drop-offs. The trade-off was size and complexity: it is still pocketable, but it feels bulkier than a small disposable, and heavy chain-puffing could leave some condensation around the mouthpiece.
What we liked
-
Smooth, consistent MTL flavor delivery from the mesh coil
-
Adjustable airflow makes small draw tweaks worth using
-
The display cuts down on battery and liquid guesswork
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want longer sessions without constant device swapping
-
Users who like MTL but still want a bit of draw control
-
Desk-and-commute users who want a more predictable charging rhythm
Where it falls short
-
Bulkier carry than a slim disposable
-
Setup is simple, but it is still an extra step
-
Condensation can build if you push it too hard without pauses

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Smooth mesh-coil flavor | Larger footprint than small disposables |
| Adjustable airflow for MTL tuning | More parts than a true grab-and-go disposable |
| Display helps with battery and liquid checks | Condensation can show up with heavy sessions |
| USB-C charging keeps it practical for daily use | Not the fastest option if you want something instant |
Details
-
Device type: Prefilled pod kit with refill containers
-
Nicotine strength: 20mg/ml nic salt
-
E-liquid capacity: 2ml pod + 2 x 10ml refill containers
-
Battery: 600mAh rechargeable
-
Charging: USB-C; our tests usually landed around 56–68 minutes for a full charge
-
Coil: 1.2 mesh coil
-
Airflow: Adjustable, MTL-focused

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 4.5/5 | Mesh coil kept the flavor blended and steady across sessions |
| Throat Hit | 4.2/5 | Firm enough for MTL without feeling harsh at a normal cadence |
| Vapor Production | 4.0/5 | Satisfying for MTL, but not built for large clouds |
| Airflow/Draw | 4.2/5 | Small airflow changes were noticeable and useful |
| Battery Life | 4.0/5 | Predictable through the day, with the display helping a lot |
| Leak Resistance | 3.8/5 | Mostly stable, though condensation needed the occasional wipe |
| Build Quality | 4.1/5 | Solid in hand, with a little extra complexity from the design |
| Ease of Use | 4.0/5 | Easy once set up, but still slower than a true disposable |
| Portability | 3.7/5 | Portable enough, just not especially slim or forgettable in a pocket |
Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device
Our Testing Experience

The 600 Puff Disposable was the easier device to understand right away. In our testing, it worked best in short, stop-and-go sessions: a few pulls, back in the pocket, then out again later. The draw stayed tight and familiar, so it felt natural for small MTL pulls, and the device never asked for charging or any setup. Flavor came through cleanly at the start, but it was less stable than the Makaveli over the full life of the device. As our testers pushed into the last stretch, the vapor felt flatter and the flavor lost some brightness. That matched the general pattern we saw: very convenient for quick breaks, but not the better pick for frequent, all-day use. Our observed lifespan landed in the high-500s to low-600s in draw count, with the last stretch feeling softer than the opening sessions.
What we liked
-
Almost no friction: draw, pocket, done
-
Consistent MTL draw for short sessions
-
Small enough to carry without thinking about it
Who it is best for
-
Adults who want quick MTL nicotine breaks with no setup
-
Users who rotate devices and do not want much commitment per unit
-
Anyone who does not want cables or maintenance
Where it falls short
-
Frequent users will go through it quickly
-
No airflow tuning or output control
-
Late-life flavor drop is easy to notice if you push it hard

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| True grab-and-go simplicity | Short lifespan for frequent users |
| Tight, familiar MTL draw | No tuning because airflow is fixed |
| Lightweight and easy to pocket | Flavor dulls near the end |
| Works well for quick breaks | Not designed for long, high-cadence use |
Details
-
Device type: Disposable pod device
-
Nicotine strength: 20mg (2%)
-
E-liquid capacity: 2ml
-
Battery: 500mAh integrated
-
Activation: Draw-activated
-
Rated lifespan: 600 puffs; our observed window was roughly the high-500s to low-600s
-
Draw style: Fixed MTL

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Flavor | 3.8/5 | Clean early on, but less lively near the end of the run |
| Throat Hit | 3.7/5 | Satisfying for MTL, but not as firm as the Makaveli |
| Vapor Production | 3.4/5 | Fine for short MTL pulls, but not especially dense |
| Airflow/Draw | 3.6/5 | Consistent, though fixed and not adaptable to preference |
| Battery Life | 3.3/5 | Works for light-to-moderate use, but heavy cadence drains it quickly |
| Leak Resistance | 4.0/5 | Stayed stable in pocket carry during normal use |
| Build Quality | 3.6/5 | Decent for a small disposable, though not especially substantial |
| Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | No setup, no charging, and almost no learning curve |
| Portability | 4.6/5 | Its strongest trait is how easy it is to carry anywhere |
Compare Performance Scores of These Vapes
| Device | Overall Score | Flavor | Throat Hit | Vapor Production | Airflow/Draw | Battery Life | Leak Resistance | Build Quality | Ease of Use | Portability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit | 4.1/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device | 3.9/5 | 3.8/5 | 3.7/5 | 3.4/5 | 3.6/5 | 3.3/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.6/5 | 4.7/5 | 4.6/5 |
The Makaveli scored more evenly across performance categories, especially in flavor, draw control, and battery predictability. The 600 Puff device clearly won on ease of use and portability. If you want the more balanced daily option, the Makaveli is the stronger pick. If you want the lowest-effort way to get through quick breaks, the 600 Puff Disposable is the simpler choice.
How to Choose the Ruthless Vape?
Pick the Makaveli 24K if you want a longer-running MTL setup, like checking a display for battery and liquid, and do not mind a short setup step. Choose the 600 Puff Disposable if convenience comes first, your sessions are usually short, and you care more about pocketability than control. In our testing, the Makaveli fit better for desk use and repeated daily carry, while the 600 Puff worked better as a backup, travel piece, or quick-break device.
Limitations
-
Ruthless Makaveli 24K Prefilled Pod Kit
-
Bulkier to carry than most one-piece disposables
-
Setup and extra components add some friction
-
Condensation can build during hard chain sessions
-
-
Ruthless E-Juice 600 Puff Disposable Vape Pod Device
-
Short run time for frequent users
-
Fixed airflow limits personalization
-
Flavor softens noticeably near the end
-
Ruthless Vape Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
-
Clear MTL focus with predictable nicotine delivery
-
One option is built for longer use, while the other is easier to carry and replace
-
Both stay straightforward compared with more feature-heavy alternatives
Alternatives to consider
-
Geek Bar Pulse X if you want a higher-capacity rechargeable disposable with a screen and airflow control
-
Lost Mary MO5000 if you want a simpler rechargeable disposable with broader flavor availability
-
Flum Pebble if you want a softer-feeling rechargeable disposable with an easier all-day draw
Pro Tips for Ruthless Vape
-
Treat both devices like MTL setups: shorter, steadier pulls usually taste better than long drags.
-
If you notice condensation on the Makaveli, wipe the mouthpiece and airflow area before it turns into gurgle.
-
Start the Makaveli with the airflow near the middle, then move tighter only if you want a firmer hit.
-
Do not chain-puff for long stretches. A few seconds between pulls helps both devices stay more consistent.
-
If flavor starts to flatten on the 600 Puff device, slow your cadence for a few pulls before deciding it is finished.
-
Use the 600 Puff as a backup or travel option if you vape often; it is not the better fit for marathon days.
-
Keep both devices out of high heat to reduce leakage and performance swings.
-
If throat hit feels too sharp, shorten your pulls before taking bigger ones.
FAQs
Does the Makaveli 24K feel too tight for people who like airy draws?
It is still an MTL device, but the airflow adjustment helps. Opening it up takes some restriction out of the draw, even though it never turns into a loose direct-lung vape.
Is the 600 Puff Disposable strong enough for frequent users?
It can work for quick hits, but frequent users will burn through it fast. In our testing, it made more sense as a backup, a travel device, or something for shorter sessions.
Which one keeps flavor more consistent over time?
The Makaveli held flavor more evenly over longer use. The 600 Puff started clean, but the flavor softened more noticeably in the last stretch.
Do these devices need maintenance?
The 600 Puff Disposable is basically maintenance-free. The Makaveli benefits from an occasional wipe around the mouthpiece if condensation starts to collect.
About the Author: Chris Miller